Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Psychiatr. Sep 19, 2021; 11(9): 507-516
Published online Sep 19, 2021. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i9.507
Future of processing and facilitating change and learning
Henriette Löffler-Stastka, Dagmar Steinmair
Henriette Löffler-Stastka, Dagmar Steinmair, Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria
Author contributions: Steinmair D and Löffler-Stastka H contributed to concept, writing, discussion, critical revision, editing, and review of the literature.
Conflict-of-interest statement: Steinmair D and Löffler-Stastka H have nothing to disclose.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Henriette Löffler-Stastka, MD, Professor, Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria. henriette.loeffler-stastka@meduniwien.ac.at
Received: February 25, 2021
Peer-review started: February 25, 2021
First decision: April 20, 2021
Revised: April 24, 2021
Accepted: August 2, 2021
Article in press: August 2, 2021
Published online: September 19, 2021
Processing time: 201 Days and 15.9 Hours
Abstract

The field of the sciences of the mind is evolving fast. With the diversification of knowledge and accumulation of data, often lacking integration and reproducibility, questions arise. The role of critical thinking and research is evident. As the science of the unconscious, psychoanalysis provides a method and theory to understand human minds and mentalities, helping the patient know his mind and transform action into reflection. Mental activities, including social skills, develop in the social context, depending on the social environment’s demands and resources put onto the individual. Encoding emotional signals, markers of meaning for the individual, is ontogenetically necessary and has influences on memory encoding. Beyond theoretical understanding, implicit relational knowledge is actualized in the therapeutic setting. With a strong focus on experiencing emotional reconsolidation of memories, previous relationships’ repercussions are enriched with broadening viewpoints in the analytic environment. The long-term effects of psychotherapeutic treatments have been examined. A sufficient explanation of the specific factors contributing to success or an answer when an impact is lacking is still under investigation. When investigating subliminal and implicit mechanisms leading to memory reconsolidation and the formation of functional object relations and interaction patterns, the focus is set on affective interplay and processing prior/during and after social interactions. The present paper discusses which parameters might contribute to the reshaping of memories and the linkage of memory with the emotional load of experience. Providing insights into such dynamic mental phenomena could enhance process research by investigating moment by moment interactions in psychoanalysis, treatment, and learning processes. Due to the research subject’s complexity, different research methods and integration of associated research fields are required.

Keywords: Psychoanalysis; Hermeneutic circle; Evidence-based medicine; Bias; Affective interplay; Micro-process

Core Tip: The mind’s ability to interact and assess the external world’s reality and integrate new experiences into existing conceptions is determined by the affective load the respective interplay is assigned. Gaining a picture of the world at an acceptable reliability level requires a curious mind and openness for a discursive dispute with encountered findings.