Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Psychiatr. May 19, 2020; 10(5): 81-94
Published online May 19, 2020. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i5.81
Neuroendocrine, epigenetic, and intergenerational effects of general anesthetics
Anatoly E Martynyuk, Ling-Sha Ju, Timothy E Morey, Jia-Qiang Zhang
Anatoly E Martynyuk, Department of Anesthesiology and the McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States
Ling-Sha Ju, Timothy E Morey, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States
Jia-Qiang Zhang, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, Henan Province, China
Author contributions: The authors conducted literature review and analysis, drafted and critically revised the manuscript, and gave final approval.
Supported by National Institutes of Health, No. R01NS091542; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81771149, No. U1704165.
Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Anatoly E Martynyuk, DSc, PhD, Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and the McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States. amartynyuk@anest.ufl.edu
Received: December 24, 2019
Peer-review started: December 24, 2019
First decision: February 20, 2020
Revised: March 18, 2020
Accepted: March 25, 2020
Article in press: March 25, 2020
Published online: May 19, 2020
Processing time: 141 Days and 19.3 Hours
Abstract

The progress of modern medicine would be impossible without the use of general anesthetics (GAs). Despite advancements in refining anesthesia approaches, the effects of GAs are not fully reversible upon GA withdrawal. Neurocognitive deficiencies attributed to GA exposure may persist in neonates or endure for weeks to years in the elderly. Human studies on the mechanisms of the long-term adverse effects of GAs are needed to improve the safety of general anesthesia but they are hampered not only by ethical limitations specific to human research, but also by a lack of specific biological markers that can be used in human studies to safely and objectively study such effects. The latter can primarily be attributed to an insufficient understanding of the full range of the biological effects induced by GAs and the molecular mechanisms mediating such effects even in rodents, which are far more extensively studied than any other species. Our most recent experimental findings in rodents suggest that GAs may adversely affect many more people than is currently anticipated. Specifically, we have shown that anesthesia with the commonly used GA sevoflurane induces in exposed animals not only neuroendocrine abnormalities (somatic effects), but also epigenetic reprogramming of germ cells (germ cell effects). The latter may pass the neurobehavioral effects of parental sevoflurane exposure to the offspring, who may be affected even at levels of anesthesia that are not harmful to the exposed parents. The large number of patients who require general anesthesia, the even larger number of their future unexposed offspring whose health may be affected, and a growing number of neurodevelopmental disorders of unknown etiology underscore the translational importance of investigating the intergenerational effects of GAs. In this mini review, we discuss emerging experimental findings on neuroendocrine, epigenetic, and intergenerational effects of GAs.

Keywords: Brain; General anesthetic; Sevoflurane; Corticosterone; Cortisol; Histone acetylation; Deoxyribonucleic acid methylation; Intergenerational effects; Gamma aminobutyric acid

Core tip: The GABAergic general anesthetics may act as stressors and endocrine disruptors in neonates and young adults. They may induce two distinct types of long-term adverse effects: Neuroendocrine effects (the somatic effects) and epigenetic reprogramming of germ cells (the germ cell effects). The latter may pass neurobehavioral abnormalities to male offspring. Compared to the somatic cells, the germ cells may be more sensitive to the deleterious effects of general anesthetics, raising the possibility that the offspring may be affected even when levels of anesthesia are not harmful to the exposed parents. Further rigorous experimental testing of all these possibilities is required.