1
|
Mortelmans L, Goossens E, Dilles T. Effect of an in-hospital medication self-management intervention (SelfMED) on medication adherence in polypharmacy patients postdischarge: protocol of a pre-post intervention study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e083129. [PMID: 38749699 PMCID: PMC11097838 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Healthcare providers usually manage medication for patients during hospitalisation, although patients are expected to self-manage their medication after discharge. A lack of self-management competencies is found to be associated with low adherence levels and medication errors harming patients' health. Currently, patients seldom receive support or education in medication self-management. When self-management is allowed during hospitalisation, it is rarely provided using a structured, evidence-based format. Therefore, an in-hospital medication self-management intervention (ie, SelfMED) was developed based on current evidence. To date, empirical data demonstrating the effect of SelfMED on medication adherence are lacking. This study primarily aims to evaluate the effect of the SelfMED intervention on medication adherence 2 months postdischarge in polypharmacy patients, as compared with usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multicentre pre-post intervention study will be conducted. The study will start with a control phase investigating usual care (ie, medication management entirely provided by healthcare providers), followed by an intervention period, investigating the effects of the SelfMED intervention. SelfMED consists of multiple components: (1) a stepped assessment evaluating patients' eligibility for in-hospital medication self-management, (2) a monitoring system allowing healthcare providers to follow up medication management and detect problems and (3) a supportive tool providing healthcare providers with a resource to act on observed problems with medication self-management. Polymedicated patients recruited during the control and intervention periods will be monitored for 2 months postdischarge. A total of 225 participants with polypharmacy should be included in each group. Medication adherence 2 months postdischarge, measured by pill counts, will be the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include self-management, medication knowledge, patient and staff satisfaction, perceived workload and healthcare service utilisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The ethics committee of the Antwerp University Hospital approved the study (reference no: B3002023000176). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summaries in layman's terms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN15132085.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Mortelmans
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eva Goossens
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Patient Care, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tinne Dilles
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mortelmans L, Dilles T. The development and evaluation of a medication diary to report problems with medication use. Heliyon 2024; 10:e26127. [PMID: 38375256 PMCID: PMC10875575 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study aimed to develop and evaluate a medication diary for patients to report problems with medication use to enable shared-decision making and improve medication adherence. Methods Based on a search for existing diaries, a review of the content, and a list of medication self-management problems compiled from previous research, a paper and pencil version of a medication diary was developed. The diary was reviewed for clarity and overall presentation by five healthcare providers and nine patients. Afterwards, user-friendliness was evaluated by 69 patients with polypharmacy discharged from hospital during a quantitative prospective study. Results The medication diary consists of several parts: (1) a medication schedule allowing patients to list their medicines, (2) information sheets allowing patients to write down specific medication-related information, (3) a monthly overview to indicate daily whether medication-related problems were experienced, (4) problem sheets elaborating on the problems encountered, (5) space for specific medication-related questions for healthcare providers to facilitate shared-decision making. The review phase resulted in minor textual adjustments and one extra problem in the problem sheet. Most participants, who tested the medication diary for two months, found the diary user-friendly (80%) and easy to fill in (89%). About 40% of participants reported problems with medication use. Half of the patients indicated that the diary can facilitate discussing problems with healthcare providers. Conclusion The medication diary offers patients the opportunity to report problems regarding their medication use in a proven user-friendly manner and to discuss these problems with healthcare providers. Reporting and discussing problems with medication use can serve as a first step towards making shared decisions on how to address the problems encountered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Mortelmans
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tinne Dilles
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Folkvord F, Würth AR, van Houten K, Liefveld AR, Carlson JI, Bol N, Krahmer E, Beets G, Ollerton RD, Turk E, Hrubos‐Strøm H, Nahoui H, Einvik G, Schirmer H, Moen A, Barrio‐Cortes J, Merino‐Barbancho B, Arroyo P, Fico G, Midão L, Sampaio R, Fonseca JA, Geipel K, Scheckenbach K, de Ruiter LE, Lupiáñez‐Villanueva F. A systematic review on experimental studies about patient adherence to treatment. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2024; 12:e1166. [PMID: 38204399 PMCID: PMC10782217 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.1166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
A better understanding of patients' adherence to treatment is a prerequisite to maximize the benefit of healthcare provision for patients, reduce treatment costs, and is a key factor in a variety of subsequent health outcomes. We aim to understand the state of the art of scientific evidence about which factors influence patients' adherence to treatment. A systematic literature review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines in five separate electronic databases of scientific publications: PubMed, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Cochrane library (Ovid), Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The search focused on literature reporting the significance of factors in adherence to treatment between 2011 and 2021, including only experimental studies (e.g., randomized controlled trials [RCT], clinical trials, etc.). We included 47 experimental studies. The results of the systematic review (SR) are grouped according to predetermined categories of the World Health Organization (WHO): socioeconomic, treatment, condition, personal, and healthcare-related factors. This review gives an actual overview of evidence-based studies on adherence and analyzed the significance of factors defined by the WHO classification. By showing the strength of certain factors in several independent studies and concomitantly uncovering gaps in research, these insights could serve as a basis for the design of future adherence studies and models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frans Folkvord
- PredictByBarcelonaSpain
- Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Department of Communication and CognitionTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Nadine Bol
- Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Department of Communication and CognitionTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
| | - Emiel Krahmer
- Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Department of Communication and CognitionTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
| | - Gwenn Beets
- Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Department of Communication and CognitionTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
| | - Rachel Drbohlav Ollerton
- Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Department of Communication and CognitionTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
| | - Eva Turk
- Institute for Health and SocietyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Harald Hrubos‐Strøm
- Akershus University HospitalLørenskogNorway
- Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | | | | | | | - Anne Moen
- Institute for Health and SocietyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Jaime Barrio‐Cortes
- Foundation for Biosanitary Research and Innovation in Primary CareMadridSpain
- Research Unit, Primary Healthcare Management, Madrid Health ServiceMadridSpain
- University Camilo José CelaMadridSpain
| | | | - Peña Arroyo
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Life Supporting Technologies Research GroupMadridSpain
| | - Giuseppe Fico
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Life Supporting Technologies Research GroupMadridSpain
| | - Luís Midão
- Associate Laboratory i4HB – Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, UCIBIO – Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Porto4Ageing – Competence Centre on Active and Healthy Ageing, Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - Rute Sampaio
- CINTESIS@RISE, Department of BiomedicineFaculty of Medicine of the University of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - João A. Fonseca
- MEDIDA, Medicina, EDucação, I&D e Avaliação LdaPortugal
- MEDCIDS, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - Katja Geipel
- Department of OtorhinolaryngologyHeinrich‐Heine‐UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fjære KW, Vejborg TE, Colberg L, Ulrich CS, Pedersen L, Demény AK, Poulsen JH, Armandi HB, Clemmensen MH. Medicine information helpline after hospitalization-a randomized trial: Impact on patient satisfaction, patient concerns about medicines and clinical outcome on patient safety. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293523. [PMID: 37883413 PMCID: PMC10602279 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Hospitalization often leads to changes in patients' medicine which challenges a safe medication use after discharge. Medicine information helplines (MIHs) can be valuable for patients in overcoming these challenges. This study evaluates patient satisfaction with a newly established Danish hospital-based MIH for discharged patients. The MIH is operated by experienced pharmacists and a pharmacy technician, and the study explores how the service affects the patient's concerns and perception of safety in relation to their medication, followed by an assessment of the clinical impact of MIH on patient safety. METHOD A randomized controlled study design was used in the present study. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the identification number NCT03829995. Participants were randomized 1:4 (50:200) into a control- and intervention group. Participants in the control group were offered standard care and those in the intervention group were offered access to the MIH. A telephone interview performed 2-4 weeks after discharge assessed patient satisfaction with the helpline and patient's feeling of safety in relation to medicine use (primary outcome). Data were analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test. After case handling of each enquiry to the MIH, the cases were assessed with regard to medication-related problems (MRPs) and clinical impact of the MIH service was assessed (primary outcome). RESULTS A total of 250 participants were included in the study and 152 participated in the telephone interviews (33 control and 119 intervention). Thirty-seven questions were enquired by 26 participants to the MIH. Of these, 8 were requested before the telephone interviews and these patients all expressed a high satisfaction with the MIH (score 4.57 +/- 0.73 on a 5-point scale). Most patients offered access to the MIH expressed that it increased the sense of safety in relation to their medicines (79%). However, comparing the control- and intervention group with regard to patient concerns and feeling of safety in relation to medicine use no differences were found. Evaluation of the enquiries revealed at least one MRP per enquiry, and in most cases the advice given were assessed to have a high- or moderate clinical significance. CONCLUSION The MIH was appreciated by the participants, indicating that the MIH could be a valuable service for discharged patients in improving the sense of safety in relation to medication and alleviating MRPs. Providing easy access for patients to medicine information may contribute to patient safe medicine use after discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karianne Wilhelmsen Fjære
- Medicines Information Center, The Hospital Pharmacy, Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Tim Emil Vejborg
- Medicines Information Center, The Hospital Pharmacy, Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Lene Colberg
- Medicines Information Center, The Hospital Pharmacy, Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Cecilia Strøjer Ulrich
- Medicines Information Center, The Hospital Pharmacy, Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Lars Pedersen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Ann Kathrin Demény
- Emergency Department, Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Joo Hanne Poulsen
- Medicines Information Center, The Hospital Pharmacy, Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Helle Byg Armandi
- Medicines Information Center, The Hospital Pharmacy, Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Marianne Hald Clemmensen
- Medicines Information Center, The Hospital Pharmacy, Capital Region of Denmark, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alqenae FA, Steinke D, Belither H, Robertson P, Bartlett J, Wilkinson J, Williams SD, Brad L, Jeffries M, Ashcroft DM, Keers RN. A Multi-method Exploratory Evaluation of a Service Designed to Improve Medication Safety for Patients with Monitored Dosage Systems Following Hospital Discharge. Drug Saf 2023; 46:1021-1037. [PMID: 37819463 PMCID: PMC10584716 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01342-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Medication safety problems are common post-hospital discharge, and an important global healthcare improvement target. The Transfers of Care Around Medicines (TCAM) service was launched by a National Health Service Trust in the North-West of England, initially focusing on patients with new or existing Monitored Dosage Systems (MDS). The TCAM service is designed to enable the prompt transfer of medication information, with referrals made by hospitals at discharge to a named community pharmacy. This study aimed to explore the utilisation and impact of the TCAM service on medication safety. METHODS The evaluation included a descriptive analysis of 3033 anonymised patient referrals to 71 community pharmacies over a 1-year period alongside an assessment of the impact of the TCAM service on unintentional medication discrepancies and adverse drug events using a retrospective before-and-after study design. Impact data were collected across 18 general practices by 16 trained clinical pharmacists. RESULTS Most patient referrals (70%, 2126/3033) were marked as 'completed' by community pharmacies, with 15% of completed referrals delayed beyond 30 days. Screening of 411 patient records by clinical pharmacists yielded no statistically significant difference in unintentional medication discrepancies or adverse drug event rates following TCAM implementation using a multivariable regression analysis (unintentional medication discrepancies adjusted odds ratio = 0.79 [95% confidence interval 0.44-1.44, p = 0.46]; and adverse drug events adjusted odds ratio = 1.19 [95% confidence interval 0.57-2.45, p = 0.63]), although there remained considerable uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS The TCAM service facilitated a number of community pharmacy services offered to patients with monitored dosage systems; but the impact of the intervention on unintentional medication discrepancies and adverse drug event rates post-hospital discharge for this patient group was uncertain. The results of this exploratory study can inform the ongoing implementation of the TCAM service at hospital discharge and highlight the need to understand service implementation in different contexts, which may influence its impact on medication safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatema A Alqenae
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
| | - Douglas Steinke
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Hilary Belither
- Pharmacy Department, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK
| | | | - Jennifer Bartlett
- Pharmacy Department, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Jack Wilkinson
- Centre for Biostatistics, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Steven D Williams
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Westbourne Medical Centre, Bournemouth, UK
| | | | - Mark Jeffries
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Population Health, Health Service Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Darren M Ashcroft
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard N Keers
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester, UK
- Suicide, Risk and Safety Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dilles T, Mortelmans L, Loots E, Sabbe K, Feyen H, Wauters M, Haegdorens F, De Baetselier E. People-centered care and patients' beliefs about medicines and adherence: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15795. [PMID: 37251820 PMCID: PMC10208933 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction People-centered care (PCC) strategies are believed to improve overall health outcomes. Medicines use is essential for the treatment of many patients with chronic conditions. Non-adherence rates are high and result in poor health outcomes, and increased healthcare utilization and costs. This study aimed to explore the relationship between PCC and adherence to medicines for persons with chronic medicines use, as well as the extent to which patients' beliefs about medicines are influenced by their level of perceived PCC. Methods A cross-sectional survey design was performed with adults using at least 3 chronic medicines per day. To measure the degree of medicines adherence, patients' ideas about medication, and PCC, four validated questionnaires were used: The Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5), Beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ), Client-Centered Care Questionnaire (CCCQ) and the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Socio-demographics, health status, and drug-related burden were questioned as potential factors to impact the relationship between PCC and adherence. Results A sample of 459 persons participated. The mean score on the CCCQ (adjusted to pharmacotherapy) was 52.7 on 75 (sd = 8.83, range [18-70]). The top 20% scored 60 or more, the 20% lowest scores were 46 or less. Adherence levels were high, with a mean score of 22.6 on 25 on the MARS-5, and 88% scoring 20 or more. An increase in PCC corresponded to a higher chance of medicines adherence (OR 1.07, 95%CI [1.02-1.12]), corrected for age, the burden due to chronic diseases, the impact of side effects on daily life, and participants' beliefs about medicines. PCC showed positive correlations with the necessity of medicines use (r = 0.1, p = 0.016) and the balance between necessity and concerns (r = 0.3, p < 0.001); and negative correlations with levels of concerns (r = -0.3, p < 0.001) and scores on harmfulness (r = -0.3, p < 0.001) and overuse of medicines (r = -0.4, p < 0.001). Conclusion Patients with chronic medicine use perceived an average high level of people-centeredness in the pharmaceutical care they received. This PCC was weakly positively associated with adherence to their medicines. The higher PCC was evaluated, the more patients believed in the necessity of the medicines use and the better the balance between necessity and concerns. The people-centeredness of pharmaceutical care showed several shortcomings and can still be improved. As such, healthcare providers are advised to actively engage in PCC, and not to wait passively for information provided by the patient.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abuaish M, Mirza G, Al-Zamzami W, Atiyah M. The Effect of a Structured Gastroenteritis Discharge Management Plan on Compliance, Prognosis, and Parents' Satisfaction. Cureus 2022; 14:e23240. [PMID: 35449640 PMCID: PMC9012551 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Acute gastroenteritis is one of the most common causes of dehydration in children. Parents’ education is an essential part of its management. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of discharge instructions in the pediatric emergency department for parents of children with acute gastroenteritis, together with disease prognosis and parents’ satisfaction. Methods: An observational prospective cohort study was conducted among parents of children with acute gastroenteritis, with mild-to-moderate dehydration, who presented to the pediatric emergency room from March 2018 to July 2018. Parents were interviewed upon their child’s presentation and in follow-up phone calls after one week to assess the parents’ knowledge and the disease’s prognosis. Results: There were a total of 218 parents of children with acute gastroenteritis of mild and moderate dehydration. The mean age was four years and one month ± three years and seven months. Forty-four percent of study participants had reasonable awareness of their child’s condition, and most patients (86%) improved fully. The exact adherence to instructions was 54%, the proportion of children who returned to the emergency department was 13%, and parental satisfaction and appreciation of the provided education was 98%. Conclusion: In the study group, not strictly following fluid rehydration plans in discharge instructions did not negatively affect the course of improvement. This indicates that simple instructions to rehydrate with any fluid a child might accept and give clear red flags for observation are likely to be enough to treat gastroenteritis of mild-to-moderate severity.
Collapse
|
8
|
Schwarzkopf A, Schönenberg A, Prell T. Patterns and Predictors of Medication Change after Discharge from Hospital: An Observational Study in Older Adults with Neurological Disorders. J Clin Med 2022; 11:563. [PMID: 35160015 PMCID: PMC8836689 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication is often changed after inpatient treatment, which affects the course of the disease, health behavior and adherence. Thus, it is important to understand patterns of medication changes after discharge from hospital. METHODS Inpatients at the Department of Neurology received a comprehensive assessment during their stay, including adherence, depression, cognition, health and sociodemographic variables. A month after being discharged, patients were contacted to enquire about post-discharge medication changes. RESULTS 910 older adults aged 70 ± 8.6 years participated, of which 204 (22.4%) reported medication changes. The majority of changes were initiated by physicians (n = 112, 56.3%) and only 25 (12.6%) patients reported adjusting medication themselves. Reasons for medication changes differed between patients and doctors (p < 0.001), with side effects or missing effects cited frequently. Sociodemographic and patient-related factors did not significantly predict medication changes. CONCLUSION Patients reported less post-discharge medication changes than expected, and contrary to previous literature on nonadherence, only a fraction of those changes were performed by patients themselves. Socioeconomic and clinical parameters regarding personality, mood and cognition were poorly associated with post-discharge medication changes. Instead, individual health-related factors play a role, with patient factors only indirectly influencing physicians' decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Schwarzkopf
- Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany; (A.S.); (T.P.)
| | - Aline Schönenberg
- Department of Geriatrics, Halle University Hospital, 06120 Halle, Germany
| | - Tino Prell
- Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany; (A.S.); (T.P.)
- Department of Geriatrics, Halle University Hospital, 06120 Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Westberg A, Sjölander M, Glader EL, Gustafsson M. Primary Non-Adherence to Preventive Drugs and Associations with Beliefs About Medicines in Stroke Survivors. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:343-352. [PMID: 35177898 PMCID: PMC8844454 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s351001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication non-adherence is a common problem in clinical practice. Little is known about stroke survivors' primary non-adherence to preventive drugs, and we hypothesised that their beliefs about medicines are associated with primary non-adherence. The objective was to describe primary non-adherence among stroke survivors and to assess associations between primary non-adherence to preventive drugs and beliefs about medicines. METHODS Questionnaires were sent to 797 individuals 3 months after stroke to assess beliefs about medicines through the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). All participants were registered in the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke), and prescriptions for new preventive drugs during the hospital stay were identified through data from Riksstroke. Primary non-adherers were those who failed to fill one or more new prescriptions within 1 month of hospital discharge based on data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Differences between primary non-adherers and adherers were assessed by 2 tests and associations between the BMQ subscales and primary non-adherence were analysed using independent two-sample t-tests and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS A total of 594 individuals responded to the survey, of which 452 received new prescriptions of preventive drugs. Overall, 53 (12%) participants were classified as primary non-adherent. Primary non-adherers were more often dependent on help or support from next of kin (p=0.032) and had difficulties with memory more often (p=0.002) than the primary adherent individuals. No statistically significant differences in BMQ subscale-scores were found between the two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION Primary non-adherence to preventive drugs was low, and no associations were found between primary non-adherence and beliefs about medicines. Associations with cognitive impairments such as difficulties with memory and need for help from next of kin suggest that more effort is needed to help stroke survivors to start important preventive drug treatments after discharge from hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annica Westberg
- Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
| | - Maria Sjölander
- Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
| | - Eva-Lotta Glader
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
| | - Maria Gustafsson
- Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden
- Correspondence: Maria Gustafsson, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 87, Sweden, Email
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Herpen-Meeuwissen LJM, van Onzenoort HAW, van den Bemt PMLA, Maat B, van den Bemt BJF. The Effect of Self-Administration of Medication During Hospitalization on Patient's Self-Efficacy and Medication Adherence After Discharge. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:2683-2693. [PMID: 36196066 PMCID: PMC9527028 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s375295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The effect of self-administration of medication (SAM), in which capable hospitalized patients administer medication themselves on medication self-efficacy is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of SAM on medication self-efficacy, adherence and patient satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospective pre-post intervention study on the orthopedic ward of the Sint Maartenskliniek (Nijmegen) was conducted from January 2020 to July 2021. All adults admitted to this ward were eligible for participation. The primary outcome was the level of medication self-efficacy measured by the Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS) one week after discharge. Secondary outcomes were SEAMS-score three months after hospitalization, medication adherence measured by the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) one week and three months after hospitalization and patient satisfaction expressed on a five-point Likert scale in patients who experienced SAM. The differences in median SEAMS-scores and non-adherence pre- versus post-implementation of SAM were statistically analyzed. Patients' agreement regarding satisfaction with SAM was calculated as proportion per Likert scale answer. RESULTS Of the 197 patients participating in the study, 96 were included pre- and 101 post-implementation of SAM. Median SEAMS-scores one week after discharge were 35 [IQR 31-38] and 34 [IQR 30-36] pre- and post-intervention respectively (p = 0.08). There was no difference in the proportion of non-adherent patients at one week and three months after discharge pre- and post-intervention, 52.4%, 53.2%, 57.9% and 64.4% respectively. Of the patients that experienced SAM 32% agreed and 49% strongly agreed that they would like to self-manage medication again during a future hospitalization. CONCLUSION In this orthopedic population with high medication self-efficacy scores at discharge, SAM did not affect patients' medication self-efficacy nor medication adherence after hospitalization. Most patients preferred SAM. Additional studies should focus on the effect of SAM in other patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes J M van Herpen-Meeuwissen
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
- Correspondence: Loes JM van Herpen-Meeuwissen, Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Tel +31 624 3617744, Email
| | - Hein A W van Onzenoort
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Patricia M L A van den Bemt
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara Maat
- Department of Pharmacy, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mortelmans L, Goossens E, Dilles T. Beliefs about medication after hospital discharge in geriatric patients with polypharmacy. Geriatr Nurs 2021; 43:280-287. [PMID: 34963073 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe beliefs about medication in geriatric patients with polypharmacy post-discharge and to evaluate the impact of discharge management on patients' medication beliefs. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2019 and March 2020 in twelve general hospitals in Belgium. Four hundred geriatric patients with polypharmacy were surveyed at hospital discharge and two to five days post-discharge using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire and self-developed questionnaires. RESULTS According to participants, the benefits of medication outweighed the disadvantages as the mean necessity score (19.4/25) outweighed the mean concern score (11.9/25). Patients receiving help with medication management post-discharge had stronger necessity-, concern- and overuse-related beliefs. No patient- or discharge management-related factors were significant predictors of medication beliefs. CONCLUSIONS Assessing patients' medication beliefs and identifying and addressing patients' concerns, can be an opportunity to improve medication use, to prevent non-adherence and to enhance safe medication practices at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Mortelmans
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery Science, Centre For Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Eva Goossens
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery Science, Centre For Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Egmontstraat 5, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; Department of Patient Care, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Tinne Dilles
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery Science, Centre For Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Daliri S, Kooij MJ, Scholte Op Reimer WJM, Ter Riet G, Jepma P, Verweij L, Peters RJG, Buurman BM, Karapinar-Çarkit F. Effects of a transitional care programme on medication adherence in an older cardiac population: A randomized clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 88:965-982. [PMID: 34410011 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Medication non-adherence post-discharge is common among patients, especially those suffering from chronic medical conditions, and contributes to hospital admissions and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Cardiac Care Bridge (CCB) intervention on medication adherence post-discharge. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of the CCB randomized single-blind trial, a study in patients ≥70 years, at high risk of functional loss and admitted to cardiology departments in six hospitals. In this multi-component intervention study, community nurses performed medication reconciliation and observed medication-related problems (MRPs) during post-discharge home visits, and pharmacists provided recommendations to resolve MRPs. Adherence to high-risk medications was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC), using pharmacy refill data. Furthermore, MRPs were assessed in the intervention group. RESULTS For 198 (64.7%) of 306 CCB patients, data were available on adherence (mean age: 82 years; 58.9% of patients used a multidose drug dispensing [MDD] system). The mean PDC before admission was 92.3% in the intervention group (n = 99) and 88.5% in the control group (n = 99), decreasing to 85.2% and 84.1% post-discharge, respectively (unadjusted difference: -2.6% (95% CI -9.8 to 4.6, P = .473); adjusted difference -3.3 (95% CI -10.3 to 3.7, P = .353)). Post-hoc analysis indicated that a modest beneficial intervention effect may be restricted to MDD non-users (Pinteraction = .085). In total, 77.0% of the patients had at least one MRP post-discharge. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that a multi-component intervention, including several components targeting medication adherence in older cardiac patients discharged from hospital back home, did not benefit their medication adherence levels. A modest positive effect on adherence may potentially exist in those patients not using an MDD system. This finding needs replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Daliri
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel J Kooij
- Community pharmacy, Service Apotheek Koning, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Research Group Chronic Diseases, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerben Ter Riet
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Centre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Jepma
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Centre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Verweij
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Centre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron J G Peters
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bianca M Buurman
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Centre of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mortelmans L, De Baetselier E, Goossens E, Dilles T. What Happens after Hospital Discharge? Deficiencies in Medication Management Encountered by Geriatric Patients with Polypharmacy. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:7031. [PMID: 34209384 PMCID: PMC8293803 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to describe post-discharge medication self-management by geriatric patients with polypharmacy, to describe the problems encountered and to determine the related factors. In a multicenter study from November 2019 to March 2020, data were collected at hospital discharge and two to five days post-discharge. Geriatric patients with polypharmacy were questioned about medication management using a combination of validated (MedMaIDE) and self-developed questionnaires. Of 400 participants, 70% did self-manage medication post-discharge. Patients had a mean of four different deficiencies in post-discharge medication management (SD 2.17, range 0-10). Knowledge-related deficiencies were most common. The number of medicines and the in-hospital provision of medication management by nurses were significant predictors of post-discharge medication management deficiencies. In addition to deficiencies in knowledge, medication-taking ability and obtaining medication, non-adherence and disrupted continuity of medication self-management were common in geriatric patients with polypharmacy post-discharge. Improvements in in-hospital preparation could avoid medication self-management problems at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Mortelmans
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium; (E.D.B.); (E.G.); (T.D.)
| | - Elyne De Baetselier
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium; (E.D.B.); (E.G.); (T.D.)
| | - Eva Goossens
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium; (E.D.B.); (E.G.); (T.D.)
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Patient Care, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Tinne Dilles
- Department of Nursing Science and Midwifery, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Nurse and Pharmaceutical Care (NuPhaC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium; (E.D.B.); (E.G.); (T.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vega D, Acosta FJ, Saavedra P. Testing the hypothesis of subtypes of nonadherence in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: A prospective study. World J Psychiatry 2020; 10:260-271. [PMID: 33269222 PMCID: PMC7672786 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v10.i11.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonadherence is a major problem in the treatment of psychotic disorders. It has been hypothesized that nonadherent patients with schizophrenia are not a homogeneous population and subtypes of nonadherence might exist, but this hypothesis has not been specifically tested.
AIM To test the hypothesis of subtypes of nonadherence in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.
METHODS This prospective study included 110 consecutively admitted patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 6 mo follow-up after discharge. Sociodemographic, clinical, psychopathological and treatment-related variables were evaluated. Adherence was defined as the concurrence of adherence to antipsychotic treatment and outpatient follow-up during the six-month period. Adherence to antipsychotic treatment was defined as the concurrence of objective and subjective adherence. Sixty-four patients (58%) fulfilled nonadherence criteria at the end of the follow-up period and were categorized according to their subtype of nonadherence.
RESULTS In nonadherent patients (n = 64), 32 (50%) fulfilled criteria of intentional nonadherence, and 32 (50%) of unintentional nonadherence (UNA). Unintentional nonadherent patients, as compared to intentional nonadherent patients, are characterized by older age, lower educational level, worse cognitive and negative symptoms, greater severity, worse knowledge of their treatment regimen, greater prevalence of supervision of the treatment, lower number of prior hospitalizations and greater use of nonpsychiatric treatment, anticholinergics and hypnotics. Low educational level (OR = 26.1; 95%CI: 2.819-241), worse treatment knowledge at six months (OR per unit = 0.904; 95%CI: 0.853-0.957) and nonpsychiatric treatment at six months (OR = 15.8; 95%CI: 1.790-139) were independently associated to UNA.
CONCLUSION Differentiated subtypes of nonadherence according to intentionality seem to exist in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Our findings suggest the need for differentiated approach, both in future research and in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dulcinea Vega
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 35016, Las Palmas, The Canary Islands, Spain
- Department of Psychiatry, Insular University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 35016, Las Palmas, The Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Francisco J Acosta
- Department of Psychiatry, Insular University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 35016, Las Palmas, The Canary Islands, Spain
- Department of Mental Health General Management of Healthcare Programs, Canary Islands Health Service, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 35004, Las Palmas, The Canary Islands, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services for Chronic Conditions (REDISSEC), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - Pedro Saavedra
- Department of Mathematics, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 35016, Las Palmas, The Canary Islands, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goldsmith H, McCloughen A, Curtis K. Using the trauma patient experience and evaluation of hospital discharge practices to inform practice change: A mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27:1589-1598. [DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Goldsmith
- Sydney Nursing School; University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
- Trauma Service; St George Hospital; Sydney NSW Australia
| | | | - Kate Curtis
- Sydney Nursing School; University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
- Emergency Service; Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District; NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Goldsmith H, McCloughen A, Curtis K. The experience and understanding of pain management in recently discharged adult trauma patients: A qualitative study. Injury 2018; 49:110-116. [PMID: 28988804 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2017] [Revised: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pain following injury is often intense, prolonged and debilitating. If poorly managed, this acute pain has the potential to delay rehabilitation and lead to chronic pain. Recent quantitative Australian research recommends implementing further information and interventions to improve trauma patient outcomes, however, to ensure effectiveness, exploration of the patient perspective is imperative to ensure the success of future pain management strategies. This study aimed to gain understanding about the experience of pain management using prescribed analgesic regimens of recently discharged adult trauma patients. METHOD Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the experiences and understandings of trauma patients in managing pain using prescribed analgesic regimens during the initial post-hospital discharge period. Twelve participants were purposively selected over a 6-month period at a level one trauma outpatient clinic based on questionnaire responses indicating pain related concerns. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. RESULTS The overarching finding was that injuries and inadequate pain management incapacitate the patient at home. Four main themes were developed: injury pain is unique and debilitating; patients are uninformed at hospital discharge; patients have low confidence with pain management at home; and patients make independent decisions about pain management. Patients felt they were not given adequate information at hospital discharge to support them to make effective decisions about their pain management practices at home. CONCLUSION There is a need for more inclusive and improved hospital discharge processes that includes patient and family education around pain management following injury. To achieve this, clinician education, support and training is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Goldsmith
- Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Trauma Service, St George Hospital, NSW, Australia.
| | | | - Kate Curtis
- Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Emergency Service, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Leung CHS, Chong C, Lim WK. Medical student-led patient education prior to hospital discharge improves 1-month adherence rates. Intern Med J 2017; 47:328-332. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.13365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Revised: 10/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chun H. S. Leung
- Department of Medicine; Ballarat Health Services; Ballarat Victoria Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Carol Chong
- Department of Aged Care; Northern Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Wen K. Lim
- Department of Aged Care; Northern Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Aged Care; Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|