Mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) are classified as mosaic deletions (loss), copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH), and duplications (gain), attracting special attention as biological aging-related acquired genetic alterations. While these mCAs have been linked with aging and various diseases, no study has investigated their association with suicide risk which is associated with abnormal biological aging. Here, we examined the association between suicide deaths and mCAs, including mosaic loss of the X (mLOX) and Y chromosomes, by leveraging blood-derived single nucleotide polymorphism-array data. The first (410 suicide decedents and 88,870 controls) and the second (363 suicide decedents and 88,870 controls) cohorts were analyzed and integrated using meta-analyses (773 suicide decedents and 177,740 controls). Total mCAs in autosomal chromosomes were significantly increased in suicide (p = 1.28 × 10-6, odds ratio [OR] = 1.78), mostly driven by loss (p = 4.05 × 10-9, OR = 2.70) and gain (p = 1.08 × 10-3, OR = 2.23). mLOX were significantly increased in female suicide (p = 2.66 × 10-21, OR = 4.00). The directions of effects of all mCAs in autosomal and sex chromosomes on suicide were the same in the first and second sets. Subgroup analyses suggest that our findings were mostly driven by suicide itself, and not confounded by comorbid psychiatric disorders or physical diseases, smoking status, sample location, or postmortem sample status. In conclusion, we provide the first evidence for aberrant mCAs in somatic autosomal and X chromosomes in suicide, which may contribute to an improved understanding of the genomic pathophysiology underlying suicide.

Suicidal behaviors have become a serious public health concern globally due to the economic and human cost of suicidal behavior to individuals, families, communities, and society. However, the underlying etiology and biological mechanism of suicidal behavior remains poorly understood.

We collected different single omic data, including single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), bulk mRNA-seq, DNA methylation microarrays from the cortex of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in suicide subjects' studies, as well as fluoxetine-treated rats brains. We matched subject IDs that overlapped between the transcriptome dataset and the methylation dataset. The differential expression genes and differentially methylated regions were calculated with a 2-group comparison analysis. Cross-omics analysis was performed to calculate the correlation between the methylated and transcript levels of differentially methylated CpG sites and mapped transcripts. Additionally, we performed a deconvolution analysis for bulk mRNA-seq and DNA methylation profiling with scRNA-seq as the reference profiles.

Difference in cell type proportions among 7 cell types. Meanwhile, our analysis of single-cell sequence from the antidepressant-treated rats found that drug-specific differential expression genes were enriched into biological pathways, including ion channels and glutamatergic receptors.

This study identified some important dysregulated genes influenced by DNA methylation in 2 brain regions of depression and suicide patients. Interestingly, we found that oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) have the most contributors for cell-type proportions related to differential expression genes and methylated sites in suicidal behavior.

Suicidal ideation, suicide attempt (SA) and suicide are significantly heritable phenotypes. However, the extent to which these phenotypes share genetic architecture is unclear. This question is of great relevance to determining key risk factors for suicide, and to alleviate the societal burden of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). To help address the question of heterogeneity, consortia efforts have recently shifted from a focus on suicide within the context of major psychopathology (e.g. major depressive disorder, schizophrenia) to suicide as an independent entity. Recent molecular studies of suicide risk by members of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium and the International Suicide Genetics Consortium have identified genome-wide significant loci associated with SA and with suicide death, and have examined these phenotypes within and outside of the context of major psychopathology. This review summarizes important insights from epidemiological and biometrical research on suicide, and discusses key empirical findings from molecular genetic examinations of STBs. Polygenic risk scores for these phenotypes have been observed to be associated with case-control status and other risk phenotypes. In addition, estimated shared genetic covariance with other phenotypes suggests specific medical and psychiatric risks beyond major depressive disorder. Broadly, molecular studies suggest a complexity of suicide etiology that cannot simply be accounted for by depression. Discussion of the state of suicide genetics, a growing field, also includes important ethical and clinical implications of studying the genetic risk of suicide.

In psychiatry, compared to other medical fields, the identification of biological markers that would complement current clinical interview, and enable more objective and faster clinical diagnosis, implement accurate monitoring of treatment response and remission, is grave. Current technological development enables analyses of various biological marks in high throughput scale at reasonable costs, and therefore 'omic' studies are entering the psychiatry research. However, big data demands a whole new plethora of skills in data processing, before clinically useful information can be extracted. So far the classical approach to data analysis did not really contribute to identification of biomarkers in psychiatry, but the extensive amounts of data might get to a higher level, if artificial intelligence in the shape of machine learning algorithms would be applied. Not many studies on machine learning in psychiatry have been published, but we can already see from that handful of studies that the potential to build a screening portfolio of biomarkers for different psychopathologies, including suicide, exists.

In post-genomic science, the development of etiological models of neurobiological vulnerability to psychiatric risk has expanded exponentially in recent decades, particularly since the neuromolecular and biosocial turns in basic research. Among this research is that of McGill Group for Suicide Studies (MGSS) whose work centers on the identification of major risk factors and epigenetic traits that help to identify a specific profile of vulnerability to psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression) and predict high-risk behaviors (e.g., suicidality). Although the MGSS has attracted attention for its environmental epigenetic models of suicide risk over the years and the translation of findings from rodent studies into human populations, its overall agenda includes multiple research axes, ranging from retrospective studies to clinical and epidemiological research. Common to these research axes is a concern with the long-term effects of adverse experiences on maladaptive trajectories and negative mental health outcomes. As these findings converge with post-genomic understandings of health and also translate into new orientations in global public health, our article queries the ways in which neurobiological vulnerability is traced, measured, and profiled in environmental epigenetics and in the MGSS research. Inspired by the philosophy of Georges Canguilhem and by literature from the social studies of risk and critical public health, we explore how the epigenetic models of neurobiological vulnerability tie into a particular way of thinking about the normal, the pathological, and the milieu in terms of risk. Through this exploration, we examine how early life adversity (ELA) and neurobiological vulnerability are localized and materialized in those emerging models while also considering their broader conceptual and translational implications in the contexts of mental health and global public health interventions. In particular, we consider how narratives of maladaptive trajectories and vulnerable selves who are at risk of harm might stand in as a "new pathological" with healthy trajectories and resilient selves being potentially equated with a "new normal" way of living in the face of adversity. By troubling neurobiological vulnerability as a universal biosocial condition, we suggest that an ecosocial perspective may help us to think differently about the dynamics of mental health and distress in the adverse milieu.