Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Pharmacol. Dec 27, 2022; 11(4): 48-55
Published online Dec 27, 2022. doi: 10.5497/wjp.v11.i4.48
Table 1 Chromatographic scheme
Thin-layer plate
Adsorbent
Amount of sample applicated in μL
Solvent
Test organism
1Kieselguhr30AB. cereus
2Silica gel30BM. flavus
3Silica gel30CS. lutea
4Silica gel30CB. subtilis
5Silica gel30DM. flavus
6Cellulose10EB. cereus
Table 2 Rf values of antibiotics on the different plates
Antibiotic
Plate
1
2
3
4
5
6
Cloxacillin--0.700.70-0
Dihydrostreptomycin-----0.40
Tetracycline0.350000-
Oxytetracycline0.200000-
Chlortetracycline0.600000-
Chloramphenicol00.700.650.650.80-
Neomycin-----0
Novobiocin-0.800.800.800.80-
Bacitracin-0.45----
Erythromycin0.200.700.350.350.25-
Oleandomycin0.200.700.35-0.25-
Ampicillin0.35-0.50---
Streptomycin-----0.50
Oxacillin0-0.600.60--
Table 3 Azithromycin degradation constant rate k values at different temperatures[10]
Time in h
4 °C
37 °C
70 °C
100 °C
11000 ± 8e50 ± 1a50 ± 2a200 ± 3a
3333 ± 3d966 ± 9d4033 ± 22e3900 ± 18e
6250 ± 2c933 ± 8d2000 ± 15d2033 ± 16d
12116 ± 2b516 ± 7c1025 ± 8c1000 ± 6c
2462 ± 2a270 ± 4b537 ± 5b533 ± 4b
Table 4 Tetracycline degradation constant rate k values at different temperatures[10]
Time in h
4 °C
37 °C
70 °C
100 °C
120 ± 4a50 ± 6a30 ± 6a60 ± 15a
3256 ± 32e400 ± 46e630 ± 81e860 ± 61e
6163 ± 17cd290± 23cd360 ± 17cd510 ± 46d
12116 ± 26c225 ± 12c300 ± 26c340 ± 32c
2450 ± 8b135 ± 20b160 ±18b160 ± 02b