The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease among Hispanic/Latine communities is increasing. Pharmacogenomic studies reveal genetic markers that influence treatment decisions. The aim of our study was to examine the frequency and impact of genetic polymorphisms on thiopurine-associated leukopenia (NUDT15, TPMT) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) immunogenicity (HLA-DQA1∗05) in a cohort of Hispanic patients of diverse ancestral backgrounds.

We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study comprising 2225 Hispanic participants. We measured the frequency of variation affecting drug response in NUDT15, TPMT, and HLA-DQA1∗05; their ancestral origin (European, African, or Amerindian); and the rate of development of myelosuppression and immunogenicity to thiopurines and anti-TNFs, in exposed patients.

NUDT15 and TPMT variants were rare, except for rs116855232 in NUDT15, which was common only in alleles of Amerindian origin. All NUDT15 variant alleles were inherited on an Amerindian haplotype, and among the Amerindian allele subset, the variant frequency of NUDT15∗4 (rs147390019) was a remarkable 23% in patients with leukopenia but only 3% in patients without leukopenia. HLA-DQA1∗05 and its European tagging variant rs2097432 were common in alleles from all ancestral origins and demonstrated association with immunogenicity to anti-TNFs. However, rs2097432 was only correlated with HLA-DQA1∗05 in the European allele subset.

These findings indicate that NUDT15 testing should become standard clinical practice before prescribing thiopurines in individuals with Amerindian/Alaska Native ancestry, including Hispanic individuals. Additionally, rs2097432 should not be used as a surrogate for HLA-DQA1∗05 testing for diverse populations. Ultimately, incorporating ancestry in personalized therapeutic approaches is important for treatment of Hispanic patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Several therapeutic advances have been achieved over the past two decades for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The expanding therapeutic armamentarium and the increasingly ambitious treatment targets have led to an increased use of advanced therapies and better outcomes. Nevertheless, many patients remain suboptimally treated and are at risk of disease progression, hospital admission, and surgery, even when advanced therapies are cycled, escalated, or combined. Conversely, IBD can also be characterised by an indolent disease course. Top-down and treat-to-target strategies, although beneficial in a substantial proportion of patients, might not be advantageous in patients with mild disease and might risk overtreatment. Identifying patients with mild activity and a benign disease trajectory in the long-term is important; unnecessary exposure to advanced therapies increases the risk of adverse events and increases financial costs and health-care resource utilisation. This Review details the importance of adopting clinical strategies to avoid the pitfalls of undertreating and overtreating IBD.

Therapeutic options in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have expanded significantly. Patients often experience primary or secondary loss of response to biologics or small molecules therapy. Determining which patients may benefit from combination of two therapies remains a key question.

Combination therapy leverages complementary mechanisms of action, conventionally using tumor necrosis factor antagonists simultaneously with immunosuppressive agents, and more recently using two advanced therapies together. Combination of two advanced therapies has shown promise in two recent randomized trials for improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes while maintaining acceptable safety profiles. Observational studies highlight its potential for refractory disease and complex phenotypes. Guidelines still conservatively recommend monotherapy for IBD patients, even for those at high risk for complications.

Advanced combination therapy (ACT) represents a potential significant advancement in managing IBD, offering treatment options for refractory cases, concomitant immune-mediated diseases and high-risk populations. Nonetheless, further randomized trials and registry data are needed to generate evidence to support broader adoption of this approach. Future research should focus on cost-effectiveness, longer-term treatment strategies and safety to refine its application in clinical practice.

In recent years, we have seen a considerable increase in the number of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases of unknown etiology, including both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Inflammatory bowel diseases can cause intestinal lesions throughout the gastrointestinal tract, necessitating gastrointestinal endoscopy for examining all relevant aspects, especially lesion characteristics, for differential diagnosis and histological diagnosis, to select the appropriate treatment options, determine treatment effectiveness, etc. Specific guidelines are necessary to ensure that endoscopy can be performed in a safe and more tailored and efficient manner, especially since gastrointestinal endoscopy, including enteroscopy, is a common procedure worldwide, including in Japan. Within this context, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has formulated the "Guidelines for the Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases" to provide detailed guidelines regarding esophagogastroduodenoscopy, enteroscopy, and colonoscopy procedures for definitive diagnosis, as well as determination of treatment effectiveness in clinical cases of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and crohn's sisease (CD) is complex. While there is significant overlap in medical therapies used for UC and CD, there remain few distinct differences in their management. The overall goals of therapy are to achieve disease remission, prevent complications, decrease the need for surgical interventions, and restore patients' quality of life. In the current article, we discuss currently available therapies and their mechanisms, limitations and side effects, followed by a comprehensive discussion of key consideration points in regards to the medical management.

Mucosal healing (MH) is a key therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD) and is associated with improved outcomes. While adult studies indicate a positive correlation between serum anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels and MH, data in pediatric patients is limited. We aimed to define the association of serum anti-TNF levels with MH in pediatric patients with CD during maintenance therapy.

Retrospective data (2014-2023) was collected from pediatric CD patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab who performed an ileocolonoscopy at least 26 weeks after initiating therapy. Serum anti-TNF levels around endoscopic time were compared with endoscopic findings. MH was defined as complete absence of inflammatory or ulcerative lesions across all segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with MH.

Data were obtained from 107 patients (41 infliximab and 66 adalimumab), with a median age at diagnosis of 12.6 (9.9-14.0) years. Median time until ileocolonoscopy following anti-TNF initiation was 89.0 (56.3-152.3) weeks. MH was identified in 31 (29.0%) patients. Anti-TNF serum levels were comparable in the MH and non-MH groups (9.5 [4.9-13.9] vs. 9.3 [6.4-15.7] µg/mL; p = 0.73), without differences in patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab. In multivariable analysis, diagnosis weight Z-score (odds ratio [OR] = 2.860, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.005-8.138; p = 0.049), along with C-reactive protein (OR = 0.037, 95% CI = 0.002-0.687; p = 0.027) and fecal calprotectin (OR = 0.995, 95% CI = 0.990-1.000; p = 0.037) at time of ileocolonoscopy were significantly associated with MH.

In our cohort, anti-TNF levels during maintenance were not associated with MH in pediatric CD.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represents a significant disease burden marked by chronic inflammation and complications that adversely affect patients' quality of life. Effective diagnostic strategies involve clinical assessments, endoscopic evaluations, imaging studies, and biomarker testing, where early diagnosis is essential for effective management and prevention of long-term complications, highlighting the need for continual advancements in diagnostic methods. The intricate interplay between genetic factors and the outcomes of biological therapy is of critical importance. Unraveling the genetic determinants that influence responses and failures to biological therapy holds significant promise for optimizing treatment strategies for patients with IBD on biologics. Through an in-depth examination of current literature, this review article synthesizes critical genetic markers associated with therapeutic efficacy and resistance in IBD. Understanding these genetic actors paves the way for personalized approaches, informing clinicians on predicting, tailoring, and enhancing the effectiveness of biological therapies for improved outcomes in patients with IBD.

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, with rising global incidence and prevalence. Over the past two decades, biologics have added to the therapeutic armamentarium and revolutionized the approach to treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The available biologics include monoclonal antibodies which target inflammatory cytokines (anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha, anti-interleukin 12/23) or recruitment of leucocytes to the gastrointestinal tract (anti-alpha4beta7 integrin) and small molecules (Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine 1-phosphate-inhibitors) which modify the proinflammatory signaling. Considering their potential disease-modifying ability, recent pediatric guidelines from the West have advocated upfront use of biologics in appropriate clinical scenarios as a top-down approach rather than the conventional step-up approach. Although real-world studies are available regarding the clinical efficacy of biologics in PIBD, there is paucity of long-term outcome and safety data in children. Also, little information is available about the best approach in the newly industrialized - developing countries where PIBD is rising but at the same time, infections are prevalent and resources are limited. In this review, we summarize the efficacy and safety profile of biologics and small molecule drugs and discuss the challenges in the management of PIBD, especially in the developing world, and future directions.

Regulatory guidance for Crohn's disease trials recommends coprimary efficacy end points that evaluate both symptoms and mucosal inflammation. We aimed to characterize the operating properties of commonly used disease activity assessments alone and in combination.

Endoscopic and clinical data were available for 129 participants from the Study of Biologic and Immunomodulator Naïve Patients in Crohn's Disease trial. Readers scored the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease and the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity using standardized conventions. Index reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients. Index responsiveness was assessed using standardized effect sizes based upon treatment assignment. Outcomes were evaluated for optimal sensitivity to treatment effect.

Substantial inter-rater reliability was observed when the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease and Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity were used as continuous measures (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.73; and 0.62 95% CI, 0.36-0.77) compared with moderate reliability when dichotomized (0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.65; and 0.51; 95% CI, 0.00-0.78). The Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease, Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity, patient-reported outcome-2, and Crohn's Disease Activity Index were similarly responsive (standardized effect size, 0.43, 95% CI, 0.05-0.81; 0.38, 95% CI, 0.0-0.76; 0.53, 95% CI, 0.15-0.91). A composite outcome of Crohn's Disease Activity Index score <150 and Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity score <6 was most sensitive to treatment effect (28.9%; 95% CI, 11.0%-46.8%; P = .003).

Endoscopic indices were more reliable as continuous measures. Composite outcomes including endoscopy improved sensitivity to treatment effect.

The impact of prophylactic medication following ileocecal resection (ICR) for Crohn's disease (CD) merits further elucidation. Prophylactic medication following ileocecal resection (ICR) is recommended in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), particularly in patients at increased risk of recurrence, but the impact on long-term outcomes needs to be further elucidated.

To evaluate the effect of postoperative prophylactic medication on long-term prognosis.

A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with CD who underwent primary ICR between 2000-2020 in the Netherlands. Patients were divided into two groups: postoperative prophylactic medication [< 12 weeks following ICR] versus no postoperative prophylactic medication. Outcomes were surgical recurrence [re-resection for CD], severe endoscopic recurrence [modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) ≥ i3] and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence [mRS ≥ i2b or radiologic recurrence]. Inverse probability of treatment weighting [IPTW] method was used to adjust for confounding and selection bias. Survival and association between postoperative prophylactic medication and outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models.

807 patients underwent ICR (median follow-up 5.0 years); 36% received postoperative prophylactic medication. Surgical, severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence rates were significantly lower in those who received prophylactic medication (p = 0.01; p < 0.01; p < 0.01). IPTW analysis showed a lower risk of severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence in patients treated with postoperative prophylactic medication (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.97; aOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.91), which also was identified as a protective factor for severe endoscopic (aHR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.6) and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence (aHR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7) in multivariable analysis after correction for confounding factors. A comparable protective effect of postoperative prophylactic medication was sustained in patients who underwent ileocolonoscopy <1 year postoperatively and who underwent surgery on or after 2010.

Prophylactic medication following primary ICR significantly reduces long-term recurrence rates in CD and was identified as a protective factor for severe endoscopic and endoscopic or radiologic recurrence.

In endoscopy, accurately diagnosing small intestinal ulcers presents significant challenges due to the complex morphology, varying number, and extensive distribution of the lesions, which contribute to a reduced accuracy in immediate diagnosis. The definitive diagnosis typically relies on pathological analysis, laboratory investigations, and prolonged follow-up, often leading to diagnostic delays. This study introduces the Cascade-E-Yolov5s network, designed to improve the efficiency and accuracy of immediate ulcer diagnosis by intelligently identifying ulcer subtypes. The Cascade-E-Yolov5s network integrates EfficientNet for the classification of ulcer lesion images and SimAM-Yolov5s for detecting lesions on these classified images. In the SimAM-Yolov5s component, EfficientNet replaces the traditional backbone structure of Yolov5s, and enhancements such as the SIoU loss function and a simple, parameter-free attention module are incorporated to optimize model performance. The study utilized a dataset comprising 4909 ulcer images from 684 patients at Shanghai Changhai Hospital, encompassing four ulcer types: cryptogenic multifocal ulcerous stenosing enteritis, non-specific ulcer, small intestinal tuberculosis, and Crohn's disease. The experimental findings indicate that Cascade-E-Yolov5s surpasses conventional detection networks, achieving an average detection precision of 86.46% and a mean average precision at the IoU of 0.5 (mAP@0.5) of 82.20%. This model notably enhances the detection efficiency of small intestinal ulcer subtypes, thereby assisting clinicians in making more precise immediate diagnoses.

Crohn's disease, a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, necessitates a comprehensive treatment approach tailored to the individual's specific disease characteristics and overall health. Treatment strategies aim to induce and maintain remission, alleviate symptoms, normalize biomarkers, improve the endoscopic appearance of the intestine, and improve quality of life. Key therapeutic options include pharmacotherapy, featuring corticosteroids, immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies, and more recently Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) which target different mechanisms of inflammation. Additionally, surgical interventions may be required for complications or when medical therapy fails. The recent introduction of novel therapies, such as the interleukin-23 (IL-23) anti-p19 inhibitor risankizumab and the selective JAKi upadacitinib, raises pertinent questions regarding the optimal sequencing of advanced therapeutic options. This review evaluates current data to address these questions and reflects the author's perspectives based on a presentation at the 27th Annual University of Manitoba Key Topics in Gastroenterology 2024.

Refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains challenging despite the availability of various biologics. Advanced combination therapy (ACT) with biologics and Upadacitinib (UPA), a rapid-onset oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor, has shown promise in managing refractory IBD. However, its use in Asia has not been explored. This study aims to fill that gap by providing data from Taiwan.

This retrospective study included refractory IBD patients who received ACT with biologics and UPA, followed up at the Chang Gung Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center from July 2020 to August 2024. Patients were assessed for clinical response and remission at weeks 4, 12, and 24. Safety profiles were monitored throughout the follow-up period to evaluate the risk of adverse events.

Sixteen refractory IBD patients were enrolled. The median disease duration was 4.5 years [IQR 2.25-9.50]. The most common regimen was Ustekinumab plus UPA (63%). Clinical response rates at weeks 4, 12, and 24 were 88%, 83%, and 100%, respectively, while remission rates were 31%, 50%, and 80%. One patient (6.25%) experienced a minor adverse event (acne), with no major events like herpes zoster reactivation or major cardiac complications.

This is the first study in Asia to demonstrate that UPA-based ACT is both effective and safe in treating refractory IBD. However, the limitations of this retrospective, single-center study with a relatively small sample size highlight the need for future larger-scale, multi-center prospective studies to confirm these findings, identify predictors of treatment response, and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Immunogenicity of biologic agents for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a critical issue, especially for tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, where anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) significantly impact drug clearance, efficacy, and safety. Studies have demonstrated that non-TNF biologics tend to have lower susceptibility to immunogenicity, potentially offering advantages, especially in long-term management. Understanding these differences is important for optimizing IBD treatment outcomes.

This review examines immunogenicity associated with different classes and individual biologic agents used in IBD; including TNF inhibitors and biologics targeting integrins and interleukins. We discuss key factors influencing ADAs formation, including drug structure, route of administration, and patient-specific factors. The literature reviewed includes recent clinical studies and long-term trials focusing on strategies to reduce immunogenicity such as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and advanced combination.

While newer biologics demonstrate lower immunogenicity compared to anti-TNF agents, challenges remain in management to overcome existing ADAs responses while advances in genetic profiling, point-of-care TDM, and combination therapies offer promising pathways to reduce immunogenicity and enhance treatment durability. Continued research and innovation in biologic delivery methods, such as oral and subcutaneous formulations, will be critical in the next decade to further mitigate immunogenic risks and improve patient outcomes.

Advanced therapies (ADT) that encompass biological agents and small molecules have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), broadening the spectrum of available treatment options. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve satisfactory responses, necessitating surgical intervention. Treatment objectives have evolved beyond clinical remission, reduction of inflammation, and mucosal healing, shifting focus toward enhancing the quality of life, acknowledging the profound impact of IBD on physical and mental well-being.

This comprehensive review describes the current landscape of ADT for IBD, including dual biologic therapy (DBT), which involves the combination of two biologics or a single biologic with a small-molecule compound, as well as considerations surrounding the discontinuation of biologics.

ADT is the standard treatment for moderate to severe IBD, while DBT appears promising for specific subsets of patients, including those with refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. However, these approaches may increase the risk of adverse effects, including malignancy. To optimize individualized treatment strategies in patients with refractory IBD, further trials are needed to refine ADT's predictive value, establish DBT's safety and indications, define biologic discontinuation criteria, and evaluate emerging biomarkers, artificial intelligence, and bowel ultrasound in patient management.

Endoscopic healing (EH) is a key therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD). Proximal small bowel (SB) lesions in patients with CD are associated with a significant risk of strictures and bowel resection. Assessing SB in patients with CD is necessary because of its significant therapeutic implications. The advent of biologic therapies, including infliximab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, has significantly altered CD treatment. However, data on the efficacy of biologics in achieving EH, specifically in the proximal SB of patients with CD, remain limited.

To assess the effectiveness of biologics for EH in patients with jejunal and/or proximal ileal CD.

Between 2017 and 2023, we retrospectively included 110 consecutive patients with isolated proximal SB CD, identified through baseline balloon-assisted enteroscopy. These patients completed 1-year of treatment with infliximab, ustekinumab, or vedolizumab, and underwent a second balloon-assisted enteroscopy at 1 year. Complete EH was defined as a modified Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) of < 3, while EH of the jejunum and proximal ileum was defined as a segmental modified SES-CD of 0.

In total, 64 patients were treated with infliximab, 28 with ustekinumab, and 18 with vedolizumab. The complete EH rate at 1 year was 20.9% (23/110), with 29.6% (19/64) for infliximab, 10.7% (3/28) for ustekinumab, and 5.5% (1/18) for vedolizumab. The median modified SES-CD significantly decreased compared to baseline [5 (2-8) vs 8 (6-9), P < 0.001]. The jejunal and proximal ileal EH rates at 1 year were 30.8% (12/39) and 15.5% (16/103), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that stricturing or penetrating disease [odds ratio (OR) = 0.261, 95%CI: 0.087-0.778, P = 0.016], prior exposure to biologics (OR = 0.080, 95%CI: 0.010-0.674, P = 0.020), and moderate-to-severe endoscopic disease (OR = 0.277, 95%CI: 0.093-0.829, P = 0.022) were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving EH at 1 year.

Only 20.9% of patients with isolated proximal SB CD achieved complete EH after 1 year of biologic therapy.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) comprise a group of chronic gastrointestinal disorders characterized by periods of relapse and remission. The mainstay of treatment is medical, involving medications such as steroids, immune modulators, monoclonal antibodies (categorized as biologics), and small molecules. These medications can provide profound therapeutic benefits, but they can also cause severe and irreversible toxicities. Clinicians may utilize laboratory tests in the diagnosis and management of IBD including assessment of disease activity, monitoring medication response or toxicity, surveillance of infectious complications, and detection of nutritional deficiencies. Routine use of laboratory tests may help clinicians avoid reactivation of life-threatening infections such as tuberculosis or hepatitis B virus upon initiation of immune suppressive therapy. They can also be used to detect vitamin deficiencies such as B12 deficiency, which has the potential to cause irreversible neurologic damage. While some laboratory tests constitute established practices, the utility of newer tests such therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the era of biologics is an evolving topic. Although clinical assessment with imaging, endoscopic, and histopathological examination is standard practice, laboratory tests serve as valuable adjuncts. We aim to explore the broad range of laboratory tests available to clinicians and to summarize their application in the current management of IBD in daily clinical practice, with special attention to updates in therapeutic drug monitoring.

The dysregulation of immune responses are responsible for the development of several diseases, such as allergic and autoimmune diseases. The medications used to treat these conditions have numerous side effects, creating the need for new drugs. Physalins are natural compounds with various pharmacological activities already described. Here, we aimed to investigate the immunomodulatory effects of physalin F in mouse splenocytes and in a delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) model. In a cytotoxicity assay, physalin F had low cytotoxicity to mouse splenocytes in concentrations equal to or below 2 µM. It significantly inhibited lymphocyte proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner and reduced the production of cytokines, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-γ, in activated splenocytes. The combined therapy of physalin F with dexamethasone was investigated in vitro, showing a synergistic action of the two compounds. Mechanistically, physalin F reduced calcineurin activity in concanavalin A-stimulated splenocyte cultures. Finally, in vivo, the intraperitoneal administration of physalin F in a DTH model reduced paw edema induced by bovine serum albumin immunization. Our results demonstrate the potential of physalin F as an immunosuppressive agent, to be used alone or in combination with glucocorticoids.

This article comments on the letter by Lowell et al, which addresses the next generation of combination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). As the understanding of the pathogenesis of IBD continues to improve, treatment strategies are evolving rapidly. The letter examines the current status and future directions of combination therapy for IBD, focusing on approaches that combine biologics with immunomodulators and the emerging dual-biologic therapy (DBT). The traditional combination of biologics and immunomodulators has demonstrated preliminary efficacy by enhancing the effects of biologics through immunomodulation. However, concerns regarding long-term safety warrant careful evaluation. Recent trials, including DUET-Crohn's disease and DUET-ulcerative colitis, have shown promising potential for the broader adoption of DBT. Nevertheless, comprehensive data on efficacy and safety, as well as the effective integration of supportive treatments, remain essential to establish new paradigms for the next generation of IBD care.

Background: Although it is generally believed that infliximab dose optimization in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with low serum infliximab concentration at trough results in increased treatment persistence, empirical data to support this notion are lacking. This study evaluated the association of infliximab therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and TDM-associated dose optimization with persistence in real-world practice. Methods: Data from adults with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who participated in a national patient support program (PSP) in Canada were analyzed. Participants who had a first TDM evaluation (with a recorded infliximab trough concentration) in the maintenance phase of treatment were assessed (excluding those who underwent prior dose optimization). Persistence was evaluated using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In the overall population of patients with CD or UC, TDM was not associated with longer persistence (n = 13,203). In patients with no prior dose optimization (n = 2729) who had a serum infliximab concentration of < 3 μg/mL, dose optimization within 9 weeks of TDM was associated with significantly longer persistence (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.50 for CD [n = 711] and HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.43 for UC [n = 501]). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results when using a threshold concentration of < 5 μg/mL. In an analysis excluding patients who received no further treatment after TDM, the association between dose optimization and longer persistence was not confirmed in patients with CD, and mostly confirmed in patients with UC at a threshold concentration of < 3 μg/mL. Conclusion: TDM-associated dose optimization in patients with UC with low serum infliximab concentrations was associated with longer persistence. This association was not confirmed in patients with CD. This study demonstrated that real-world data from a PSP-generated cohort can be evaluated to inform clinical practice and that this approach may be complementary to other types of cohort studies.

Moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) treatment was revolutionized by introducing anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, which is still a cornerstone of the treatment. It is speculated that adipose tissue may influence treatment response, especially for non-weight-adjusted agents.

Research comparing the effectiveness of anti-TNFs between eutrophic and overweight patients may impact clinical management. We performed a retrospective analysis of a CD patient database. The primary endpoint was loss of response (LOR) after 54 weeks with infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) in patients with body mass index (BMI) <25 and ≥25. Secondary endpoints were steroid-free remission and endoscopic remission rate.

One hundred seventy-nine CD patients were evaluated; 48.9% had LOR after 54 weeks of anti-TNF therapy. Fifty-four patients had a BMI ≥25, with 51 receiving IFX and 28 receiving ADA. The univariate analysis identified LOR in 56.5% of the patients with IFX and 34.9% in the ADA group (p=0.009). In the 54-week multivariate analysis, loss of response in the IFX group with BMI ≥25 had a relative risk of 1.04 [CI 0.60-1.80 (p=0.891)] compared to patients with BMI <25. Being overweight or obese led to a risk of 1.50 for LOR for ADA at 54-week time point [CI 0.60-3.74 (p=0.0387)]. Clinical remission at 54 weeks was similar between BMI groups.

Being overweight did not influence the LOR to treatment when IFX and ADA were compared, nor did it affect clinical and endoscopic remission after 54 weeks.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are chronic and complex autoimmune conditions. Despite the advancements in biologics and small molecules, the therapeutic ceiling persists, posing significant treatment challenges and contributing to the concept of difficult-to-treat IBD. Dual-targeted therapy (DTT), combining two biologic agents or biologics with small molecules, has emerged as a novel approach to address this unmet need by targeting multiple inflammatory pathways simultaneously. Evidence suggests that DTT holds promise in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes, especially in patients with refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. Safety data, while consistent with monotherapy profiles, highlight the importance of vigilant monitoring for infections and other adverse events. Continued research and high-quality trials are crucial to defining optimal DTT regimens and broadening its clinical applicability. This review explores the efficacy and safety of DTT in IBD, reporting data from clinical trials, systematic reviews, and real-world studies.

A growing number of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis have disease that is refractory to multiple advanced therapies, have undergone multiple surgeries, and require further treatment options. For this reason, there has been increasing use of multiple simultaneous advanced targeted therapies. Although the knowledge on combined advanced targeted therapy (CATT) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been largely limited to observational data and early-phase randomized controlled trials, combination of therapies is commonplace in many other diseases. This review discusses conceptual frameworks of CATT in IBD, provides context of combined therapies in other diseases, provides current evidence for CATT in IBD, and projects future applications and positioning of CATT using existing, novel, and orthogonal mechanisms of action. CATT aims to address the need to overcome low efficacy rates and frequent loss of response of current individual therapies. Both treatment exposure and disease duration are major determinants of response to therapy. Identification of safe and effective CATT may impact positioning of this strategy to apply to a broader IBD population.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is a group of chronic, immune-mediated disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that present substantial clinical challenges owing to their complex pathophysiology and tendency to relapse. A treat-to-target approach is recommended, involving iterative treatment adjustments to achieve clinical response, reduce inflammatory markers and achieve long-term goals such as mucosal healing. Lifelong medication is often necessary to manage the disease, maintain remission and prevent complications. The therapeutic landscape for IBD has evolved substantially; however, a ceiling on therapeutic efficacy remains and surgery is sometimes required (owing to uncontrolled disease activity or complications). Effective IBD management involves comprehensive care, including medication adherence and a collaborative clinician-patient relationship. This Review discusses current therapeutic options for IBD, detailing mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety profiles and guidelines for use of each drug class. We also explore emerging therapies and the role of surgery. Additionally, the importance of a multidisciplinary team and personalized care in managing IBD is emphasized, advocating for patient empowerment and involvement in treatment decisions. By synthesizing current knowledge and emerging trends, this Review aims to equip healthcare professionals with a thorough understanding of therapeutic options for IBD, enhancing informed, evidence-based decisions in clinical practice.

Crohn's disease (CD) causes gastrointestinal symptoms (i.e., diarrhea and abdominal pain), systemic symptoms (i.e., fatigue, anemia, weight loss, and fever), and perianal fistulas that produce anal pain. Because of the frequent occurrence of diarrhea and ulcers in the rectum, CD is often exacerbated by perianal abscesses and/or fistulas. Perianal fistulizing CD (PFCD) has an unknown etiology and recurring symptoms such as pain and discharge, which seriously affects the patient's quality of life (QOL). In the past, radical surgery was performed for PFCD, but due to the risk of anal sphincter impairment, conservative therapy using antibiotics and immunosuppressive medications is currently the first treatment option. PFCD management has greatly improved with the use of biologics such as the antitumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) antibodies infliximab and adalimumab. In this review, the results of the administration of anti-TNF-α (certolizumab pegol), anti-interleukin-12/23 (ustekinumab), and anti-α4β7 integrin antibodies (vedolizumab) were evaluated. Our investigation showed that these medications may be effective for maintenance therapy to prevent the recurrence of anal fistulas. In addition to biologics, molecular target drugs and even regenerative medicine using mesenchymal stem cells have been introduced to further expand the treatment options for consideration by medical personnel. We herein discuss the management of PFCD by focusing on studies conducted in the United States and Europe where researchers used recommended guidelines and consensus statements to evaluate the efficacy of each medication and published their findings in peer-reviewed journals.

Background/Objectives: Despite the increasing number of available medications, a significant proportion of IBD patients fail to achieve the current therapeutic targets. Uncontrolled IBD has a significant impact on patients' quality of life and on overall costs for the healthcare system. Given the complex pathophysiology of IBD, Combined Advanced Targeted Therapy (CATT), involving the combination of biologics/small molecules, appears to have biological plausibility and is gaining increasing interest. The aim of this narrative review is to provide the current evidence regarding CATT in IBD and propose future developments in this field. Methods: Relevant literature evidence was searched with pertinent MeSH terms in the most important database. Results: Available evidence of CATT in IBD provides encouraging results in terms of efficacy and effectiveness, with an acceptable safety profile. CATT may represent a therapeutic solution for patients with "difficult-to-treat" IBD or with concomitant immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. However, current data are restricted by an overall low level of evidence and by the short follow-up. Conclusions: There are no data concluding the superiority of one combination therapy over another. Various therapeutic schemes could be applied in the near future. Further studies are needed to provide recommendations and integrate this therapeutic strategy into everyday clinical practice.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition requiring continuous treatment and monitoring. There is limited pharmacokinetic data on vedolizumab during maintenance therapy and the effect of thiopurines on vedolizumab trough concentrations is unknown.

To investigate the exposure-response relationship of vedolizumab and the impact of thiopurine withdrawal in UC patients who have achieved sustained clinical and endoscopic remission during maintenance therapy.

This is a post-hoc analysis of prospective randomized clinical trial (VIEWS) involving UC patients across 8 centers in Australia from 2018 to 2022. Patients in clinical and endoscopic remission were randomized to continue or withdraw thiopurine while receiving vedolizumab. We evaluated vedolizumab serum trough concentrations, presence of anti-vedolizumab antibodies, and clinical outcomes over 48 weeks to assess exposure-response association and impact of thiopurine withdrawal.

There were 62 UC participants with mean age of 43.4 years and 42% were females. All participants received vedolizumab as maintenance therapy with 67.7% withdrew thiopurine. Vedolizumab serum trough concentrations remained stable over 48 weeks regardless of thiopurine use, with no anti-vedolizumab antibodies detected. Patients with clinical remission had higher trough concentrations at week 48. In quartile analysis, a threshold of > 11.3 μg/mL was associated with sustained clinical remission, showing a sensitivity of 82.4%, specificity of 60.0%, and an area of receiver operating characteristic of 0.71 (95%CI: 0.49-0.93). Patients discontinuing thiopurine required higher vedolizumab concentrations for achieving remission.

A positive exposure-response relationship between vedolizumab trough concentrations and UC outcomes suggests that monitoring drug levels may be beneficial. While thiopurine did not influence vedolizumab levels, its withdrawal may necessitate higher vedolizumab trough concentrations to maintain remission.

Background/Objectives: The introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) agents, particularly infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA), has significantly expanded the therapeutic arsenal for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While these biologics have demonstrated substantial efficacy, they are associated with a spectrum of potential adverse events (AEs). This study aims to evaluate and document these AEs to facilitate optimal patient selection and monitoring strategies of patients undergoing these therapies. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study examined pediatric IBD patients receiving anti-TNF-α therapy at the "Grigore Alexandrescu" Emergency Hospital for Children in Bucharest, Romania, from January 2015 to October 2024. AEs were categorized into non-infectious complications (acute infusion reactions, anti-drug antibody formation), dermatological effects (erythema nodosum, vasculitis), neurological effects (Guillain-Barré syndrome), and infections. AEs were analyzed in relation to the specific anti-TNF-α agent administered and comprehensively characterized. Results: Of 40 patients enrolled, 22 (55%) had Crohn's disease (CD). The median (IQR) age at diagnosis was 14.8 years [10.8-15.9]. IFX was used in 34 (85%) patients while 6 (15%) patients received either ADA or IFX/ADA sequential therapy. Twenty-seven AEs were documented in 19 (47.5%) patients, the most prevalent being antidrug antibody formation (44.4%), infections (22.2%), and acute infusion reactions (22.2%). All ADA-exposed patients experienced at least one AE, compared to 41.2% (n = 14) patients treated with IFX, p = 0.01. Conclusions: AEs were observed in approximately half of the study cohort, with anti-drug antibody formation emerging as the most frequent complication. ADA therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of AEs compared to IFX. These findings underscore the critical importance of vigilant monitoring for patients undergoing anti-TNF-α therapy in pediatric IBD management.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies are commonly prescribed treatments for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Many patients treated with anti-TNF therapy eventually develop anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Understanding the factors associated with immunogenicity in anti-TNF-treated patients can help guide treatment. The Humira SERENE studies were Phase 3 trials investigating adalimumab induction regimens in CD and UC patients.

We imputed alleles for 7 HLA genes in 1100 patients from the SERENE CD and SERENE UC trials. We then tested these alleles for association with time to immunogenicity. Subsequently, we tested loci significantly associated with immunogenicity for their association with patients who had consistently low drug serum concentrations.

This study replicated the association of HLA-DQA1*05 with time to immunogenicity (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42, p = 2.22E-06). Specifically, HLA-DQA1*05:05 was strongly associated (HR 1.76, p = 2.02E-10) and we detected a novel association represented by HLA-DRB1*01:02 (HR 3.16, p = 2.92E-07). Carriage of HLA-DQA1*05:05 and HLA-DRB1*01:02 was associated with patients who experienced consistently low adalimumab trough concentrations (HLA-DQA1*05:05: odds ratio [OR] 1.98, p = 0.0049; HLA DRB1*01:02: OR 7.06, p = 7.44E-05).

We found a significant association between alleles at genes in the human HLA locus and the formation of adalimumab immunogenicity and low adalimumab drug serum concentrations in large clinical studies of CD and UC patients. This work extends previous findings in CD to UC and directly shows a genetic association in patients with low drug concentrations. This work builds on existing literature to suggest that genetic screening could be a useful tool for clinicians concerned with patient anti-TNF immunogenicity.

SERENE CD (NCT02065570), SERENE UC (NCT02065622).

In contrast to previous network meta-analysis using classical frequentist methods, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of six frequently-used biologics through a Bayesian method.

Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, comparing Infliximab, Adalimumab, Certolizumab pegol, Ustekinumab, Risankizumab, or Vedolizumab, relative to placebo or an active comparator for induction of clinical response (two different definitions) and maintenance of clinical remission. A random-effects model was performed with rankings according to the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability. Finally, we completed sensitivity and consistency analyses, and evaluated the certainty of evidence through GRADE working group guidance.

We identified 22 and 20 RCTs for induction and maintenance therapy, respectively. Infliximab combined with azathioprine was most effective for inducing clinical response in TNF (tumor necrosis factor) antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab (SUCRA 86.19) and Risankizumab (SUCRA 62.56) have the largest SUCRA in induction of clinical response. Risankizumab has the lowest risk of adverse events (SUCRA 84.81), serious adverse events (SUCRA 94.23), and serious infections (SUCRA 79.73) in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab rank highest for maintaining clinical remission.

This analysis suggests that Infliximab in combination with azathioprine may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy in TNF antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab and Risankizumab may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy. Risankizumab potentially has the lowest safety risk worth exploring in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab have maintenance efficacy benefits for responders to induction therapy.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=458609, Identifier CRD42023458609.

The aim was to explore factors associated with intestinal tissue levels of anti-TNF alpha (anti-TNF), anti-TNF antibodies, and cytokines in pediatric patients with Crohn Disease (CD). In a prospective exploratory study of CD patients undergoing ileocecal resection or colonoscopy between 6/2020 and 1/2023, we analysed tissue levels of anti-TNF, anti-TNF antibodies, and cytokines (TNF-α, IL-17, IL-1β, IFN-γ) from intestinal biopsies. Mixed-effects regression models, adjusted for potential confounders, were used. Data from 27 CD patients (18 females, 66.7%) were analysed. Fourteen (52%) received adalimumab (ADA) and thirteen received infliximab (IFX), with a median therapy duration of 17 (IQR 4.5-41.5) months. Higher levels of free anti-TNF were found in macroscopically inflamed tissue compared to non-inflamed tissue (β = 3.42, 95% CI 1.05-6.10). No significant association was found between serum and tissue anti-TNF levels (β= -0.06, 95% CI - 0.70-0.58). Patients treated longer with anti-TNF had increased IL-17 levels (β = 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.33), independent of disease duration and age. IFN-γ levels were linked with both follow-up duration and anti-TNF length. Our study shows significantly higher free drug levels in inflamed tissue. Long-term anti-TNF treatment has been linked to increased IL-17 levels, suggesting a possible impact on the cytokine response pathway. We did not observe a relationship between serum and tissue anti-TNF levels.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), primarily encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, represent a challenging spectrum of disorders with a multifaceted pathogenesis. Despite the array of available treatments, a demand for novel therapeutic options persists to achieve remission in a broader patient population. Research findings indicate that relying solely on a single biologic drug may limit future treatment choices, prompting consideration for a more suitable shift from step-up to top-down strategies in certain cases. In the backdrop of advancing drug development, reimagining the application of existing therapies presents a promising avenue. Among these innovative approaches is combination therapy. This review explores the outcomes of recent randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and case studies, focusing on dual biologic therapy. It underscores the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining two biologic drugs in IBD, providing insights into a potentially impactful treatment strategy.

Despite advancements in the therapeutic armamentarium for Crohn's disease (CD), biologic and small molecule monotherapies are associated with sub-optimal response and remission rates. Utilizing dual biologic therapy (DBT) holds the potential to increase efficacy in the treatment of refractory or partially responsive CD. Evidence pertaining to this strategy remains limited.

We retrospectively examined refractory CD patients treated with a combination of ustekinumab and vedolizumab. Outcomes to DBT at week (wk) 52 were compared to monotherapy. The primary outcome constituted corticosteroid-free remission. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, infections, hospitalizations, surgeries, treatment persistence, and disease clearance.

Sixteen of 21 active refractory CD patients (76%) on DBT achieved disease remission at wk 52. Mucosal healing was observed in 38% (n = 6), biochemical remission in 25% (n = 4), and both clinical and biochemical remission in 38% (n = 6). Of these patients, 50% (n = 8) achieved corticosteroid-free remission. Three patients (37.5%) with corticosteroid-free remission achieved complete disease clearance. Paired median fecal calprotectin decreased from 508 to 118 µg/g (P < .0001). Paired C-reactive protein median decreased from 1.04 to 0.50 mg/dL (P < .0001). Median Harvey Bradshaw Index score reduced from 7 to 2 (P = .003). Endoscopic healing was achieved with a paired simple endoscopic score for CD decrease from 6 to 3 (P = .013). Corticosteroid dependency reduced from 17 to 8 patients discontinuing altogether. Patients still requiring corticosteroids experienced a decrease in average daily dose from 9 to 6 mg (P = .045). At wk 52, 5 patients (24%) did not meet the criteria for remission with 4 requiring CD-related surgical intervention. Mean CD-related hospitalizations reduced from 2.95 ± 2.33 to 0.52 ± 1.12 (P < .001) and surgeries from 1.76 ± 1.3 to 0.14 ± 0.4 (P < .001). Three infections with 1 requiring hospitalization and 1 report of headache were noted. Two patients discontinued DBT.

Dual biologic therapy with ustekinumab and vedolizumab is a safe and effective strategy to induce disease remission in refractory CD. Large-scale studies are necessary to validate findings in a prospective setting.

Over the past decades, an increased importance has been given to gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy in the management of children with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), considering that mucosal healing has been recognized as the optimal endpoint in the treat-to-target paradigm. The recent advances in technology and anesthesia have facilitated the comprehensive evaluation of the GI tract. In this review, we will discuss the role of ileocolonoscopy, upper GI endoscopy, and device-assisted enteroscopy in the work-up and management of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis, with particular attention on non-invasive endoscopic techniques, such as wireless capsule endoscopy. We will also analyze the most commonly used endoscopic scoring systems, including small bowel scoring systems and endoscopic recurrence grading of neo-terminal ileum CD. Moreover, we will focus on the endoscopic management of complications, such as strictures, that commonly require surgery. Lastly, we will discuss cancer surveillance in children with IBD, with particular consideration of the role of high-definition endoscopic equipment and chromoendoscopy in dysplasia detection rates.

The treatment options for chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have been greatly expanded due to a better understanding of the underlying pathogenesis. A total of five classes of advanced treatment are available.

A practical overview of advanced treatment of IBD.

Narrative review.

Advanced treatments are indicated for moderate to severe IBD. A timely use is recommended to achieve better response rates and to avoid irreversible bowel damage. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have a broad efficacy, also for extraintestinal disease manifestations. The risk of reactivation of varicella zoster virus is increased with JAK inhibitors. In high-risk patients and an age >65 years there is possibly a moderately elevated cardiovascular risk and neoplastic side effects. The integrin alpha4beta7 inhibitor vedolizumab and the interleukin (IL) 12 and 23 inhibitor ustekinumab have very good safety profiles. Selective IL-23 inhibitors are sometimes superior to ustekinumab with comparable safety profiles with respect to efficacy. The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators ozanimod and etrasimod are approved for oral treatment of ulcerative colitis. The treatment success of the medications remains still limited and a minority of patients will not respond to every individual treatment. Thus, sequential administration of several treatments is often needed. Due to the lack of comparative studies, the personalized choice, sequence and decision for treatments are usually based on personal experience and should take patient preferences, efficacy, safety and individual patient profiles into consideration.

The introduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The subsequent introduction of both anti-integrins and cytokine blockers has since expanded the biologic armamentarium. However, immunogenicity, defined as the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to the prescribed biopharmaceutical, means a significant fraction of patients exposed to biologic agents will experience a secondary loss of response to one or more of the drugs. In clinical settings, immunogenicity may be caused by several factors, both patient related (e.g., underlying chronic disease, systemic immune burden, including previous biologic therapy failure, and [epi]genetic background) and treatment related (e.g., dose and administration regimens, drug physical structure, photostability, temperature, and agitation). Here, we outline these elements in detail to enhance biopharmaceutical delivery and therapy for patients with IBD. Moreover, concurrent immunomodulator medication may reduce the risks of ADA generation, especially when using the chimeric drug infliximab. Summarizing the latest developments and knowledge in the field, this review aims to provide strategies to prevent ADA production and information on managing non-responsiveness or loss of response to biologics. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of ADAs and the critical factors influencing the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals may lead to improved health outcomes in the IBD community that may benefit both the individual patient and society through lower healthcare expenses.

A significant proportion of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients fail to respond to advanced therapies. Combining advanced therapies may improve treatment outcome. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, adverse events, and costs associated with combining advanced therapies in IBD patients.

Combination advanced therapy was defined as the concurrent use of two biological agents or one biological agent with a small molecule therapy. Clinical data, including disease characteristics, treatment regimens, and adverse events, were collected from electronic patient records. Clinical response rates, biochemical markers, and treatment costs were evaluated.

The study included 109 IBD patients receiving combination advanced therapies from 9 academic centers in Ireland. Corticosteroid-free clinical response rates at 12 weeks and 52 weeks were 39 % and 38 %, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 26 % of therapeutic trials, with disease-related events being the most common. Notably, there were 3 cases of non-melanomatous skin cancer and 10 infectious complications. The annual cost of maintenance therapy for combination advanced therapies ranged from €17,560 to €30,724 per patient.

Combination advanced therapies demonstrated effectiveness and acceptable safety profiles in a cohort of treatment-refractory IBD patients. Further large, prospective trials are required to definitively evaluate the role of combination advanced therapies in IBD.