Published online Mar 20, 2024. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i1.88541
Peer-review started: September 27, 2023
First decision: January 2, 2024
Revised: January 8, 2024
Accepted: February 2, 2024
Article in press: February 2, 2024
Published online: March 20, 2024
Processing time: 173 Days and 22.3 Hours
The Erbil Cardiac Center studied 96 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Key factors influencing survival rates included clinical features, procedure details, and the time from symptom onset to hospital arrival. Prompt intervention significantly improved outcomes. Understanding these factors can enable better treatment strategies and public awareness campaigns, ultimately reducing mortality.
This study focuses on STEMI treatment, PPCI efficacy, and identifying mortality predictors. Key problems include identifying mortality predictors and determining onset-to-arrival time's role. Resolving these issues could enhance STEMI treatment, reduce time-to-treatment, and guide future STEMI and PPCI research endeavors, thereby improving patient outcomes and advancing cardiology and emergency medicine fields.
This STEMI study aspired to examine patient mortality rates, identify mortality predictors, and assess onset-to-door time impact. It successfully revealed specific mortality rates and predictors, and it confirmed the importance of prompt intervention. These findings provide a benchmark for treatment strategies, underscore the value of personalizing care, and inspire research on reducing delays and further exploring mortality predictors.
The study aimed to assess STEMI patient mortality rates, identify in-hospital mortality predictors, and uncover the impact of onset-to-hospital time using data analysis methods for a detailed evaluation. These objectives' fulfilment generates mortality benchmarks, guides new treatments, informs public health policies, and catalyzes future research, thereby contributing novel insights into STEMI patient care.
This study assessed STEMI patients, identifying mortality rates, mortality predictors, and onset-to-door time's significance on prognosis. The findings highlight early intervention importance, clarify mortality predictors, and stimulate personalized treatment plans to enhance PPCI effectiveness. Yet, underlying causes for hospital arrival delays, underlying processes of mortality predictors, and their generality across demographics need additional research.
The study confirms the “time is muscle” theory, emphasizing swift intervention in STEMI cases, and broadens knowledge by identifying multiple mortality predictors. Though it proposes no new theories, methods, or phenomena, its insights improve our understanding of STEMI management. These findings don't imply confirmed hypotheses but provide a basis for future treatments and hypotheses in clinical practice.
Future research should focus on reducing onset-to-door time by understanding delay causes, further exploring identified mortality predictors, verifying the study's findings in larger, diverse populations, and assessing novel STEMI treatments. Investigations may employ methods such as comprehensive data analysis, clinical trials, and patient education programs for these research directions.