Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Crit Care Med. Jul 9, 2021; 10(4): 120-131
Published online Jul 9, 2021. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i4.120
Published online Jul 9, 2021. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i4.120
Emergency service results of central venous catheters: Single center, 1042 patients, 10-year experience
Abuzer Coskun, Sakir Ömür Hıncal, Emergency Medicine Clinic, SBU Istanbul Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey
Sevki Hakan Eren, Department of Emergency, Gaziantep University Medical Faculty, Gaziantep 27410, Turkey
Author contributions: Coskun A and Eren SH contributed to study design, concept, writing the manuscript, and revising the final form; Coskun A and Hıncal SÖ contributed to data collection and manuscript revision; all authors contributed to writing and discussion management; all authors contributed to data management and manuscript revision, data collection, interpretation of data, and revising of the manuscript; Coskun A contributed to data collection and revision; Hıncal SÖ contributed to data collection and statistical analysis; Eren SH contributed to critical revision; Coskun A suggested the idea, as a chair of the department provided general support and substantial contribution to concept and design, and acquisition of data; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: Ethical approval was obtained from the Local Ethics Committee of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Medicine with the date of 04/12/2012 and the decision number of 08/12/2012.
Informed consent statement: The studied group as the study was retrospective in nature, and no specific intervention was described by the author’s methodology. The medical research center waived the informed consent for the project.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Abuzer Coskun, MD, Associate Professor, Doctor, Emergency Medicine Clinic, SBU Istanbul Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, Central Quarter Dr. Sadık Ahmet Street, Bağcılar, Istanbul 34200, Turkey. dr.acoskun44@hotmail.com
Received: February 26, 2021
Peer-review started: February 26, 2021
First decision: April 6, 2021
Revised: April 29, 2021
Accepted: May 20, 2021
Article in press: May 20, 2021
Published online: July 9, 2021
Peer-review started: February 26, 2021
First decision: April 6, 2021
Revised: April 29, 2021
Accepted: May 20, 2021
Article in press: May 20, 2021
Published online: July 9, 2021
Core Tip
Core Tip: A total of 1042 patients were included in this retrospective study. All central venous catheters were inserted in the emergency room. This study included 10 years of experience in our emergency department. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of hospitalization time and mortality, sensitivity was 71%, and specificity was 89% (P = 0.040). Complications in the subclavian vein and femoral vein were observed more frequently in the long term. Jugular vein catheterization can be preferred primarily due to the difficulties in application and due to the low number of complications.