Published online Jan 9, 2021. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i1.12
Peer-review started: October 11, 2020
First decision: December 1, 2020
Revised: December 9, 2020
Accepted: December 23, 2020
Article in press: December 23, 2020
Published online: January 9, 2021
Processing time: 87 Days and 3.8 Hours
Left main coronary artery (LMCA) supplies more than 80% of the left ventricle, and significant disease of this artery carries a high mortality unless intervened surgically. However, the influence of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery on patients with LMCA disease on morbidity intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes needs to be explored.
However, the impact of CABG surgery on the morbidity of the ICU population with LMCA disease is worth exploring.
We aim at determining whether LMCA disease is a definitive risk factor of prolonged ICU stay as a primary outcome and early morbidity within the ICU stay as secondary outcome.
Retrospective descriptive study with purposive sampling analyzing 399 patients who underwent isolated urgent or elective CABG. Patients were divided into 2 groups; those with LMCA disease as group 1 (75 patients) and those without LMCA disease as group 2 (324 patients). We correlated ICU outcome parameters including ICU length of stay, post-operative atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, re-exploration, perioperative myocardial infarction, post-operative bleeding in both groups.
In this study, patients with LMCA disease had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes (43.3% vs 29%, P = 0.001). However, we did not find a statistically significant difference with regards to ICU stay, or other morbidity and mortality outcome measures.
Patients with left main stem (LMS) disease showed similar outcome as those without LMS in this study. Diabetes was more prevalent in patients with LMS. We observed that patients with LMS had significantly more intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) utilization. These findings may help in guiding decision making for future practice and stratifying the patients’ care.
(1) The hospital length of stay did not differ between the studied groups with and without LMS disease; (2) The secondary outcome measures did not show any significant differences among the studied population; (3) Need for IABP support for LMS group was significantly higher than the group without LMS; and (4) Diabetes was more prevalent in patients with LMS.