Editorial
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Crit Care Med. Aug 4, 2012; 1(4): 94-101
Published online Aug 4, 2012. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v1.i4.94
Infection control in severely burned patients
Yusuf Kenan Coban
Yusuf Kenan Coban, Burn Unit, Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Turgut Ozal Medical Centre, Inonu Üniversity Medical Faculty, Malatya 44910, Turkey
Author contributions: Coban YK solely contributed to this paper.
Correspondence to: Yusuf Kenan Coban, MD, Associated Professor, Burn Unit, Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Turgut Ozal Medical Centre, Inonu Üniversity Medical Faculty, Malatya 44910, Turkey. ykenanc@yahoo.com
Telephone: +90-422-2384780 Fax: +90-422-3773000
Received: August 16, 2011
Revised: June 19, 2012
Accepted: July 12, 2012
Published online: August 4, 2012
Abstract

In the last two decades, much progress has been made in the control of burn wound infection and nasocomial infections (NI) in severely burned patients. The continiually changing epidemiology is partially related to greater understanding of and improved techniques for burn patient management as well as effective hospital infection control measures. With the advent of antimicrobial chemotherapeutic agents, infection of the wound site is now not as common as, for example, urinary and blood stream infections. Universal application of early excision of burned tissues has made a substantial improvement in the control of wound-related infections in burns. Additionally, the development of new technologies in wound care have helped to decrease morbidity and mortality in severe burn victims. Many examples can be given of the successful control of wound infection, such as the application of an appropriate antibiotic solution to invasive wound infection sites with simultaneous vacuum-assisted closure, optimal preservation of viable tissues with waterjet debridement systems, edema and exudate controlling dressings impregnated with Ag (Silvercel, Aquacell-Ag). The burned patient is at high risk for NI. Invasive interventions including intravenous and urinary chateterization, and entubation pose a further risk of NIs. The use of newly designed antimicrobial impregnated chateters or silicone devices may help the control of infection in these immunocomprimised patients. Strict infection control practices (physical isolation in a private room, use of gloves and gowns during patient contact) and appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy guided by laboratory surveillance culture as well as routine microbial burn wound culture are essential to help reduce the incidance of infections due to antibiotic resistant microorganisms.

Keywords: Severe burn injury, Infection control, Wound care, Infection control programs, Survelliance