1
|
Carreño-Hernández FL, Prieto S, Abondando D, Gaitán JA, Cárdenas-Bolívar YR, Beltrán A, Alvarado-Sánchez JI, Nates JL. Noninvasive oxygenation and ventilation strategies for viral acute respiratory failure: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2025; 14:33. [PMID: 39905526 PMCID: PMC11792210 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-025-02775-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2025] [Indexed: 02/06/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a critical shortage of respiratory ventilators, highlighting the urgent need to explore alternative treatment options for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by respiratory viruses, as an alternative to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in future pandemics. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of alternative noninvasive oxygenation and ventilation strategies in comparison to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with virus-induced acute respiratory failure (ARF). The primary outcome was the all-cause ICU mortality rate. METHODS A systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane guidelines and PRISMA reporting guidelines. The search encompassed databases such as Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase to identify relevant indexed literature. Additionally, gray literature was included by consulting regulatory agencies. The included studies compared various oxygenation and ventilatory alternatives, such as high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) with IMV. An exploratory meta-analysis was performed by calculating the risk ratio (RR) by random effects and meta-regression to explore possible sources of heterogeneity and to compare ventilatory alternatives against IMV to reduce mortality, length of stay (LOS) days in ICU, nosocomial infection, and barotrauma. RESULTS A total of forty-seven studies were included in this systematic review. NIMV had an RR of 0.70 (0.58-0.85), HFNC had an RR of 0.54 (0.42-0.71), and CPAP had an RR of 0.80 (0.71-0.90), with meta-regression models that reduced heterogeneity to 0%. For LOS days in ICU, NIMV had 0.38 (- 0.69: - 0.08) lower days and HFNC 0.29 (- 0.64: 0.06) lower days with meta-regression models that reduction heterogeneity to 0% for HFNC and 50% for NIMV. Not enough studies reported nosocomial infection or barotrauma to evaluate them in a meta-analysis. The overall quality of evidence, as assessed by GRADE evaluation, was determined to be from very low to medium certainty depending on the ventilatory strategy and outcome. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this systematic review support the use of alternative noninvasive oxygenation and ventilation strategies as viable alternatives to conventional respiratory ventilation for managing viral-induced ARF. Although it is essential to interpret these findings with caution given the overall low to medium certainty of the evidence, the integration of these modalities as part of the management strategies of these patients could help reduce the utilization of ICU beds, invasive ventilators, and costs in both developed and developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sergio Prieto
- Clinical Research, School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Daniela Abondando
- School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
| | - Jairo Alejandro Gaitán
- Clinical Research, Neurology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Jorge Iván Alvarado-Sánchez
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Intensive Care Unit, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, Houston, TX, U.S
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gashame DF, Boateng KAA, Twagirumukiza JD, de Dieu Mahoro J, Moore CC, Twagirumugabe T. Outcomes of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 at the University Teaching Hospital of Butare in Rwanda and validation of the Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) mortality risk score. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0003695. [PMID: 39652578 PMCID: PMC11627434 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/16/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
There are few data regarding clinical outcomes from COVD-19 from low-income countries (LICs) including Rwanda. Accordingly, we aimed to determine 1) outcomes of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 in Rwanda, and 2) the ability of the Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) score to predict mortality in patients with COVID-19 compared to sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and quick (qSOFA) scores. We conducted a retrospective study of patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at the University Teaching Hospital of Butare (CHUB), Rwanda, April 2021-January 2022. For each participant, we calculated UVA, SOFA, and qSOFA risk scores and determined their area under the receive operating characteristic curve (AUC). We used logistic regression to determine predictors of mortality. Of the 150 patients included, 83 (55%) were female and the median (IQR) age was 61 (43-73) years. The median (IQR) length of hospital stay was 6 (3-10) days. Respiratory failure occurred in 69 (46%) including 34 (23%) who had ARDS. The case fatality rate was 44%. Factors independently associated with mortality included acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-43.22, p = 0.016), severe COVID-19 (aOR 3.42, 95% CI 1.06-11.01, p = 0.039), and a UVA score >4 (aOR 7.15, 95% CI 1.56-32.79, p = 0.011). The AUCs for UVA, qSOFA, and SOFA scores were 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.92), 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.88), and 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.91), respectively, which were not statistically significantly different from each other. At a UVA score cut-off of 4, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for mortality were 0.58, 0.93, 0.86, and 0.74, respectively. Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in CHUB had high mortality, which was accurately predicted by the UVA score. Calculation of the UVA score in patients with COVID-19 in LICs may assist clinicians with triage and other management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dona Fabiola Gashame
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Kigali University Teaching Hospital, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Kwame A. Akuamoah Boateng
- Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgical Services, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
| | | | - Jean de Dieu Mahoro
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University Teaching Hospital of Butare, University of Rwanda, Huye, Rwanda
| | - Christopher C. Moore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Theogene Twagirumugabe
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University Teaching Hospital of Butare, University of Rwanda, Huye, Rwanda
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Briones-Claudett KH, Briones-Claudett MH, Bajaña Huilcapi CK, Tripul Villamar OE, Ochoa Vásquez R, Rivera Salas CDR, Briones-Zamora KH, Benites Solis J, Briones-Márquez DC, Freire AX, Grunauer M. Surfactant therapy using vibrating-mesh nebulizers in adults with COVID-19-induced ARDS: A case series. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2024; 12:2050313X241236313. [PMID: 38444695 PMCID: PMC10913513 DOI: 10.1177/2050313x241236313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus adult respiratory distress syndrome, characterized by decreased surfactant due to lysis of type II pneumocytes and hyaline membrane formation, contributes to severe hypoxemia. The administration of surfactant via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) may positively affect lung structure and function in this context. In this study, we report on five clinical cases, encompassing patients aged 40-60 years of both sexes, who tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 via real-time polymerase chain reaction and exhibited significant pulmonary compromise with elevated inflammatory biomarkers. These patients were treated with aerosol therapy using surfactant delivered through vibrating-mesh nebulizers alongside HFNC. Of these patients, four demonstrated positive responses to the treatment, suggesting that aerosol therapy with surfactant through vibrating-mesh nebulizers could be a viable rescue therapy in adults receiving HFNC oxygen therapy for hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Unfortunately, one patient had a negative outcome and succumbed. The findings from these cases indicate that the use of aerosol therapy with vibrating-mesh nebulizers as rescue therapy might offer an alternative approach for managing adults with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2, as evidenced by the positive outcomes in four out of the five cases presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Killen H Briones-Claudett
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Las Americas, Quito, Ecuador
- Intensive Care Unit, Ecuadorian Institute of Social Security, Babahoyo, Ecuador
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amado X Freire
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Michelle Grunauer
- School of Medicine, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aretha D, Kefala S, Nikolopoulou A, Karamouzos V, Valta M, Mplani V, Georgakopoulou A, Papamichail C, Sklavou C, Fligou F. Intubation Time, Lung Mechanics and Outcome in COVID-19 Patients Suffering Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Single-Center Study. J Clin Med Res 2024; 16:15-23. [PMID: 38327390 PMCID: PMC10846488 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background We examined the effect of intubation time and the lung mechanics on clinical outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods Based on the patient's hospital admission, intubation time was defined as early (≤ 2 days) or late (> 2 days). Patients were further divided into three groups; early (≤ 3 days), late (4 - 6 days), and very late (> 6 days) intubated. Results A total of 194 patients were included; 66.5% male, median age 65 years. Fifty-eight patients (29.9%) were intubated early and 136 (70.1%) late. Early intubated patients revealed lower mortality (44.8% vs. 72%, P < 0.001), were younger (60 vs. 67, P = 0.002), had lower sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (6 vs. 8, P = 0.002) and higher lung compliance on admission days 1, 6 and 12 (42 vs. 36, P = 0.006; 40 vs. 33, P < 0.001; and 37.5 vs. 32, P < 0.001, respectively). Older age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.15, P < 0.001), intubation time (aOR = 1.15, P = 0.004), high SOFA scores (aOR = 1.81, P < 0.001), low partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fractional inspired oxygen tension (FiO2) ratio (aOR = 0.96, P = 0.001), and low lung compliance on admission days 1 and 12 (aOR = 1.12, P = 0.012 and aOR = 1.14, P < 0.001, respectively) were associated with higher mortality. Very late and late intubated patients had higher mortality rates than patients intubated early (78.4% vs. 63.4% vs. 44.6%, respectively, P < 0.001). Conclusions Among COVID-19 intubated patients, age, late intubation, high SOFA scores, low PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and low lung compliance are associated with higher intensive care unit (ICU) mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diamanto Aretha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Sotiria Kefala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Alexandra Nikolopoulou
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Vasilios Karamouzos
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Maria Valta
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Virginia Mplani
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Alexandra Georgakopoulou
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Chrysavgi Papamichail
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Christina Sklavou
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Fotini Fligou
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nadeem R, Alheraki M, Dar F, Hussein KS, Mirza H, Aijazi I, ElZeiny MG, Awadh NA, Osman H, Albwidani R. Early Versus Late Endotracheal Intubation in Subjects with COVID-19 Pneumonia Treated with High-Flow Oxygen: A Retrospective Observational Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e47488. [PMID: 38022004 PMCID: PMC10663406 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The availability of high-flow oxygen (HFO) machines allowed patients with COVID-19 pneumonia to be comfortably treated for longer periods of time until endotracheal intubation became inevitable. Patients treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) preceded by HFO treatment may continue to progress and die. Hence there is a belief in physicians that patients treated with HFO might have delayed invasive MV. METHODS The study was conducted as a retrospective review of subjects with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the Dubai Hospital ICU. Study variables included time to intubation, duration of HFO, and cumulative duration of tachypnea and tachycardia while on HFO usage. Early intubation was defined as within 24 hours of the start of HFO, and late intubation was defined as after seven days on HFO. Groups were compared for outcome measures; mortality and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and hospital. RESULTS Clinical outcomes of mortality and LOS in ICU and hospital were not significantly different among patients intubated early versus late. Duration of tachypnea and tachycardia was also not different comparing patients intubated early versus late. CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes in patients intubated early versus late in patients treated with HFO for COVID-19 pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Farooq Dar
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, ARE
| | | | - Hina Mirza
- Internal Medicine, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, ARE
| | | | | | - Neama A Awadh
- Family Medicine, Dubai Academic Health Corporation, Dubai, ARE
| | | | - Rawan Albwidani
- Intensive Care Medicine, Dubai Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, ARE
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nadeem R, Nadeem N, Albwidani RM, Falih FH, Husain HR, Krrak AZ, Mathews MP, Hussein KSH, Abdulkarim F, Dar F. The optimal time for endotracheal intubation in subjects with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: A retrospective observational study. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2023; 13:85-91. [PMID: 38023571 PMCID: PMC10664033 DOI: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_79_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal timing of intubation has been debated among healthcare professionals, current studies do not show any differences between early and late intubation. most studies failed to show any significant difference in clinical outcomes between early or late intubation. Methods The study was conducted as a retrospective review of subjects with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the Dubai Hospital intensive care unit (ICU). Study variables included time to intubation, duration of supplemental oxygen requirement >15 L/min, and cumulative duration of tachypnea and tachycardia while on the aforementioned oxygen requirement on this oxygen usage level. Each time duration was assessed for correlation with clinical variables including mortality and length of stay in ICU and hospital. Results Subjects who require endotracheal intubation within 4 h after the start of oxygen >15 L/min have lower survival (P = 0.03). Subjects who have tachypnea on the aforementioned oxygen requirement for 6-19.5 h (P = 0.01) before they require intubation have better survival. No duration of tachycardia has any significant effect on survival. Only the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) correlated with the hospital length of stay. Conclusions Subjects who require endotracheal intubation within 4 h after the start of oxygen >15 L/min have lower survival. The optimal time for intubation is after tachypnea of 6 h but before 19.5 h. No duration of tachycardia has any significant effect on survival. Only the duration of invasive MV correlated with the hospital length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashid Nadeem
- Department of Intensive Care, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Nadia Nadeem
- Department of Medicine, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Farooq Dar
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dubai Healthcare Authority, Dubai, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bouldin E, Sandeep S, Gillespie A, Tkaczuk A. Otolaryngologic Symptom Severity Post SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J Voice 2023:S0892-1997(23)00080-2. [PMID: 37068983 PMCID: PMC9977624 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective(s) To assess laryngologic symptomatology following SARS-CoV-2 infection and determine whether symptom severity correlates with disease severity. Methods Single-institution survey study in participants with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 2020 and February 2021. Data acquired included demographic, infection severity characteristics, comorbidities, and current upper aerodigestive symptoms via validated patient reported outcome measures. Primary outcomes of interest were scores of symptom severity questionnaires. COVID-19 severity was defined by hospitalization status. Descriptive subgroup analyses were performed to investigate differences in demographics, comorbidities, and symptom severity in hospitalized participants stratified by ICU status. Multivariate logistical regression was used to evaluate significant differences in symptom severity scores by hospitalization status. Results Surveys were distributed to 5300 individuals with upper respiratory infections. Ultimately, 470 participants with COVID-19 were included where 352 were hospitalized and 118 were not hospitalized. Those not hospitalized were younger (45.87 vs. 56.28 years), more likely female (74.17 vs. 58.92%), and less likely white (44.17 vs. 52.41%). Severity of dysphonia, dyspnea, cough, and dysphagia was significantly worse in hospitalized patients overall and remained worse at all time points. Cough severity paradoxically worsened in hospitalized respondents over time. Dyspnea scores remained abnormally elevated in respondents even 12 months after resolution of infection. Conclusion Results indicate that laryngologic symptoms are expected to be worse in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Dyspnea and cough symptoms can be expected to persist or even worsen by one-year post infection in those who were hospitalized. Dysphagia and dysphonia symptoms were mild. Non-hospitalized participants tended to have minimal residual symptoms by one year after infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emerson Bouldin
- Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Shelly Sandeep
- Emory University Hospital Midtown, Medical Office Tower, 9th Floor Voice Center, 550 Peachtree St. NE, Atlanta, GA 30308
| | - Amanda Gillespie
- Emory University Hospital Midtown, Medical Office Tower, 9th Floor Voice Center, 550 Peachtree St. NE, Atlanta, GA 30308
| | - Andrew Tkaczuk
- Emory University Hospital Midtown, Medical Office Tower, 9th Floor Voice Center, 550 Peachtree St. NE, Atlanta, GA 30308,Corresponding Author: Andrew T. Tkaczuk, Emory University School of Medicine, Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Medical Office Tower, 9th Floor Voice Center, 550 Peachtree St. NE, Atlanta, GA 30308, Tell: 404-778-3381, Fax: 404-686-4699
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Riera J, Barbeta E, Tormos A, Mellado-Artigas R, Ceccato A, Motos A, Fernández-Barat L, Ferrer R, García-Gasulla D, Peñuelas O, Lorente JÁ, Menéndez R, Roca O, Palomeque A, Ferrando C, Solé-Violán J, Novo M, Boado MV, Tamayo L, Estella Á, Galban C, Trenado J, Huerta A, Loza A, Aguilera L, García Garmendia JL, Barberà C, Gumucio V, Socias L, Franco N, Valdivia LJ, Vidal P, Sagredo V, Ruiz-García ÁL, Martínez Varela I, López J, Pozo JC, Nieto M, Gómez JM, Blandino A, Valledor M, Bustamante-Munguira E, Sánchez-Miralles Á, Peñasco Y, Barberán J, Ubeda A, Amaya-Villar R, Martín MC, Jorge R, Caballero J, Marin J, Añón JM, Suárez Sipmann F, Albaiceta GM, Castellanos-Ortega Á, Adell-Serrano B, Catalán M, Martínez de la Gándara A, Ricart P, Carbajales C, Rodríguez A, Díaz E, de la Torre MC, Gallego E, Cantón-Bulnes L, Carbonell N, González J, de Gonzalo-Calvo D, Barbé F, Torres A. Effects of intubation timing in patients with COVID-19 throughout the four waves of the pandemic: a matched analysis. Eur Respir J 2023; 61:13993003.01426-2022. [PMID: 36396142 PMCID: PMC9686319 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01426-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary aim of our study was to investigate the association between intubation timing and hospital mortality in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated respiratory failure. We also analysed both the impact of such timing throughout the first four pandemic waves and the influence of prior noninvasive respiratory support on outcomes. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre, observational and prospective cohort study that included all consecutive patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19 from across 58 Spanish intensive care units (ICUs) participating in the CIBERESUCICOVID project. The study period was between 29 February 2020 and 31 August 2021. Early intubation was defined as that occurring within the first 24 h of ICU admission. Propensity score matching was used to achieve a balance across baseline variables between the early intubation cohort and those patients who were intubated after the first 24 h of ICU admission. Differences in outcomes between early and delayed intubation were also assessed. We performed sensitivity analyses to consider a different time-point (48 h from ICU admission) for early and delayed intubation. RESULTS Of the 2725 patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation, a total of 614 matched patients were included in the analysis (307 for each group). In the unmatched population, there were no differences in mortality between the early and delayed groups. After propensity score matching, patients with delayed intubation presented higher hospital mortality (27.3% versus 37.1%; p=0.01), ICU mortality (25.7% versus 36.1%; p=0.007) and 90-day mortality (30.9% versus 40.2%; p=0.02) compared with the early intubation group. Very similar findings were observed when we used a 48-h time-point for early or delayed intubation. The use of early intubation decreased after the first wave of the pandemic (72%, 49%, 46% and 45% in the first, second, third and fourth waves, respectively; first versus second, third and fourth waves p<0.001). In both the main and sensitivity analyses, hospital mortality was lower in patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) (n=294) who were intubated earlier. The subgroup of patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation (n=214) before intubation showed higher mortality when delayed intubation was set as that occurring after 48 h from ICU admission, but not when after 24 h. CONCLUSIONS In patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, delayed intubation was associated with a higher risk of hospital mortality. The use of early intubation significantly decreased throughout the course of the pandemic. Benefits of such an approach occurred more notably in patients who had received HFNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Riera
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, SODIR, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Enric Barbeta
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Adrián Tormos
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ricard Mellado-Artigas
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adrián Ceccato
- Critical Care Center, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Sabadell, Spain
- Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Motos
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Fernández-Barat
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ricard Ferrer
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, SODIR, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Oscar Peñuelas
- Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Rosario Menéndez
- Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe/Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Oriol Roca
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, SODIR, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Palomeque
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Ferrando
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Solé-Violán
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Dr Negrín Gran Canaria, Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Mariana Novo
- Servei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Luis Tamayo
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ángel Estella
- Departamento Medicina, Facultad Medicina, Universidad de Cádiz, Hospital Universitario de Jerez, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
| | - Cristóbal Galban
- Department of Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Josep Trenado
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain
| | - Arturo Huerta
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Emergency Department, Clínica Sagrada Família, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Loza
- Hospital Virgen de Valme, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Víctor Gumucio
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorenzo Socias
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | | | - Pablo Vidal
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
| | | | - Ángela Leonor Ruiz-García
- Servicio de Microbiología Clínica, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Departamento de Biomedicina y Biotecnología, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Juan López
- Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia, Palencia, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Pozo
- UGC-Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Instituto Maimonides IMIBIC, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Maite Nieto
- Hospital Universitario de Segovia, Segovia, Spain
| | - José M Gómez
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aaron Blandino
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Ángel Sánchez-Miralles
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Sant Joan d'Alacant, Alicante, Spain
| | - Yhivian Peñasco
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - José Barberán
- Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Ubeda
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Punta de Europa, Algeciras, Spain
| | - Rosario Amaya-Villar
- Intensive Care Clinical Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - María Cruz Martín
- Hospital Universitario Torrejón, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ruth Jorge
- Intensive Care Department, Hospital Nuestra Señora de Gracia, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Jesús Caballero
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Judith Marin
- Critical Care Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Guillermo M Albaiceta
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Departamento de Biología Funcional, Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Universidad de Oviedo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | | | - Mercedes Catalán
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Pilar Ricart
- Servei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias, Badalona, Spain
| | | | | | - Emili Díaz
- Critical Care Center, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Sabadell, Spain
- Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Elena Gallego
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain
| | | | - Nieves Carbonell
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clínico y Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jessica González
- Translational Research in Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitari Aranu de Vilanova and Santa Maria, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - David de Gonzalo-Calvo
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Translational Research in Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitari Aranu de Vilanova and Santa Maria, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Ferran Barbé
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Translational Research in Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitari Aranu de Vilanova and Santa Maria, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Antoni Torres
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
- Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ridjab DA, Ivan I, Budiman F, Juzar DA. Outcome in early vs late intubation among COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:21588. [PMID: 36517555 PMCID: PMC9748395 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26234-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Timing of endotracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial regarding its risk and benefit in patient outcomes. Our study aims to elucidate early versus late intubation outcomes among COVID-19 patients with ARDS. A protocol of this study is registered at the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42021230272). We report our systematic review based on PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. We searched the Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, EMBASE, Grey Literature Report, OpenGrey, ProQuest, PubMed, and ScienceDirect from inception until 4 December 2021. Titles and abstracts were reviewed for their relevance. The risk of bias in each study was evaluated using the risk of bias in non-randomised studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I) guideline. Trial sequential analysis is done to elucidate firm evidence. We retrieved 20 observational studies that assessed an intervention (early vs. late intubation). Meta-analysis for in-hospital mortality reduction showed 119 fewer deaths per 1000 patients in early intubation. Early intubation reduces 2.81 days of ICU length of stay (LOS) and 2.12 days of ventilation duration. Benefits for mortality and ICU LOS reduction were based on studies with low to moderate risk of bias while ventilation duration was based on low disease burden setting. According to the contextualized approach, the benefit of mortality reduction showed a trivial effect, while ICU LOS and ventilation duration showed a small effect. GRADE certainty of evidence for mortality reduction in early intubation is moderate. The certainty of evidence for ICU length of stay, ventilation duration, ventilator-free days, and continuous renal replacement therapy are very low. This updated systematic review provided new evidence that early intubation might provide benefits in treating COVID-19 patients with ARDS. The benefits of early intubation appear to have an important but small effect based on contextualized approach for ICU LOS and ventilation duration. In reducing in-hospital mortality, the early intubation effect was present but only trivial based on contextualized approach. TSA showed that more studies are needed to elucidate firmer evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denio A Ridjab
- Department of Medical Education Unit, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
| | - Ignatius Ivan
- Fifth Year Medical Student, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Fanny Budiman
- Fifth Year Medical Student, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Dafsah A Juzar
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, National Cardiovascular Center of Harapan Kita, Jakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee HJ, Kim J, Choi M, Choi WI, Joh J, Park J, Kim J. Early intubation and clinical outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:226. [PMID: 36329482 PMCID: PMC9631590 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00841-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence regarding the timing of the application of mechanical ventilation among patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is insufficient. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early intubation compared to late intubation in patients with severe and critical COVID-19. METHODS For this study, we searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases as well as one Korean domestic database on July 15, 2021. We updated the search monthly from September 10, 2021 to February 10, 2022. Studies that compared early intubation with late intubation in patients with severe COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. Relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) were calculated as measures of effect using the random-effects model for the pooled estimates of in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), hospital LOS, ICU-free days, and ventilator-free days. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the definition of early intubation and the index time. To assess the risk of bias in the included studies, we used the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized studies 2.0. RESULTS Of the 1523 records identified, 12 cohort studies, involving 2843 patients with severe COVID-19 were eligible. There were no differences in in-hospital mortality (8 studies, n = 795; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.75-1.10, P = 0.32, I2 = 33%), LOS in the ICU (9 studies, n = 978; MD -1.77 days, 95% CI -4.61 to 1.07 days, P = 0.22, I2 = 78%), MV duration (9 studies, n = 1,066; MD -0.03 day, 95% CI -1.79 to 1.72 days, P = 0.97, I2 = 49%), ICU-free days (1 study, n = 32; 0 day vs. 0 day; P = 0.39), and ventilator-free days (4 studies, n = 344; MD 0.94 day, 95% CI -4.56 to 6.43 days, P = 0.74, I2 = 54%) between the early and late intubation groups. However, the early intubation group had significant advantage in terms of hospital LOS (6 studies, n = 738; MD -4.32 days, 95% CI -7.20 to -1.44 days, P = 0.003, I2 = 45%). CONCLUSION This study showed no significant difference in both primary and secondary outcomes between the early intubation and late intubation groups. Trial registration This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on 16 February, 2022 (registration number CRD42022311122).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeon-Jeong Lee
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joohae Kim
- grid.415619.e0000 0004 1773 6903Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won-Il Choi
- grid.49606.3d0000 0001 1364 9317Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Joonsung Joh
- grid.415619.e0000 0004 1773 6903Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jungeun Park
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Junghyun Kim
- grid.415619.e0000 0004 1773 6903Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea ,grid.488450.50000 0004 1790 2596Present Address: Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dragoi L, Siuba MT, Fan E. Lessons learned in mechanical ventilation/oxygen support in COVID19. Clin Chest Med 2022; 44:321-333. [PMID: 37085222 PMCID: PMC9678831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The clinical spectrum of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection ranges from asymptomatic infection or mild respiratory symptoms to pneumonia, with severe cases leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome with multiorgan involvement. The clinical management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) changed over the course of the pandemic, being adjusted as more evidence became available. This article will review how the ventilatory management of COVID-19 ARDS evolved and will conclude with current evidence-based recommendations.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rehman S, Shahiman MA, Khaleel MA, Holý O. Does the intubation timeline affect the in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients? A retrospective cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1023229. [PMID: 36275820 PMCID: PMC9582598 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1023229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective strategies for managing coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patients suffering from acute respiratory distress are constantly evolving. The timeline and threshold for transitioning from non-invasive ventilation to intermittent mandatory ventilation in critical cases who develop COVID-19-related respiratory distress are undetermined. The present research intends to investigate if emergency room intubations in COVID-19 patients affect mortality. Methods Between January 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021, we retrospectively reviewed chart analysis on all patients with confirmed positive COVID-19 screening and who underwent endotracheal intubation. Depending on when the intubation was performed; early in the emergency room or delayed outside the emergency room, patients were separated into two cohorts. In addition to comorbid clinical manifestations, the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score, and in-hospital mortality were all recorded as demographic and clinical information. Results Fifty-eight of the 224 corona-positive patients who underwent intubation had their intubations performed in the emergency room. Age, sex, alcohol use, and smoking status did not significantly differ between the two categories at the baseline. The mean qSOFA score was higher in the early intubation cohort (3.5; p < 0.000) along with more underlying comorbidities (3.0; p < 0.000). When compared to the late intubation cohort (45.78%), patients treated with early intubation had a significantly greater death rate (67.24%). Conclusion In summary, we discovered that patients who underwent intubation in the emergency units exhibited a high quick SOFA score as well as maximum co-morbid conditions than patients intubated somewhere else in the hospital. The findings of our investigation imply that intubating patients too early might be risky.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shazia Rehman
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pak-Austria Fachhochschule, Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology, Haripur, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Ali Shahiman
- Department of Urology, and Renal Transplantation, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Mundher A. Khaleel
- Department of Mathematics, College of Computer Science and Mathematics, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq
| | - Ondřej Holý
- Science and Research Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia,*Correspondence: Ondřej Holý
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented numbers of critically ill patients. Critical care providers have been challenged to increase the capacity for critical care, prevent the spread of syndrome coronavirus 2 in hospitals, determine the optimal treatment approaches for patients with critical COVID-19, and to design and implement systems for fair allocation of scarce life-saving resources when capacity is exhausted. The global burden of COVID-19 highlighted disparities, across geographic regions and among minority patient populations. Faced with a novel pathogen, critical care providers grappled with the extent to which conventional supportive critical care practices should be followed versus adapted to treat patients with COVID-19. Fiercely debated practices included the use of awake prone positioning, the timing of intubation, and optimal approach to sedation. Advances in clinical trial design were necessary to rapidly identify appropriate therapeutics for the critically ill patient with COVID-19. In this article, we review the epidemiology, outcomes, and treatments for the critically ill patient with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K Hensley
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5200 Centre Avenue, Suite 610, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
| | - Hallie C Prescott
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, NCRC Building 16, Room 341E / 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, HSR&D Center of Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. https://twitter.com/HalliePrescott
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bowen A, Zucker J, Shen Y, Huang S, Yan Q, Annavajhala MK, Uhlemann AC, Kuhn L, Sobieszczyk M, Castor D. Reduction in risk of death among patients admitted with COVID-19 between first and second epidemic waves in New York City. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac436. [PMID: 36131846 PMCID: PMC9452151 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Many regions have experienced successive epidemic waves of COVID-19 since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 with heterogeneous differences in mortality. Elucidating factors differentially associated with mortality between epidemic waves may inform clinical and public health strategies.
Methods
We examined clinical and demographic data among patients admitted with COVID-19 during the first (March-August 2020) and second (August 2020-March 2021) epidemic waves at an academic medical center in New York City.
Results
Hospitalized patients (N = 4631) had lower overall and 30-day in-hospital mortality, defined as death or discharge to hospice, during the second wave (14% and 11%) than the first (22% and 21%). The wave 2 in-hospital mortality decrease persisted after adjusting for several potential confounders. Adjusting for the volume of COVID-19 admissions, a measure of health system strain, accounted for the mortality difference between waves. Several demographic and clinical patient factors were associated with an increased risk of mortality independent of wave; SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold, Do-Not-Intubate status, oxygen requirement, and intensive care unit admission.
Conclusions
This work suggests that increased in-hospital mortality rates observed during the first epidemic wave were partly due to strain on hospital resources. Preparations for future epidemics should prioritize evidence-based patient risks, treatment paradigms, and approaches to augment hospital capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Bowen
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| | - Jason Zucker
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| | - Yanhan Shen
- Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| | - Simian Huang
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| | - Qiheng Yan
- Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| | - Medini K Annavajhala
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| | - Anne Catrin Uhlemann
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| | - Louise Kuhn
- Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| | - Magdalena Sobieszczyk
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| | - Delivette Castor
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center , New York , USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Garcia MA, Johnson SW, Sisson EK, Sheldrick CR, Kumar VK, Boman K, Bolesta S, Bansal V, Bogojevic M, Domecq JP, Lal A, Heavner S, Cheruku SR, Lee D, Anderson HL, Denson JL, Gajic O, Kashyap R, Walkey AJ. Variation in Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation Among Patients With COVID-19. Respir Care 2022; 67:929-938. [PMID: 35672139 PMCID: PMC9451494 DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 are recommended by critical-care guidelines; however, apprehension about viral particle aerosolization and patient self-inflicted lung injury may have limited use. We aimed to describe hospital variation in the use and clinical outcomes of HFNC and NIV for the management of COVID-19. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 who received supplemental oxygen between February 15, 2020, and April 12, 2021, across 102 international and United States hospitals by using the COVID-19 Registry. Associations of HFNC and NIV use with clinical outcomes were evaluated by using multivariable adjusted hierarchical random-effects logistic regression models. Hospital variation was characterized by using intraclass correlation and the median odds ratio. RESULTS Among 13,454 adults with COVID-19 who received supplemental oxygen, 8,143 (60%) received nasal cannula/face mask only, 2,859 (21%) received HFNC, 878 (7%) received NIV, 1,574 (12%) received both HFNC and NIV, with 3,640 subjects (27%) progressing to invasive ventilation. The hospital of admission contributed to 24% of the risk-adjusted variation in HFNC and 30% of the risk-adjusted variation in NIV. The median odds ratio for hospital variation of HFNC was 2.6 (95% CI 1.4-4.9) and of NIV was 3.1 (95% CI 1.2-8.1). Among 5,311 subjects who received HFNC and/or NIV, 2,772 (52%) did not receive invasive ventilation and survived to hospital discharge. Hospital-level use of HFNC or NIV were not associated with the rates of invasive ventilation or mortality. CONCLUSIONS Hospital variation in the use of HFNC and NIV for acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 was great but was not associated with intubation or mortality. The wide variation and relatively low use of HFNC/NIV observed within our study signaled that implementation of increased HFNC/NIV use in patients with COVID-19 will require changes to current care delivery practices. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04323787.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Garcia
- The Pulmonary Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Shelsey W Johnson
- The Pulmonary Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily K Sisson
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Karen Boman
- Society of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Prospect, Illinois
| | - Scott Bolesta
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Nesbitt School of Pharmacy, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
| | - Vikas Bansal
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Marija Bogojevic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - J P Domecq
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Amos Lal
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Smith Heavner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Prisma Health, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Sreekanth R Cheruku
- Divisions of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Donna Lee
- Center for Advanced Analytics, Best Practices, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Harry L Anderson
- Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joshua L Denson
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Environmental Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Ognjen Gajic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rahul Kashyap
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Allan J Walkey
- The Pulmonary Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Evans Center of Implementation and Improvement Sciences, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Farhadi N, Varpaei HA, Fattah Ghazi S, Amoozadeh L, Mohammadi M. Deciding When to Intubate a COVID-19 Patient. Anesth Pain Med 2022; 12:e123350. [PMID: 36818481 PMCID: PMC9923339 DOI: 10.5812/aapm-123350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is one of the most significant challenges for healthcare providers, particularly in the critical care setting. The timing of intubation in COVID-19 patients seems to be challenging. Therefore, we aimed to investigate how it may have a survival benefit, and we determined which clinical characteristics were associated with outcomes. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex. We randomly selected patients admitted to intensive care units and, based on intubation status, categorized them into three subgroups (early, late, and not intubated). Early intubation is defined as intubation within 48 hours of ICU admission, and late intubation is defined as intubation after 48 hours of ICU admission. Results Early-intubated patients were more likely to have dyspnea than late-intubated patients, and late-intubated patients had a higher mean heart rate than early-intubated patients. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in not-intubated patients than in other patients. There was no difference in NLR between early- and late-intubated patients. Mean serum creatine phosphokinase and troponin I levels were higher in late-intubated patients than in early- and not-intubated patients. Early-intubated patients had a lower ROX index than late-intubated patients. Patients with higher scores of APACHE 2, respiratory rates, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were more likely to be intubated. Increasing APACHE and SOFA scores were associated with decreased odds of survival. Conclusions There were no statistically significant differences in total mortality between early- and late-intubated patients. APACHE 2 scores, NLR, RR, and history of ischemic heart disease are some of the appropriate predictors of intubation. Higher respiratory rates (tachypnea) can be an indicator of early intubation. The ROX index is one of the most sensitive and capable tools for predicting intubation. Intubation status is a potent predictor of in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hesam Aldin Varpaei
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University Tehran Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Samrand Fattah Ghazi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Laya Amoozadeh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mostafa Mohammadi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rocans RP, Ozolina A, Battaglini D, Bine E, Birnbaums JV, Tsarevskaya A, Udre S, Aleksejeva M, Mamaja B, Pelosi P. The Impact of Different Ventilatory Strategies on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia. J Clin Med 2022; 11:2710. [PMID: 35628835 PMCID: PMC9143826 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The aim was to investigate the impact of different ventilator strategies (non-invasive ventilation (NIV); invasive MV with tracheal tube (TT) and with tracheostomy (TS) on outcomes (mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay) in patients with COVID-19. We also assessed the impact of timing of percutaneous tracheostomy and other risk factors on mortality. Methods: The retrospective cohort included 868 patients with severe COVID-19. Demographics, MV parameters and duration, and ICU mortality were collected. Results: MV was provided in 530 (61.1%) patients, divided into three groups: NIV (n = 139), TT (n = 313), and TS (n = 78). Prevalence of tracheostomy was 14.7%, and ICU mortality was 90.4%, 60.2%, and 30.2% in TT, TS, and NIV groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Tracheostomy increased the chances of survival and being discharged from ICU (OR 6.3, p < 0.001) despite prolonging ICU stay compared to the TT group (22.2 days vs. 10.7 days, p < 0.001) without differences in survival rates between early and late tracheostomy. Patients who only received invasive MV had higher odds of survival compared to those receiving NIV in ICU prior to invasive MV (OR 2.7, p = 0.001). The odds of death increased with age (OR 1.032, p < 0.001), obesity (1.58, p = 0.041), chronic renal disease (1.57, p = 0.019), sepsis (2.8, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (1.7, p = 0.049), multiple organ dysfunction (3.2, p < 0.001), and ARDS (3.3, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Percutaneous tracheostomy compared to MV via TT significantly increased survival and the rate of discharge from ICU, without differences between early or late tracheostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rihards P. Rocans
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Clinics, Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Hipokrata Street 2, LV-1079 Riga, Latvia; (A.O.); (E.B.); (J.V.B.); (B.M.)
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia;
| | - Agnese Ozolina
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Clinics, Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Hipokrata Street 2, LV-1079 Riga, Latvia; (A.O.); (E.B.); (J.V.B.); (B.M.)
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia;
| | - Denise Battaglini
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (D.B.); (P.P.)
| | - Evita Bine
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Clinics, Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Hipokrata Street 2, LV-1079 Riga, Latvia; (A.O.); (E.B.); (J.V.B.); (B.M.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
| | - Janis V. Birnbaums
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Clinics, Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Hipokrata Street 2, LV-1079 Riga, Latvia; (A.O.); (E.B.); (J.V.B.); (B.M.)
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia;
| | - Anastasija Tsarevskaya
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia;
- Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
| | - Sintija Udre
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Raina Boulevard 19, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia; (S.U.); (M.A.)
| | - Marija Aleksejeva
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Raina Boulevard 19, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia; (S.U.); (M.A.)
| | - Biruta Mamaja
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Clinics, Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Hipokrata Street 2, LV-1079 Riga, Latvia; (A.O.); (E.B.); (J.V.B.); (B.M.)
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia;
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (D.B.); (P.P.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, 16145 Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chong WH, Saha BK, Murphy DJ, Chopra A. Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients undergoing early versus late intubation from initial hospital admission: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Investig 2022; 60:327-336. [PMID: 35367154 PMCID: PMC8968211 DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The true impact of intubation and mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remains controversial. METHODS We searched Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to October 30th, 2021 for studies containing comparative data of COVID-19 patients undergoing early versus late intubation from initial hospital admission. Early intubation was defined as intubation within 48 h of hospital admission. The primary outcomes assessed were all-cause in-hospital mortality, renal replacement therapy (RRT), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) duration. RESULTS Four cohort studies with 498 COVID-19 patients were included between February to August 2020, in which 28.6% had early intubation, and 36.0% underwent late intubation. Although the pooled hospital mortality rate was 32.1%, no significant difference in mortality rate was observed (odds ratio [OR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.32-2.00; P = 0.64) among those undergoing early and late intubation. IMV duration (mean 9.62 vs. 11.77 days; P = 0.25) and RRT requirement (18.3% vs. 14.6%; OR 1.19; P = 0.59) were similar regardless of intubation timing. While age, sex, diabetes, and body mass index were comparable, patients undergoing early intubation had higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (mean 7.00 vs. 5.17; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The timing of intubation from initial hospital admission did not significantly alter clinical outcomes during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher SOFA scores could explain early intubation. With the advancements in COVID-19 therapies, more research is required to determine optimal intubation time beyond the first wave of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woon Hean Chong
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, New York, 12208, USA.
| | - Biplab K Saha
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Ozarks Medical Center, 1100 Kentucky Ave, West Plains, Missouri, 65775, USA
| | - Dermot J Murphy
- Department of Medicine, Mercy Medical Center, 271 Carew Street, Springfield, MA, 01104, USA
| | - Amit Chopra
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, 43 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, New York, 12208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brioni M, Meli A, Grasselli G. Mechanical Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 43:405-416. [PMID: 35439831 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) is frequently needed in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. While NIV can be delivered in hospital wards and nonintensive care environments, intubated patients require intensive care unit (ICU) admission and support. Thus, the lack of ICU beds generated by the pandemic has often forced the use of NIV in severely hypoxemic patients treated outside the ICU. In this context, awake prone positioning has been widely adopted to ameliorate oxygenation during noninvasive respiratory support. Still, the incidence of NIV failure and the role of patient self-induced lung injury on hospital outcomes of COVID-19 subjects need to be elucidated. On the other hand, endotracheal intubation is indicated when gas exchange deterioration, muscular exhaustion, and/or neurological impairment ensue. Yet, the best timing for intubation in COVID-19 is still widely debated, as it is the safest use of neuromuscular blocking agents. Not differently from other types of acute respiratory distress syndrome, the aim of MV during COVID-19 is to provide adequate gas exchange while avoiding ventilator-induced lung injury. At the same time, the use of rescue therapies is advocated when standard care is unable to guarantee sufficient organ support. Nevertheless, the general shortage of health care resources experienced during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic might affect the utilization of high-cost, highly specialized, and long-term supports. In this article, we describe the state-of-the-art of NIV and MV setting and their usage for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Brioni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Meli
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Grasselli
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Quach S. Questions About Fugitive Aerosols: The Answer Is PPE. Respir Care 2022; 67:496-499. [PMID: 35338098 PMCID: PMC9994015 DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Quach
- School of Rehabilitation SciencesMcMaster UniversityHamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bowen A, Zucker J, Shen Y, Huang S, Yan Q, Annavajhala MK, Uhlemann AC, Kuhn L, Sobieszczyk M, Castor D. Reduction in risk of death among patients admitted with COVID-19 between first and second epidemic waves in New York City. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2022:2022.03.29.22273044. [PMID: 35378759 PMCID: PMC8978950 DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.29.22273044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Many regions have experienced successive epidemic waves of COVID-19 since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 with heterogeneous differences in mortality. Elucidating factors differentially associated with mortality between epidemic waves may inform clinical and public health strategies. We examined clinical and demographic data among patients admitted with COVID-19 during the first (March-June 2020) and second (December 2020-March 2021) epidemic waves at an academic medical center in New York City. Hospitalized patients (N=4631) had lower mortality during the second wave (14%) than the first (23%). Patients in the second wave had a lower 30-day mortality (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% CI 0.44, 0.61) than those in the first wave. The mortality decrease persisted after adjusting for confounders except for the volume of COVID-19 admissions (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.70, 1.11), a measure of health system strain. Several demographic and clinical patient factors were associated with an increased risk of mortality independent of wave. Article summary Using clinical and demographic data from COVID-19 hospitalizations at a tertiary New York City medical center, we show that a reduction in mortality during the second epidemic wave was associated with decreased strain on healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yanhan Shen
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Simian Huang
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Qiheng Yan
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Louise Kuhn
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Al-Tarbsheh A, Chong W, Oweis J, Saha B, Feustel P, Leamon A, Chopra A. Clinical Outcomes of Early Versus Late Intubation in COVID-19 Patients. Cureus 2022; 14:e21669. [PMID: 35237472 PMCID: PMC8882044 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The implications of intubation timing in COVID-19 patients remain highly debatable due to the scarcity of available evidence. Objectives Our study aims to assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients undergoing early intubation compared to those undergoing late intubation. Methods This is a single-center retrospective study of adult COVID-19 patients admitted between March 1, 2020 and January 10, 2021. Early intubation was defined as intubation within 24 hours of a) hospital admission; b) respiratory status deterioration requiring FiO2 60% and higher; or c) moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) diagnosis. Results Among the 128 COVID-19 patients included, 66.4% required early intubation, and 33.6% required late intubation. The 28-day all-cause mortality and other outcomes of mechanical ventilation duration, hospital and ICU length of stay were equal regardless of intubation timing. Clinical characteristics, inflammatory markers, COVID-19 therapies, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and pH were comparable for both groups. Better lung compliance was observed during early intubation than late intubation based on plateau (mean 21.3 vs. 25.5 cmH2O; P < 0.01) and peak pressure (mean 24.1 vs. 27.4 cmH2O; P = 0.04). Conclusions In critically ill COVID-19 patients, the timing of intubation was not significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes in the setting of matching clinical characteristics. More research is needed to determine which subset of patients may benefit from intubation and the predictors for optimal intubation timing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Woon Chong
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, USA
| | - Jozef Oweis
- Internal Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, USA
| | - Biplab Saha
- Pulmonary and Critical Care, Ozark Medical Center, West Plan, USA
| | - Paul Feustel
- Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, USA
| | - Annie Leamon
- Internal Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, USA
| | - Amit Chopra
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gattinoni L, Gattarello S, Steinberg I, Busana M, Palermo P, Lazzari S, Romitti F, Quintel M, Meissner K, Marini JJ, Chiumello D, Camporota L. COVID-19 pneumonia: pathophysiology and management. Eur Respir Rev 2021; 30:30/162/210138. [PMID: 34670808 PMCID: PMC8527244 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0138-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is an evolving disease. We will focus on the development of its pathophysiologic characteristics over time, and how these time-related changes determine modifications in treatment. In the emergency department: the peculiar characteristic is the coexistence, in a significant fraction of patients, of severe hypoxaemia, near-normal lung computed tomography imaging, lung gas volume and respiratory mechanics. Despite high respiratory drive, dyspnoea and respiratory rate are often normal. The underlying mechanism is primarily altered lung perfusion. The anatomical prerequisites for PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) to work (lung oedema, atelectasis, and therefore recruitability) are lacking. In the high-dependency unit: the disease starts to worsen either because of its natural evolution or additional patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI). Oedema and atelectasis may develop, increasing recruitability. Noninvasive supports are indicated if they result in a reversal of hypoxaemia and a decreased inspiratory effort. Otherwise, mechanical ventilation should be considered to avert P-SILI. In the intensive care unit: the primary characteristic of the advance of unresolved COVID-19 disease is a progressive shift from oedema or atelectasis to less reversible structural lung alterations to lung fibrosis. These later characteristics are associated with notable impairment of respiratory mechanics, increased arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2), decreased recruitability and lack of response to PEEP and prone positioning. COVID-19 pneumonia cannot be correctly described, analysed and treated if the time-factor is not taken into accounthttps://bit.ly/3AOKxc4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciano Gattinoni
- Dept of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Simone Gattarello
- Dept of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Irene Steinberg
- Dept of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Mattia Busana
- Dept of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Paola Palermo
- Dept of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Stefano Lazzari
- Dept of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Federica Romitti
- Dept of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Michael Quintel
- Dept of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Dept of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine Donau-Isar-Klinikum Deggendorf, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Konrad Meissner
- Dept of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - John J Marini
- Dept of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota and Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Davide Chiumello
- Dept of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Camporota
- Dept of Adult Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Health Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mendes JJ, Paiva JA, Gonzalez F, Mergulhão P, Froes F, Roncon R, Gouveia J. Update of the recommendations of the Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos and the Infection and Sepsis Group for the approach to COVID-19 in Intensive Care Medicine. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2021; 33:487-536. [PMID: 35081236 PMCID: PMC8889599 DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.0103-507x-rbti-20210080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos and the Infection and Sepsis Group have previously issued health service and management recommendations for critically ill patients with COVID-19. Due to the evolution of knowledge, the panel of experts was again convened to review the current evidence and issue updated recommendations. METHODS A national panel of experts who declared that they had no conflicts of interest regarding the development of the recommendations was assembled. Operational questions were developed based on the PICO methodology, and a rapid systematic review was conducted by consulting different bibliographic sources. The panel determined the direction and strength of the recommendations using two Delphi rounds, conducted in accordance with the principles of the GRADE system. A strong recommendation received the wording "is recommended", and a weak recommendation was written as "is suggested." RESULTS A total of 48 recommendations and 30 suggestions were issued, covering the following topics: diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, coinfection and superinfection; criteria for admission, cure and suspension of isolation; organization of services; personal protective equipment; and respiratory support and other specific therapies (antivirals, immunomodulators and anticoagulation). CONCLUSION These recommendations, specifically oriented to the Portuguese reality but that may also apply to Portuguese-speaking African countries and East Timor, aim to support health professionals in the management of critically ill patients with COVID-19. They will be continuously reviewed to reflect the progress of our understanding and the treatment of this pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João João Mendes
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos - Lisboa,
Portugal
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Prof. Doutor
Fernando da Fonseca EPE - Lisboa, Portugal
| | - José Artur Paiva
- College of Specialties of Intensive Care Medicine, Ordem dos
Médicos- Lisboa, Portugal
- Infection and Sepsis Group - Lisboa, Portugal
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centro Hospitalar
Universitário de São João EPE, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto -
Porto, Portugal
| | - Filipe Gonzalez
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos - Lisboa,
Portugal
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Garcia de Orta EPE -
Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Paulo Mergulhão
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos - Lisboa,
Portugal
- Infection and Sepsis Group - Lisboa, Portugal
- Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Lusíadas Porto - Porto,
Portugal
| | - Filipe Froes
- Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de Pulido Valente,
Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte EPE - Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Roberto Roncon
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centro Hospitalar
Universitário de São João EPE, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto -
Porto, Portugal
| | - João Gouveia
- Sociedade Portuguesa de Cuidados Intensivos - Lisboa,
Portugal
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centro Hospitalar
Universitário de Lisboa Norte EPE - Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Boscolo A, Pasin L, Sella N, Pretto C, Tocco M, Tamburini E, Rosi P, Polati E, Donadello K, Gottin L, Vianello A, Landoni G, Navalesi P. Outcomes of COVID-19 patients intubated after failure of non-invasive ventilation: a multicenter observational study. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17730. [PMID: 34489504 PMCID: PMC8421335 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96762-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in acute respiratory failure secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection remains controversial. Current literature mainly examined efficacy, safety and potential predictors of NIV failure provided out of the intensive care unit (ICU). On the contrary, the outcomes of ICU patients, intubated after NIV failure, remain to be explored. The aims of the present study are: (1) investigating in-hospital mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ICU patients receiving endotracheal intubation after NIV failure and (2) assessing whether the length of NIV application affects patient survival. This observational multicenter study included all consecutive COVID-19 adult patients, admitted into the twenty-five ICUs of the COVID-19 VENETO ICU network (February-April 2020), who underwent endotracheal intubation after NIV failure. Among the 704 patients admitted to ICU during the study period, 280 (40%) presented the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The median age was 69 [60-76] years; 219 patients (78%) were male. In-hospital mortality was 43%. Only the length of NIV application before ICU admission (OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.06-4.98), p = 0.03) and age (OR 1.18 (95% CI 1.04-1.33), p < 0.01) were identified as independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality; whilst the length of NIV after ICU admission did not affect patient outcome. In-hospital mortality of ICU patients intubated after NIV failure was 43%. Days on NIV before ICU admission and age were assessed to be potential risk factors of greater in-hospital mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa Boscolo
- Institute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Laura Pasin
- Institute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicolò Sella
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Vincenzo Gallucci 13, 35121, Padua, Italy
| | - Chiara Pretto
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Vincenzo Gallucci 13, 35121, Padua, Italy
| | - Martina Tocco
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Vincenzo Gallucci 13, 35121, Padua, Italy
| | - Enrico Tamburini
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Vincenzo Gallucci 13, 35121, Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Rosi
- Emergency Medical Services, Regional Department, AULSS 3, Venice, Italy
| | - Enrico Polati
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit B, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, AOUI - University Hospital Integrated Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Katia Donadello
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit B, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, AOUI - University Hospital Integrated Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Leonardo Gottin
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit B, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, AOUI - University Hospital Integrated Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Vianello
- Respiratory Pathophysiology Division, Department of Cardio-Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Landoni
- IRCCS San Raffaele Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Navalesi
- Institute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy. .,Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Vincenzo Gallucci 13, 35121, Padua, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Belletti A, Landoni G, Zangrillo A. Pneumothorax and barotrauma in invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19. Respir Med 2021; 187:106552. [PMID: 34364198 PMCID: PMC8323514 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Belletti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Landoni
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Zangrillo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Qian Z, Lu S, Luo X, Chen Y, Liu L. Mortality and Clinical Interventions in Critically ill Patient With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:635560. [PMID: 34368175 PMCID: PMC8342953 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.635560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to summarize the current existing evidence on the outcome of critically ill patients with COVID-19 as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of clinical interventions. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, Web of Science, the China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data from their inception to May 15, 2021. The search strings consisted of various search terms related to the concepts of mortality of critically ill patients and clinical interventions. Study Selection: After eliminating duplicates, two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts first, and then the full texts of potentially relevant articles were reviewed to identify cohort studies and case series that focus on the mortality of critically ill patients and clinical interventions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the mortality of critically ill patients with COVID-19. The secondary outcomes included all sorts of supportive care. Results: There were 27 cohort studies and six case series involving 42,219 participants that met our inclusion criteria. All-cause mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 35% and mortality in hospital was 32% in critically ill patients with COVID-19 for the year 2020, with very high between-study heterogeneity (I 2 = 97%; p < 0.01). In a subgroup analysis, the mortality during ICU hospitalization in China was 39%, in Asia-except for China-it was 48%, in Europe it was 34%, in America it was 15%, and in the Middle East it was 39%. Non-surviving patients who had an older age [-8.10, 95% CI (-9.31 to -6.90)], a higher APACHE II score [-4.90, 95% CI (-6.54 to -3.27)], a higher SOFA score [-2.27, 95% CI (-2.95 to -1.59)], and a lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio [34.77, 95% CI (14.68 to 54.85)] than those who survived. Among clinical interventions, invasive mechanical ventilation [risk ratio (RR) 0.49, 95% CI (0.39-0.61)], kidney replacement therapy [RR 0.34, 95% CI (0.26-0.43)], and vasopressor [RR 0.54, 95% CI (0.34-0.88)] were used more in surviving patients. Conclusions: Mortality was high in critically ill patients with COVID-19 based on low-quality evidence and regional difference that existed. The early identification of critical characteristics and the use of support care help to indicate the outcome of critically ill patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhicheng Qian
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Shuya Lu
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Pediatric, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xufei Luo
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yaolong Chen
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Institute of Health Data Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ling Liu
- Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Roger C, Collange O, Mezzarobba M, Abou-Arab O, Teule L, Garnier M, Hoffmann C, Muller L, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, Novy E, Abraham P, Clavier T, Bourenne J, Besch G, Favier L, Fiani M, Ouattara A, Joannes-Boyau O, Fischer MO, Leone M, Ait Tamlihat Y, Pottecher J, Cordier PY, Aussant P, Moussa MD, Hautin E, Bouex M, Julia JM, Cady J, Danguy Des Déserts M, Mayeur N, Mura T, Allaouchiche B. French multicentre observational study on SARS-CoV-2 infections intensive care initial management: the FRENCH CORONA study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2021; 40:100931. [PMID: 34256165 PMCID: PMC8272066 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Describing acute respiratory distress syndrome patterns, therapeutics management, and outcomes of ICU COVID-19 patients and indentifying risk factors of 28-day mortality. METHODS Prospective multicentre, cohort study conducted in 29 French ICUs. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, adjunctive therapies, ventilatory support at ICU admission and survival data were collected. RESULTS From March to July 2020, 966 patients were enrolled with a median age of 66 (interquartile range 58-73) years and a median SAPS II of 37 (29-48). During the first 24 h of ICU admission, COVID-19 patients received one of the following respiratory supports: mechanical ventilation for 559 (58%), standard oxygen therapy for 228 (24%) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for 179 (19%) patients. Overall, 721 (75%) patients were mechanically ventilated during their ICU stay. Prone positioning and neuromuscular blocking agents were used in 494 (51%) and 460 (48%) patients, respectively. Bacterial co-infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia were diagnosed in 79 (3%) and 411 (43%) patients, respectively. The overall 28-day mortality was 18%. Age, pre-existing comorbidities, severity of respiratory failure and the absence of antiviral therapy on admission were identified as independent predictors of 28-day outcome. CONCLUSION Severity of hypoxaemia on admission, older age (> 70 years), cardiovascular and renal comorbidities were associated with worse outcome in COVID-19 patients. Antiviral treatment on admission was identified as a protective factor for 28-day mortality. Ascertaining the outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients is crucial to optimise hospital and ICU resources and provide the appropriate intensity level of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Roger
- Service des Réanimations, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation Douleur Urgence, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France; UR UM103 IMAGINE, Faculté de Médecine, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| | - Olivier Collange
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Myriam Mezzarobba
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, and Innovation in Methodology, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| | - Osama Abou-Arab
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Amiens Picardie University Hospital, 1 rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054 Amiens, France
| | - Lauranne Teule
- Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan, Perpignan, France
| | - Marc Garnier
- Sorbonne University, GRC29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, St Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Laurent Muller
- Service des Réanimations, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation Douleur Urgence, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France; UR UM103 IMAGINE, Faculté de Médecine, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Yves Lefrant
- Service des Réanimations, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation Douleur Urgence, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France; UR UM103 IMAGINE, Faculté de Médecine, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Grégoire Guinot
- Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, 2 Bd Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Emmanuel Novy
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Institut Lorrain du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, University Hospital of Nancy-Brabois, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Paul Abraham
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Clavier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France; Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1096, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Jérémy Bourenne
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Marseille, Hôpital de la Timone, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Guillaume Besch
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France; University of Franche-Comte, EA3920, Besançon, France
| | - Laurent Favier
- Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Béziers, France
| | - Michel Fiani
- Service de Réanimation, CH Château Thierry, France
| | - Alexandre Ouattara
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Sud, Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Olivier Joannes-Boyau
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Sud, Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Marc-Olivier Fischer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Marc Leone
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, 13015, Marseille, France
| | | | - Julien Pottecher
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation & Médecine Péri-opératoire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (HUS), Strasbourg, France; UR 3072, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | | | - Etienne Hautin
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Ramsay Sante, Clinique de la Sauvegarde, Lyon, France
| | | | - Jean-Michel Julia
- Anesthésie et Réanimation, Clinique du Parc, Castelnau-Le-Lez, France
| | - Julien Cady
- Institut Arnault Tzanck, Saint Laurent du Var, France
| | - Marc Danguy Des Déserts
- Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Pôle Bloc Anesthésie Réanimation Urgences, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Clermont Tonnerre, Brest, France
| | - Nicolas Mayeur
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Clinique Pasteur, 45 avenue de Lombez BP27617, 31076 Toulouse Cedex 03, France
| | - Thibault Mura
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, and Innovation in Methodology, CHU Nîmes, University Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| | - Bernard Allaouchiche
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Réanimation, 69310, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nitesh J, Kashyap R, Surani SR. What we learned in the past year in managing our COVID-19 patients in intensive care units? World J Crit Care Med 2021; 10:81-101. [PMID: 34316444 PMCID: PMC8291007 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i4.81] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 is a pandemic, was first recognized at Wuhan province, China in December 2019. The disease spread quickly across the globe, spreading stealthily from human to human through both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. A multisystem disease which appears to primarily spread via bio aerosols, it has exhibited a wide clinical spectrum involving multiple organ systems with the respiratory system pathology being the prime cause of morbidity and mortality. Initially unleashing a huge destructive trail at Wuhan China, Lombardy Italy and New York City, it has now spread to all parts of the globe and has actively thrived and mutated into new forms. Health care systems and Governments responded initially with panic, with containment measures giving way to mitigation strategies. The global medical and scientific community has come together and responded to this huge challenge. Professional medical societies quickly laid out "expert" guidelines which were conservative in their approach. Many drugs were re formulated and tested quickly with the help of national and international collaborative groups, helping carve out effective treatment strategies and help build a good scientific foundation for evidence-based medicine. Out of the darkness of chaos, we now have an orderly approach to manage this disease both from a public health preventive and therapeutic standpoint. With preventive measures such as masking and social distancing to the development of highly effective and potent vaccines, the public health success of such measures has been tempered by behavioral responses and resource mobilization. From a therapy standpoint, we now have drugs that were promising but now proven ineffective, and those that are effective when given early during viral pathogenesis or later when immune dysregulation has established, and the goal is to help reign in the destructive cascade. It has been a fascinating journey for mankind and our work here recapitulates the evolution of various aspects of critical care and other inpatient practices which continue to evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jain Nitesh
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, MN 56001, United States
| | - Rahul Kashyap
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Salim R Surani
- Department of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, TX 78404, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vera M, Kattan E, Born P, Rivas E, Amthauer M, Nesvadba A, Lara B, Rao I, Espíndola E, Rojas L, Hernández G, Bugedo G, Castro R. Intubation timing as determinant of outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Crit Care 2021; 65:164-169. [PMID: 34166852 PMCID: PMC8216652 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether time-to-intubation was associated with higher ICU mortality in patients with COVID-19 on mechanical ventilation due to respiratory insufficiency. Materials and methods We conducted an observational, prospective, single-center study of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalized with moderate to severe ARDS, connected to mechanical ventilation in the ICU between March 17 and July 31, 2020. We examined their general and clinical characteristics. Time-to-intubation was the time from hospital admission to endotracheal intubation. Results We included 183 consecutive patients; 28% were female, and median age was 62 years old. Eighty-eight patients (48%) were intubated before 48 h (early) and ninety-five (52%) after 48 h (late). Patients intubated early had similar admission PaO2/FiO2 ratio (123 vs 99; p = 0.179) but were younger (59 vs 64; p = 0.013) and had higher body mass index (30 vs 28; p = 0.006) compared to patients intubated late. Mortality was higher in patients intubated late (18% versus 43%), with admission PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 100 mmHg (OR 5.2; p = 0.011), of older age (OR 1.1; p = 0.001), and with previous use of ACE inhibitors (OR 4.8; p = 0.026). Conclusions In COVID-19 patients, late intubation, Pafi <100, older age, and previous ACE inhibitors use were associated with increased ICU mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Vera
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Eduardo Kattan
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Pablo Born
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Elizabeth Rivas
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Macarena Amthauer
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Annael Nesvadba
- Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Barbara Lara
- Sección Medicina de Urgencia, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Isabel Rao
- Sección Medicina de Urgencia, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Eduardo Espíndola
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Luis Rojas
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Glenn Hernández
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Guillermo Bugedo
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Ricardo Castro
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Early Intubation and Increased Coronavirus Disease 2019 Mortality: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study. Crit Care Explor 2021; 3:e0452. [PMID: 34151281 PMCID: PMC8208412 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Objectives: There has been controversy about the timing and indications for intubation and mechanical ventilation in novel coronavirus disease 2019. This study assessed the effect of early intubation and mechanical ventilation on all-cause, inhospital mortality for coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Setting: Eleven municipal hospitals in New York City from March 1, 2020, to December 1, 2020. Patients: Adult patients who tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 in the emergency department were subsequently admitted. Patients with do-not-intubate orders at admission were excluded. Interventions: Intubation within 48 hours of triage and intubation at any point during hospital stay. Measurements and Main Results: Data from 7,597 coronavirus disease 2019 patients were included; of these, 1,628 (21%) were intubated overall and 807 (11%) were intubated within 48 hours of triage. After controlling for available confounders, intubation rates for coronavirus disease 2019 patients varied significantly across hospitals and decreased steadily as the pandemic progressed. After nearest neighbor propensity score matching, intubation within 48 hours of triage was associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.30 [1.15–1.48]; p < 0.0001), as was intubation at any time point (hazard ratio, 1.62 [1.45–1.80]; p < 0.0001). Among intubated patients, intubation within 48 hours of triage was not significantly associated with differences in mortality (hazard ratio, 1.09 [0.94–1.26]; p = 0.26). These results remained robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Intubation within 48 hours of triage, as well as at any time point in the hospital course, was associated with increased mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 patients in this observational study.
Collapse
|
32
|
Mohammadi M, Khafaee Pour Khamseh A, Varpaei HA. Invasive Airway "Intubation" in COVID-19 Patients; Statistics, Causes, and Recommendations: A Review Article. Anesth Pain Med 2021; 11:e115868. [PMID: 34540642 PMCID: PMC8438719 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.115868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can induce acute respiratory distress, which is characterized by tachypnea, hypoxia, and dyspnea. Intubation and mechanical ventilation are strategic treatments for COVID-19 distress or hypoxia. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify relevant randomized control trials, observational studies, and case series published from April 1, 2021. RESULTS 24 studies were included in this review. Studies had been conducted in the USA, China, Spain, South Korea, Italy, Iran, and Brazil. Most patients had been intubated in the intensive care unit. Rapid sequence induction had been mostly used for intubation. ROX index can be utilized as the predictor of the necessity of intubation in COVID-19 patients. According to the studies, the rate of intubation was 5 to 88%. It was revealed that 1.4 - 44.5% of patients might be extubated. Yet obesity and age (elderly) are the only risk factors of delayed or difficult extubation. CONCLUSIONS Acute respiratory distress in COVID-19 patients could require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Severe respiratory distress, loss of consciousness, and hypoxia had been the most important reasons for intubation. Also, increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, d-dimer, and lipase in combination with hypoxia are correlated with intubation. Old age, diabetes mellitus, respiratory rate, increased level of CRP, bicarbonate level, and oxygen saturation are the most valuable predictors of the need for mechanical ventilation. ICU admission mortality following intubation was found to be 15 to 36%. Awake-prone positioning in comparison with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy did not reduce the risk of intubation and mechanical ventilation. There was no association between intubation timing and mortality of the infected patients. Noninvasive ventilation may have survival benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Mohammadi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Department of Spiritual Health, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Hesam Aldin Varpaei
- Islamic Azad University Tehran Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Nursing, Michigan State University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ray B, Sahu AK. Timing of Endotracheal Intubation and Mortality among Patients with Severe COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25:477-478. [PMID: 34177159 PMCID: PMC8196369 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
How to cite this article: Ray B, Sahu AK. Timing of Endotracheal Intubation and Mortality among Patients with Severe COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(5):477-478.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Banambar Ray
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sum Ultimate Medicare, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Arun K Sahu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sum Ultimate Medicare, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Papoutsi E, Giannakoulis VG, Xourgia E, Routsi C, Kotanidou A, Siempos II. Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies. Crit Care 2021; 25:121. [PMID: 33766109 PMCID: PMC7993905 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03540-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although several international guidelines recommend early over late intubation of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), this issue is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect (if any) of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 by carrying out a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched, while references and preprint servers were explored, for relevant articles up to December 26, 2020, to identify studies which reported on mortality and/or morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing early versus late intubation. "Early" was defined as intubation within 24 h from intensive care unit (ICU) admission, while "late" as intubation at any time after 24 h of ICU admission. All-cause mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) were the primary outcomes of the meta-analysis. Pooled risk ratio (RR), pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020222147). RESULTS A total of 12 studies, involving 8944 critically ill patients with COVID-19, were included. There was no statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality between patients undergoing early versus late intubation (3981 deaths; 45.4% versus 39.1%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, p = 0.08). This was also the case for duration of MV (1892 patients; MD - 0.58 days, 95% CI - 3.06 to 1.89 days, p = 0.65). In a sensitivity analysis using an alternate definition of early/late intubation, intubation without versus with a prior trial of high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive mechanical ventilation was still not associated with a statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality (1128 deaths; 48.9% versus 42.5%; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99-1.25, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS The synthesized evidence suggests that timing of intubation may have no effect on mortality and morbidity of critically ill patients with COVID-19. These results might justify a wait-and-see approach, which may lead to fewer intubations. Relevant guidelines may therefore need to be updated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Papoutsi
- First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, 45-47 Ipsilantou Street, 10676, Athens, Greece
| | - Vassilis G Giannakoulis
- First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, 45-47 Ipsilantou Street, 10676, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Xourgia
- First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, 45-47 Ipsilantou Street, 10676, Athens, Greece
| | - Christina Routsi
- First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, 45-47 Ipsilantou Street, 10676, Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasia Kotanidou
- First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, 45-47 Ipsilantou Street, 10676, Athens, Greece
| | - Ilias I Siempos
- First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, 45-47 Ipsilantou Street, 10676, Athens, Greece.
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zirpe KG, Tiwari AM, Gurav SK, Deshmukh AM, Suryawanshi PB, Wankhede PP, Kapse US, Bhoyar AP, Khan AZ, Malhotra RV, Kusalkar PH, Chavan KJ, Naik SA, Bhalke RB, Bhosale NN, Makhija SV, Kuchimanchi VN, Jadhav AS, Deshmukh KR, Kulkarni GS. Timing of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Mortality among Patients with Severe COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021; 25:493-498. [PMID: 34177166 PMCID: PMC8196392 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) (CARDS) pneumonitis presents a clinical challenge as regards to the timing of intubation and ambiguity of outcome. There is a lack of clear consensus on when to switch patients from trials of noninvasive therapies to invasive mechanical ventilation. We investigated the effect of the timing of intubation from the time of admission on the clinical outcome of CARDS. Aim and objective The aim and objective was to analyze the effect of timing of intubation early (within 48 hours of admission to critical care unit) versus delayed (after 48 hours of admission to critical care unit) on mortality in severe CARDS patients. Materials and methods A retrospective observational study performed in a 28-bedded COVID-19 intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Pune, India. All patients admitted between April 1, 2020, and October 15, 2020, with confirmed COVID-19 (RT-PCR positive) requiring mechanical ventilation were included in the study. Results The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Among 2,230 patients that were admitted to the hospital, 525 required critical care (23.5%), invasive mechanical ventilation was needed in 162 patients and 147 (28%) of critical care admission were included in the study cohort after exclusion. Seventy-five patients (51%) were intubated within 48 hours of critical care admission (early group) and 72 (48.9%) were intubated after 48 hours of critical care admission (delayed group). With regards to the total of 147 included patients; male patients were 74.1% with a median age of 59 years (interquartile range, 51-68 years). Diabetes (44.9%) and hypertension (43.5%) were the most common comorbidities. Higher admission acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores and lower absolute lymphocyte count were observed in patients intubated within 48 hours. The early intubated group had a mortality of 60% whereas the same was observed as 77.7% in delayed intubation group, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Conclusion Current study concludes that early intubation is associated with improved survival rates in severe CARDS patients. How to cite this article Zirpe KG, Tiwari AM, Gurav SK, Deshmukh AM, Suryawanshi PB, Wankhede PP, et al. Timing of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Mortality among Patients with Severe COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(5):493-498.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kapil G Zirpe
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anand M Tiwari
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sushma K Gurav
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Abhijit M Deshmukh
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Prasad B Suryawanshi
- Department of Critical Care, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Prajkta P Wankhede
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Upendrakumar S Kapse
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Abhaya P Bhoyar
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Afroz Z Khan
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ria V Malhotra
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pranoti H Kusalkar
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kaustubh J Chavan
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Seema A Naik
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rahul B Bhalke
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ninad N Bhosale
- Department of Critical Care, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sonika V Makhija
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Venkata N Kuchimanchi
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Amol S Jadhav
- Department of Neuro Trauma Stroke Unit, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kedar R Deshmukh
- Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Gaurav S Kulkarni
- Department of Cardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Grant Medical Foundation's Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|