1
|
Piercy J, Fishman J, Higgins V, Pike J. Impact of Choice of Tariff When Calculating Clinically Meaningful EQ-5D Scores in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis. Liver Int 2025; 45:e70043. [PMID: 40192123 PMCID: PMC11974243 DOI: 10.1111/liv.70043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2024] [Revised: 01/28/2025] [Accepted: 02/13/2025] [Indexed: 04/10/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Self-reported health varies across countries, as populations attribute different degrees of value to EQ-5D domains. Country-specific EQ-5D tariffs were developed to account for this but are not always stated in the literature. We aim to assess the reporting of EQ-5D in the literature and the impact of applying country-specific tariffs. METHODS We reviewed literature-reported EQ-5D utilities for patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis versus real-world EQ-5D utilities from the Adelphi Real World Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis Disease Specific Programme (DSP), a cross-sectional survey in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis balanced DSP data with literature studies by age, sex, comorbidities and fibrosis stage. DSP utility scores generated using national tariffs were compared with literature utilities using weighted t tests. RESULTS Ten studies with varying recruitment criteria, patient demographics and clinical characteristics were identified. Country-specific tariffs were not used or not reported. EQ-5D utilities varied, reflecting geographic, clinical and demographic characteristics. The comparison of literature and matched utilities derived using DSP data and five national tariffs revealed ≥ two comparisons for each study with a difference not exceeding the minimal clinically important difference versus the matched DSP value. CONCLUSIONS Literature-reported EQ-5D utilities vary considerably depending on study methodology and country-specific EQ-5D tariff, and even if stated may not always use the most appropriate tariff. This suggests a need for consistent use of country-specific tariffs and sensitivity analyses confirming results and conclusions that include EQ-5D-based utility measurement to inform decision-making by health authorities.
Collapse
|
2
|
de Leon JA, Cvancara DJ, Carlson AL, Cheng A, Rizvi ZH, Giliberto JP, Sauder C, Bhatt NK. Quantifying Health Utility of Age-related Vocal Atrophy. Laryngoscope 2025; 135:1143-1147. [PMID: 39460679 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Age-related vocal atrophy (ARVA) negatively impacts voice and quality of life (QOL). This study aims to determine utility-based QOL in ARVA patients, correlate findings with traditional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and generate utility-based inferences. METHODS Forty ARVA patients were prospectively recruited from a tertiary care center. Health utility was measured using standard gamble, time trade-off, and visual analog scale, assessing participants' current health states relative to defined comparison states (blindness/death). Traditional PROMs (Voice Handicap Index-10 [VHI-10] and Voice-Related Quality of Life Scale [V-RQOL]) were also collected. Descriptive and paired statistics were performed to determine health utility, and Pearson correlation assessed the association between PROMs and health utilities. RESULTS Mean health utility in ARVA was 0.84 ± 0.22, 0.88 ± 0.17, and 0.62 ± 0.25 using standard gamble, time trade-off, and visual analog scale, respectively. There were positive correlations between V-RQOL and time trade-off (r = 0.66; p < 0.0001) as well as with standard gamble (r = 0.47; p = 0.002). Participants with ARVA reported no difference in health utility impact between their voice impairment and monocular blindness (Mean dif 10.9; 95% CI -1.6, 23.5; p = 0.101). Patients with ARVA were willing to part with an average 4.6 ± 6.1 years of life to restore normal voice. CONCLUSIONS ARVA patients view their voice impairment as a significant health decrement, comparable to monocular blindness. These findings underscore the substantial impact of ARVA on QOL and highlight the need for continued research and new therapies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 135:1143-1147, 2025.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio A de Leon
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - David J Cvancara
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Abbey L Carlson
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Powers Health, Munster, Indiana, U.S.A
| | - Alice Cheng
- Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, U.S.A
| | - Zain H Rizvi
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - J P Giliberto
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Cara Sauder
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| | - Neel K Bhatt
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dilokthornsakul P, Louthrenoo W, Chevaisrakul P, Siripaitoon B, Jatuworapruk K, Upakdee N, Buttham B, Towiwat P. Impact of gout flare on health-related quality of life: a multi-center cross-sectional study in Thailand. Clin Rheumatol 2025; 44:1317-1327. [PMID: 39888479 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-025-07339-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2024] [Revised: 12/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) instrument has been used to determine health-related quality of life and health utility in gout, it is used in comparing health utility among gout flare (GF) and non-gout flare (non-GF) patients is still limited. This study aimed to compare health utility among GF and non-GF patients in Thailand. METHODS In this multi-center cross-sectional study, patients with GF and non-GF were interviewed for the EQ-5D5L and EQ-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) instruments by rheumatologists or trained research staffs. Patients with GF were subdivided into 2 subgroups (those who received no treatment and those who received treatment less than 48 h after GF episode). RESULTS Two hundred and sixteen patients (108 GF and 108 non-GF patients), males in 90.28%, were included. The gout disease duration was significantly longer in the non-GF than in the GF groups (median, 10 vs 5 years; p = 0.004). There was no difference in the tophi present between the two groups. When compared with the non-GF group, the GF patients significantly had low health utility (0.34 ± 0.36 vs. 0.89 ± 0.15, p < 0.001) and EQ-VAS score (54.73 ± 25.14 vs. 84.06 ± 13.38, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of the non-GF group, there was insignificant health utility and EQ-VAS score between those with tophi and those without tophi (0.87 ± 0.14 vs. 0.90 ± 0.15, p = 0.124 and 83.36 ± 14.92 vs. 84.33 ± 12.83, p = 0.938, respectively). CONCLUSION This study found that GF clearly had a substantial impact on patients' quality of life. Targeted interventions in managing GF patients to improve their health outcomes are needed. Key Points • Patients with gout flare had lower health utility than those without gout flare. • The clinical significance of the utility and EQ-VAS was evaluated by the EQ-5D-5L instrument between gout flare and non-gout flare groups in Thai gouty patients. • Regarding the presence of tophi or disease duration, no significant differences in health utility and EQ-VAS were observed in the gout flare or non-gout flare group. • Targeted interventions for management of gout flare are needed to improve the health outcomes of gout flare patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
- Center for Medical and Health Technology Assessment (CM-HTA), Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Worawit Louthrenoo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Parawee Chevaisrakul
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Boonjing Siripaitoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkhla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Kanon Jatuworapruk
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Nilawan Upakdee
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
| | - Bodin Buttham
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, 65000, Thailand
| | - Patapong Towiwat
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, 65000, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Elezbawy B, Kaló Z, Fasseeh A, Inotai A, Nemeth B, Ágh T. The hidden burden of atopic dermatitis in central and Eastern European countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2025; 25:257-264. [PMID: 39388211 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2416249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2024] [Revised: 10/06/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atopic dermatitis (AD) imposes a hidden burden through its negative effects on quality of life and productivity. We aim to estimate this hidden burden in adults and adolescents in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. METHODS We created a burden of disease model to quantify AD's hidden burden. Humanistic burden was calculated by estimating the monetary value of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost, using prevalence data from the Global Burden of Disease study and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita for each country. Indirect economic burden was estimated based on productivity loss from absenteeism and presenteeism, adjusted for labor force participation and unemployment rates. Total hidden burden was determined by combining productivity losses and QALYs lost. RESULTS QALY loss due to AD ranged from 1,832 to 58,596 annually in CEE countries, equating to 38 million to approximately 1 billion Euros per country. Productivity losses ranged from 3.6 to 148.9 million Euros annually. The total hidden burden of AD represents 0.11% to 0.43% of the GDP. CONCLUSIONS Our estimates reflect significant differences in population size, prevalence, and economic strength among CEE countries. Adjusting findings to country-specific GDP provided insights into AD's true hidden burden, offering valuable information for decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baher Elezbawy
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Doctoral School of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Evidence Synthesis, Syreon Middle East, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ahmad Fasseeh
- Department of Evidence Synthesis, Syreon Middle East, Alexandria, Egypt
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - András Inotai
- Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Tamás Ágh
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Doctoral School of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martin J, Bradley C, Kran BS, Ross NC. Rasch analysis and targeting assessment of the teach-CVI survey tool in a cohort of CVI patients. FRONTIERS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY 2024; 4:1495000. [PMID: 39677967 PMCID: PMC11638165 DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1495000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/17/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI) is the leading cause of pediatric visual impairment. Given the diversity of clinical presentations of CVI, we are interested in whether questionnaires appropriately target the spectrum CVI cases, specifically the Teach-CVI Screening Tool. Rasch analysis is a standard psychometric technique for assessing the targeting of questionnaire items, however this analysis technique has not yet been applied to this questionnaire. Methods We performed a retrospective review of clinical CVI cases from the NECO Center for Eye Care at Perkins School for the Blind from January 2016 to December 2022. Electronic medical records were reviewed to identify patients with an ICD-9 or ICD-10 code of CVI or other neurological visual impairment. Age, gender, diagnoses, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual fields, ocular alignment, and Teach-CVI responses were collected. We applied the method of successive dichotomizations, a polytomous Rasch model, to estimate item measures and person measures from the survey. Targeting of questionnaire items to the sample population was explored by comparing estimated item measures to person measures. Multiple linear regression was used to determine which factors influence patient visual ability (i.e., Teach-CVI person measure). Results 119 patient records were included, 54% of which were male. The mean age was 8.9 years (SD = 6.12) with a range of 0 to 33 years of age. Mean visual acuity was 0.46 logMAR (SD = 0.40), or 20/57. The majority of patients in the sample had a co-occurring visual disorder in addition to CVI (84%), the most frequent being strabismus (69.9%) or visual field loss (25.3%). Item measures ranged from -2.67 to 1.77 logits (SD = 0.76), with a mean of 0 logit by convention. Estimated person measures ranged from -2.19 to 3.08 logits (SD = 1.10) with a mean of -0.03 logit. The range of item measures covered 93.3% of the person measures, and all person measures, except one, were within one logit of an item measure. Visual measures were not statistically significantly associated with Teach-CVI person measures. Conclusion The findings from this study suggest that the Teach-CVI survey is well targeted and an appropriate patient reported outcome measure for CVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jem Martin
- Department of Specialty, Advanced Care and Vision Science, New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Chris Bradley
- Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Barry S. Kran
- Department of Specialty, Advanced Care and Vision Science, New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Nicole C. Ross
- Department of Specialty, Advanced Care and Vision Science, New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leelathanalerk A, Piankarnka N, Srimongkon P, Chanasopon S, Phumart P, Paktipat P, Saramunee K, Phimarn W. Quality of life and utility of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:28823. [PMID: 39572676 PMCID: PMC11582567 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80387-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients experience low utility, especially those having undergone amputation. Utility is one of the quality weights of health status, converted from quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to systematically review published literature and analyze a pooled estimate of utility in PAD patients. The following databases were queried for articles published from inception up to August 30, 2022: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, ThaiJo, and the Thai thesis database. Four quality assessment tools were used, tailored to each study's design. A pooled utility was estimated by the random effect and reported using Rutherford and Fontaine classification systems due to their common use in practice. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023392775). Fourteen high-quality studies were included, pooling utility from 3,664 PAD patients. The pooled utility by the Rutherford categories was 0.67, with scores for categories 0, 1-3, 4, and 5 being 0.88, 0.65, 0.68, and 0.58, respectively. The pooled utility by the Fontaine stage was 0.68, with stages 1, 2, 3, and 4 scoring 0.88, 0.65, 0.67, and 0.58, respectively. PAD utility is comparable to that of other chronic diseases. The pooled utility could be a valuable parameter for cost-utility analysis in PAD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Areerut Leelathanalerk
- Health Services and Pharmacy Practice Research and Innovation, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand
| | - Nuttakunlaya Piankarnka
- Master student, Master of Pharmacy Program in Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand
| | - Pornchanok Srimongkon
- Health Services and Pharmacy Practice Research and Innovation, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand
| | - Suratchada Chanasopon
- Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand
| | - Panumart Phumart
- Department of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
| | - Pawich Paktipat
- Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand
| | - Kritsanee Saramunee
- Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand
| | - Wiraphol Phimarn
- Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tam ACT, Naik H, Trenaman L, Lynd L, Zhang W. Health-related quality of life among women and men living with migraine: a Canada-wide cross-sectional study. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:170. [PMID: 39379822 PMCID: PMC11462961 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01882-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a prevalent neurologic disorder that affects women more than men. Examining health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by gender can aid decision makers in prioritizing future treatment and prevention programs. We aimed to quantify HRQoL by different levels of migraine disability and by gender. METHODS As part of a Canada-wide cross-sectional study, we administered an online survey to employed adults who self-reported a diagnosis of migraine. Migraine disability level was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire (MIDAS). MIDAS scores were used to categorize respondents as having little to no, mild, moderate, or severe level of migraine-related disability. Physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) and health utilities were derived from responses to the Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey. PCS, MCS, and health utilities were summarized by migraine-related disability levels and gender. Covariate-adjusted linear regressions were used to examine the association between migraine disability level and health utility by gender. RESULTS A total of 441 participants completed the survey. The sample was predominantly women (60.1%), White race (75.5%), and had a mean age of 37 years. Mean health utility, PCS, and MCS scores were 0.61 (0.22), 45.0 (7.7), and 43.4 (11.0), respectively. All three scores decreased with increased migraine disability level. Gender differences on HRQoL within each migraine disability level were not statistically significant, except in the little to no disability level where women had lower mean MCS scores and health utility relative to men [mean (SD) MCS: women 44.0 (11.3); men 55.1 (8.1), p < 0.001; health utility: women 0.66 (0.18); men 0.81 (0.18), p < 0.001]. Linear regressions showed women with severe migraine-related disability had reduced health utility compared to women with little to no disability [adjusted difference: -0.16 (95%CI -0.24,-0.09)]. Associations among men increased in magnitude with migraine disability level [adjusted differences: mild - 0.16 (95%CI -0.24,-0.09); moderate - 0.18 (95%CI -0.26,-0.10); severe - 0.28 (95%CI -0.37,-0.20)]. CONCLUSIONS Findings contribute to the literature on the association between migraine disability level and HRQoL by examining trends by gender. Model results emphasize the importance of future treatments reducing severe disability due to migraine among both women and men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C T Tam
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hiten Naik
- Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, V6T 1Z3, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Logan Trenaman
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Larry Lynd
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, V6T 1Z3, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wei Zhang
- Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, V6T 1Z3, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Muchadeyi MT, Hernandez-Villafuerte K, Di Tanna GL, Eckford RD, Feng Y, Meregaglia M, Peasgood T, Petrou S, Ubels J, Schlander M. Quality Appraisal in Systematic Literature Reviews of Studies Eliciting Health State Utility Values: Conceptual Considerations. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:767-782. [PMID: 38551803 PMCID: PMC11180162 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01365-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing number of studies that generate health state utility values (HSUVs) and the impact of HSUVs on cost-utility analyses make a robust tailored quality appraisal (QA) tool for systematic reviews of these studies necessary. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to address conceptual issues regarding QA in systematic reviews of studies eliciting HSUVs by establishing a consensus on the definitions, dimensions and scope of a QA tool specific to this context. METHODS A modified Delphi method was used in this study. An international multidisciplinary panel of seven experts was purposively assembled. The experts engaged in two anonymous online survey rounds. After each round, the experts received structured and controlled feedback on the previous phase. Controlled feedback allowed the experts to re-evaluate and adjust their positions based on collective insights. Following these surveys, a virtual face-to-face meeting was held to resolve outstanding issues. Consensus was defined a priori at all stages of the modified Delphi process. RESULTS The response rates to the first-round and second-round questionnaires and the virtual consensus meeting were 100%, 86% and 71%, respectively. The entire process culminated in a consensus on the definitions of scientific quality, QA, the three QA dimensions-reporting, relevance and methodological quality-and the scope of a QA tool specific to studies that elicit HSUVs. CONCLUSIONS Achieving this consensus marks a pivotal step towards developing a QA tool specific to systematic reviews of studies eliciting HSUVs. Future research will build on this foundation, identify QA items, signalling questions and response options, and develop a QA tool specific to studies eliciting HSUVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muchandifunga Trust Muchadeyi
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Karla Hernandez-Villafuerte
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gian Luca Di Tanna
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care (DEASS), University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Lugano, Switzerland
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel D Eckford
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yan Feng
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michela Meregaglia
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jasper Ubels
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Schlander
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ) Foundation under Public Law, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
- Alfred Weber Institute for Economics (AWI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liao M, Luo N, Rand K, Yang Z. Urban/rural differences in preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states: a study of a multi-ethnic region in China. Qual Life Res 2023:10.1007/s11136-023-03394-1. [PMID: 36944783 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03394-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare health preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states between urban and rural populations in China. METHODS This study used pooled secondary data from two EQ-5D-5L valuation studies. Participants were recruited from Guizhou province and Chongqing municipality, China using quota sampling. Each participant was interviewed face-to-face to value a set of 15 or 16 out of 30 EQ-5D-5L health states using time trade-off (TTO) methods including composite TTO and other two variants. Regression analysis was used to compare health state preferences between urban and rural participants. RESULTS A total of 597 participants (urban: 55.44%; rural: 44.56%) completed the valuation interviews. Both univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses showed that rural participants tended to value health states lower than urban participants regardless of severity of health states. The unadjusted and adjusted overall mean differences between the two groups were - 0.041 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.077, - 0.004, p-value = 0.031) and - 0.040 (95% CI - 0.078, - 0.002, p-value = 0.038), respectively. Predictions for the 3125 health states based on rural participants' health preferences were lower than those based on urban participants' health preferences. CONCLUSION There were small, yet statistically significant, differences in EQ-5D-5L health states preferences between urban and rural populations in China. Future study aiming at establishing a national value set should pay more attention to the sample representativeness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meixia Liao
- Health Systems and Behavioural Sciences Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nan Luo
- Health Systems and Behavioural Sciences Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kim Rand
- Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Maths in Health B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saeed YA, Mason K, Mitsakakis N, Feld JJ, Bremner KE, Phoon A, Fried A, Wong JF, Powis J, Krahn MD, Wong WWL. Disparities in health utilities among hepatitis C patients receiving care in different settings. CANADIAN LIVER JOURNAL 2023; 6:24-38. [PMID: 36908577 PMCID: PMC9997513 DOI: 10.3138/canlivj-2022-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although chronic hepatitis C (CHC) disproportionately affects marginalized individuals, most health utility studies are conducted in hospital settings which are difficult for marginalized patients to access. We compared health utilities in CHC patients receiving care at hospital-based clinics and socio-economically marginalized CHC patients receiving care through a community-based program. METHODS: We recruited CHC patients from hospital-based clinics at the University Health Network and community-based sites of the Toronto Community Hep C Program, which provides treatment, support, and education to patients who have difficulty accessing mainstream health care. We elicited utilities using six standardized instruments (EuroQol-5D-3L [EQ-5D], Health Utilities Index Mark 2/Mark 3 [HUI2/HUI3], Short Form-6D [SF-6D], time trade-off [TTO], and Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to examine factors associated with differences in health utility. RESULTS: Compared with patients recruited from the hospital setting (n = 190), patients recruited from the community setting (n = 101) had higher unemployment (87% versus 67%), history of injection drug use (88% versus 42%), and history of mental health issue(s) (79% versus 46%). Unadjusted health utilities were lower in community than hospital patients (e.g., EQ-5D: 0.722 [SD 0.209] versus 0.806 [SD 0.195]). Unemployment and a history of mental health issue(s) were significant predictors of low health utility. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economically marginalized CHC patients have lower health utilities than patients typically represented in the CHC utility literature. Their utilities should be incorporated into future cost-utility analyses to better represent the population living with CHC in health policy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin A Saeed
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kate Mason
- Toronto Community Hep C Program (TCHCP), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicholas Mitsakakis
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jordan J Feld
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen E Bremner
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arcturus Phoon
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alice Fried
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Josephine F Wong
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeff Powis
- Toronto Community Hep C Program (TCHCP), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Murray D Krahn
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Deceased 01 07 22
| | - William WL Wong
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Borre ED, Kaalund K, Frisco N, Zhang G, Ayer A, Kelly-Hedrick M, Reed SD, Emmett SD, Francis H, Tucci DL, Wilson BS, Kosinski AS, Ogbuoji O, Sanders Schmidler GD. The Impact of Hearing Loss and Its Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life Utility: a Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:456-479. [PMID: 36385406 PMCID: PMC9905346 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07795-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing loss significantly impacts health-related quality of life (QoL), yet the effects of current treatments on QoL utility remain uncertain. Our objective was to describe the impact of untreated and treated hearing loss on QoL utility to inform hearing healthcare policy. METHODS We searched databases for articles published through 02/01/2021. Two independent reviewers screened for articles that reported elicitation of general QoL utility values for untreated and treated hearing loss health states. We extracted data and quality indicators from 62 studies that met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS Included studies predominately used observational pre/post designs (61%), evaluated unilateral cochlear implantation (65%), administered the Health Utilities Index 3 (HUI3; 71%), and were conducted in Europe and North America (84%). In general, treatment of hearing loss improved post-treatment QoL utility when measured by most methods except the Euro-QoL 5 dimension (EQ-5D). In meta-analysis, hearing aids for adult mild-to-moderate hearing loss compared to no treatment significantly improved HUI3-estimated QoL utility (3 studies; mean change=0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07 to 0.14) but did not impact EQ-5D-estimated QoL (3 studies; mean change=0.0; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.04). Cochlear implants improved adult QoL utility 1-year post-implantation when measured by the HUI3 (7 studies; mean change=0.17; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.23); however, pediatric VAS-estimated QoL utility was non-significant (4 studies; mean change=0.12; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.25). The quality of included studies was limited by failure to report missingness of data and low survey response rates. Our study was limited by heterogeneous study populations and designs. FINDINGS Treatment of hearing loss significantly improves QoL utility, and the HUI3 and VAS were most sensitive to improvements in hearing. Improved access to hearing healthcare should be prioritized. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42021253314.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan D Borre
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kamaria Kaalund
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nicholas Frisco
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Gloria Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Austin Ayer
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Margot Kelly-Hedrick
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Susan D Emmett
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Howard Francis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Debara L Tucci
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Blake S Wilson
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andrzej S Kosinski
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Osondu Ogbuoji
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for Policy Impact in Global Health, Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gillian D Sanders Schmidler
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 100 Fuqua Drive, Box 90120, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke University Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lau VI, Johnson JA, Bagshaw SM, Rewa OG, Basmaji J, Lewis KA, Wilcox ME, Barrett K, Lamontagne F, Lauzier F, Ferguson ND, Oczkowski SJW, Fiest KM, Niven DJ, Stelfox HT, Alhazzani W, Herridge M, Fowler R, Cook DJ, Rochwerg B, Xie F. Health-related quality-of-life and health-utility reporting in critical care. World J Crit Care Med 2022; 11:236-245. [PMID: 36051941 PMCID: PMC9305682 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i4.236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mortality is a well-established patient-important outcome in critical care studies. In contrast, morbidity is less uniformly reported (given the myriad of critical care illnesses and complications of each) but may have a common end-impact on a patient’s functional capacity and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). Survival with a poor quality-of-life may not be acceptable depending on individual patient values and preferences. Hence, as mortality decreases within critical care, it becomes increasingly important to measure intensive care unit (ICU) survivor HRQoL. HRQoL measurements with a preference-based scoring algorithm can be converted into health utilities on a scale anchored at 0 (representing death) and 1 (representing full health). They can be combined with survival to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), which are one of the most widely used methods of combining morbidity and mortality into a composite outcome. Although QALYs have been use for health-technology assessment decision-making, an emerging and novel role would be to inform clinical decision-making for patients, families and healthcare providers about what expected HRQoL may be during and after ICU care. Critical care randomized control trials (RCTs) have not routinely measured or reported HRQoL (until more recently), likely due to incapacity of some patients to participate in patient-reported outcome measures. Further differences in HRQoL measurement tools can lead to non-comparable values. To this end, we propose the validation of a gold-standard HRQoL tool in critical care, specifically the EQ-5D-5L. Both combined health-utility and mortality (disaggregated) and QALYs (aggregated) can be reported, with disaggregation allowing for determination of which components are the main drivers of the QALY outcome. Increased use of HRQoL, health-utility, and QALYs in critical care RCTs has the potential to: (1) Increase the likelihood of finding important effects if they exist; (2) improve research efficiency; and (3) help inform optimal management of critically ill patients allowing for decision-making about their HRQoL, in additional to traditional health-technology assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Issac Lau
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, AB, Canada
| | - Jeffrey A Johnson
- School of Public Health, Inst Hlth Econ, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, AB, Canada
| | - Sean M Bagshaw
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, AB, Canada
| | - Oleksa G Rewa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2B7, AB, Canada
| | - John Basmaji
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Western University, London N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Kimberley A Lewis
- Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - M Elizabeth Wilcox
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Kali Barrett
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto M5T 2S8, Canada
| | | | - Francois Lauzier
- Departments of Medicine and Anesthesiology, University Laval, Laval G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Niall D Ferguson
- Department Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Simon J W Oczkowski
- Department of Medicine, McMaster Clin, Hamilton Gen Hosp, McMaster University, Hamilton L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Kirsten M Fiest
- Department of Community Health Sciences & Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Daniel J Niven
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University Calgary, Calgary T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Henry T Stelfox
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Margaret Herridge
- Indepartmental Division of Critical Care, University Health Network, Toronto M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Robert Fowler
- Departments of Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Deborah J Cook
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Feng Xie
- Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton L8N 3Z5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Browne M, Russell AMT, Begg S, Rockloff MJ, Li E, Rawat V, Hing N. Benchmarking gambling screens to health-state utility: the PGSI and the SGHS estimate similar levels of population gambling-harm. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:839. [PMID: 35473621 PMCID: PMC9044680 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13243-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) and the Short Gambling Harms Screen (SGHS) purport to identify individuals harmed by gambling. However, there is dispute as to how much individuals are harmed, conditional on their scores from these instruments. We used an experienced utility framework to estimate the magnitude of implied impacts on health and wellbeing. METHODS We measured health utility using the Short Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D), and used this as a benchmark. All 2603 cases were propensity score weighted, to balance the affected group (i.e., SGHS 1+ or PGSI 1+ vs 0) with a reference group of gamblers with respect to risk factors for gambling harm. Weighted regression models estimated decrements to health utility scores attributable to gambling, whilst controlling for key comorbidities. RESULTS We found significant attributable decrements to health utility for all non-zero SGHS scores, as well as moderate-risk and problem gamblers, but not for PGSI low-risk gamblers. Applying these coefficients to population data, we find a similar total burden for both instruments, although the SGHS more specifically identified the subpopulation of harmed individuals. For both screens, outcomes on the SF-6D implies that about two-thirds of the 'burden of harm' is attributable to gamblers outside of the most severe categories. CONCLUSIONS Gambling screens have hitherto provided nominal category membership, it has been unclear whether moderate or 'at-risk' scores imply meaningful impact, and accordingly, population surveys have typically focused on problem gambling prevalence. These results quantify the health utility decrement for each category, allowing for tracking of the aggregate population impact based on all affected gamblers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Browne
- School of Medical, Health & Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg B8 G.47 University Dr, Branyan, QLD, 4670, Australia.
| | - Alex M T Russell
- School of Medical, Health & Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg B8 G.47 University Dr, Branyan, QLD, 4670, Australia
| | - Stephen Begg
- La Trobe Rural Health School, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew J Rockloff
- School of Medical, Health & Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg B8 G.47 University Dr, Branyan, QLD, 4670, Australia
| | - En Li
- School of Medical, Health & Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg B8 G.47 University Dr, Branyan, QLD, 4670, Australia
| | - Vijay Rawat
- School of Medical, Health & Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg B8 G.47 University Dr, Branyan, QLD, 4670, Australia
| | - Nerilee Hing
- School of Medical, Health & Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg B8 G.47 University Dr, Branyan, QLD, 4670, Australia
| |
Collapse
|