Prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation is a common complication after major aortic surgery. The relationship between prolonged ventilation and intraoperative variables influenced by anesthesiologists, such as ventilation practices, fluid administration, and blood pressure control during major aortic surgery is unknown. We sought to identify perioperative factors, including intraoperative physiologic and anesthesia-related variables, which are associated with ventilation duration following aortic surgery.

Single-center retrospective observational study.

A tertiary, high-volume cardiac surgery referral center.

Adult patients undergoing major aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

None (retrospective observational study).

The primary outcome was the duration of postoperative ventilation (hours). Mixed-effects regression was performed to identify factors associated with the primary outcome. Among the 647 patients included in this study, the median of postoperative mechanical ventilation duration was 9.0 (IQR 6.0, 14.4) hours, with 73 (11.3%) of patients receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. Variables significantly associated with the outcome were increases in pre- to post-CPB driving pressure (β = 4.23; 95% CI [0.08, 8.39]; p = 0.04), reduction in pre- to post-CPB end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (β = -5.12; 95% CI [-8.85, -1.39]; p < 0.001), and normalized transfusion volumes (β = 11.14; 95% CI [4.36, 17.91]; p < 0.001). Mechanical power was not associated with postoperative ventilation duration (β = -2.29; 95% CI [-6.48, 1.90]; p = 0.52).

Patients undergoing major aortic surgery are at risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation. Transfusion volume and pre- to post-CPB changes in driving pressures and end-tidal carbon dioxide are significantly associated with postoperative ventilation duration. Intraoperative mechanical ventilator power is not a significant predictor of mechanical ventilation duration after major aortic surgery. These variables are potentially modifiable by anesthesiologists and may be future therapeutic targets.

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of bilateral rectus sheath blocks (RSBs) and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane (OSTAP) blocks on mechanical power (MP) in patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Additionally, we sought to evaluate the impact of these blocks on postoperative pain and quality of patient recovery.

In this prospective, double-blind study, 66 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into two groups: Group C (control), which received a standard analgesic intravenous regimen; and Group B (block), which received bilateral RSB and OSTAP blocks. Intraoperative mechanical power was measured for all patients. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and recovery quality was measured using the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire.

The mechanical power values for patients in Group C were consistently greater at all measured times: baseline, before bridion, and after bridion. Although the difference at baseline was not statistically significant, significant differences were observed before and after bridion (p values = 0.112, 0.021, and 0.003, respectively). Patients in Group B exhibited significantly lower VAS scores at all time points (30 min, 2 h, 8 h, and 24 h) (p < 0.05). Additionally, essential variations were noted in the administration of rescue analgesia between the groups (p < 0.001). Regarding tramadol consumption, Group C patients had significantly greater values [84 (74-156) vs. 0 (0-75), median (25-75th percentiles)] (p < 0.001). For the QoR-15 scores, Group C also had significantly greater values [129 (124-133) vs. 122 (115-125), median (25-75th percentiles)] (p < 0.001).

Bilateral RSB and OSTAP blocks significantly reduce mechanical power during surgery. Moreover, they significantly decrease postoperative pain and analgesic consumption and increase patient recovery scores.

The study protocol was registered in the international database ClinicalTrials.gov (registration no. NCT06202040). This study was conducted between December 2023 and January 2024 at the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation of Konya City Hospital.

The prone position is commonly used in spinal surgery, but it can lead to decreased lung compliance and increased airway pressure. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of individualized end-inspiratory pause guided by driving pressure on respiratory mechanics in patients undergoing prone spinal surgery.

A randomized controlled trial was conducted from August to October 2023. Patients scheduled for elective prone spinal surgery were randomly assigned to either a study group, receiving individualized end-inspiratory pause, or a control group, receiving a fixed end-inspiratory pause (10% of total inspiratory time). Mechanical ventilation parameters, including tidal volume, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and peak pressure, were recorded at different time points. Arterial blood gases were collected at baseline and at specified intervals.

Data from 36 subjects (18 in each group) were included in the final analysis. The study group exhibited a significant increase in respiratory system compliance (P < 0.05) and improved intraoperative oxygenation (P < 0.05). In addition, the individualized end-inspiratory pause significantly decreased plateau pressure (P < 0.05) and driving pressure (P < 0.05) compared to the control group.

The individualized end-inspiratory pause guided by driving pressure effectively optimized pulmonary compliance and improved oxygenation during prone spinal surgery. These findings suggest that this ventilation strategy may enhance respiratory mechanics and reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.

The win ratio analysis method might provide new insight on the impact of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on clinical outcomes.

The aim is to re-analyse the results of the 'Re-evaluation of the effects of high PEEP with recruitment manoeuvres vs. low PEEP without recruitment manoeuvres during general anaesthesia for surgery' (REPEAT) study using the win ratio analysis.

Individual patient data meta-analysis.

Three international multicentre randomised trials.

Patients undergoing general anaesthesia for surgery.

High vs. low PEEP.

Hierarchical composite endpoint of: all-cause hospital mortality; hospital length of stay; need for postoperative mechanical ventilation; severe pulmonary complications; and mild pulmonary complications.

A total of 3774 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for surgery were included in this analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 57 [45 to 68] years and 2077 (55%) were women. A total of 3 560 720 comparison pairs were produced. The high PEEP group had a higher percentage of losses than wins in hospital mortality (1.1 vs. 0.9%) and hospital length of stay (33.8 vs. 33.2%), comparable percentages of losses and wins in postoperative invasive mechanical ventilation (0.2 vs. 0.2%), a higher percentage of wins in severe complications (2.5 vs. 2.1%) and a higher percentage of ties in mild complications (18.7 vs. 3.9% wins vs. 3.3% losses). The win ratio for high PEEP compared with low PEEP group was 1.00 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.09).

No beneficial effects of high PEEP compared with low PEEP were found in this win ratio analysis.

Clinicaltrials.gov (study identifier NCT03937375).

Placing patients in the steep Trendelenburg position with a pressurised pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery increases pulmonary airway pressure, increasing the risks of lung injury and postoperative pulmonary complications, even in patients with healthy lungs.

The aim was to determine whether an integrated anaesthesia protocol was superior to traditional protective ventilation in terms of preventing pulmonary complications.

This study used a randomised, controlled, parallel-group design.

This single-centre trial was conducted at the National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January to May 2023.

A total of 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with intermediate to high risk of pulmonary complications, as determined by the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) score.

Participants were randomly assigned to either lung protective ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight + deep neuromuscular block (a train-of-four count of 0 and post tetanic of 1 to 2) + low peritoneal pressure (10 mmHg) or conventional pulmonary ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 of predicted body weight + moderate neuromuscular block (a train-of-four count of 1 to 2) + standard peritoneal pressure (15 mmHg).

The primary outcome was the incidence of pulmonary complications within 30 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes included serological biomarkers of lung injury.

The lung protective group had a significantly lower incidence of pulmonary complications (15.0%) than the conventional group (38.3%; hazard ratio, 0.332; 95% CI, 0.153 to 0.718; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in the plasma biomarker levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and angiopoietin-2 for lung injury between the groups. The treatment-by-covariate interactive analysis revealed that the lung-protective strategy conferred considerable benefits for males and individuals aged 60 years or above. A nomogram that predicted pulmonary complications incorporating four variables exhibited a strong discriminative performance, and the results of the decision curve analysis revealed the potential clinical value of this nomogram.

Compared with traditional strategies, the integrated lung-protective approach may mitigate pulmonary complications without causing lung injury in intermediate to high-respiratory-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Chinese Clinical Trial Register Identifier: ChiCTR2100054215.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in children are common. However, few models tailored specifically for children are available to identify risk factors for PPCs and enable preoperative interventions. This study aimed to identify independent risk factors for PPCs in children and establish a risk prediction model.

The clinical data of pediatric patients aged 0-6 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I or II, and had undergone surgery with mechanical ventilation at Henan Provincial People's Hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify risk factors for PPCs. The corresponding nomogram prediction model was constructed based on the regression coefficients. The receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve were used respectively to evaluate the discriminant validity and calibration of the prediction model.

Among 1545 patients included, 211 (13.4%) developed PPCs (156 of 1082 patients in the discovery cohort and 55 of 463 patients in the test cohort). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.96, P=0.007), mechanical ventilation time (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.20-1.55, P<0.001), airway device (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.04-2.68, P=0.033), ASA physical status (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.34-2.88, P=0.001), and type of surgery (the total effect, P=0.004) were identified as the independent risk factors for PPCs in the discovery cohort. The prediction model showed good discrimination and calibration performance in both the discovery and test cohorts. The corresponding area under the curve was 0.762 (95% CI: 0.722, 0.803) and 0.818 (95% CI: 0.760, 0.875), respectively.

We identified age, ventilation device and duration, ASA physical status, and surgical site as independent risk factors for PPCs in children aged 0-6 years. The predictive model performed well and demonstrated a certain capability in predicting the risk of PPCs.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are frequent after abdominal surgery and significantly affect postoperative outcomes. Intraoperative protective ventilation (IPV) has been demonstrated to mitigate PPCs. However, the comparative effectiveness of two common IPV regimens-IPV with or without periodic lung recruitment manoeuvres (PLRM)-in preventing PPCs is unclear. This study aims to compare the effects of these two IPV regimens on PPCs.

This study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. A total of 1060 patients at intermediate or high risk for PPCs, scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery, will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either an IPV with PLRM (intensive IPV group) or an IPV without PLRM (moderate IPV group). Patients assigned to the intensive IPV group will receive positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 6-10 cm H2O with lung recruitment manoeuvres performed every 30 min. Patients in the moderate IPV group will receive the same level of PEEP without lung recruitment manoeuvres. Both groups will receive a tidal volume of 7 mL/kg predicted body weight and an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.3-0.4. The primary outcome is respiratory failure within the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes include other PPCs, extrapulmonary complications, unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit, length of postoperative hospital stay and mortality from any cause.

This protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. The first participant was recruited on 9 October 2022, with an estimated completion date of 30 May 2025. The results of this trial are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals.

NCT05556174.

High and individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during laparoscopic surgery may improve oxygenation and respiratory mechanics.

We searched RCTs in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from from from January 2000 to December 2023 comparing the different intraoperative PEEP (low PEEP (LPEEP): 0-5 mbar; moderate PEEP (MPEEP): 6-9 mbar; high PEEP (HPEEP): >=10 mbar; individualized PEEP (iPEEP): PEEP set by special physiological technique) on arterial oxygenation, respiratory compliance (Cdyn) or driving pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) in patients during laparoscopic surgery in reverse Trendelenburg position. We calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and predictive intervals (PI) using random-effects models. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool was applied.

8 RCTs (n = 425) met the inclusion criteria. HPEEP vs. LPEEP increased PaO2/FiO2 (+ 129.93 [+ 75.20; +184.65] mmHg, p < 0.0001) with high variation of true effect (Chi2 34.92, p < 0.0001; I2 89%). iPEEP vs. LPEEP also increased PaO2/FiO2 + 130.23 [+ 57.18; +203.27] mmHg, p = 0.0005) with high variation of true effect (Chi2 26.95, p < 0.0001; I2 93%). HPEEP vs. LPEEP increased Cdyn (+ 15.06 [5.47; +24.65] ml/mbar, p = 0.002) with high variation of true effect (Chi2 93.16, p < 0.0001; I2 96%). iPEEP vs. LPEEP increased Cdyn (+ 22.46 [+ 8.56; +36.35] ml/mbar, p = 0.002) with high variability of the true effect (Chi2 53.92, p < 0.0001; I2 96%). HPEEP group had higher MAP as compared to LPEEP) + 4.36 [+ 0.36;+8.36], p = 0.03), variability of the true effect was nonsignificant. HR did nit differ between all comparisons.

In patients with obesity undergoing surgery in the reverse Trendelenburg position HPEEP and iPEEP may improve oxygenation, decrease driving pressure, and increase dynamic compliance compared to LPEEP with high variation of true effect without relevant hemodynamic compromise. Data with MPEEP comparisons are inconclusive.

CRD42023488971; registered December 14, 2023.

The impact of distinct primary colorectal cancer (CRC) sites on lung injury and complications remains largely unexplored, despite the palpable differences in surgical positions, procedures, and the resulting mechanically induced respiratory pressures at each site.

This study employed a forwards-looking approach utilising the propensity score matching (PSM) method; 300 patients with pathological CRC after laparoscopic surgery from April 2019 to May 2023 were enrolled. Two categories were bifurcated based on their surgical locations: the rectosigmoid colon (RSC) group and the descending/ascending colon (DAC) group, with a 2:1 ratio. The occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within a 30-day postoperative period was meticulously evaluated. Additionally, assessments have been performed for plasma biomarkers of immune response dynamics and lung injury (plasma soluble advanced glycation end-product receptor [sRAGE], angiopoietin-2 [ANG-2], interleukin-1β/6 [IL-1β/IL-6]) and other parameters.

Although the increase in postoperative lung epithelial damage, as indicated by the plasma sRAGE levels, was significant in the RSC group (DAC vs. RSC; 1029.6 [576.8-1365.2] vs. 1271.6 [896.3-1587.6]; odds ratio=0.999; 95% CI: 0.998 to 1.000; P=0.007), a significantly increased percentage of PPCs was observed in the DAC group (DAC vs. RSC; hazard ratio=1.669; 95% CI, 1.141 to 2.439; P=0.008). A univariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that sRAGE, ANG-2, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels were not correlated with the incidence of time-to-PPCs across the two cohorts (P>0.05). Propensity score-weighted Cox regression and causal mediation analysis further demonstrated that the DAC site directly affected the incidence of PPCs, regardless of the other baseline confounders and clinical covariates related to the tumour site and PPCs.

The primary site of CRC is an independent predictor of the development of PPCs. Despite the steep Trendelenburg position of the RSC group inciting more pulmonary stress, inflammation and lung epithelial injury, as indicated by higher sRAGE, it demonstrated a lower PPCs occurrence relative to its DAC counterpart, with a slightly inclined or reversed Trendelenburg position. None of the plasma biomarkers of inflammation or lung injury indicated sufficient prognostic value for PPCs.

Limited information is available regarding the application of lung-protective ventilation strategies during one-lung ventilation (OLV) across mainland China. A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate this issue in current clinical practice.

The survey covered various aspects, including respondent demographics, the establishment and maintenance of OLV, intraoperative monitoring standards, and complications associated with OLV.

Five hundred forty-three valid responses were collected from all provinces in mainland China. Volume control ventilation mode, 4 to 6 mL per kilogram of predictive body weight, pure oxygen inspiration, and a low-level positive end-expiratory pressure ≤ 5 cm H2O were the most popular ventilation parameters. The most common thresholds of intraoperative respiration monitoring were peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 90-94%, end-tidal CO2 of 45 to 55 mm Hg, and an airway pressure of 30 to 34 cm H2O. Recruitment maneuvers were traditionally performed by 94% of the respondents. Intraoperative hypoxemia and laryngeal injury were experienced by 75% and 51% of the respondents, respectively. The proportions of anesthesiologists who frequently experienced hypoxemia during OLV were 19%, 24%, and 7% for lung, cardiovascular, and esophageal surgeries, respectively. Up to 32% of respondents were reluctant to perform lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the volume-control ventilation mode and an SpO2 intervention threshold of < 85% were independent risk factors for hypoxemia during OLV in lung and cardiovascular surgeries. In esophageal surgery, working in a tier 2 hospital and using traditional ventilation strategies were independent risk factors for hypoxemia during OLV. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in intraoperative hypoxemia during OLV between respondents who performed lung-protective ventilation strategies and those who did not.

Lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV have been widely accepted in mainland China and are strongly recommended for esophageal surgery, particularly in tier 2 hospitals. Implementing volume control ventilation mode and early management of oxygen desaturation might prevent hypoxemia during OLV.

This special article is the 17th in an annual series for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The authors thank the editor in chief, Dr Kaplan, and the editorial board for the opportunity to continue this series, namely, the research highlights of the past year in the specialty of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesiology.1 The major themes selected for 2024 are outlined in this introduction, and each highlight is reviewed in detail in the main article. The literature highlights in the specialty for 2024 begin with an update on perioperative rehabilitation and enhanced recovery in cardiothoracic surgery, with a focus on novel methods to best assess our patients in the preoperative period and the impact of implementing enhanced recovery care models on outcomes. The second major theme is focused on cardiac surgery, with the authors discussing new insights into anemia, transfusions, and coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes with a focus on gender disparities. The third theme is focused on cardiothoracic transplantation, with discussions focusing on techniques related to lung transplantation, including mechanical circulatory support. The 4th theme is focused on mechanical circulatory support, with discussions exploring advancements in left ventricular assist devices highlight the evolving landscape of mechanical circulatory support and discussion of anticoagulation practices. The fifth and final theme is an update on medical cardiology, with a focus on the outcomes of transcatheter management of regurgitant pathology, device management in heart failure, and new techniques in catheter ablation. The themes selected for this article are only a few of the diverse advances in the specialty during 2024. These highlights will inform the reader of key updates on a variety of topics, leading to improvement in perioperative outcomes for patients with cardiothoracic and vascular disease.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) significantly increase morbidity and mortality in surgical patients, particularly those with pulmonary conditions. PPC incidence varies widely, influenced by factors such as surgery type, patient age, smoking status, and comorbid conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and congestive heart failure. While preoperative pulmonary function tests and chest radiographs are crucial for lung resection surgery, their use should be judiciously tailored to individual risk profiles. Effective risk stratification models, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Arozullah respiratory failure index, Gupta Calculators, and Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) model, play a key role in predicting PPCs. Key strategies to diminish PPCs include preoperative optimization of respiratory conditions, smoking cessation, and respiratory rehabilitation. In patients with COPD and asthma, it is crucial to maintain optimal disease control through inhaled therapies, systemic corticosteroids, and tailored preoperative respiratory exercises. Anemia and hypoalbuminemia are significant predictors of PPCs and require meticulous management. The choice and duration of anesthesia also notably influence PPC risk, with regional anesthesia being preferable to general anesthesia when possible. Comprehensive preoperative evaluations and tailored interventions are essential for enhancing surgical outcomes and reducing PPC incidence. Additional studies involving domestic patients are necessary to refine national guidelines for managing those at risk of PPCs.

General anesthesia is a critical component of surgical procedures, requiring effective ventilation strategies to ensure adequate oxygenation and prevent complications. This narrative review aims to compare various ventilation techniques used during general anesthesia, focusing on their physiological foundations, clinical applications, and outcomes. Traditional methods, such as high tidal volume ventilation, have evolved into more sophisticated approaches, including protective lung ventilation, which are particularly beneficial for high-risk patients with respiratory comorbidities. The review highlights that protective lung ventilation, characterized by lower tidal volumes and optimal positive end-expiratory pressure, is associated with improved oxygenation, reduced incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications, and enhanced overall recovery. Despite the advantages of personalized ventilation approaches, current evidence remains limited by small sample sizes and variability in study designs. This underscores the need for larger, randomized controlled trials to establish definitive guidelines. Future research should also explore emerging technologies to optimize the real-time management of ventilation parameters. The findings emphasize the importance of individualized ventilation strategies in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes and inform policy development. By advancing our understanding of ventilation techniques, this review aims to contribute to safer anesthesia practices and enhance recovery in surgical patients.

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has been used to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This study aims to develop a comprehensive view of the efficacy and long-term prognosis of EIT-guided PEEP compared to other conventional approaches in various clinical scenarios, including patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) and patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.

The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, from inception to July 30, 2023 (ARDS/hARF) and October 5, 2023 (surgery). The Cochrane risk of bias assessment and the methodological index for non-randomized studies were used for quality appraisal. The main outcomes were PEEP level, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, lung/respiratory system compliance (CL/Crs), driving pressure (ΔP), in-hospital mortality, and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in surgical studies.

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one historical control study, and six before-after studies of ARDS/hARF, as well as eight surgical RCTs, were retrieved. Subgroup analysis has been carried out and analysis of before-after studies was performed separately. Diverse PEEP strategies were adopted in the included studies, such as low/high PEEP-FiO2-table of ARDS-net, pressure-volume loop, and transpulmonary pressure. In ARDS/hARF studies, the EIT strategy did not result in considerably enhanced respiratory system mechanics, including comparable PaO2/FiO2 ratios, comparable ΔP, and increased CL/Crs. As for long-term prognosis, the rough overall meta-analysis showed decreased in-hospital mortality (risk ratio RR = 1.54, 95% CI = (1.09, 2.18), P = 0.01). In patients undergoing general anesthesia surgery, the EIT group demonstrated increased PaO2/FiO2 ratio, CL/Crs, and decreased ΔP versus the fixed 4 or 5 cmH2O PEEP. In postoperative prognosis, incidence of PPCs was generally comparable between the two groups.

The EIT-derived PEEP setting strategy might be associated with potential benefits in respiratory outcomes and prognosis in ARDS/hARF and surgical patients. Current data is insufficient to provide solid evidence.

During laparoscopic surgery, the role of PEEP to improve outcome is controversial. Mechanistically, PEEP benefits depend on the extent of alveolar recruitment, which prevents ventilator-induced lung injury by reducing lung dynamic strain. The hypotheses of this study were that pneumoperitoneum-induced aeration loss and PEEP-induced recruitment are inter-individually variable, and that the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I) can identify patients who benefit from PEEP in terms of strain reduction.

Sequential study.

Operating room.

Seventeen ASA I-III patients receiving robot-assisted prostatectomy during Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum.

Patients underwent end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and respiratory/lung/chest wall mechanics (esophageal manometry and inspiratory/expiratory occlusions) assessment at PEEP = 0 cmH2O before and after pneumoperitoneum, at PEEP = 4 and 12 cmH2O during pneumoperitoneum. Pneumoperitoneum-induced derecruitment and PEEP-induced recruitment were assessed through a simplified method based on multiple pressure-volume curve. Dynamic and static strain changes were evaluated. R/I between 12 and 4 cmH2O was assessed from EELV. Inter-individual variability was rated with the ratio of standard deviation to mean (CoV).

Pneumoperitoneum reduced EELV by (median [IqR]) 410 mL [80-770] (p < 0.001) and increased dynamic strain by 0.04 [0.01-0.07] (p < 0.001), with high inter-individual variability (CoV = 70% and 88%, respectively). Compared to PEEP = 4 cmH2O, PEEP = 12 cmH2O yielded variable amount of recruitment (139 mL [96-366] CoV = 101%), causing different extent of dynamic strain reduction (median decrease 0.02 [0.01-0.04], p = 0.002; CoV = 86%) and static strain increases (median increase 0.05 [0.04-0.07], p = 0.01, CoV = 33%). R/I (1.73 [0.58-3.35]) estimated the decrease in dynamic strain (p ≤0.001, r = -0.90) and the increase in static strain (p = 0.009, r = -0.73) induced by PEEP, while PEEP-induced changes in respiratory and lung mechanics did not.

Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum yields variable derecruitment: PEEP capability to revert these phenomena varies significantly among individuals. High R/I identifies patients in whom higher PEEP mostly reduces dynamic strain with limited static strain increases, potentially allowing individualized settings.

Intraoperative driving pressure (ΔP) has an independent association with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving ventilation during general anesthesia for major surgery. Ventilation with high intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers (RMs) that result in a low ΔP has the potential to prevent PPCs. This trial tests the hypothesis that compared to standard low PEEP without RMs, an individualized high PEEP strategy, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs prevents PPCs in patients receiving intraoperative protective ventilation during anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery.

"DrivinG prEssure duriNg gEneRal AnesThesia fOr minimally invasive abdominal suRgery (GENERATOR)" is an international, multicenter, two-group, patient and outcome-assessor blinded randomized clinical trial. In total, 1806 adult patients scheduled for minimally invasive abdominal surgery and with an increased risk of PPCs based on (i) the ARISCAT risk score for PPCs (≥ 26 points) and/or (ii) a combination of age > 40 years and scheduled surgery lasting > 2 h and planned to receive an intra-arterial catheter for blood pressure monitoring during the surgery will be included. Patients are assigned to either an intraoperative ventilation strategy with individualized high PEEP, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs or one with a standard low PEEP of 5 cm H2O without RMs. The primary outcome is a collapsed composite endpoint of PPCs until postoperative day 5.

GENERATOR will be the first adequately powered randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of individualized high PEEP with RMs versus standard low PEEP without RMs on the occurrence of PPCs after minimally invasive abdominal surgery. The results of the GENERATOR trial will support anesthesiologists in their decisions regarding PEEP settings during minimally invasive abdominal surgery.

GENERATOR is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (study identifier: NCT06101511) on 26 October 2023.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) requires pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position. Our aim was to investigate the influence of the combination of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on mechanical power and its components during RALP.

Sixty-one prospectively enrolled patients scheduled for RALP were studied in supine position before surgery, during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery at constant ventilatory setting. In a subgroup of 17 patients the response to increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from 5 to 10 cmH2O was studied.

The application of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position increased the total mechanical power (13.8 [11.6 - 15.5] vs 9.2 [7.5 - 11.7] J/min, p < 0.001) and its elastic and resistive components compared to supine position before surgery. In supine position after surgery the total mechanical power and its elastic component decreased but remained higher compared to supine position before surgery. Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cmH2O within each timepoint significantly increased the total mechanical power (supine position before surgery: 9.8 [8.4 - 10.4] vs 12.1 [11.4 - 14.2] J/min, p < 0.001; pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position: 13.8 [12.2 - 14.3] vs 15.5 [15.0 - 16.7] J/min, p < 0.001; supine position after surgery: 10.2 [9.4 - 10.7] vs 12.7 [12.0 - 13.6] J/min, p < 0.001), without affecting respiratory system elastance.

Mechanical power in healthy patients undergoing RALP significantly increased both during the pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery. PEEP always increased mechanical power without ameliorating the respiratory system elastance.

Postoperative pulmonary complications can increase hospital length of stay, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. Although many factors can increase the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, it is not known whether intraoperative ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) mismatch can be associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications after major noncardiac surgery.

This study enrolled patients undergoing general anesthesia for noncardiac surgery and evaluated intraoperative V/Q distribution using the automatic lung parameter estimator technique. The assessment was done after anesthesia induction, after 1 h from surgery start, and at the end of surgery. Demographic and procedural information were collected, and intraoperative ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters were measured at each timepoint. Patients were followed up for 7 days after surgery and assessed daily for postoperative pulmonary complication occurrence.

The study enrolled 101 patients with a median age of 71 [62 to 77] years, a body mass index of 25 [22.4 to 27.9] kg/m2, and a preoperative Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) score of 41 [34 to 47]. Of these patients, 29 (29%) developed postoperative pulmonary complications, mainly acute respiratory failure (23%) and pleural effusion (11%). Patients with and without postoperative pulmonary complications did not differ in levels of shunt at T1 (postoperative pulmonary complications: 22.4% [10.4 to 35.9%] vs. no postoperative pulmonary complications:19.3% [9.4 to 24.1%]; P = 0.18) or during the protocol, whereas significantly different levels of high V/Q ratio were found during surgery (postoperative pulmonary complications: 13 [11 to 15] mmHg vs. no postoperative pulmonary complications: 10 [8 to 13.5] mmHg; P = 0.007) and before extubation (postoperative pulmonary complications: 13 [11 to 14] mmHg vs. no postoperative pulmonary complications: 10 [8 to 12] mmHg; P = 0.006). After adjusting for age, ARISCAT, body mass index, smoking, fluid balance, anesthesia type, laparoscopic procedure and surgery duration, high V/Q ratio before extubation was independently associated with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 1.147; 95% CI, 1.021 to 1.289; P = 0.02). The sensitivity analysis showed an E-value of 1.35 (CI, 1.11).

In patients with intermediate or high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications undergoing major noncardiac surgery, intraoperative V/Q mismatch is associated with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications. Increased high V/Q ratio before extubation is independently associated with the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the first 7 days after surgery.

Mechanical ventilation exposes the lung to injurious stresses and strains that can negatively affect clinical outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome or cause pulmonary complications after general anesthesia. Excess global lung strain, estimated as increased respiratory system driving pressure, is associated with mortality related to mechanical ventilation. The role of small-dimension biomechanical factors underlying this association and their spatial heterogeneity within the lung are currently unknown. Using four-dimensional computed tomography with a voxel resolution of 2.4 cubic millimeters and a multiresolution convolutional neural network for whole-lung image segmentation, we dynamically measured voxel-wise lung inflation and tidal parenchymal strains. Healthy or injured ovine lungs were evaluated as the mechanical ventilation positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was titrated from 20 to 2 centimeters of water. The PEEP of minimal driving pressure (PEEPDP) optimized local lung biomechanics. We observed a greater rate of change in nonaerated lung mass with respect to PEEP below PEEPDP compared with PEEP values above this threshold. PEEPDP similarly characterized a breaking point in the relationships between PEEP and SD of local tidal parenchymal strain, the 95th percentile of local strains, and the magnitude of tidal overdistension. These findings advance the understanding of lung collapse, tidal overdistension, and strain heterogeneity as local triggers of ventilator-induced lung injury in large-animal lungs similar to those of humans and could inform the clinical management of mechanical ventilation to improve local lung biomechanics.

This study determined the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure levels in infants in supine and prone positions under general anesthesia using electrical impedance tomography (EIT).

This prospective observational single-centre study included infants scheduled for surgery in the prone position. An electrical impedance tomography sensor was applied after inducing general anesthesia. The optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in the supine position was determined in a decremental trial based on EIT and compliance. Subsequently, the patient's position was changed to prone. Electrical impedance tomography parameters, including global inhomogeneity index, regional ventilation delay, opening pressure, the centre of ventilation, and pendelluft volume, were continuously obtained up to 1 h after prone positioning. The optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in the prone position was similarly determined.

Data from 30 infants were analyzed. The mean value of electrical impedance tomography-based optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in the prone position was significantly higher than that in the supine position [10.9 (1.6) cmH2O and 6.1 (0.9) cmH2O, respectively (p < .001)]. Significant differences were observed between electrical impedance tomography- and compliance-based optimal positive end-expiratory pressure. Peak and mean airway, plateau, and driving pressures increased 1 h after prone positioning compared with those in the supine position. In addition, the centre of ventilation for balance in ventilation between the ventral and dorsal regions improved.

The prone position required higher positive end-expiratory pressure than the supine position in mechanically ventilated infants under general anesthesia. EIT is a promising tool to find the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure, which needs to be individualized.

Respiratory system compliance (Crs) is a simple indicator of lung flexibility. However, it remains unclear whether a low Crs during anesthesia induction (iCrs) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative mechanical ventilation.

This retrospective observational study was conducted using a local database. All mechanically ventilated postoperative ICU patients were included in this study. The duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality were compared between the low iCrs group (<25% of distribution) and the normal iCrs group.

A total of 315 patients were classified into the low iCrs (<39 mL/cmH2O) group (n = 78) or the normal iCrs group (n = 237). Low iCrs was associated with a higher chance of mechanical ventilation in 28 days (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The duration of hospital stay was similar. Multivariate analysis showed that in-hospital mortality was higher in the low iCrs group than in the normal iCrs group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.04 [1.13, 32.26]; p = 0.04).

Low iCrs was associated with an increased risk of requiring postoperative mechanical ventilation. An additional result of poor survival related to low iCrs may require further study.

Pulmonary compliance is an important lung factor and is affected by tidal volume. In this study, static and dynamic compliance with tidal volumes of 6 and 10 ml/kg have been evaluated in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery.

This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 patients who were candidate for abdominal cancer surgery. This study was done in patients aged 20-65 years without chronic diseases. After induction of anesthesia, the first group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 10 ml/kg and 8 breaths/minute, and also the second group was ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and 14 breaths/minute. From the beginning and every 15 minutes, expiratory tidal volume, peak and plateau airway pressure, heart rate and blood pressure were measured for two hours. The data was analyzed with SPSS v.20 and P < 0.05 was meaningful.

There was no significant difference between the two groups for demographic characteristics. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the dynamic and static compliance of the patients during the study. However, the static compliance decreased in the 6 ml/kg group and increased in the 10 ml/kg group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.32). The peak, plateau pressure and hemodynamic parameters were the same in the two groups.

In general, the static and dynamic compliance was not significantly different in the two groups despite a slight decrease in the 6 ml/kg group and a slight increase in the 10 ml/kg group.

Surgical procedures on obese patients are dramatically increasing worldwide over the past few years. In this review, we discuss the physiopathology of predominantly respiratory system in obese patients, the importance of preoperative evaluation, preoxygenation and intraoperative positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration to prevent pulmonary complications and the optimization of airway management and oxygenation to reduce or prevent postoperative respiratory complications.

Many patients are coming to preoperative clinic with medication history of glucagon-like-peptide 1 agonists ( GLP-1) agonists and it has raised many questions regarding Nil Per Os (NPO)/perioperative fasting guidelines due to delayed gastric emptying caused by these medications. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) has come up with guiding document to help with such situations. Ambulatory surgery centers are doing more obesity cases in a safe manner which were deemed unsafe at one point . Quantitative train of four (TOF) monitoring, better neuromuscular reversal agents and gastric ultrasounds seemed to have made a significant impact in the care of obese patients in the perioperative period.

Obese patients are at higher risk of perioperative complications, mainly associated with those related to the respiratory function. An appropriate preoperative evaluation, intraoperative management, and postoperative support and monitoring is essential to improve outcome and increase the safety of the surgical procedure.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), can lead to organ dysfunction and clinical symptoms beyond the acute infection phase. These effects may have significant implications for the management of perioperative patients. The purpose of this article is to provide a systems-based approach to the subacute and chronic effects of SARS-CoV-2 that are most relevant to anesthesiology practice.

In 2024, COVID-19 remains a concern for anesthesiologists due ongoing new infections, evolving viral strains, and relatively low rates of booster vaccination in the general population. A growing body of literature describes the post-COVID-19 syndrome in which patients experience symptoms more than 12 weeks after acute infection. Recent literature describes the lingering effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on all major organ systems, including neurologic, pulmonary, cardiovascular, renal, hematologic, and musculoskeletal, and suggests an increased perioperative mortality risk in some populations.

This review offers anesthesiologists an organ system-based approach to patients with a history of COVID-19. Recognizing the long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection can help anesthesiologists to better evaluate perioperative risk, anticipate clinical challenges, and thereby optimize patient care.

Mechanical power (MP), the rate of mechanical energy (ME) delivery, is a recently introduced unifying ventilator parameter consisting of tidal volume, airway pressures, and respiratory rates, which predicts pulmonary complications in several clinical contexts. However, ME has not been previously studied in the perioperative context, and neither parameter has been studied in the context of thoracic surgery utilizing one-lung ventilation.

The relationships between ME variables and postoperative pulmonary complications were evaluated in this post hoc analysis of data from a multicenter randomized clinical trial of lung resection surgery conducted between 2020 and 2021 (n = 1,170). Time-weighted average MP and ME (the area under the MP time curve) were obtained for individual patients. The primary analysis was the association of time-weighted average MP and ME with pulmonary complications within 7 postoperative days. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the relationships between energy variables and the primary outcome.

In 1,055 patients analyzed, pulmonary complications occurred in 41% (431 of 1,055). The median (interquartile ranges) ME and time-weighted average MP in patients who developed postoperative pulmonary complications versus those who did not were 1,146 (811 to 1,530) J versus 924 (730 to 1,240) J (P < 0.001), and 6.9 (5.5 to 8.7) J/min versus 6.7 (5.2 to 8.5) J/min (P = 0.091), respectively. ME was independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (ORadjusted, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.80]; P = 0.001). However, the association between time-weighted average MP and postoperative pulmonary complications was time-dependent, and time-weighted average MP was significantly associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in cases utilizing longer periods of mechanical ventilation (210 min or greater; ORadjusted, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.93]; P = 0.007). Normalization of ME and time-weighted average MP either to predicted body weight or to respiratory system compliance did not alter these associations.

ME and, in cases requiring longer periods of mechanical ventilation, MP were independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery.

The present review summarizes the current knowledge and the barriers encountered when implementing tailoring lung-protective ventilation strategies to individual patients based on advanced monitoring systems.

Lung-protective ventilation has become a pivotal component of perioperative care, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). High-quality research has established the benefits of strategies such as low tidal volume ventilation and low driving pressures. Debate is still ongoing on the most suitable levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the role of recruitment maneuvers. Adapting PEEP according to patient-specific factors offers potential benefits in maintaining ventilation distribution uniformity, especially in challenging scenarios like pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positions. Advanced monitoring systems, which continuously assess patient responses and enable the fine-tuning of ventilation parameters, offer real-time data analytics to predict and prevent impending lung complications. However, their impact on postoperative outcomes, particularly PPCs, is an ongoing area of research.

Refining protective lung ventilation is crucial to provide patients with the best possible care during surgery, reduce the incidence of PPCs, and improve their overall surgical journey.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to lessen surgical insult, promote recovery, and improve postoperative clinical outcomes across a number of specialty operations. A core tenet of ERAS involves the provision of protocolized evidence-based perioperative interventions. Given both the growing enthusiasm for applying ERAS principles to cardiac surgery and the broad scope of relevant interventions, an international, multidisciplinary expert panel was assembled to derive a list of potential program elements, review the literature, and provide a statement regarding clinical practice for each topic area. This article summarizes those consensus statements and their accompanying evidence. These results provide the foundation for best practice for the management of the adult patient undergoing cardiac surgery.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) has a significant negative impact and are associated with increased length of hospital stay and cost of care. Emergency surgery is a well-established risk factor for PPC. Previous studies reported that personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) might reduce postoperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications. N = 168 adult patients undergoing major emergency laparotomy under general anesthesia were recruited in this study. A minimum driving pressure based incremental PEEP titration was compared to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O. The primary outcome was PPC up to postoperative day 7. The mean (standard deviation) of the recruited patients was 41.7(16.1)y, and 48.8% (82 of 168 patients) were female. The risk of PPC at postoperative day 7 was similar in both the study groups [Relative risk (RR) (95% Confidence interval, CI) 0.81 (0.58, 1.13); p = 0.25]. In addition, the incidence of intraoperative hypotension [p = 0.75], oxygen-free days at day 28 [p = 0.27], duration of postoperative hospital stay [p = 0.50], length of postoperative intensive care unit stay [p = 0.28], and in-hospital mortality [p = 0.38] were similar in two groups. Incidence of PPC was not reduced with the use of an individualized PEEP strategy based on lowest driving pressure. However, the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was also not increased with titrated PEEP.Trial Registration: www.ctri.nic.in ; CTRI/2020/12/029765.

Intraoperative cardiopulmonary variables are well-known predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC), traditionally quantified by median values over the duration of surgery. However, it is unknown whether cardiopulmonary instability, or wider intra-operative variability of the same metrics, is distinctly associated with PPC risk and severity. We leveraged a retrospective cohort of adults (n = 1202) undergoing major non-cardiothoracic surgery. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association of two outcomes (1)moderate-or-severe PPC and (2)any PPC with two sets of exposure variables- (a)variability of cardiopulmonary metrics (inter-quartile range, IQR) and (b)median intraoperative cardiopulmonary metrics. We compared predictive ability (receiver operating curve analysis, ROC) and parsimony (information criteria) of three models evaluating different aspects of the intra-operative cardiopulmonary metrics: Median-based: Median cardiopulmonary metrics alone, Variability-based: IQR of cardiopulmonary metrics alone, and Combined: Medians and IQR. Models controlled for peri-operative/surgical factors, demographics, and comorbidities. PPC occurred in 400(33%) of patients, and 91(8%) experienced moderate-or-severe PPC. Variability in multiple intra-operative cardiopulmonary metrics was independently associated with risk of moderate-or-severe, but not any, PPC. For moderate-or-severe PPC, the best-fit predictive model was the Variability-based model by both information criteria and ROC analysis (area under the curve, AUCVariability-based = 0.74 vs AUCMedian-based = 0.65, p = 0.0015; AUCVariability-based = 0.74 vs AUCCombined = 0.68, p = 0.012). For any PPC, the Median-based model yielded the best fit by information criteria. Predictive accuracy was marginally but not significantly higher for the Combined model (AUCCombined = 0.661) than for the Median-based (AUCMedian-based = 0.657, p = 0.60) or Variability-based (AUCVariability-based = 0.649, p = 0.29) models. Variability of cardiopulmonary metrics, distinct from median intra-operative values, is an important predictor of moderate-or-severe PPC.

Postoperative pulmonary complications is a major issue that affects outcomes of surgical patients. The hypothesis was that the intraoperative ventilation parameters are associated with occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Lille University Hospital, France. The study included 33,701 adults undergoing noncardiac, nonthoracic elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with tracheal intubation between January 2010 and December 2019. Intraoperative ventilation parameters were compared between patients with and without one or more postoperative pulmonary complications (respiratory infection, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm, and aspiration pneumonitis) within 7 days of surgery.

Among 33,701 patients, 2,033 (6.0%) had one or more postoperative pulmonary complications. The lower tidal volume to predicted body weight ratio (odds ratio per -1 ml·kgPBW-1, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.14; P < 0.001), higher mechanical power (odds ratio per 4 J·min-1, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.49; P < 0.001), dynamic respiratory system compliance less than 30 ml·cm H2O (1.30; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.46; P < 0.001), oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry less than 96% (odds ratio, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.96; P < 0.001), and lower end-tidal carbon dioxide (odds ratio per -3 mmHg, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13; P = 0.023) were independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients with postoperative pulmonary complications were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 12.5; 95% CI, 6.6 to 10.1; P < 0.001), had longer hospital length of stay (subhazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.45), and higher in-hospital (subhazard ratio, 6.0; 95% CI, 4.1 to 9.0; P < 0.001) and 1-yr mortality (subhazard ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 2.33 to 3.02; P < 0.001).

In the study's population, decreased rather than increased tidal volume, decreased compliance, increased mechanical power, and decreased end-tidal carbon dioxide were independently associated with postoperative pulmonary complications.

Inadequate intraoperative mechanical ventilation (MV) can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury and increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Mechanical power (MP) was shown to be a valuable indicator for MV outcomes in critical care patients. The aim of this study is to assess the association between intraoperative MP in low-risk surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia and PPCs.

Two-hundred eighteen low-risk surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery were included in the study. Intraoperative mechanical ventilatory support parameters were collected for all patients. Postoperatively, patients were followed throughout their hospital stay and up to seven days post discharge for the occurrence of any PPCs.

Out of 218 patients, 35% exhibited PPCs. The average body mass index, tidal volume per ideal body weight, peak inspiratory pressure, and MP were significantly higher in the patients with PPCs than in the patients without PPCs (30.3 ± 8.1 kg/m2 vs. 26.8 ± 4.9 kg.m2, p < 0.001; 9.1 ± 1.9 ml/kg vs. 8.6 ± 1.4 ml/kg, p = 0.02; 20 ± 4.9 cmH2O vs. 18 ± 3.7 cmH2O, p = 0.001; 12.9 ± 4.5 J/min vs. 11.1 ± 3.7 J/min, p = 0.002). A multivariable regression analysis revealed MP as the sole significant predictor for the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications [OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.2, p = 0.036].

High intraoperative mechanical power is a risk factor for developing postoperative pulmonary complications. Furthermore, intraoperative mechanical power is superior to other traditional mechanical ventilation variables in identifying surgical patients who are at risk for developing postoperative pulmonary complications.

NCT03551899; 24/02/2017.

High mechanical power and driving pressure (ΔP) have been associated with postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) and may be important parameters guiding mechanical ventilation. However, it remains unclear whether high mechanical power and ΔP merely reflect patients with poor respiratory system mechanics at risk of PRF. We investigated the effect of mechanical power and ΔP on PRF in cohorts after exact matching by patients' baseline respiratory system compliance.

Hospital registry study.

Academic hospital in New England.

Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia between 2008 and 2020.

None.

The primary exposure was high (≥ 6.7 J/min, cohort median) versus low mechanical power and the key-secondary exposure was high (≥ 15.0 cm H 2 O) versus low ΔP. The primary endpoint was PRF (reintubation or unplanned noninvasive ventilation within seven days). Among 97,555 included patients, 4,030 (4.1%) developed PRF. In adjusted analyses, high intraoperative mechanical power and ΔP were associated with higher odds of PRF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.37 [95% CI, 1.25-1.50]; p < 0.001 and aOR 1.45 [95% CI, 1.31-1.60]; p < 0.001, respectively). There was large variability in applied ventilatory parameters, dependent on the anesthesia provider. This facilitated matching of 63,612 (mechanical power cohort) and 53,260 (ΔP cohort) patients, yielding identical baseline standardized respiratory system compliance (standardized difference [SDiff] = 0.00) with distinctly different mechanical power (9.4 [2.4] vs 4.9 [1.3] J/min; SDiff = -2.33) and ΔP (19.3 [4.1] vs 11.9 [2.1] cm H 2 O; SDiff = -2.27). After matching, high mechanical power and ΔP remained associated with higher risk of PRF (aOR 1.30 [95% CI, 1.17-1.45]; p < 0.001 and aOR 1.28 [95% CI, 1.12-1.46]; p < 0.001, respectively).

High mechanical power and ΔP are associated with PRF independent of patient's baseline respiratory system compliance. Our findings support utilization of these parameters for titrating mechanical ventilation in the operating room and ICU.

Many RCTs have evaluated the influence of intraoperative tidal volume (tV), PEEP, and driving pressure on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, cardiovascular complications, and mortality in adult patients. Our meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between tV, PEEP, and driving pressure and the above-mentioned outcomes.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs from inception to May 19, 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications; the secondary outcomes were intraoperative cardiovascular complications and 30-day mortality. Primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated stratifying patients in the following groups: (1) low tV (LV, tV 6-8 ml kg-1 and PEEP ≥5 cm H2O) vs high tV (HV, tV >8 ml kg-1 and PEEP=0 cm H2O); (2) higher PEEP (HP, ≥6 cm H2O) vs lower PEEP (LP, <6 cm H2O); and (3) driving pressure-guided PEEP (DP) vs fixed PEEP (FP).

We included 16 RCTs with a total sample size of 4993. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was lower in patients treated with LV than with HV (OR=0.402, CI 0.280-0.577, P<0.001) and lower in DP than in FP group (OR=0.358, CI 0.187-0.684, P=0.002). Postoperative pulmonary complications did not differ between HP and LP groups; the incidence of intraoperative cardiovascular complications was higher in HP group (OR=1.385, CI 1.027-1.867, P=0.002). The 30-day mortality was not influenced by the ventilation strategy.

Optimal intraoperative mechanical ventilation is unclear; however, our meta-analysis showed that low tidal volume and driving pressure-guided PEEP strategies were associated with a reduction in postoperative pulmonary complications.

Higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during laparoscopic surgery may increase oxygenation and respiratory compliance. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the impact of different intraoperative PEEP strategies on arterial oxygenation, compliance, and hemodynamics during laparoscopic surgery in non-obese patients.

We searched RCTs in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from January 2012 to April 2022 comparing the different intraoperative PEEP (Low PEEP (LPEEP): 0-4 mbar; Moderate PEEP (MPEEP): 5-8 mbar; high PEEP (HPEEP): >8 mbar; individualized PEEP - iPEEP) on arterial oxygenation, respiratory compliance (Cdyn), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR). We calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and predictive intervals (PI) using random-effects models. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool was applied.

21 RCTs (n = 1554) met the inclusion criteria. HPEEP vs. LPEEP increased PaO2 (+ 29.38 [16.20; 42.56] mmHg, p < 0.0001) or PaO2/FiO2 (+ 36.7 [+ 2.23; +71.70] mmHg, p = 0.04). HPEEP vs. MPEEP increased PaO2 (+ 22.00 [+ 1.11; +42.88] mmHg, p = 0.04) or PaO2/FiO2 (+ 42.7 [+ 2.74; +82.67] mmHg, p = 0.04). iPEEP vs. MPEEP increased PaO2/FiO2 (+ 115.2 [+ 87.21; +143.20] mmHg, p < 0.001). MPEEP vs. LPEP, and HPEEP vs. MPEEP increased PaO2 or PaO2/FiO2 significantly with different heterogeneity. HPEEP vs. LPEEP increased Cdyn (+ 7.87 [+ 1.49; +14.25] ml/mbar, p = 0.02). MPEEP vs. LPEEP, and HPEEP vs. MPEEP did not impact Cdyn (p = 0.14 and 0.38, respectively). iPEEP vs. LPEEP decreased driving pressure (-4.13 [-2.63; -5.63] mbar, p < 0.001). No significant differences in MAP or HR were found between any subgroups.

HPEEP and iPEEP during PNP in non-obese patients could promote oxygenation and increase Cdyn without clinically significant changes in MAP and HR. MPEEP could be insufficient to increase respiratory compliance and improve oxygenation. LPEEP may lead to decreased respiratory compliance and worsened oxygenation.

CRD42022362379; registered October 09, 2022.

A protective intra-operative lung ventilation strategy has been widely recommended for laparoscopic surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and its effects during pneumoperitoneum. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has recently been introduced as a bedside tool to monitor lung ventilation in real-time.

We hypothesised that individually titrated EIT-PEEP adjusted to the surgical intervention would improve respiratory mechanics during and after surgery.

Randomised controlled trial.

First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing.

Seventy-five patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery under general anaesthesia.

Patients were randomly assigned 2 : 1 to individualised EIT-titrated PEEP (PEEPEIT; n = 50) or traditional PEEP 5 cmH2O (PEEP5 cmH2O; n = 25). The PEEPEIT group received individually titrated EIT-PEEP during pneumoperitoneum. The PEEP5 cmH2O group received PEEP of 5 cmH2O during pneumoperitoneum.

The primary outcome was respiratory system compliance during laparoscopic surgery. Secondary outcomes were individualised PEEP levels, oxygenation, respiratory and haemodynamic status, and occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within 7 days.

Compared with PEEP5 cmH2O, patients who received PEEPEIT had higher respiratory system compliance (mean values during surgery of 44.3 ± 11.3 vs. 31.9 ± 6.6, ml cmH2O-1; P < 0.001), lower driving pressure (11.5 ± 2.1 vs. 14.0 ± 2.4 cmH2O; P < 0.001), better oxygenation (mean PaO2/FiO2 427.5 ± 28.6 vs. 366.8 ± 36.4; P = 0.003), and less postoperative atelectasis (19.4 ± 1.6 vs. 46.3 ± 14.8 g of lung tissue mass; P = 0.003). Haemodynamic values did not differ significantly between the groups. No adverse effects were observed during surgery.

Individualised PEEP by EIT may improve intra-operative pulmonary mechanics and oxygenation without impairing haemodynamic stability, and decrease postoperative atelectasis.

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn) identifier: ChiCTR2100045166.

Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) improves respiratory mechanics. However, whether PEEP reduces postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remains unclear. We investigated whether driving pressure-guided PEEP reduces PPCs after laparoscopic/robotic abdominal surgery.

This single-centre, randomised controlled trial enrolled patients at risk for PPCs undergoing laparoscopic or robotic lower abdominal surgery. The individualised group received driving pressure-guided PEEP, whereas the comparator group received 5 cm H2O fixed PEEP during surgery. Both groups received a tidal volume of 8 ml kg-1 ideal body weight. The primary outcome analysed per protocol was a composite of pulmonary complications (defined by pre-specified clinical and radiological criteria) within 7 postoperative days after surgery.

Some 384 patients (median age: 67 yr [inter-quartile range: 61-73]; 66 [18%] female) were randomised. Mean (standard deviation) PEEP in patients randomised to individualised PEEP (n=178) was 13.6 cm H2O (2.1). Individualised PEEP resulted in lower mean driving pressures (14.7 cm H2O [2.6]), compared with 185 patients randomised to standard PEEP (18.4 cm H2O [3.2]; mean difference: -3.7 cm H2O [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.3 to -3.1 cm H2O]; P<0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of pulmonary complications between individualised (25/178 [14.0%]) vs standard PEEP (36/185 [19.5%]; risk ratio [95% CI], 0.72 [0.45-1.15]; P=0.215). Pulmonary complications as a result of desaturation were less frequent in patients randomised to individualised PEEP (8/178 [4.5%], compared with standard PEEP (30/185 [16.2%], risk ratio [95% CI], 0.28 [0.13-0.59]; P=0.001).

Driving pressure-guided PEEP did not decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications within 7 days of laparoscopic or robotic lower abdominal surgery, although uncertainty remains given the lower than anticipated event rate for the primary outcome.

KCT0004888 (http://cris.nih.go.kr, registration date: April 6, 2020).

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different titrated methods used to determine individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for intraoperative mechanical ventilation in female patients undergoing general anesthesia in different operative positions, and provide reference ranges of optimal PEEP values based on the titration.

A total of 123 female patients who underwent elective open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. After endotracheal intubation, patients' body position was adjusted to the supine position, Trendelenburg positions at 10° and 20° respectively. PEEP was titrated from 20 cmH2O to 4 cmH2O, decreasing by 2 cmH2O every 1 min. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), hemodynamic and respiratory mechanics parameters were continuously monitored and recorded. Optimal PEEP values and reference ranges were respectively calculated based on optimal EIT parameters, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and lung dynamic compliance (Cdyn).

EIT-guided optimal PEEP was found to have higher values than those of the MAP-guided and Cdyn-guided methods for all three body positions (P < 0.001), and it was observed to more significantly inhibit hemodynamics (P < 0.05). The variable coefficients of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were smaller than those of the other two methods, and this technique could provide better ventilation uniformity for dorsal/ventral lung fields and better balance for pulmonary atelectasis/collapse. The 95% reference ranges of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were 4.6-13.8 cmH2O, 7.0-15.0 cmH2O and 8.6-17.0 cmH2O for the supine position, Trendelenburg 10°, and Trendelenburg 20° positions, respectively.

EIT-guided optimal PEEP titration was found to be a superior method for lung protective ventilation in different operative positions under general anesthesia. The calculated reference ranges of PEEP values based on the EIT-guided method can be used as a reference for intraoperative mechanical ventilation.