Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Urol. Nov 24, 2014; 3(3): 364-369
Published online Nov 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.364
Table 1 Study designs
Ref.No. of patientsStudy designLength of studyControl groupLength of follow up
Gelbard et al[22]31ProspectiveMean of 22 mo per patientNone9.8 mo (mean)
Gelbard et al[23]49Double blind, RCT3 moPlacebo3 mo
Jordan[24]25Prospective9 moNoneNone
Gelbard et al[25]147Double blind, RCTUp to 18 wkPlaceboNone
Gelbard et al[26]832Double blind, RCTUp to 52 wkPlaceboNone
Table 2 Study treatments
Ref.Intralesional injection therapy dose and schedule
Gelbard et al[22]One daily dose of 470620 μg/mL (15 patients) or 910 μg/mL (16 patients) for three consecutive days
Gelbard et al[23]CCH single injection (6000-14000 Units)
Jordan[24]Three 10000 Units injections administered over 7-10 d, repeated at 3 mo
Gelbard et al[25]CCH 0.58 mg (10000 Units), 2 injections 24-72 h apart, repeated every 6 wk for up to 3 cycles
Gelbard et al[26]CCH 0.58 mg (10000 Units), 2 injections 24-72 h apart, repeated every 6 wk for up to 4 cycles
Table 3 Adverse events
Ref.Adverse effects (n)
Gelbard et al[22]Ecchymosis (21), Pain (2), Albuginea rupture (1)
Gelbard et al[23]Tenderness at injection site (Majority), tunica albuginea rupture (1)
Jordan[24]Edema/pain/or ecchymosis (20), No serious AEs
Gelbard et al[25]Bruising (96), Edema (50), Pain (58), No serious AEs
Gelbard et al[26]Ecchymosis (441), Edema (30), Pain (250), Corporeal rupture (3), Penile hematoma (3)
Table 4 Study outcomes
Ref.OutcomeOxford Centre for Evidence-Based
Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence
Gelbard et al[22]Improvement seen in 20 patients (4 had plaque disappearance, 16 had curvature decrease by 20%-100%)2
Gelbard et al[23]Overall, 36% responsed to treatment. Improvement greatest in patients with lesser degree of pre-treatment curvature2
Jordan[24]Significant mean changes from baseline angular deviation and plaque width at 3, 6, and 9 mo2
Gelbard et al[25]Improved penile curvature (29.7% vs 11.0%, P < 0.05 ) and patient reported bother scores for treatment group vs placebo1
Gelbard et al[26]Improved penile curvature (34% vs 18%, P < 0.0001) and patient reported symtom bother score for treatment group vs placebo1