Published online Nov 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.364
Revised: May 16, 2014
Accepted: July 15, 2014
Published online: November 24, 2014
Processing time: 227 Days and 21.1 Hours
AIM: To review the relevant literature in an effort to examine the body of evidence available to date.
METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE search database was queried using MeSH terms “penile induration”, “peyronie’s disease”, “Collagenases” and “Collagenase” using various permutations. No temporal parameters were employed.
RESULTS: In all, 5 relevant clinical trials were isolated from 34 results. These trials were analyzed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. They were further examined based on study design and methods; the primary and secondary outcomes were reviewed for treatment efficacy and collagenase-related side effects.
CONCLUSION: Intralesional collagenase appears to be safe and effective in the non-surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. However, the data remains limited and further inquiries into the safety of collagenase, treatment standardization and standardized outcomes reporting remain necessary. Furthermore, studies comparing intralesional collagenase to alternative medical and surgical therapy will be important in guiding the future treatment decision process.
Core tip: In December of 2013, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved the use of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease (PD). In all, 5 relevant clinical trials were isolated from 34 results. With limited data on medical PD treatments, the studies to date appear to support CCH as a reasonably safe and well-tolerated non-surgical intervention. However, because no studies compared CCH to other medical interventions and no trials have been conducted to assess the ultimate need for surgical intervention, further comparative investigations are necessary to determine the ultimate role that the intralesional collagenase may play in the treatment of PD.