Katagiri D, Hinoshita F. Benefits and risks of erythrocyte-stimulating agents. World J Clin Urol 2014; 3(3): 258-263 [DOI: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.258]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Fumihiko Hinoshita, MD, PhD, Department of Nephrology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan. fhinoshi@hosp.ncgm.go.jp
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Article-Type of This Article
Review
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Classify patients as having ESA hyporesponsiveness if they have no increase in Hb concentration from baseline after the first month of ESA treatment on appropriate weight-based dosing
In patients with ESA hyporesponsiveness, avoid repeated escalations of the ESA dose beyond double the initial weight-based dose
Subsequent ESA hyporesponsiveness
Classify patients as having acquired ESA hyporesponsiveness if after treatment with stable doses of ESA, they require two increases in ESA doses up to 50% beyond the dose at which they had been stable in an effort to maintain a stable Hb concentration
In patients with acquired ESA hyporesponsiveness, avoid repeated escalations in ESA dose beyond double the dose at which they had been stable
Management of poor ESA responsiveness
Evaluate patients with either initial or acquired ESA hyporesponsiveness and treat for specific causes of poor ESA response
For patients who remain hyporesponsive despite the correction of treatable causes, accounting for relative risks and benefits: decline in Hb concentration; continuing ESA if needed to maintain Hb concentration, with due consideration of the doses required; blood transfusions
Table 3 Practical approach in the presence of erythrocyte-stimulating agents resintance (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Guideline 2012)[20]
Tests
Finding and action
Check adherence
If poor, attempt to improve (if self-injection)
Reticulocyte count
If > 130000/μL, look for blood loss or hemolysis: endoscopy, colonoscopy, hemolysis screen
Serum vitamin B12, folate
If low, replenish
Iron status
If low, replenish iron
Serum PTH
If elevated, manage hyperparathyroidism
Serum CRP
If elevated, check for and treat infection or inflammation
Underdialysis
If underdialyzed, improve dialysis efficiency
ACEi/ARB use
If yes, consider reducing dose or discontinuing drug
Table 4 Nonhematologic complications associated with erythropoietin therapy[11]
Adverse effects
Hypertension
Injection site pain
Seizure
Pure red cell aplasia
Liver dysfunction
Shock, anaphylaxis
Thrombotic complications
Table 5 Evaluation for pure red cell aplasia (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Guideline 2012)[20]
Investigate for possible antibody-mediated PRCA when a patient receiving ESA therapy for more than 8 wk develops the following:
Sudden rapid decrease in Hb concentration at the rate of 0.5 to 1.0 g/dL (5 to 10 g/L) per week OR requirement of transfusions at the rate of approximately 1 to 2 per week
Normal platelet and white cell counts
Absolute reticulocyte count less than 10000/mL
ESA therapy should be stopped in patients who develop antibody-mediated PRCA
Peginesatide should be used to treat patients with antibody-mediated PRCA
Citation: Katagiri D, Hinoshita F. Benefits and risks of erythrocyte-stimulating agents. World J Clin Urol 2014; 3(3): 258-263