Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2014; 3(1): 44-46
Published online Mar 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i1.44
Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic work up of clinical localized prostate cancer: A review
Martin H Umbehr, Cédric Poyet, Olivio F Donati, Michael Müntener
Martin H Umbehr, Michael Müntener, Department of Urology, City Hospital Triemli of Zurich, 8063 Zurich, Switzerland
Cédric Poyet, Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
Olivio F Donati, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
Author contributions: All the authors contributed equally to this work by writing and editing the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Martin H Umbehr, MD, Department of Urology, City Hospital Triemli of Zurich, Birmensdorferstrasse 497, 8063 Zurich, Switzerland. martin.umbehr@triemli.zuerich.ch
Telephone: +41-44-4661111 Fax: +41-44-4662701
Received: November 3, 2013
Revised: December 24, 2013
Accepted: January 14, 2014
Published online: March 24, 2014
Processing time: 141 Days and 15.2 Hours
Abstract

Imaging plays an increasingly important role in the work up of prostate cancer (PCa) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is generally accepted as the most accurate and promising imaging modality in the local staging of PCa due to its high spatial resolution and excellent soft tissue contrast. The quality and performance of MRI of the prostate has improved dramatically during the last decade. Mainly, the combination of morphological information and functional information on cell density, tissue perfusion or metabolism as provided in multi-parametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) has led to a substantial increase in lesion detection and characterization. The correlation between functional parameters as provided by MRI and the aggressiveness of PCa as determined by the Gleason Score may help in differentiating clinically significant from indolent PCa non-invasively. Besides these pros, radiologists are confronted with an immense amount of information and standardized acquisition, interpretation and reporting of mpMRI is not yet a reality. Furthermore, prostate MRI availability is still limited to high volume centers in many countries; hence, it is not yet a routine tool in common daily practice. Hence, development of guidelines for standardized acquisition, interpretation and reporting of prostate MRI exams is urgently needed in order to provide useful information for treating clinicians. Preferably, multi-centric clinical studies comparing MRI findings to step-section histological specimens are mandatory during the coming years. Furthermore, simplification of the acquisition must be achieved in order to make this imaging modality applicable for daily use in common uro-radiological practice.

Keywords: Localized prostate cancer, Magnetic resonance imaging, Local imaging, Staging, Diagnostic work up

Core tip: This review gives an overview about the current strengths and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging in the work up of clinical localized prostate cancer as well as suggestions for steps in the future.