Published online Feb 8, 2016. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i1.47
Peer-review started: June 17, 2015
First decision: September 30, 2015
Revised: October 21, 2015
Accepted: November 23, 2015
Article in press: November 25, 2015
Published online: February 8, 2016
Processing time: 227 Days and 15.9 Hours
Allergic rhinitis is estimated to affect 10%-20% of pediatric population and it is caused by the IgE-sensitization to environmental allergens, most importantly grass pollens and house dust mites. Allergic rhinitis can influence patient’s daily activity severely and may precede the development of asthma, especially if it is not diagnosed and treated correctly. In addition to subcutaneous immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) represents the only treatment being potentially able to cure allergic respiratory diseases, by modulating the immune system activity. This review clearly summarizes and analyzes the available randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials, which aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and the safety of grass pollen and house dust mite SLIT for the specific treatment of pediatric allergic rhinitis. Our analysis demonstrates the good evidence supporting the efficacy of SLIT for allergic rhinitis to grass pollens in children, whereas trials regarding pediatric allergic rhinitis to house dust mites present lower quality, although several studies supported its usefulness.
Core tip: This manuscript aims at describing objectively the current evidences of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for the treatment of pollen and house dust mite allergic rhinitis in children, based upon the available randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials. All these studies have been directly analyzed by the authors and have been summarized in this manuscript, in order to be readily available to the reader. We concluded that there is a good evidence of efficacy for grass pollen SLIT, while the benefit seems to be weaker for house dust mite SLIT, in the specific setting of pediatric allergic rhinitis.