Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy results in clinical and histological remission in approximately 50% of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients. We aimed to systematically update this topic due to cumulative data from pediatric/adult populations in wider geographical settings.

A search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed. Primary outcomes were clinical response and histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field). Subgroup analyses included age group, PPI drug and dosage, study design, data origin, and risk of bias. Data were pooled using random-effects models.

Seventy-three studies comprising 7304 patients were included. PPI therapy led to clinical response in 65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.2-72.4; I2 = 0%) and histological remission in 45.4% (95% CI, 41.6%-49.3%) of patients, without differences between children and adults (41.2% vs 48%; P ••• .17). Overall, 34.1% (95% CI, 27.9%-40.5%) achieved <5 eosinophils per high-power field. Pooled effectiveness was significantly superior (P < .001) in Western Pacific areas, principally Japan (67.9%), compared with American and European areas (40.6% and 44.4%, respectively). Histological remission was significantly higher with double PPI doses compared with standard (51.7% vs 28.3%; P •••.005). Response was significantly higher in studies with lower risk of bias. Maintenance half-doses led to sustained histological remission in 68.2% (95% CI, 63.7%-72.6%; I2 = 0%) of patients.

PPI therapy induces clinic-histological remission in almost half of pediatric and adult EoE patients. Response to PPIs is significantly higher in Japan. Sustained remission is common on tapering PPI doses.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) is divided into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (non-EoE-EGID), based on the involved gastrointestinal organs. The present survey was performed to provide an overview of the current status of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of EGID in Asia.

Responses to the questionnaire were obtained from 228 doctors at various institutions in eight Asian countries. The questionnaire consisted of 52 questions on EoE and non-EoE EGID.

Responses to questionnaire were obtained from 228 doctors from eight countries. The most common participation facilities were university hospitals, followed by public hospitals, private hospitals, and private clinics. 1-10 were the most frequent patients per year in each institution for both EoE and non-EoE-EGID. The 30s and 40s are common age groups for both EoE and non-EoE-EGID. Although endoscopic findings vary among countries, 15 or more eosinophil infiltrations in high-power fields as a diagnostic criterion are used in all countries for EoE. As treatments, the prescription rates of Proton pump inhibitor, diet, topical and systemic steroids, and biologics were similar among the eight countries in EoE. Non-EoE-EGID showed a similar trend to EoE in epidemiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment.

The questionnaire survey partially revealed the current status of the epidemiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of EGID in Asian countries.

EsoCap is a thin mucoadhesive film designed to target the oesophageal mucosa. The device loaded with mometasone furoate (ESO-101) is under investigation for the treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ESO-101 in patients with active EoE.

We conducted a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial at 14 European sites in adults with EoE. Participants received placebo, uncoated EsoCap (n = 15), or EsoCap loaded with 800 μg of mometasone furoate (n = 28) once daily during 28 days. The primary outcome was the absolute change in the peak eosinophil count; secondary outcomes were histologic, clinical and endoscopic measures.

Treatment with ESO-101 resulted in reduction (mean ± SD) of 49.1 ± 88.4 eosinophils/high-power field from baseline, compared with 6.6 ± 65.1 with placebo (p = 0.03). With ESO-101, 48% and 44% of patients achieved < 15 and < 6 eosinophils/high-power field, respectively; these were 0% with placebo. EoE Endoscopic Reference Score reduced significantly in patients treated with ESO-101. In contrast, dysphagia and odynophagia severity decreased similarly in both groups. There were no serious treatment-emergent adverse events. Mean serum cortisol did not change significantly throughout the trial. Notably, no oropharyngeal or oesophageal candidiasis was documented. The device was well tolerated.

ESO-101 was superior to placebo in reducing oesophageal eosinophilia. The device was safe and well tolerated in adults with EoE, supporting the continued development of ESO-101 for the treatment of EoE (Trials.gov No.: NCT04849390; Eu-CT No.: 2020-000082-16).

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory esophageal disorder, often associated with dysphagia, chest discomfort, and heartburn. There is limited information on persistent esophageal symptoms despite histologic remission (HR). We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of persistent esophageal symptoms in adult patients with EoE in HR. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult EoE patients in HR (<15 eosinophils per high power field [eos/hpf]). Exclusion criteria included: no available data on symptoms, chronic opiate use, disorders of esophagogastric junction outflow on Chicago Classification version 4 diagnosis, esophageal candidiasis, erosive esophagitis, or other known cause of esophageal dysphagia besides EoE. Based on prior literature, definitions include: complete HR (<5 eos/hpf), partial HR (5-14 eos/hpf), and endoscopic fibrostenosis (rings and/or stricture). Esophageal symptoms were assessed within 2 weeks of HR and categorized into the major symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain, and heartburn. Given the retrospective nature of the study, a global symptom response (absence or presence) was used. Demographics, disease history, endoscopy reports, EoE endoscopic reference score, and histology were recorded. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Eosinophil thresholds for persistent symptoms were determined using receiver operating characteristics analyses. Of 289 EoE patients in HR, 133 (46%) had esophageal symptoms: dysphagia (N = 119; 41.2%), heartburn (N = 28; 20.8%), and chest pain (N = 10; 7.5%). Significant predictors for persistent dysphagia were anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.77) and endoscopic fibrostenosis (aOR 3.87). Significant predictors for persistent heartburn with or without chest pain were anxiety or depression (aOR 12.2 and aOR 11.0) and partial HR (aOR 1.17 and aOR 1.18). Threshold eosinophil counts for persistent heartburn and chest pain were 2.5 and 3.5 eos/hpf, respectively (AUC 0.71 and 0.69). We report a high prevalence of persistent esophageal symptoms in EoE patients who are in HR. Risk factors include anxiety, depression, endoscopic fibrostenosis, and partial HR. These findings can help direct patient care, including endoscopic dilation and managing psychiatric comorbidities. Targeting less than 2.5 and 3.5 eos/hpf for heartburn and chest pain may be warranted.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the standards of care of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) treatment, though PPI response rates are variable ranging from 23 to 63% in pediatric studies. We sought to determine if expression of select genes in esophageal mucosa can predict PPI responsiveness in EoE. Children with a new diagnosis of EoE (15 or more eosinophils/hpf on esophageal biopsy) were prospectively treated with 8 weeks of PPI therapy before follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Children with <15 eosinophils/hpf on follow-up were classified as having PPI-Responsive EoE (PPI-R) and ≥ 15 eosinophils/hpf as PPI-Nonresponsive EoE (PPI-NR). Using the Nanostring nCounter Analysis System, mRNA expression of a custom panel of genes was measured in esophageal biopsies. Immunohistochemical staining of biopsies was performed. Among children with EoE, 32% (8/25) had PPI-R EoE. ATP12A, ATP4A, tryptase-beta 2 (TPSB2), CLC and IL13 had higher expression in PPI-NR EoE compared to PPI-R EoE or controls. Immunohistochemical staining of ATP12A was higher among PPI-R EoE and PPI-NR EoE, compared to non-EoE controls. In this study, PPI-NR EoE had significantly higher baseline gene expression of mast cell, cytokine, proton pump, and eosinophil genes compared to PPI-R EoE. PPIs may be involved in an inflammatory cascade of mast cell activation that stimulates IL-13 release, which upregulates ATP12A and ATP4A that leads to eosinophil recruitment. Histologic PPI failure may occur when increased gene expression of these components is high and cannot be overcome pharmacologically, especially in the case of proton pump genes.

Adaptive behaviors at mealtime, esophageal symptom-specific anxiety and hypervigilance may affect dysphagia reporting in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but this has not been investigated. Moreover, the relationship between such confounding factors and histological disease activity (HDA) is unclear.

This was a prospective study on adults with EoE. Dysphagia, anxiety, and hypervigilance were assessed using specific questionnaires (i.e., modified dysphagia symptom questionnaire [mDSQ], Dysphagia Symptom Score [DSS], and Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale). Adaptive behaviors were assessed using the Pisa EoE Adaptation Questionnaire. Appropriate statistics was used to investigate correlation between dysphagia, anxiety, hypervigilance, adaptive behaviors, and HDA.

Ninety-five patients were included. Esophageal anxiety, hypervigilance, and use of adaptive behaviors were found in about 50% of patients with EoE. Esophageal anxiety and hypervigilance were significantly higher ( P = 0.03 for both), and adaptive behaviors were significantly more prevalent in histologically active EoE compared with EoE in remission (76.8% vs 25.6%, P < 0.001). As a standalone measurement, mDSQ and DSS had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 77.7% and 75.3% for predicting HDA. Adjustments of mDSQ and DSS based on individual Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale scores and adaptive behaviors at mealtime significantly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of mDSQ and DSS to 86.6% and 84.3%, respectively ( P < 0.05 for both).

Use of adaptive behaviors, higher esophageal anxiety and hypervigilance are associated with active EoE and represent clinical markers of HDA. Adaptive behaviors provide complementary clinical information that is not detected by symptoms alone. The assessment of adaptive behaviors, anxiety, and hypervigilance improves the correlation between clinical and HDA in EoE.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) predominantly affects males across all ages; however, little is known about sex differences for other aspects of EoE.

To investigate associations between sex and clinical presentation, endoscopic features, treatment choice and response in EoE patients in real-world practice.

Cross-sectional analysis of the multicenter EoE CONNECT registry. The independent contribution of patients' sex and other relevant variables were statistically assessed by multivariate models.

A total of 2976 patients (76% male) were evaluated. Males were diagnosed at a younger age compared to females (32.7 ± 14.8 vs. 34.8 ± 15.6 years, respectively; p = 0.002) with similar diagnostic delay. EoE symptoms varied significantly between sexes, with food impaction predominating in males and dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation and abdominal and epigastric pain in females. However, female sex contributed to higher symptom severity at diagnosis as measured with Dysphagia Symptom Score (R2 = 0.57; p = 0.013) and presented higher peak eosinophil count in esophageal biopsies (p = 0.005). Males showed increased risk of stricturing or mixed phenotypes (adjusted OR 1.43, 95%CI:1.05-1.96; p = 0.024). No association was found between patients' sex and first-line treatment modality: proton pump inhibitors (PPI) were preferred over topical corticosteroids in patients with inflammatory phenotypes instead of stricturing or mixed phenotypes, and in patients who did not present food impaction. Both topical corticosteroids and dietary interventions were preferred over PPI in pediatric patients regardless of sex.

Sex is associated with clinical and phenotypical presentation of EoE at diagnosis, with more fibrotic findings in males but higher symptom score in females.

Recently, we have identified a dysregulated protein signature in the esophageal epithelium of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients including proteins associated with inflammation and epithelial barrier function; however, the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment on this signature is unknown. Herein, we used a proteomic approach to investigate: (1) whether PPI treatment alters the esophageal epithelium protein profile observed in EoE patients and (2) whether the protein signature at baseline predicts PPI response.

We evaluated the protein signature of esophageal biopsies using a cohort of adult EoE (n = 25) patients and healthy controls (C) (n = 10). In EoE patients, esophageal biopsies were taken before (pre) and after (post) an 8-week PPI treatment, determining the histologic response. Eosinophil count PostPPI was used to classify the patients: ≥15 eosinophils/hpf as non-responders (non-responder) and < 15 eosinophils/hpf as responders (R). Protein signature was determined and differentially accumulated proteins were characterized to identify altered biological processes and signaling pathways.

Comparative analysis of differentially accumulated proteins between groups revealed common signatures between three groups of patients with inflammation (responder-PrePPI, non-responder-PrePPI, and non-responder-PostPPI) and without inflammation (controls and responder-PostPPI). PPI therapy almost reversed the EoE specific esophageal protein signature, which is enriched in pathways associated with inflammation and epithelial barrier function, in responder-PostPPI. Furthermore, we identified a set of candidate proteins to differentiate responder-PrePPI and non-responder-PrePPI EoE patients before treatment.

These findings provide evidence that PPI therapy reverses the alterations in esophageal inflammatory and epithelial proteins characterizing EoE, thereby providing new insights into the mechanism of PPI clinical response. Interestingly, our results also suggest that PPI response could be predicted at baseline in EoE.

The management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has not been completely established yet. There is a controversy over the universal maintenance therapy for EoE to prevent esophageal fibrostenotic complications. Using an employer-based insurance claim database from January 2005 to September 2022, we investigated the treatment patterns of EoE and the occurrence of esophageal complications. The treatment patterns were analyzed at a 6-month interval from the diagnosis of EoE. The time to treatment discontinuation of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)/potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Of 15,200,895 individuals, 615 patients with EoE were ultimately analyzed with the median follow-up time from the index date of 700 days. PPI/P-CAB and swallowed topical steroids accounted for 80% and 4.6% of the initial therapy, respectively. PPI/P-CAB use rapidly decreased by 40% in the first 6 months and afterwards reinitiation was rarely seen. The median time to treatment discontinuation were 172 days (95% CI 147-206 days) for PPI/P-CAB. Only 1 EoE patient developed esophageal fibrostenotic complications after the diagnosis. With the low incidence of esophageal complications, the universal maintenance therapy may not be necessary for mild EoE patients often seen in Japan.

Data regarding histologic recurrence of EoE on PPI maintenance therapy are lacking.

Retrospective review of 101 patients with histologic PPI-responsive EoE.

52/101 (51%) patients underwent follow-up EGD with biopsies. Of the 52 patients, 29 (56%) maintained histologic remission and 23 (44%) had histologic recurrence. 21 (40%) patients maintained BID PPI, 20 (39%) tapered to QD, and 11 (21%) had discontinued PPI. Of the 21 patients on BID PPI, 7 (33%) had histologic recurrence, of which 6 (86%) were asymptomatic.

Patients on PPI therapy for EoE benefit from serial clinical, endoscopic, and histologic surveillance.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease. In Denmark, the budesonide orodispersible tablet (BOT) is recommended as a second-line treatment for proton pump inhibitor-refractory EoE patients.

To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with BOT in adult EoE patients in a population-based setting in Denmark.

This was a retrospective, registry-based, DanEoE cohort study of all 76 adult EoE patients treated with BOT and diagnosed between 2007 and 2021 in the North Denmark Region. After medical record revision, the EoE diagnosis was defined according to the AGREE consensus. Symptomatic response was based on the information found in the patients' medical reports and histologic remission was defined as <15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf).

Histologic remission was achieved in 89% of the patients treated with BOT who underwent histologic evaluation. Clinicohistologic remission was achieved in 71% of the patients who underwent both symptomatic and histologic evaluation. Despite histologic remission, 18% of patients still experienced symptoms. Non-responders were found in 7% of the patients. Complications were rare, with dilation of strictures performed in 7% and food bolus obstruction (FBO) occurring in 3%. Discontinuation of the treatment due to unacceptable side effects was observed in 11% of the treated patients.

Treatment with BOT effectively induced histologic remission in most of the EoE patients. Despite achieving histologic remission, approximately 1/5 of the patients were still symptomatic. Complications were rare. In non-responders and those with unacceptable side effects, alternative treatment options such as biologic agents might be needed.

This position paper deals with an expert consensus on diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal food impaction issued by the Austrian Eosinophilic Esophagitis Network, a working group under the patronage of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH). In need of a standardized approach on the management of EoE, recommendations were made based on international guidelines and landmark studies.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and histologically by predominantly eosinophilic infiltration of the squamous epithelium. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published a guideline in 2014; however, the rapid evolution of knowledge about pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic options have made an update necessary.

A consensus group of pediatric gastroenterologists from the ESPGHAN Working Group on Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases (ESPGHAN EGID WG) reviewed the recent literature and proposed statements and recommendations on 28 relevant questions about EoE. A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2014 to 2022. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations.

A total of 52 statements based on the available evidence and 44 consensus-based recommendations are available. A revision of the diagnostic protocol, options for initial drug treatment, and the new concept of simplified empiric elimination diets are now available. Biologics are becoming a part of the potential armamentarium for refractory EoE, and systemic steroids may be considered as the initial treatment for esophageal strictures before esophageal dilation. The importance and assessment of quality of life and a planned transition to adult medical care are new areas addressed in this guideline.

Research in recent years has led to a better understanding of childhood EoE. This guideline incorporates the new findings and provides a practical guide for clinicians treating children diagnosed with EoE.

This study compared short-term effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC), and dietary therapies in reversing clinical and histological features in pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitits (EoE). Determinants for treatment choice and PPI therapy effectiveness were also assessed.  A cross-sectional study analysis of patients under 18 years old recruited onto the multicenter EoE CONNECT registry was performed. Clinico-histological response was defined as symptomatic improvement plus a peak eosinophil count below 15 per high-power field after treatment. Effectiveness of first-line options used in monotherapy was compared. Overall, 393 patients (64% adolescents) receiving PPI, STC, or dietary monotherapy to induce EoE remission were identified. PPI was the preferred option (71.5%), despite STC providing the highest clinico-histological response rates (66%) compared to PPI (44%) and diet (42%). Logistic regression identified fibrotic features and recruitment at Italian sites independently associated to first-line STC treatment; age under 12 associated to dietary therapy over other options. Analysis of 262 patients in whom PPI effectiveness was evaluated after median (IQR) 96 (70-145) days showed that this effectiveness was significantly associated with management at pediatric facilities and use of high PPI doses. Among PPI responders, decrease in rings and structures in endoscopy from baseline was documented, with EREFS fibrotic subscore for rings also decreasing among responders (0.27 ± 0.63 vs. 0.05 ± 0.22, p < 0.001).    Conclusion: Initial therapy choice for EoE depends on endoscopic phenotype, patient's age, and patients' origin. High PPI doses and treatment in pediatric facilities significantly determined effectiveness, and reversed fibrotic endoscopic features among responders. What is Known: • Proton pump inhibitors are widely used to induce and maintain remission in EoE in real practice, despite other first-line alternative therapies possibly providing higher effectiveness. What is New: • Proton pump inhibitors represent up to two-thirds of first-line monotherapies used to induce EoE remission in pediatric and adolescent patients with EoE. The choice of STC as first-line treatment for EoE was significantly associated with fibrotic features at baseline endoscopy and recruitment in Italian centers; age less than 12 years was associated with dietary therapy. • PPI effectiveness was found to be determined by use of high doses, attendance at pediatric facilities, presenting inflammatory instead of fibrotic or mixed phenotypes, and younger age. Among responders, PPI therapy reversed both inflammatory and fibrotic features of EoE after short-term treatment.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2 inflammation-mediated disease characterized by an eosinophil-predominant inflammation of the esophagus and symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Relevant treatment outcomes in the setting of EoE include the improvement of histology, symptoms, and endoscopy findings, quality of life (QoL), and the psychological burden of the disease. Established validated tools for the assessment of EoE include questionnaires on dysphagia and QoL (ie, DSQ, EEsAI, and EoE-IQ). More recently, esophageal symptom-specific anxiety and hypervigilance, assessed using the esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS), have emerged as contributors to disease burden, confirming the importance of psychological aspects in EoE patients. The EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is the only validated endoscopy score in EoE and can quantify mucosal disease burden. However, esophageal panometry using the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) have shown potential to optimize the assessment of fibrostenotic features of EoE, providing novel insights into the pathophysiology of symptoms. There is a growing number of licenced and off-label therapeutic options in EoE, with various randomized controlled trials demonstrating the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors, topical steroids, food elimination diets, biological drugs, and esophageal dilatation. However, standardized optimal management strategies of EoE are currently lacking. In this review, we provide an overview of established and novel assessment tools in EoE including patient reported outcomes, FLIP panometry, HRM, endoscopy, and histology outcome measures to improve the outcomes of EoE patients. In addition, we summarize available therapeutic options for EoE based on the most recent evidence.

The present document constitutes Part 2 of the EoETALY Consensus Statements guideline on the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) developed by experts in the field of EoE across Italy (i.e., EoETALY Consensus Group). Part 1 was published as a different document, and included three chapters discussing 1) definition, epidemiology, and pathogenesis; 2) clinical presentation and natural history and 3) diagnosis of EoE. The present work provides guidelines on the management of EoE in two final chapters: 4) treatment and 5) monitoring and follow-up, and also includes considerations on knowledge gaps and a proposed research agenda for the coming years. The guideline was developed through a Delphi process, with grading of the strength and quality of the evidence of the recommendations performed according to accepted GRADE criteria.This document has received the endorsement of three Italian national societies including the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), the Italian Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (SINGEM), and the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC). The guidelines also involved the contribution of members of ESEO Italia, the Italian Association of Families Against EoE.

Eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) and duodenitis (EoD) are rare conditions that are poorly understood. Our aim was to describe the natural history of children with varying degrees of gastric or duodenal eosinophilia with respect to disease complications and histologic and endoscopic longitudinal trajectories.

The electronic medical record at a tertiary children's hospital was queried to identify patients with EoG, EoD, or EoG + EoD who were cared for between January 2010 and 2022. Multiple logistic regression was performed to explore associations between baseline features and persistence/recurrence of eosinophilia or complications remote from diagnosis.

We identified 151 patients: 92 with EoG, 24 with EoD, 12 with EoG + EoD, and 23 with tissue eosinophilia but did not meet histologic criteria for EoG or EoD (low grade). The average age at diagnosis was 10.6 years, and average follow-up was 5.8 years. Twenty-five percent of patients with EoG or EoD had persistence/recurrence of eosinophilia; this was associated with increases in the EoG Endoscopic Reference Score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.34, confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.74) on diagnostic endoscopy. Eighteen percent suffered from disease complications, and development of late complications was associated with presenting with a complication (aOR 9.63, CI 1.09-85.20), severity of duodenal endoscopic abnormalities (aOR 8.74, CI 1.67-45.60), and increases in the EoG Endoscopic Reference Score (aOR 1.70, CI 1.11-2.63).

Patients with gastric and duodenal eosinophilia should be followed closely to monitor for recurrence and complications, especially those presenting with endoscopic abnormalities or complications.

Swallowed topical corticosteroids (tC) are common therapy for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Widely heterogeneous results have occurred due to their active ingredients, formulations and doses.

To assess the effectiveness of topical corticosteroid therapy for EoE in real-world practice.

Cross-sectional study analysis of the multicentre EoE CONNECT registry. Clinical remission was defined as a decrease of ≥50% in dysphagia symptom scores; histological remission was defined as a peak eosinophil count below 15 per high-power field. The effectiveness in achieving clinico-histological remission (CHR) was compared for the main tC formulations.

Overall, data on 1456 prescriptions of tC in monotherapy used in 866 individual patients were assessed. Of those, 904 prescriptions with data on formulation were employed for the induction of remission; 234 reduced a previously effective dose for maintenance. Fluticasone propionate formulations dominated the first-line treatment, while budesonide was more common in later therapies. A swallowed nasal drop suspension was the most common formulation of fluticasone propionate. Doses ≥0.8 mg/day provided a 65% CHR rate and were superior to lower doses. Oral viscous solution prepared by a pharmacist was the most common prescription of budesonide; 4 mg/day provided no benefit over 2 mg/day (CHR rated being 72% and 80%, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed budesonide orodispersible tablets as the most effective therapy (OR 18.9, p < 0.001); use of higher doses (OR 4.3, p = 0.03) and lower symptom scores (OR 0.9, p = 0.01) were also determinants of effectiveness.

Reduced symptom severity, use of high doses, and use of budesonide orodispersible tablets particularly were all independent predictors of tC effectiveness.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2-mediated inflammatory disease of the esophagus that represents the most common eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease. Experts in the field of EoE across Italy (i.e., EoETALY Consensus Group) including gastroenterologists, endoscopists, allergologists/immunologists, and paediatricians conducted a Delphi process to develop updated consensus statements for the management of patients with EoE and update the previous position paper of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) in light of recent evidence. Grading of the strength and quality of the evidence of the recommendations was performed using accepted GRADE criteria. The guideline is divided in two documents: Part 1 includes three chapters, namely 1) definition, epidemiology, and pathogenesis; 2) clinical presentation and natural history, and 3) diagnosis, while Part 2 includes two chapters: 4) treatment and 5) monitoring and follow-up. This document has received the endorsement of three Italian national societies including the SIGE, the Italian Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (SINGEM), and the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC). With regards to patients' involvement, these guidelines involved the contribution of members of ESEO Italia, the Italian Association of Families Against EoE.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), swallowed topical corticosteroids (STSs), and dupilumab are highly effective therapies for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Shared decision-making informs the choice of therapy and factors such as ease of use, safety, cost, and efficacy should be addressed. PPIs are the most common medication utilized early in the disease course; however, for nonresponders, STSs are an excellent alternative. Dupilumab is unlikely to replace PPIs or STSs as first-line therapy, except in highly specific circumstances. Identification of novel biologic pathways and the development of small molecules may lead to a wider range of treatment options in the future.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a newly recognized entity, in which there is significant evidence available that clearly demonstrates the positive impact of PPIs on reducing esophageal eosinophilia in individuals across different age groups, including children, adolescents, and adults. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain how this treatment effect occurs. In Brazil, there seems to be a lack of studies that have prospectively assessed the clinical and therapeutic response rate in pediatric patients with EoE. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical and therapeutic response of pediatric patients with EoE in a medical center located in southern Brazil, by investigating the effectiveness of PPI treatment.

This study is a clinical, prospective, open trial that took place in a pediatric hospital located in southern Brazil. The focus of the study was on patients diagnosed with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) who were given treatment using omeprazole/esomeprazole at a dosage of 1 mg.kg per dose, twice daily, for a period of 8-12 weeks. Following the treatment period, the patients underwent another endoscopy. Patients who exhibited 15 or less eosinophils in the biopsy conducted after the treatment were considered as responders.

A total of 27 patients was evaluated (74.1% boys). The average age (± standard deviation) was 8 years (±4). Nineteen patients (70.3%) were considered as responders to PPI treatment: 6 patients-22.2%-exhibited a complete response (defined as having 5 or fewer eosinophil per high power field. Additionally, 13 patients-48.1%-demonstrated a partial response, characterized by eosinophil counts exceeding 5 but less than 15 eos/hpf. When comparing the responder and non-responder groups at presentation, a statistical difference was observed in the prevalence of food refusal as a presenting symptom. Food refusal was found to be more prevalent in the non-responder group (87.5% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.008). No differences were observed in terms of atopy history and endoscopic scores. Upon comparing the histological findings from the post-treatment endoscopy of the two groups, it was observed that PPI responders exhibited a greater tendency to decrease basal cell hyperplasia (P = 0.06) and intercellular edema (P = 0.08).

In this group of pediatric patients with EoE in Southern Brazil most patients showed a high prevalence of histological, endoscopic, and clinical response to PPI treatment. PPIs showed efficacy in Brazilian patients with EoE, most of whom would probably not be able to adequately undergo other treatments.

https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-2ntbth9, identifier (U1111-1301-1842).