Data on the incidence of Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) distal to the esophagus are scarce. This study aimed to examine the incidence of non-eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) EGID in Sweden, as well as its three entities; eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC).

We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study of individuals with incident biopsy-confirmed non-EoE EGID in Sweden from 1990 to 2015. Age-standardized and age-specific incidence rates (IRs) were calculated.

We identified 1882 individuals with incident non-EoE EGID. Females constituted 58% and the mean age at diagnosis was 45 years. EoC was the most common subtype (62%). From 1990 to 2015, the mean age-standardized IR was approximately 0.8 per 100,000 person-years (IR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.64-0.93), but with higher IRs in recent years (2013-2015: IR = 1.51; 95%CI = 1.09-1.93). The incidence increased especially during the 1990s, with a 27% annual increase before 2000, compared to a 3% annual increase thereafter. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) between females and males was 1.38 (95%CI = 1.26-1.51), but no evidence was found to suggest that the IRR varied across calendar periods or by age. The lifetime risk of diagnosed non-EoE EGID was 0.08% (1 in 1250) in females and 0.06% (1 in 1667) in males.

The incidence of non-EoE EGID in Sweden increased between 1990 and 2015. This may reflect a higher disease awareness in recent years.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common cause of food impaction.

This study aims to provide a nationwide analysis of food impaction in patients with or without EoE diagnosis, concentrating on patient demographics, interventions, outcomes, and development of predictive machine-learning models.

A retrospective assessment was conducted using Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. We compared patients with food impaction with an associated EoE diagnosis to those without EoE and derived machine-learning models to predict EoE using International Classification of Diseases codes at discharge for identification.

Of 286,886,714 emergency department visits, 146,084 were for food impaction, with 7093 cases coinciding with an EoE diagnosis (4.9%). Patients with EoE were more commonly young men with fewer overall comorbidities but higher incidences of obesity, asthma, gastritis, and allergic rhinitis. A significantly larger proportion in the EoE group (89.6%) underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy compared to the non-EoE group (51.1%; P < 0.001) and had a higher rate of biopsy during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the emergency department (54.9% vs 13.4%; P < 0.001). Our machine-learning models, incorporating patient demographics, hospital attributes, and comorbidities, had a sensitivity of 86.1% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.828.

This nationwide study demonstrates that EoE in food impaction is associated with specific patient demographics, comorbidities, and elevated interventions. Our machine-learning models hold promise as screening tools for EoE, aiding medical practitioners in determining the need for biopsy.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are primary immune-mediated disorders, with significant morbidity and long-term sequelae. Temporal trends in incidence and prevalence are on the rise, but studies outside Europe and North America are sparse.

Based on retrospective Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data, we studied a large population cohort during the years 2014-2021 of all patients diagnosed with EGIDs. Incidence rate and prevalence were calculated for each year during the study cohort stratified by disease location, age, and sex.

Between 2014 and 2021, among a population of 2.4 million persons, the incidence rate of EGIDs tripled from 2.51 (95% CI: 1.78-3.23) to 7.88 (95% CI: 6.75-9.01) per 100 000 person-years. Most (85.1%) were patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The increased temporal trend was almost identical among all subgroups, including patients with EoE, patients with non-EoE EGIDs, and patients with EGIDs with esophageal involvement. The prevalence of EGIDs increased from 14.53 (95% CI: 12.80-16.26) to 51.43 (95% CI: 48.60-54.26) per 100 000 persons. In 2021, at the end of the study, the prevalence of EoE was 39.54 (95% CI: 37.05-42.02) per 100 000 persons, and the prevalence of non-EoE EGID was 11.89 (95% CI: 10.53-13.26) per 100 000 persons.

The incidence and prevalence of EGIDs in Israel have risen steeply during the last decade. The main contribution came from the increased incidence rate of patients with EoE. By the end of the surveillance period, the increased temporal trends did not reach a plateau.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects the esophagus. Previous studies have indicated a substantial increase of EoE over the last decades. The aim of the current study was to describe the incidence and prevalence of EoE over time and by geographical regions in Sweden, utilizing nationwide population-based registries.

The number of hospital admissions (in-patient and out-patient) for patients were identified using ICD-10-SE code K20.9A from the National Patient Registry between 1st January 2011 and 31st December 2021. Crude incidence and prevalence numbers were presented per 100,000 person years and persons, respectively.

In 2011, no hospital visits of EoE were recorded. A total of 3,243 incident patients (2,379 (73.4%) men and 864 (26.6%) women) had a record of EoE between 2012 and 2021. The incidence increased over calendar year in where the incidence was from 1.59 per 100,000 person years in 2012 to 5.34 per 100,000 person years in 2021. The prevalence was 1.29 per 100,000 person years and 31.02 per 100,000 person years in 2012 and 2021, respectively. Major differences in the prevalence between geographical regions in Sweden were observed, e.g. in 2021, the prevalence was 12.24 in Västernorrland compared to 43.26 in Västra Götaland per 100,000 person years, which is similar to the prevalence in the Stockholm region.

The incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis has significantly increased over calendar year but differs between geographical regions in Sweden. These differences should be further investigated.

The connection between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and food and airborne allergens is complex. Exposure to allergens (mainly food) is often the trigger for EoE flares. The development of EoE has been described as a side effect of allergen immunotherapy, especially oral immunotherapy (OIT, with food allergens), while isolated cases of EoE have been reported during sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT, with extracts of aeroallergens).

EoE is currently recognized as a common side effect of OIT, while a solid correlation between SLIT and EoE is missing. Animal models have been developed to study the pathophysiological link between sensitization to aeroallergens and the induction of EoE and will probably provide an interpretation of why there are cases of EoE developed during SLIT. Recent findings in animal models suggest a genetic connection to EoE development after sensitization and re-exposure to airborne allergens. Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy does not have a causative effect on EoE; on the contrary, a beneficial effect on EoE has been reported. Moreover, epicutaneous immunotherapy with a vector containing milk has also been used to treat children with milk-induced EoE.

Discovering the immune links between allergens and EoE will further guide the proper use of allergen immunotherapy and help define future strategies for the management of EoE.

Dysphagia is the hallmark symptom in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). However, data are limited regarding the overall prevalence and potential implications of atypical symptoms like odynophagia and retrosternal pain.

Patients enrolled into the Swiss EoE cohort study (SEECS) were analyzed regarding the presence of odynophagia and retrosternal pain. Demographics, other EoE-related symptoms, histologic and endoscopic activity were compared between EoE-patients with vs. without odynophagia and/or retrosternal pain.

474 patients (75.2% male) were analyzed. In their individual course of disease 110 (23.2%) patients stated to have ever experienced odynophagia and 64 (13.5%) retrosternal pain independent of food intake, 24 (5%) patients complained about both symptoms. Patients with odynophagia consistently scored higher in symptom severity (p < 0.001), EREFS score (median 3.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.006), histologic activity and a lower quality of life (p = 0.001) compared to patients without odynophagia. Sex, age at diagnosis, EoE-specific treatment, complications such as candida or viral esophagitis and disease duration were similar in patients with vs. without odynophagia. Also patients with retrosternal pain scored higher in symptom severity (2.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.001 and 2.0 vs. 1.0, p < 0.001 in physician and patient questionnaire assessment, respectively). However, there was neither a difference in endoscopic/histologic disease activity nor in quality of life according to presence or absence of retrosternal pain. Due to logistic reasons, a stratification regarding the presence of concomitant dysphagia was not possible.

Odynophagia and swallowing-independent retrosternal pain are common symptoms in patients with EoE, associate with an overall higher EoE-related symptom severity and for the case of odynophagia lower quality of life. However, the influence of concomitant dysphagia and its severity remains unclear and needs to be included in future analyses.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is increasing in prevalence but there is a lack of population-based studies. We sought to determine the prevalence, demographics, and associated atopic diseases in the Veterans Affairs (VA) population.

A nationwide analysis of data from the VA patient population was done using a Veterans Health Administration database. EoE was identified using ICD9 (530.13) and ICD10 (K20.0) codes from October 2008 to June 2020. Demographic data, smoking status, BMI, treatment, and ICD codes for atopic diagnoses were collected. Two sample proportion z-tests, Chi-square tests, two-sample t tests, and one-way ANOVA were used to assess associations across demographic categories.

We identified a total of 11,775 patients with an EoE diagnosis: 91% male, 83% White, 8.6% Black, and 5% were of Hispanic ethnicity. The prevalence of EoE increased over time. At diagnosis, the mean age was 48.5 years overall, 51.6 years for Black patients, 45.3 years for Hispanic patients, and 48.2 years for Whites. Dysphagia was the most common symptom overall, but a higher percentage of Blacks and females were found to report chest pain (p < 0.0001, h = 0.32). With the exception of urticaria and atopic dermatitis, both Blacks and Hispanics had a higher incidence of atopic conditions compared to other races and ethnicities (p < 0.0001).

While EoE is seen primarily in White males, our study shows that a notable percentage of patients were Black or Hispanic, suggesting that EoE should be considered in non-white patients. The later age of diagnosis in this group could represent a lack of awareness about EoE among non-white patients. More research is needed to study these associations.

Eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) and duodenitis (EoD) are rare conditions that are poorly understood. Our aim was to describe the natural history of children with varying degrees of gastric or duodenal eosinophilia with respect to disease complications and histologic and endoscopic longitudinal trajectories.

The electronic medical record at a tertiary children's hospital was queried to identify patients with EoG, EoD, or EoG + EoD who were cared for between January 2010 and 2022. Multiple logistic regression was performed to explore associations between baseline features and persistence/recurrence of eosinophilia or complications remote from diagnosis.

We identified 151 patients: 92 with EoG, 24 with EoD, 12 with EoG + EoD, and 23 with tissue eosinophilia but did not meet histologic criteria for EoG or EoD (low grade). The average age at diagnosis was 10.6 years, and average follow-up was 5.8 years. Twenty-five percent of patients with EoG or EoD had persistence/recurrence of eosinophilia; this was associated with increases in the EoG Endoscopic Reference Score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.34, confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.74) on diagnostic endoscopy. Eighteen percent suffered from disease complications, and development of late complications was associated with presenting with a complication (aOR 9.63, CI 1.09-85.20), severity of duodenal endoscopic abnormalities (aOR 8.74, CI 1.67-45.60), and increases in the EoG Endoscopic Reference Score (aOR 1.70, CI 1.11-2.63).

Patients with gastric and duodenal eosinophilia should be followed closely to monitor for recurrence and complications, especially those presenting with endoscopic abnormalities or complications.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an antigen-mediated chronic inflammatory disorder that has risen in incidence and prevalence over the past 2 decades. The clinical presentation is variable and consists of mainly esophageal symptoms such as dysphagia, heartburn, food impaction, and vomiting. Current management relies on dietary elimination, proton-pump inhibitors, and topical corticosteroids with different response rates and relapses after treatment discontinuation. With a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, many molecules emerged recently as targeted treatment including dupilumab (IL4/IL13 blocker), as the first FDA-approved biological treatment, which has changed the management paradigm.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2-mediated inflammatory disease of the esophagus that represents the most common eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease. Experts in the field of EoE across Italy (i.e., EoETALY Consensus Group) including gastroenterologists, endoscopists, allergologists/immunologists, and paediatricians conducted a Delphi process to develop updated consensus statements for the management of patients with EoE and update the previous position paper of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) in light of recent evidence. Grading of the strength and quality of the evidence of the recommendations was performed using accepted GRADE criteria. The guideline is divided in two documents: Part 1 includes three chapters, namely 1) definition, epidemiology, and pathogenesis; 2) clinical presentation and natural history, and 3) diagnosis, while Part 2 includes two chapters: 4) treatment and 5) monitoring and follow-up. This document has received the endorsement of three Italian national societies including the SIGE, the Italian Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (SINGEM), and the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC). With regards to patients' involvement, these guidelines involved the contribution of members of ESEO Italia, the Italian Association of Families Against EoE.

Despite the rising prevalence and incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), the etiology and pathophysiology remain unknown. Studies to date suggest that complex interactions between genetic and environmental risk factors result in the development and presentation of disease. Examining environmental factors both in the early life and later life exposures offers potential clues for the development of EoE, although challenges exist in making causal inferences due to diagnostic delay and access, ascertainment biases, and misclassification of cases. The authors review studies supporting early life factors as etiologic factors in the development of EoE.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are rare diseases in which eosinophils abnormally infiltrate the gastrointestinal tract. Because these are rare diseases, there is limited information regarding race and ethnicity in EGIDs and even less is known about the impact of socioeconomic factors. There is some evidence that access to care in rural settings may be affecting epidemiologic understanding of EGIDs in the pediatric populations. Future work should try to evaluate bias in research and strive for representation in clinical trials and medicine.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic and progressive immune-mediated esophageal disorder. Given its increasing incidence, it is now a leading cause of dysphagia and food impaction in the United States. Eosinophilic esophagitis is most common in adult White men and has a high concurrence rate with other atopic conditions like allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma, and eczema. The initial presentation includes symptoms of esophageal dysfunction, classically solid-food dysphagia. Without treatment, inflammation can progress to fibrosis with the formation of strictures, leading to complications such as food impaction. It is a clinicopathologic disease requiring compatible clinical symptoms and histologic evidence of eosinophil-predominant inflammation of the esophageal epithelium with more than 15 eosinophils per high-power field. The mainstay of management includes the 3 d's (diet, drugs, dilation): dietary modifications to eliminate trigger food groups; medications including proton pump inhibitors, swallowed topical glucocorticoids, and dupilumab; and esophageal dilation to manage strictures. Various elimination diets have been found to be effective, including 1-food, 2-food, 4-food, and 6-food elimination diets. Dupilumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that regulates interleukin 4 and 13 signaling pathways, has shown promising results in clinical trials and was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2022 for use in EoE. Symptom alleviation, although important, is not the sole end point of treatment in EoE as persistent inflammation, even in the absence of symptoms, can lead to esophageal fibrosis and stricture formation over time. The chronic nature and high recurrence rates of EoE warrant maintenance therapy in patients with EoE after initial remission is achieved.

Vitamin D deficiency is associated with atopic and immune-mediated diseases but has not been extensively assessed in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to assess if vitamin D levels in newly diagnosed EoE patients were lower than in non-EoE controls and examine levels in relation to EoE clinical features.

This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study used data and biosamples from adults who underwent outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Before each procedure, blood was obtained and stored at -80oC. Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D3 (25(OH)D3) was measured by ELISA. Levels for cases and controls were compared at baseline. Within cases, 25(OH)D3 levels were compared for clinical, endoscopic, and histologic measures.

We analyzed 40 EoE and 40 non-EoE controls. Mean serum 25(OH)D3 level was slightly lower in EoE patients than controls (30.9 ± 15.3 ng/mL vs. 35.9 ± 15.4; p = 0.15). After controlling for age, sex, and race, adjusted levels were 10.8 ng/mL lower in EoE patients (95% CI: -19.0, -2.5), but 25(OH)D3 deficiency (< 20ng/mL) was similar in cases and controls (20% vs. 15%; p = 0.56). Levels of 25(OH)D3 were not associated with differences in clinical or endoscopic features of EoE, and EREFS and eosinophil counts did not significantly correlate with 25(OH)D3 levels (R of -0.28 [p = 0.08] and - 0.01 [p = 0.93], respectively). 25(OH)D3 levels were lower in EoE cases with lamina propria fibrosis (23.2 ± 9.6 vs. 45.0 ± 17.7; p = 0.03).

After adjusting for age, sex, and race, 25(OH)D3 levels were lower in EoE cases than controls, but deficiency was not common. 25(OH)D3 levels were generally similar across most EoE disease features.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a newly recognized disease first described about 50 years ago. The definition, diagnosis, and management have evolved with new published consensus guidelines and newly approved treatment available to pediatricians, enabling a better understanding of this disease and more targeted treatment for patients. We describe the definition, presentation, and diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis including management, challenges, and future directions in children. The definition, diagnosis, and management of eosinophilic esophagitis have evolved over the last 50 years. Consensus guidelines and newly approved biologic treatment have enabled pediatricians to better understand this disease and allow for more targeted treatment for patients. We describe the definition, presentation, diagnosis, management, and treatment in addition to the challenges and future directions of eosinophilic esophagitis management in children.

In addition to the elimination diet, dietary composition may influence disease severity in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) through modulation of the immune response.

To explore the immunomodulatory role of nutrition before and during elimination diet in adult EoE patients.

Nutritional intake was assessed in 39 Dutch adult EoE patients participating in the Supplemental Elemental Trial (Dutch trial registry NL6014, NTR6778) using 3-day food diaries. In this randomized controlled trial, diagnosed patients received either a four-food elimination diet alone (FFED) or FFED with addition of an amino acid-based formula for 6 weeks. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess associations between the intake of nutrients and food groups per 1000 kCal and peak eosinophil count/high power field (PEC), both at baseline and after 6 weeks.

At baseline, we found a statistically significant negative (thus favorable) relationship between the intake of protein, total fat, phosphorus, zinc, vitamin B12, folate, and milk products and PEC (p < .05), while calcium (p = .058) and full-fat cheese/curd (p = .056) were borderline (favorably) significant. In contrast, total carbohydrates, prepacked fruit juice, and white bread were significantly positively (unfavorable) related to PEC (p < .05), while ultra-processed meals (p = .059) were borderline (unfavorably) significant. After dietary intervention, coffee/tea were significantly negatively (favorably) related to PEC, hummus/legumes were significantly positively (unfavorably) related with PEC, while peanuts were borderline significantly positively related (p = .058).

Dietary composition may be related to inflammation in adult EoE patients. High-quality and anti-inflammatory diets may be a promising adjuvant therapy in the dietary management of EoE.

Several studies have reported large increases in the incidence of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) in the last 20 years. We aimed to systematically review the incidence and prevalence of EoE, focused on all European countries.

Systematic review and meta-analysis up to 31 December 2022, based on PubMed, CINAHL and extensive hand searching of reference lists. Twenty-five eligible studies were identified and included.

For both adults and children, the highest EoE incidence and prevalence have been reported from regional studies in Spain. EoE incidence for both adults and children was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in nationwide studies (meta-analysis = 3.64 per 100,000 person-years overall) compared with regional or centre-based studies (7.16). EoE incidence and prevalence were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in adults than children. All studies that reported on longitudinal trends in EoE incidence showed increases over time, more markedly during more recent years. Larger increases in incidence tend to refer to regional rather than nationwide studies; from Spain, Switzerland and Denmark, both for paediatric and adult age groups. Increases in EoE incidence 100,000 person-years were larger than for incidence per number of diagnostic endoscopies. The most frequently reported co-morbidities in adults were rhinitis, followed by asthma, food allergy and gastroesophageal reflux disease, and in children, erosive oesophagitis, asthma, food allergy and rhinitis.

The incidence of EoE has increased in Europe over the last 30 years, exceeding increases in the volume of oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopies performed. The patchy and low incidence and prevalence of EoE generally in Europe and compared with North America, may reflect a lack of clinical awareness and research focus rather than a genuinely low incidence of EoE. A co-ordinated Europe-wide study that uses standardised methodology is urgently needed to provide a comprehensive picture of EoE incidence and prevalence across Europe.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are chronic, immune-mediated disorders characterised clinically by gastrointestinal symptoms and histologically by a pathologic increase in eosinophil-predominant inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, in the absence of secondary causes of eosinophilia.

To highlight emerging insights and research efforts into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs, and discuss key remaining knowledge gaps.

We selected and reviewed original research, retrospective studies, case series, randomised controlled trials, and meta-analyses.

Standardised nomenclature classifies EGIDs as EoE, eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). Incidence and prevalence of EoE are rising, emphasising the need to better understand how environmental risk factors and genetic features interact. Advances in understanding EoE pathophysiology have led to clinical trials of targeted therapy and the approval (in the United States) of dupilumab for EoE. Several therapies that are under investigation hope to satisfy both histologic and clinical targets. For non-EoE EGIDs, efforts are focused on better defining clinical and histopathologic disease determinants and natural history, as well as establishing new therapies.

Unmet needs for research are dramatically different for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs. In EoE, non-invasive diagnostic tests, clinicopathologic models that determine the risk of disease progression and therapeutic failure, and novel biologic therapies are emerging. In contrast, in non-EoE EGIDs, epidemiologic trends, diagnostic histopathologic thresholds, and natural history models are still developing for these more rare disorders.

Differences in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) presentation and outcomes by ethnicity or race remain understudied. We aimed to determine whether EoE patients of Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity or non-White race have differences in presentation at diagnosis or response to topical corticosteroid (tCS) treatment.

This retrospective cohort study included subjects of any age with a new diagnosis of EoE and documentation of ethnicity or race. For those who had treatment with tCS and follow-up endoscopy/biopsy, we assessed histologic response (<15 eosinophils/hpf), global symptom response, and endoscopic response. Hispanic EoE patients were compared with non-Hispanics at baseline and before and after treatment. The same analyses were repeated for White vs non-Whites.

Of 1,026 EoE patients with ethnicity data, just 23 (2%) were Hispanic. Most clinical features at presentation were similar to non-Hispanic EoE patients but histologic response to tCS was numerically lower (38% vs 57%). Non-White EoE patients (13%) were younger at diagnosis and had less insurance, lower zip code-level income, shorter symptom duration, more vomiting, less dysphagia and food impaction, fewer typical endoscopic features, and less dilation. Of 475 patients with race data treated with tCS, non-Whites had a significantly lower histologic response rate (41% vs 59%; P = 0.01), and odds of histologic response remained lower after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence intervals: 0.19-0.87).

Few EoE patients at our center were Hispanic, and they had similar clinical presentations as non-Hispanics. The non-White EoE group was larger, and presentation was less dysphagia-specific. Non-White patients were also less than half as likely to respond to tCS.

Prior work suggests eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is rare in those aged over 65 years. However, elderly patients with EoE experience a substantial diagnostic delay from symptom onset to diagnosis.

To assess if age predicted whether oesophageal biopsies were obtained in patients with EoE symptoms, what clinical features predict EoE in the elderly, and if EoE phenotype differs between elderly and non-elderly patients.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilising the University of North Carolina (UNC) electronic medical record, EoE clinicopathologic database and UNC endoscopy software from July 2008 to April 2021. A sample of 193 elderly and non-elderly patients with dysphagia, chest pain and/or heartburn were assembled. Patients with EoE were newly diagnosed per contemporaneous guidelines. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and procedural data were extracted. Summary statistics, bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Of 193 patients, we included 91 elderly (47%) and 102 non-elderly (53%). Age independently predicted the odds of biopsies (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.44 elderly vs. non-elderly; 95% CI: 0.21-0.92). Endoscopic features of EoE, but not symptoms, were more common in elderly than non-EoE elderly patients. Elderly patients with EoE differed from non-elderly only by time to diagnosis (aOR per year of symptoms preceding diagnosis: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.11).

Elderly patients with EoE have <50% the odds of oesophageal biopsies. There were no significant differences between elderly and non-elderly EoE patients, although endoscopic features helped discriminate the two groups. Our findings suggest that older age represents a barrier to EoE diagnosis.

The Swiss Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort Study (SEECS) is a national cohort that was established in 2015 with the aim of improving quality of care of affected adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Between 2020 and 2022, paper questionnaires were gradually replaced by fully electronic data capture using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap®) software. We aim to provide an update of the SEECS 8 years after its launch.

The SEECS prospectively includes adults (≥18 years of age) with EoE as well as patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy control subjects (HC). Upon inclusion and follow-up (typically once every 12-18 months), patients and physicians complete REDCap® questionnaires, which are available in German, French, and English. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and biologic findings are assessed on the same day using validated instruments (EEsAI PRO for symptoms; EoE-QoL-A for QoL; EREFS for endoscopic activity; modified EoE-HSS for histologic activity). The SEECS biobank includes biosamples from patients with EoE, GERD, and HC.

As of July 2023, the SEECS included 778 patients (716 [92%] with EoE, 29 [3.8%] with GERD, and 33 [4.2%] HC; 559/778 [71.9%] were male). Mean age ± SD (years) at enrollment according to diagnosis was as follows: EoE 41.9 ± 12.9, GERD 53.6 ± 16.4, HC 51.7 ± 17.2. Concomitant GERD was found in 200 patients (27.9%) of the EoE cohort. Concomitant allergic disorders (asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, eczema) were present in 500 EoE patients (74.4%). At inclusion, 686 (95.8%) of EoE patients were on ongoing treatment (orodispersible budesonide tablet [Jorveza®] in 281 patients [41%]; budesonide or fluticasone syrup or swallowed powder in 290 patients [42.3%]; proton-pump inhibitors in 162 patients [23.6%]; elimination diets in 103 patients [15%]; and esophageal dilation at last visit in 166 patients [24.2%]). A total of 8,698 biosamples were collected, of which 1,395 (16%) were used in the framework of translational research projects.

SEECS continuously grows and is operational using fully electronic data capture. SEECS offers up-to-date epidemiologic and real-world clinical efficacy data on EoE and promotes clinical and translational research.

The prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is rising in the West. However, data from the Indian subcontinent is limited. In this prospective cross-sectional study, we estimated the prevalence of EoE among children undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE).

We enrolled 200 consecutive children (123 boys, median age 10.25 years [interquartile range 8.25-14.5]) between March 2020 and November 2022 at our center. Clinical characteristics, endoscopic findings, and laboratory parameters were noted. A total of 12 mucosal biopsies (3 each from the middle and lower third of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum) were obtained. EoE was diagnosed if the peak eosinophil count was ≥15/high-power field (HPF) in absence of gastric and duodenal eosinophilia.

The commonest indications for UGIE were gastroesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms (29%), inflammatory bowel disease (22.5%), celiac disease (15%), and abdominal pain (13%). EoE was detected in seven children, suggesting an overall prevalence of 3.5%. Of the 20 children evaluated for dysphagia, 4 (20%) had EoE. Also, two of three (67%) children presented with food bolus impaction along with dysphagia had EoE. Of the seven children with EoE, three (43%) had bronchial asthma, two (28.5%) had peripheral eosinophilia, and one (14%) had elevated serum IgE. Trachealization and linear furrows were found in 57% and 71% cases, respectively. Four children received high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for 12 weeks, two received PPI+ stricture dilatation, and one received systemic steroids. All achieved clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological remission.

Hospital-based prevalence of EoE among children undergoing elective UGIE was 3.5%. EoE patients had favorable outcomes with PPI.

It is 40 years since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori infection. Over that time major changes have occurred in esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings. The aim of this review is to describe these changes, and the important role H. pylori infection has played in their evolution.

References were identified through searches of PubMed using the search terms-endoscopy time trends, peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, upper gastrointestinal cancer, gastric polyps, H. pylori, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, and celiac disease, from 1970 through December 2021.

The prevalence of H. pylori infection has fallen and consequently, H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer disease has become rare. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is now the commonest disorder diagnosed at EGD, and Barrett's esophagus has increased in parallel. Cancer of the distal stomach has fallen while esophageal adenocarcinoma and reflux-related cardia cancer have risen. Gastric polyps have changed from hyperplastic and adenomas to sporadic fundic gland polyps. Antimicrobial resistance has made H. pylori infection more difficult to eradicate. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, particularly eosinophilic esophagitis, have emerged as important new allergic disorders. Celiac disease has changed and increased.

EGD findings appear to have changed from features suggesting a H. pylori-positive "phenotype" 40 years ago to a H. pylori-negative "phenotype" today. These changes have major implications for the management of gastrointestinal disorders.

Owing to 2018 expanded diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and thus a possible increase in diagnosis, previous studies on the global incidence and prevalence of EoE may need to be updated. We aimed to describe global, regional, and national trends in the incidence and prevalence of EoE from 1976 to 2022 and analyze their associations with geographic, demographic, and social factors through a systematic review.

We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases from their inception dates to December 20, 2022, for studies that reported the incidence or prevalence of EoE in the general population. We calculated the global incidence and prevalence of EoE using pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and performed subgroup analysis based on age, sex, race, geographical area, World Bank income group, and diagnostic criteria of EoE.

Forty studies met the eligibility criteria, including over 288 million participants and 147,668 patients with EoE from 15 countries across the five continents. The global pooled incidence and prevalence of EoE were 5.31 cases per 100,000 inhabitant-years (95% CI, 3.98-6.63; number of studies, 27; sample population, 42,191,506) and 40.04 cases per 100,000 inhabitant-years (95% CI, 31.10-48.98; number of studies, 20; sample population, 30,467,177), respectively. The pooled incidence of EoE was higher in high-income countries (vs low- or middle-income countries), males, and North America (vs Europe and Asia). The global prevalence of EoE followed a similar pattern. The pooled prevalence of EoE gradually increased from 1976 to 2022 (1976-2001; 8.18; 95% CI, 3.67-12.69 vs 2017-2022; 74.42; 95% CI, 39.66-109.19 cases per 100,000 inhabitant-years).

The incidence and prevalence of EoE have increased substantially and vary widely across the world. Further research is needed to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of EoE in Asia, South America, and Africa.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated esophageal disease with rising incidence. While proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment, a significant proportion of patients do not respond. This study aimed to determine if the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS) can predict PPI responsiveness.

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 89 pediatric patients diagnosed with EoE between 2016 and 2022. Patients were categorized into PPI responders (PPIREoE) and non-responders (PPINREoE) based on post-treatment biopsies. EoEHSS values from biopsies of the esophagus (distal, middle, and proximal segments) were compared between the two groups.

No significant differences in EoEHSS scores were observed for the distal and proximal esophagus between the groups. However, the middle esophagus showed a significantly higher EoEHSS grade score in the PPINREoE group, indicating a more pronounced disease severity. Specific histological features, particularly eosinophilic abscesses and surface layering of the middle segment of the esophagus, were significantly different between the groups.

Performing a biopsy of each esophageal segment, particularly the middle, is crucial for diagnostic precision and predicting PPI responsiveness. The EoEHSS can serve as a valuable tool in predicting therapy response, emphasizing the need for personalized therapeutic approaches in EoE management.

Gaps remain in understanding the epidemiology of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Our aim was to identify and validate a national cohort of individuals with EoE using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) data.

We used 2 validation strategies to develop algorithms that identified adults with EoE between 1999 and 2020. The first validation strategy applied International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code algorithms to a base cohort of individuals who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with esophageal biopsy specimens. The second applied ICD code algorithms to a base cohort of all individuals in the VHA. For each ICD algorithm applied, a random sample of candidate EoE cases and non-EoE controls were selected and the charts were reviewed manually by a blinded reviewer. Each algorithm was modified iteratively until the prespecified diagnostic accuracy end point (95% confidence lower bound for a positive predictive value [PPV], >88%) was achieved. We compiled individuals from each strategy's maximum performance algorithm to construct the Veterans Affairs Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort.

The maximum performance algorithm from the first validation strategy included 2 or more ICD code encounters for EoE separated by more than 30 days and achieved a 93.3% PPV (lower bound, 88.1%) for identifying true EoE cases. The maximum performance algorithm from the second validation strategy included 4 or more ICD code encounters for EoE in which 2 codes were separated by at least 30 days, and similarly achieved a 93.3% PPV (lower bound, 88.1%). Combining both strategies yielded 6637 individuals, which comprised the Veterans Affairs Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort.

We developed and validated 2 highly accurate coding algorithms for EoE and established a nationwide VHA cohort of adults with EoE for future studies.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic progressive inflammatory disease of the esophagus, characterized by extracellular matrix remodeling and fibrotic stricture formation. Disease monitoring requires multiple re-endoscopies with esophageal biopsies. Hence non-invasive methods for determining tissue fibrosis and treatment efficacy are warranted.

To investigate the ability of extracellular matrix proteins in serum as potential biomarkers of tissue remodeling and clinical, endoscopic, and histological disease outcomes in adult EoE patients.

Protein-fingerprint assays were used to measure neo-epitope specific fragments of collagen remodeling, human-neutrophil elastase degraded calprotectin, and citrullinated or non-citrullinated vimentin in the serum of an adult EoE-cohort. Biomarker analysis, symptoms, endoscopic features and histological disease activity (eosinophils(eos) per high-power-field(hpf)) were evaluated at baseline and after six weeks of dietary intervention.

Patients with a baseline (Endoscopic Reference score) EREFS fibrosis subscore ≥ 2 presented with increased fibrolysis of cross-linked type III collagen (CTX-III) (p < 0.01), whereas low CTX-III levels were observed in patients achieving histological remission (< 15 eos/hpf) (vs. no histological remission (p < 0.05). Progression of endoscopic fibrosis after intervention was associated with increased levels of type-III (PRO-C3) and -VI collagen (PRO-C6) formation (all; p < 0.05). A baseline EREFS inflammatory subscore ≥ 2 correlated with higher neutrophilic activity (Cpa9-HNE) at week 6 (p < 0.05). Moreover, increased degradation of type-III (C3M) and -IV (C4M/PRO-C4) collagens were associated with remission of food impaction after intervention (all; p < 0.05).

Serum extracellular matrix remodeling proteins demonstrated potential as surrogate biomarkers for assessing histological disease remission, endoscopic fibrosis, and remission of symptoms of food impaction after diet intervention in adult EoE patients.

We aimed to determine whether mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 antibody, was more effective than placebo for improving dysphagia symptoms and decreasing oesophageal eosinophil counts in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).

We conducted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial. In the first part, patients aged 16-75 with EoE and dysphagia symptoms (per EoE Symptom Activity Index (EEsAI)) were randomised 1:1 to 3 months of mepolizumab 300 mg monthly or placebo. Primary outcome was change in EEsAI from baseline to month 3 (M3). Secondary outcomes included histological, endoscopic and safety metrics. In part 2, patients initially randomised to mepolizumab continued 300 mg monthly for 3 additional months (mepo/mepo), placebo patients started mepolizumab 100 mg monthly (pbo/mepo), and outcomes were reassessed at month 6 (M6).

Of 66 patients randomised, 64 completed M3, and 56 completed M6. At M3, EEsAI decreased 15.4±18.1 with mepolizumab and 8.3±18.0 with placebo (p=0.14). Peak eosinophil counts decreased more with mepolizumab (113±77 to 36±43) than placebo (146±94 to 160±133) (p<0.001). With mepolizumab, 42% and 34% achieved histological responses of <15 and ≤6 eos/hpf compared with 3% and 3% with placebo (p<0.001 and 0.02). The change in EoE Endoscopic Reference Score at M3 was also larger with mepolizumab. At M6, EEsAI decreased 18.3±18.1 points for mepo/mepo and 18.6±19.2 for pbo/mepo (p=0.85). The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions.

Mepolizumab did not achieve the primary endpoint of improving dysphagia symptoms compared with placebo. While eosinophil counts and endoscopic severity improved with mepolizumab at 3 months, longer treatment did not yield additional improvement.

NCT03656380.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated disease, characterized by Th2-type inflammation linked to specific foods. No currently available allergy tests reliably identify food triggers in EoE, leading to empiric dietary elimination strategies. Recently, milk- and wheat-specific IgA in esophageal brushings were linked to clinical food triggers. In this study, we aimed to determine whether food-specific IgA from esophageal biopsies is associated with known food triggers.

A prior cohort of 21 patients (median age 39 years) with confirmed EoE underwent empirical elimination diets and subsequent reintroduction of foods to determine triggers. Archived baseline biopsies were used to quantify levels of peanut-, milk-, soy-, egg-, wheat-specific and total IgA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Overall, 13 patients (62%) responded to the dietary elimination as determined by histology (<15 eos/hpf), with milk and egg being the most common triggers. Biopsies had varying amounts of total IgA, while food-specific IgA was only detectable in 48 of 105 (46%) samples. Food-specific IgA was normalized to total IgA for each sample and stratified by whether a food was a known trigger. For all foods tested, there were no significant differences in IgA between positive and negative triggers.

Food-specific IgA in esophageal biopsies was not associated with previously identified food triggers in this cohort. Future studies comparing food-specific IgA in esophageal brushings, mucous scrapings, and biopsies from patients with known triggers will be critical to determining whether food-specific IgA may serve as a biomarker for identification of EoE triggers.

Early-life exposures have been associated with an increased risk of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE); however, most studies to date have been conducted at referral centers and are subject to recall bias. By contrast, we conducted a nationwide, population-based and registry-based case-control study of prenatal, intrapartum, and neonatal exposures, using data collected prospectively through population-based Danish health and administrative registries.

We ascertained all EoE cases in Denmark (birth years 1997-2018). Cases were sex and age matched to controls (1:10) using risk-set sampling. We obtained data on prenatal, intrapartum, and neonatal factors, i.e., pregnancy complications, mode of delivery, gestational age at delivery, birthweight (expressed as a z-score), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. We used conditional logistic regression to compute the crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of EoE in relation to each prenatal, intrapartum, and neonatal factor, thus providing an estimate of incidence density ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

In the 393 cases and 3,659 population controls included (median age at index date, 11 years [interquartile range, 6-15]; 69% male), we observed an association between gestational age and EoE, peaking at 33 vs 40 weeks (aOR 3.6 [95% CI 1.8-7.4]), and between NICU admission and EoE (aOR 2.8 [95% CI 1.2-6.6], for a NICU hospitalization of 2-3 weeks vs no admission). In interaction analyses, we observed a stronger association between NICU admission and EoE in infants born at term than in preterm infants (aOR 2.0 [95% CI 1.4-2.9] for term infants and aOR 1.0 [95% CI 0.5-2.0] for preterm infants). We also observed an association between pregnancy complications and EoE (aOR 1.4 [95% CI 1.0-1.9]). Infants who were very growth restricted at birth had an increased rate of EoE (aOR 1.4 [95% CI: 1.0-1.9] for a z-score of -1.5 vs a z-score of 0). Mode of delivery was not associated with EoE.

Prenatal, intrapartum, and neonatal factors, particularly preterm birth and NICU admission, were associated with development of EoE. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed associations.

Early life exposures increase risk of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but it is unknown whether they contribute to increased risk for non-EoE eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs). We aimed to assess the association between prenatal, antenatal, and early life factors and non-EoE EGIDs.

We conducted a case-control study based in EGID Partners, an online patient-centered research network. Adults (≥18 years) with non-EoE EGIDs, caregivers of children <18 years of age with an EGID, and non-EGID adult controls were eligible. Subjects completed our Early Life Exposure Questionnaire, detailing maternal and early childhood exposures. We assessed for associations between non-EoE EGIDs and early life exposures, focusing on exposures previously evaluated in association with EoE.

We analyzed 61 non-EoE EGID cases and 20 controls. Of the EGID cases, 14 had eosinophilic gastritis, 19 had eosinophilic enteritis, 6 had eosinophilic colitis, and 22 had multiple areas affected; additionally, 30 had esophageal involvement. Relative to controls, EGID cases were more likely to have had antenatal/perinatal pregnancy-related complications (43% vs 13%; p = 0.02), NICU admission (20% vs 0%; p = 0.03), and antibiotics in infancy (43% vs 10%; p = 0.01). With adjustment for age at diagnosis, we observed increased odds of an EGID for pregnancy complications (aOR 3.83; 95% CI: 0.99-14.9) and antibiotic use in infancy (aOR 7.65; 95% CI: 1.28-45.7).

Early life factors, including pregnancy complications, NICU admission, and antibiotics in infancy, were associated with development of non-EoE EGIDs. The impact of early life exposures on non-EoE EGID pathogenic mechanisms should be investigated.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease. Telemedicine is a healthcare technology used when a patient is separated by distance. The reliability of the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score, version 2.0 (PEESS v2.0) for telemedicine applications, has not been studied yet. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reliability of PEESS v2.0 for telemedicine.

We sent a telesurvey using questionnaires via electronic telecommunication as the telemedicine method. Children with EoE and their parents were asked to complete PEESS v2.0 with the telesurvey method (unsynchronized with the physician) and attend in-person visits one week apart. Intraclass correlation (ICC), Wilcoxon, and Bland-Altman tests were used as reliability analyses. Reliability was defined as a strong agreement between the measurements in ICC ≥ 0.8 and a p-value of ≤0.05 and no statistically significant difference between the scores of the two methods in the Wilcoxon and Bland-Altman analyses, i.e. a p-value of >0.05.

The total scores of children and parents were higher in in-person visits than in the telesurvey (Wilcoxon tests, p ≤ 0.05). Bland- Altman analysis showed that the mean difference in total scores between the two methods was significant for both children and parents (p ≤ 0.05). ICC levels for the children and parent scores for the entire group ranged from 0.595 to 0.763 (moderate agreement).

Unsynchronized telesurvey use of PEESS v2.0 is unreliable both for children and parents. We suggest testing the reliability of chosen telemedicine methods before using them in clinical and research practice.

Eosinophils are typically considered tissue-damaging effector cells in type 2 immune-related diseases. However, they are also increasingly recognized as important modulators of various homeostatic processes, suggesting they retain the ability to adapt their function to different tissue contexts. In this review, we discuss recent progress in our understanding of eosinophil activities within tissues, with particular emphasis on the gastrointestinal tract, where a large population of these cells resides under non-inflammatory conditions. We further examine evidence of their transcriptional and functional heterogeneity and highlight environmental signals emerging as key regulators of their activities, beyond classical type 2 cytokines.

Few predictors of response to topical corticosteroid (tCS) treatment have been identified in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to determine whether baseline gene expression predicts histologic response to tCS treatment for EoE. We analyzed prospectively collected samples from incident EoE cases who were treated with tCS for 8 weeks in a development cohort (prospective study) or in an independent validation cohort (clinical trial). Whole transcriptome RNA expression was determined from a baseline (pre-treatment) RNA-later preserved esophageal biopsy. Baseline expression was compared between histologic responders (<15 eos/hpf) and non-responders (≥15 eos/hpf), and differential correlation was used to assess baseline gene expression by response status. In 87 EoE cases analyzed in the development set, there were no differentially expressed genes associated with treatment response (at false discovery rate = 0.1). However, differential correlation identified a module of 22 genes with statistically significantly high pairwise correlation in non-responders (mean correlation coefficient = 0.7) compared to low correlation in responders (coefficient = 0.3). When this 22-gene module was applied to the 89 EoE cases in the independent cohort, it was not validated to predict tCS response at the 15 eos/hpf threshold (mean correlation coefficient = 0.32 in responders and 0.25 in nonresponders). Exploration of other thresholds also did not validate any modules. Though we identified a 22 gene differential correlation module measured pre-treatment that was strongly associated with subsequent histologic response to tCS in EoE, this was not validated in an independent population. Alternative methods to predict steroid response should be explored.