Published online Feb 20, 2019. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v9.i3.30
Peer-review started: December 4, 2018
First decision: January 4, 2019
Revised: January 10, 2019
Accepted: January 28, 2019
Article in press: January 28, 2019
Published online: February 20, 2019
Processing time: 78 Days and 19.3 Hours
Subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) affects the 4th division and more distal pulmonary arterial branches. SSPE can be isolated or affect multiple subsegments, be symptomatic or incidental (unsuspected) and may or may not be associated with deep vein thrombosis. Symptoms, clinical risk scores and biomarkers are less sensitive for diagnosing SSPE compared to more central pulmonary embolism. The diagnosis is confirmed using radiological imaging, predominately computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) or ventilation/perfusion scanning. The increasing utilization of CTPAs may have resulted in overdiagnosis driven by smaller pulmonary emboli. There is insufficient evidence of improved mortality or reduced venous thromboembolism recurrence with anticoagulation treatment for SSPE however, the major and clinically significant haemorrhage risks are well described. As the resolution of diagnostic imaging has improved, we may be viewing the natural physiological filtering process performed by the lungs that may not require treatment.
Core tip: Current guidelines suggest that isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) patients at low risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and without concurrent proximal VTE can be followed up with clinical surveillance in preference to anticoagulation. This is based on limited evidence and a randomised controlled trial is required to determine the risks and benefits of anticoagulation in SSPE.