Published online May 11, 2023. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v12.i3.17
Peer-review started: January 26, 2023
First decision: February 8, 2023
Revised: February 8, 2023
Accepted: April 4, 2023
Article in press: April 4, 2023
Published online: May 11, 2023
Processing time: 105 Days and 6 Hours
Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy condition with an unknown origin that includes two subtypes based on 34 wk of gestation: Early and late onset PE; inflammation was postulated as an explanation. The platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), an inflammatory biomarker, was investigated as a predictor of poor maternal-neonatal outcome in patients with early-onset PE (EoPE).
Much research has shown that inflammation may be an underlying pathology that triggers PE development. There is an increased need for new methods with enhanced predictive ability. Demonstrating changes in blood indices, PLR seems an appealing option given the promising results declared by earlier work.
To ascertain if PLR in cases with early-onset PE can be linked to essential predictors of fetomaternal wellbeing during the intrapartum period. The second goal is to analyze the reliability of PLR as a helpful marker for monitoring prenatal predictors in women with early-onset PE.
Cross-sectional research at University Hospital involved 60 pregnant women with EoPE (at 32-30 wk of gestation). Platelet counts and indices (mean platelet volume and platelet distribution width), PLR, Doppler study, which produced estimated fetal weight (EFW), amniotic fluid index (AFI), resistance index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI) were all gathered. Participants were tracked until birth, when maternal outcomes such as delivery style and reason for cesarean section were documented, as well as newborn outcomes such as fetal growth restriction (FGR), meconium-stained fluids, five-minute Apgar score, and admission to the critical care unit.
A cesarean section trend has been noted. Sixty-one-point two percent (37/60) fetuses were hospitalized to the newborn care unit, 70% had meconium-stained liquid, and 56.7% had FGR. PLR was shown to be favorably connected with AFI and EFW (r = 0.98, 0.97, P < 0.001), and negatively correlated with PI and RI (r = -0.99, -0.98, P < 0.001). The Apgar score and the number of days admitted to the critical care unit had a positive and negative connection (r = 0.69, -0.98, P < 0.001), respectively. The PLR cutoff value derived by receiver operating characteristic (7.49) differentiated FGR with 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity.
PLR had substantial P value associations with FGR measures and poor neonatal outcomes, making it a promising biomarker for screening EoPE-related problems. More research is needed to determine the influence on maternal-neonatal health.
Defining reliable biomarkers that are antenatal clinics based with no added expense can be a promising option, especially for low-resource settings.