Editorial
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Dec 10, 2012; 1(4): 40-41
Published online Dec 10, 2012. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v1.i4.40
Why hypertension is good new and preeclampsia bad news-demonstrating the failure of prevention
Yves Jacquemyn
Yves Jacquemyn, Departement of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Antwerp University Hospital UZA, Wilrijkstraat, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
Author contributions: Jacquemyn Y solely contributed to this paper.
Correspondence to: Yves Jacquemyn, MD, PhD, Professor, Head, Departement of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Antwerp University Hospital UZA, Wilrijkstraat, 2650 Edegem, Belgium. yves.jacquemyn@uza.be
Telephone: +32-38-215945 Fax: +32-34-584774
Received: April 29, 2012
Revised: August 29, 2012
Accepted: September 12, 2012
Published online: December 10, 2012
Abstract

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy continue to be an intriguing and potentially lethal complication in humans and some other primates. In a simplistic way the current hypothesis is that the genesis of preeclampsia starts at 12 to 14 wk gestation with failure of trophoblast invasion in the spiral arteries, resulting in some degree of hypoxemia in the placenta. The hypoperfused placental tissue starts to secrete variable amounts of angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors which eventually cause endothelial damage all over the pregnant women’s body with one of the many signs of preeclampsia as the clinical endpoint. For some incomprehensible reason a major interest has existed for decades concerning the early prediction of preeclampsia, most commonly tested using uterine artery Doppler (the earlier the better) and various serum markers, alone or in combination. Any new model for detection has been welcomed enthusiastically, although nothing has changed in the outcome of women presenting with preeclampsia.

Keywords: Hypertensive disorder; Pregnancy; Preeclampsia