Published online Mar 27, 2018. doi: 10.5313/wja.v7.i1.1
Peer-review started: December 5, 2017
First decision: December 18, 2017
Revised: December 24, 2017
Accepted: January 16, 2018
Article in press: January 16, 2018
Published online: March 27, 2018
Processing time: 157 Days and 10.9 Hours
Advanced techniques and equipment are often needed for tracheal intubation in patients with difficult airways. New technology has brought about video laryngoscopes (VLs). Multiple studies have compared VL to direct laryngoscopy and the effects on success rates and factors surrounding intubation. However, in this study we aim to investigate the influence of VL on fiberoptic intubation, the previous gold standard for difficult airways.
Management of the difficult airway has traditionally relied on the difficult airway algorithm published by the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Given the ever-increasing clinical use of VL, it is important to assess if their introduction has affected the clinical practice of managing difficult airways, specifically in regards to awake fiberoptic intubation, part of the difficult airway algorithm.
In light of the introduction of VL, this study investigates whether or not the rate of awake fiberoptic intubation has decreased in the management of difficult airway. It is important to recognize the trends surrounding VL given that the frequency of use and level of training that anesthetists have with fiberoptic intubation may be influenced. If this were the case it would be important to acknowledge and address in the future.
Anesthetic records were reviewed at Rush University Medical Center before and after the introduction of video laryngoscopes to analyze the effects on awake fiberoptic intubation (FOI).
Awake FOI decreased from 13.1% before VL to 9% after video laryngoscopy (P = 0.1768 but trended toward significance). Morbid obesity (larger BMI P = 0.0154, OR = 1.5 per 10-point BMI increase), male gender (P = 0.0026, OR = 3.0), and higher el-Ganzouri score (P = 0.0007, OR = 1.5) predicted higher rates of awake FOI. VL was used to intubate 51% of predicted difficult airways, while use of direct laryngoscopy significantly decreased.
In light of increasing use of VL, fiberoptic intubation remains the gold standard for difficult airway intubation. It is important for patient safety that our specialty commit to train on multiple modalities of tracheal intubation in order to be prepared for the most difficult of airways. Continued study is required to assess trends in regards to VL vs fiberoptic intubation in difficult airways.
While a retrospective study has shed light on the fact that the rate of VL is clearly increasing, a randomized clinical trial could provide greater data on the outcomes of difficult airways given varying tracheal intubation methods. In addition, continual readdressing of VL use in difficult airways will aid in assessing whether or not it should be introduced into the difficult airway algorithm.