Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2015; 6(8): 577-589
Published online Sep 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i8.577
Table 1 Clinical features and magnetic resonance imaging findings in the four grades of tibial stress injury
GradeClinical examMRI
1Periosteal tenderness at the distal 1/3 to 1/2 of the anteromedial tibial surface. Requires firm palpation with thumbPeriosteal oedema: mild to moderate on T2-weighted images. Marrow normal on T1 and T2-weighted images
2Tenderness as abovePeriosteal oedema: moderate to severe on T2-weighted images Marrow oedema on STIR or T2-weighted images. T1 normal
Requires less firm palpation with thumb and may have linear tenderness along the posteromedial tibial border
3Tenderness as abovePeriosteal oedema: moderate to severe on T2-weighted images. Marrow oedema on T1 and STIR-T2-weighted images
Requires less firm palpation and may have linear tenderness as above
May have subcutaneous anteromedial tibial oedema
4Tenderness as abovePeriosteal oedema: moderate to severe on T2-weighted images. Marrow oedema on T1-STIR or T2-weighted images
Requires less firm palpation and may have linear tenderness as aboveFracture line clearly visible as low fuzzy incomplete (4a) or complete (4b) line
A discrete region of maximal tenderness/thickening (early callus formation) over the fracture site will be palpable. Obvious tibial subcutaneous oedema is usually presentMay see oedema in proximal tibial origins of Tibialis Posterior, FDL and Soleus
Table 2 Bone mineral density in male medial tibial stress syndrome patients and an athletic control group[31]
BMD (g/cm2)MTSSAthletic controlSignificance
Proximal1.291.48< 0.01b
33% level (injury site)1.431.85< 0.001b
Distal1.321.33> 0.05
Table 3 Bone mineral density in female tibial stress fracture and medial tibial stress syndrome patients[33]
BMD (g/cm2)MTSS (n = 20)TSF (n = 10)Significance
Proximal1.211.270.136
33% level (injury site)1.461.630.013a
Distal0.900.940.403