Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2022; 13(3): 278-288
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.278
Table 1 Demographic, clinical and outcome data of subgroup A patients treated with a combined technology Masquelet induced membrane technique + Ilizarov bone transport
Patient
Age (yr), Gender
Mechanism of injury/Туре the fracture
Disease duration (yr)
Type (number) of previous surgeries
Type of nonunion/Infection
Shortening/Bone defect (cm)
Joint Function before surgery
Regenerate/nonunion consolidation completeness
Nonunion consolidation (mo)
Postoperative complication (Paley classification)
Follow-up (mo)
Residual limb length discrepancy (cm)
Further surgery
PTD-151, FMVA, OF1EF (1)TW; Delayed wound healing3/3Knee and ankle stiffness+/+11 Pin-tract infection Regenerate deformity; Deep vein thrombosis172 -
PTD-250, MMVA, OF4 Plate (1); EF (1)HN; History of infection3/5Ankle ankyloses+/+10 Regenerate deformity245 Rejected further surgery
PTD-348, MIF, OF3Plate (1); EF (1)HN; History of infection0/3Ankle stiffness+/+7 Pin-tract infection12--
PTD-418, MIF, OF3Plate (2); EF (2)HN; History of infection6/3Ankle ankyloses+/+11 Knee joint stiffness 366 3-cm lengthening
PTD-521, MIF; OF1EF (2)HN0/4Full function+/+5 Regenerate deformity24--
PTD-639, MCT; CF12Plate (1); EF (1)HN; History of infection1/3Ankle stiffness+/+7 Pin-tract infection12--
PTD-743, MCT2Plate (1)HN; History of infection0/4Ankle stiffness+/+8- n/a -N/A
Table 2 Demographic, clinical and outcome data of subgroup B patients treated with a combined technology Masquelet induced membrane technique + Ilizarov bone transport
Patient
Age (yr), Gender
Neurofibromatosis
Type (number) of previous surgeries
Paley CPT Type
Shortening/Bone defect (cm)
Joint Function
Regenerate/nonunion consolidation completeness
Consolidation time (mo)
Complications (Paley classification)
Follow-up (mo)
Residual limb length discrepancy (cm)
Recurrence/Further surgery
СPT-14, MI type-4C5/3Full+/+7Regenerate deformity243Refracture
СPT -23, M-EF (1); Nail (1)4C5/2Ankle stiffness+/+9Pin-tract infection363 Refracture
СPT -315, FI typeMore than 10 including EF, Nail4A15/3Ankle stiffness+/+10Pin-tract infection1212
СPT -45, MI type-4B3/1.5Full+/-7.5Pin-tract infection243Ilizarov monofocal compression
СPT -58, FI typePlate (1); Nail (2); EF (4)4B10/3Ankle ankylosis+/+9 -3612 Twice Ilizarov lengthening by 6 cm
СPT -64, MI typeEF (1); Autograft (1)4C5/1.5Full-/-8 Ischemic regenerate246 Bone defect, rejected further treatment
СPT -76, F-EF and allograft (2)4A5/5Full+/+13.5 Ischemic regenerate 125 -
СPT -86, F-Plate (1); Nail (2); EF (4)4B4/3Full+/+7 Pin-tract infection242 Refracture
СPT -94, F-Plate (1); Nail (2); EF (4)4A2/2Ankle stiffness+/+8 -362 Refracture
Table 3 Main mean values of preoperative and postoperative data by combined use of Masquelet induced membrane technique + Ilizarov bone transport
Parameter
Subgroup A
Subgroup B
Number of previous surgeries per patient2.0 ± 0.23.3 ± 0.7
LLD at admission (cm)3.5 ± 0.56.0 ± 1.0
Defect size (сm)3.6 ± 0.32.7 ± 0.3
True defect (LLD + bone gap) after debridement relative to the contralateral limb (%)13.3 ± 1.731.0 ± 3.0
Time of spacer retention (d) 42.4 ± 4.555.8 ± 6.6
Duration of distraction (d)43.0 ± 4.231.9 ± 4.2
Distraction regenerate size (cm) 3.1 ± 0.22.6 ± 0.2
Completeness of defect filling (%) 75.4 ± 10.634.6 ± 4.2
External fixation index per cm143.5 ± 13.2117.8 ± 8.5
Duration of total external fixation, including spacer retention time (d)397.0 ± 15.3270.1 ± 16.3
Mean follow-up time (mo) 20.8 ± 2.725.3 ± 2.3