Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2022; 13(3): 278-288
Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.278
Ilizarov bone transport combined with the Masquelet technique for bone defects of various etiologies (preliminary results)
Dmitry Y Borzunov, Sergey N Kolchin, Denis S Mokhovikov, Tatiana A Malkova
Dmitry Y Borzunov, Department of Taumatology and Orthopedics, Ural State Medical University, Ekaterinburg 620109, Russia
Sergey N Kolchin, Denis S Mokhovikov, Orthopaedic Department 4, Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan 640014, Russia
Tatiana A Malkova, Department of Medical Information and Analysis, Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Kurgan 640014, Russia
Author contributions: All authors contributed to the conception and design, drafting of the manuscript, analysis and interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript; Malkova TA and Kolchin SN contributed to the acquisition of literature data; Kolchin SN performed statistical analysis. Borzunov DY, Kolchin SN, Mokhovikov DS performed the interventions in the cases included into this study.
Institutional review board statement: The study was approved by the ethical committee at the Ilizarov Center.
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interests.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Tatiana A Malkova, Technical Editor, Department of Medical Information and Analysis, Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, 6, M. Ulianova street, Kurgan 640014, Russia. tmalkova@mail.ru
Received: April 28, 2021
Peer-review started: April 28, 2021
First decision: September 29, 2021
Revised: October 11, 2021
Accepted: February 19, 2022
Article in press: February 19, 2022
Published online: March 18, 2022
Processing time: 323 Days and 2.2 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

The Ilizarov bone transport (IBT) and the Masquelet induced membrane technique (IMT) have specific merits and shortcomings, but numerous studies have shown their efficacy in the management of extensive long-bone defects of various etiologies, including congenital deficiencies. Combining their strong benefits seems a promising strategy to enhance bone regeneration and reduce the risk of refractures in the management of post-traumatic and congenital defects and nonunion that failed to respond to other treatments.

AIM

To combine IBT and IMT for the management of severe tibial defects and pseudarthrosis, and present preliminary results of this technological solution.

METHODS

Seven adults with post-traumatic tibial defects (subgroup A) and nine children (subgroup B) with congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT) were treated with the combination of IMT and IBT after the failure of previous treatments. The mean number of previous surgeries was 2.0 ± 0.2 in subgroup A and 3.3 ± 0.7 in subgroup B. Step 1 included Ilizarov frame placement and spacer introduction into the defect to generate the induced membrane which remained in the interfragmental gap after spacer removal. Step 2 was an osteotomy and bone transport of the fragment through the tunnel in the induced membrane, its compression and docking for consolidation without grafting. The outcomes were retrospectively studied after a mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 2.7 mo in subgroup A and 25.3 ± 2.3 mo in subgroup B.

RESULTS

The “true defect” after resection was 13.3 ± 1.7% in subgroup A and 31.0 ± 3.0% in subgroup B relative to the contralateral limb. Upon completion of treatment, defects were filled by 75.4 ± 10.6% and 34.6 ± 4.2%, respectively. Total duration of external fixation was 397 ± 9.2 and 270.1 ± 16.3 d, including spacer retention time of 42.4 ± 4.5 and 55.8 ± 6.6 d, in subgroups A and B, respectively. Bone infection was not observed. Postoperative complications were several cases of pin-tract infection and regenerate deformity in both subgroups. Ischemic regeneration was observed in two cases of subgroup B. Complications were corrected during the course of treatment. Bone union was achieved in all patients of subgroup A and in seven patients of subgroup B. One non-united CPT case was further treated with the Ilizarov compression method only and achieved union. After a follow-up period of two to three years, refractures occurred in four cases of united CPT.

CONCLUSION

The combination of IMT and IBT provides good outcomes in post-traumatic tibial defects after previous treatment failure but external fixation is longer due to spacer retention. Refractures may occur in severe CPT.

Keywords: Ilizarov bone transport; Induced membrane technique; Post-traumatic tibial defect; Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia; Distraction osteogenesis; Regeneration

Core Tip: This study presents preliminary outcomes and the protocol of a developed technology that includes phase 1 of the Masquelet technique for induced membrane generation and Ilizarov bone transport. The technology did not comprise bone grafting or skin flaps. It was used in 16 patients with post-traumatic tibial defects and congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT), after multiple failed treatments. The results were rated as good in patients with post-traumatic tibial defects. Congenital cases showed similar rates of pseudarthrosis union as other means currently used for CPT. Refractures may be expected in severe types of CPT after multiple previous treatments