Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2023; 14(6): 485-501
Published online Jun 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.485
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Proportional risk of bias graph: Judgement of the percentage of bias items arising from all included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Risk of bias summary diagram: Assessment of specific items of bias arising from all included studies.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Forest plot of change values for Victorian Institute Ankle Function Scale scores. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Forest plot of Achilles tendon thickness variation. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Forest plot of change in visual analogue scale scores. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Forest plot of change in patient satisfaction. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Forest plot of patient return to exercise rate. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Forest plot of Victorian Institute Ankle Function Scale scores in patients with Achilles tendon rupture. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 10
Figure 10 Forest plot of single heel lift height in patients with Achilles tendon rupture. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 11
Figure 11 Forest plot of calf circumference in patients with Achilles tendon rupture. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 12
Figure 12 Forest plot of ankle mobility in patients with Achilles tendon rupture. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 13
Figure 13 Forest plot of return to sport rates in patients with Achilles tendon rupture. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Figure 14
Figure 14 Forest plot of the incidence of adverse events in patients with Achilles tendon rupture. PRP: Platelet-Rich Plasma.