Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2024; 15(6): 554-559
Published online Jun 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.554
Published online Jun 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.554
Examining the “revisability” benefit of hip resurfacing arthroplasty
Jose George, Adam J Taylor, Thomas P Schmalzried, Department of Orthopedics, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90509, United States
Author contributions: George J, Taylor AJ, and Schmalzried TP contributed equally to this work; George J and Taylor AJ performed the primary literature search, data extraction, analysis of data, and writing of the manuscript; Schmalzried TP was the principal surgeon of the study, conceptualized the idea of the study, helped with the methodology, writing, and supervision of the study; and all authors have read and approved the final version.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by John F. Wolf M.D. Human Subjects Committee (Approval No. 18CR-32450-01R).
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The author(s) received no financial or material support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data sharing statement: Technical appendix, statistical code, and dataset available from the corresponding author at josegrg2019@gmail.com. Consent for data sharing was not obtained from participants but the presented data are anonymized and risk of identification is low.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Corresponding author: Jose George, MD, Surgeon, Department of Orthopedics, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, 1000 W Carson Street, Box 422, Torrance, CA 90509, United States. josegrg2019@gmail.com
Received: January 31, 2024
Revised: April 20, 2024
Accepted: April 26, 2024
Published online: June 18, 2024
Processing time: 134 Days and 1.8 Hours
Revised: April 20, 2024
Accepted: April 26, 2024
Published online: June 18, 2024
Processing time: 134 Days and 1.8 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: We aim to examine the “revisability” benefit of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA): Are outcomes of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed metal-on-metal-HRA worse compared to primary THA? This study expands the literature by examining patient reported outcomes between HRA revision and primary THA, and outcomes between HRA revision and revision THA. HRA patients revised to THA have worse clinical outcomes compared to primary THA and the outcome is dependent on the etiology of failure.