Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.47
Peer-review started: February 11, 2019
First decision: June 7, 2019
Revised: July 4, 2019
Accepted: November 6, 2019
Article in press: November 6, 2019
Published online: January 18, 2020
Processing time: 342 Days and 6 Hours
Flexibility, agility and muscle strength are key factors to either win or lose a game. The high incidence and prevalence of muscular injuries led coaches, medical teams and researchers from around the world to seek modalities to prevent these events from happening. Recently, the effect of a new technique, deep transverse friction massage (DTFM) on muscle extensibility as compared to traditional stretching techniques has been examined.
This study compares the effect of DTFM to that of static and dynamic stretching techniques on the hamstring’s performance amongst Lebanese and Syrian football players. Sports injuries and more precisely muscular injuries can have a serious negative impact on a player’s health, future, and surroundings. Therefore, seeking modalities to prevent these events from happening is needed.
This study primary objective was to compare the effect of DTFM vs static and dynamic stretching techniques on the hamstring’s extensibility, agility, and strength amongst Lebanese and Syrian football players. Recording the incidence of non-contact hamstring muscle injury was a secondary objective. Optimizing the muscle-related parameters is important to decrease the incidence and impact of muscle injuries.
A single-blinded prospective longitudinal randomized controlled trial was designed to realize the objectives of this study. The experiment took place over a period of four weeks, where Football players were randomized into three intervention groups (static stretching; dynamic stretching; DTFM). Participants were followed-up carefully three times per week, for a total of 12 sessions. Straight leg raise, and 1 repetition maximum tests were used to measure the dominant leg hamstring muscle extensibility and maximal strength respectively. T-drill test was used to assess the lower extremities agility at (baseline; acute; and chronic) phases.
Measures of acute strength (P = 0.011) and chronic extensibility (P = 0.000) showed solely a significant difference between the intervention groups, where the static group showed to be the superior. Moreover, no loss to follow-up or protocol violation was recorded. These findings reinforce the effect of static stretching on long-term flexibility and contradict that on strength.
This study has shown that static stretching technique best outcomes on long-term extensibility and short-term maximal voluntary hamstring muscle strength. Finally, no difference between the interventions was recorded regarding its effects on the rate of muscle injuries occurrence.
Future studies are required to test the effect of the DTFM as compared to the above-mentioned stretching techniques on muscle performance for a longer period of time. Moreover, the standardization of DTFM testing is needed.