Published online Feb 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i2.117
Peer-review started: May 15, 2015
First decision: September 29, 2015
Revised: November 18, 2015
Accepted: December 3, 2015
Article in press: December 4, 2015
Published online: February 18, 2016
Processing time: 277 Days and 13.5 Hours
AIM: To evaluate the effect of different elbow and forearm positions on radiocapitellar alignment.
METHODS: Fifty-one healthy volunteers were recruited and bilateral elbow radiographs were taken to form a radiologic database. Lateral elbow radiographs were taken with the elbow in five different positions: Maximal extension and forearm in neutral, maximal flexion and forearm in neutral, elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral, elbow at 90° and forearm in supination and elbow at 90° and forearm in pronation. A goniometer was used to verify the accuracy of the elbow’s position for the radiographs at a 90° angle. The radiocapitellar ratio (RCR) measurements were then taken on the collected radiographs using the SliceOmatic software. An orthopedic resident performed the radiographic measurements on the 102 elbows, for a total of 510 lateral elbow radiographic measures. ANOVA paired t-tests and Pearson coefficients were used to assess the differences and correlations between the RCR in each position.
RESULTS: Mean RCR values were -2% ± 7% (maximal extension), -5% ± 9% (maximal flexion), and for elbow at 90° and forearm in neutral -2% ± 5%, supination 1% ± 6% and pronation 1% ± 5%. ANOVA analyses demonstrated significant differences between the RCR in different elbow and forearm positions. Paired t-tests confirmed significant differences between the RCR at maximal flexion and flexion at 90°, and maximal extension and flexion. The Pearson coefficient showed significant correlations between the RCR with the elbow at 90° - maximal flexion; the forearm in neutral-supination; the forearm in neutral-pronation.
CONCLUSION: Overall, 95% of the RCR values are included in the normal range (obtained at 90° of flexion) and a value outside this range, in any position, should raise suspicion for instability.
Core tip: Assessing radial head alignment after injury and obtaining perfect lateral radiographs with the elbow at 90° and the forearm in neutral may be difficult. Therefore we designed this study to assess whether the radiocapitellar ratios (RCR) calculated from true lateral radiographs at different positions of elbow flexion and forearm pronosupination differ from those taken in 90° flexion and neutral position. The paper shows that the RCR measurement continues to be an overall valid and reliable method throughout different elbow and forearm positions. However, values in the negative range, > 5% regardless of forearm rotation, should raise suspicion for elbow instability.