Published online Oct 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i9.655
Peer-review started: June 1, 2015
First decision: July 7, 2015
Revised: July 12, 2015
Accepted: August 20, 2015
Article in press: August 21, 2015
Published online: October 18, 2015
Processing time: 144 Days and 4.2 Hours
In this article, a concise description of the recent advances in the field of osteoarthritis management is presented. The main focus is to highlight the most promising techniques that emerge in both biological joint replacement and artificial joint arthroplasty. A critical view of high quality evidence regarding outcome and safety profile of these techniques is presented. The potential role of kinematically aligned total knee replacement, navigation, and robotic-assisted surgery is outlined. A critical description of both primary and stem cell-based therapies, the cell homing theory, the use of biologic factors and recent advancements in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine is provided. Based on the current evidence, some thoughts on a realistic approach towards answering these questions are attempted.
Core tip: In the quest for answers for the future of joint reconstruction, this article explores how feasible is to claim today that biological joint reconstruction will soon replace artificial joint arthroplasty. Will stem cell-based therapies, biologic factors, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine be able to change orthopedic practice in the near future? What is the current evidence? On the other hand, are kinematically aligned total knee replacement, and robotic-assisted surgery able to further advance joint replacement? Based on the current evidence, some thoughts on a realistic approach for the future of joint reconstruction, biological or not, are discussed.