Review
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2011; 2(10): 93-101
Published online Oct 18, 2011. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v2.i10.93
Role of polyethylene particles in peri-prosthetic osteolysis: A review
Gerald J Atkins, David R Haynes, Donald W Howie, David M Findlay
Gerald J Atkins, Donald W Howie, David M Findlay, Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, The University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
David R Haynes, Discipline of Pathology, The University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
Author contributions: Atkins GJ and Findlay DM drafted the manuscript; all authors contributed to the conceptual design and editing; Atkins GJ designed the figure.
Supported by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
Correspondence to: Gerald J Atkins, Associate Professor, Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, The University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. gerald.atkins@adelaide.edu.au
Telephone: +61-8-82223054 Fax: +61-8-82323065
Received: September 1, 2011
Revised: September 30, 2011
Accepted: October 7, 2011
Published online: October 18, 2011
Abstract

There is convincing evidence that particles produced by the wear of joint prostheses are causal in the peri-prosthetic loss of bone, or osteolysis, which, if it progresses, leads to the phenomenon of aseptic loosening. It is important to fully understand the biology of this bone loss because it threatens prosthesis survival, and loosened implants can result in peri-prosthetic fracture, which is disastrous for the patient and presents a difficult surgical scenario. The focus of this review is the bioactivity of polyethylene (PE) particles, since there is evidence that these are major players in the development and progression of osteolysis around prostheses which use PE as the bearing surface. The review describes the biological consequences of interaction of PE particles with macrophages, osteoclasts and cells of the osteoblast lineage, including osteocytes. It explores the possible cellular mechanisms of action of PE and seeks to use the findings to date to propose potential non-surgical treatments for osteolysis. In particular, a non-surgical approach is likely to be applicable to implants containing newer, highly cross-linked PEs (HXLPEs), for which osteolysis seems to occur with much reduced PE wear compared with conventional PEs. The caveat here is that we know little as yet about the bioactivity of HXLPE particles and addressing this constitutes our next challenge.

Keywords: Polyethylene; Aseptic loosening; Osteolysis; Wear particle; Peri-prosthetic