Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2023; 14(6): 399-410
Published online Jun 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.399
Two surgical pathways for isolated hip fractures: A comparative study
Alexander A Fokin, Joanna Wycech Knight, Maral Darya, Ryan Stalder, Ivan Puente, Russell D Weisz
Alexander A Fokin, Joanna Wycech Knight, Maral Darya, Ryan Stalder, Ivan Puente, Russell D Weisz, Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, FL 33484, United States
Alexander A Fokin, Ivan Puente, Department of Surgery, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States
Joanna Wycech Knight, Ivan Puente, Trauma and Critical Care Services, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316, United States
Maral Darya, Ryan Stalder, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, United States
Ivan Puente, Department of Surgery, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, United States
Russell D Weisz, Department of Orthopedics, South Palm Orthopedics, Delray Beach, FL 33445, United States
Author contributions: Fokin AA and Weisz RD conceptualized the research study; Fokin AA, Wycech Knight J, Puente I, and Weisz RD designed the methodology; Fokin AA, Puente I, and Weisz RD were the project administrators and supervisors; Wycech Knight J, Darya M, and Stalder R performed the research; Wycech Knight J performed the software analysis; Fokin AA, Wycech Knight J, Darya M, Stalder R, Puente I, and Weisz RD performed formal data analysis and validation; Fokin AA, Wycech Knight J, Darya M, and Stalder R wrote the original draft of the manuscript; Fokin AA, Wycech Knight J, Darya M, Stalder R, Puente I, and Weisz RD performed manuscript review and editing; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the MetroWest Institutional Review Board, Framingham, MA under the protocol number: #2020-138.
Informed consent statement: This retrospective study was granted a waiver of informed consent by the MetroWest Institutional Review Board.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report having no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: Deidentified data and study materials are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author at alexander.fokin@tenethealth.com.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Alexander A Fokin, Doctor, MD, Professor, Researcher, Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, 5352 Linton Blvd, Delray Beach, FL 33484, United States. alexander.fokin@tenethealth.com
Received: December 13, 2022
Peer-review started: December 13, 2022
First decision: March 14, 2023
Revised: March 22, 2023
Accepted: April 27, 2023
Article in press: April 27, 2023
Published online: June 18, 2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Hip fractures (HF) are common among the aging population, and surgery within 48 h is recommended. Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways, either trauma or medicine admitting services.

AIM

To compare management and outcomes among patients admitted through the trauma pathway (TP) vs medical pathway (MP).

METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 2094 patients with proximal femur fractures (AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association Type 31) who underwent surgery at a level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021. There were 69 patients admitted through the TP and 2025 admitted through the MP. To ensure comparability between groups, 66 of the 2025 MP patients were propensity matched to 66 TP patients by age, sex, HF type, HF surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiology score. The statistical analyses included multivariable analysis, group characteristics, and bivariate correlation comparisons with the χ² test and t-test.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, the mean age in both groups was 75-years-old, 62% of both groups were females, the main HF type was intertrochanteric (TP 52% vs MP 62%), open reduction internal fixation was the most common surgery (TP 68% vs MP 71%), and the mean American Society of Anesthesiology score was 2.8 for TP and 2.7 for MP. The majority of patients in TP and MP (71% vs 74%) were geriatric (≥ 65-years-old). Falls were the main mechanism of injury in both groups (77% vs 97%, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in pre-surgery anticoagulation use (49% vs 41%), admission day of the week, or insurance status. The incidence of comorbidities was equal (94% for both) with cardiac comorbidities being dominant in both groups (71% vs 73%). The number of preoperative consultations was similar for TP and MP, with the most common consultation being cardiology in both (44% and 36%). HF displacement occurred more among TP patients (76% vs 39%, P = 0.000). Time to surgery was not statistically different (23 h in both), but length of surgery was significantly longer for TP (59 min vs 41 min, P = 0.000). Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were not statistically different (5 d vs 8 d and 6 d for both). There were no statistical differences in discharge disposition and mortality (3% vs 0%).

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in outcomes of surgeries between admission through TP vs MP. The focus should be on the patient’s health condition and on prompt surgical intervention.

Keywords: Isolated hip fractures, Admitting service, Trauma center, Time to surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Preoperative consultations

Core Tip: We evaluated 2094 hip fracture patients admitted for surgery to a level 1 trauma center over a 5-year period. Patients were stratified based on the admitting service, either trauma or medical. After a propensity score matching comparison of 66 patients in each group it was revealed that there was no difference in outcomes. Predictors of a prolonged hospital length of stay were increased American Society of Anesthesiology score and delayed time to surgery. Predictors of mortality were increased American Society of Anesthesiology score and increased age. The health condition of the patient, but not the admitting service, was the defining factor for management and outcomes.