Published online Sep 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.825
Peer-review started: October 26, 2021
First decision: February 15, 2022
Revised: February 28, 2022
Accepted: August 12, 2022
Article in press: August 12, 2022
Published online: September 18, 2022
Processing time: 325 Days and 10.9 Hours
Despite recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there remains no consensus regarding the preferred surgical treatment for humeral shaft fractures. The fragility index (FI) is an emerging tool used to evaluate the robustness of RCTs by quantifying the number of participants in a study group that would need to switch outcomes in order to reverse the study conclusions.
To investigate the fragility index of randomized control trials assessing outcomes of operative fixation in proximal humerus fractures.
We completed a systematic review of RCTs evaluating the surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Inclusion criteria included: articles published in English; patients randomized and allotted in 1:1 ratio to 2 parallel arms; and dichotomous outcome variables. The FI was calculated for total complications, each complication individually, and secondary surgeries using the Fisher exact test, as previously published.
Fifteen RCTs were included in the analysis comparing open reduction plate osteosynthesis with dynamic compression plate or locking compression plate, intramedullary nail, and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. The median FI was 0 for all parameters analyzed. Regarding individual outcomes, the FI was 0 for 81/91 (89%) of outcomes. The FI exceeded the number lost to follow up in only 2/91 (2%) outcomes.
The FI shows that data from RCTs regarding operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures are fragile and does not demonstrate superiority of any particular surgical technique.
Core Tip: Humerus shaft fractures have been managed with intramedullary nail fixation and plate osteosynthesis. Multiple randomized control trials have been performed to compare outcomes, complications, reoperations, and union rates between both treatment modalities. Despite multiple randomized control trials, there remains a lack of consensus from the existing literature regarding surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures. This manuscript aims to further assess the quality of the literature that guides treatment decisions by employing a new metric, the fragility index.