Published online Aug 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i8.725
Peer-review started: February 23, 2022
First decision: April 13, 2022
Revised: April 23, 2022
Accepted: July 25, 2022
Article in press: July 25, 2022
Published online: August 18, 2022
Processing time: 174 Days and 9.2 Hours
In 2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed bundled payments for hip fractures to improve the quality and decrease costs of care. Patients transferred from other facilities may be imposing a financial risk on the hospitals that accept these patients.
To determine the costs associated with patients that either presented to the emergency department or were transferred from another hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF) with the diagnosis of a hip fracture requiring operative intervention.
A retrospective single institution review was conducted for all arthroplasty patients from 2010 to 2015. Inclusion criteria included a total or partial hip replacement for a hip fracture. Exclusion criteria included pathologic, periprosthetic, and fracture non-union. Data was collected to compare total observed costs for patients from the emergency department, patients from skilled nursing facilities, and patients from an outside hospital.
A total of 223 patients met the inclusion criteria. 135 (60.54%) of these patients presented primarily to the emergency department, 58 patients (26.01%) were transferred from an outside hospital, and 30 patients (13.43%) were transferred from a SNF. Cost data analysis showed that outside hospital patients demonstrated significantly greater total cost for their hospitalization ($43302) compared to emergency department patients ($28875, P = 0.000) and SNF patients ($28282, P = 0.000).
Patients transferred from an outside hospital incurred greater costs for their hospitalization than patients presenting from an emergency department or SNF. This is a strong argument for risk-adjustment models when bundling payments for the care of hip fracture patients.
Core Tip: Transfers to regional tertiary care centers of critically ill and severely injured patients have been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality. Many of these patients have increased morbidity, length of stay, blood transfusion requirements, and intensive care utilization has been previously documented in transferred patients. To our knowledge, this study is the first to document this phenomenon in patients with femoral neck fractures being treated with arthroplasty. With the nationwide implementation of bundled payments looming, determining the additional risks and costs associated with providing referral services for community and regional hospitals is essential. It is clear from our data that patients transferred from an outside hospital more significantly strain the resources of the receiving tertiary care hospital compared to those patients who present primarily to the emergency department. This is a strong argument for robust risk-adjustment models that potentially even include patient point of origin.