Published online Oct 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.732
Peer-review started: February 25, 2021
First decision: May 13, 2021
Revised: May 23, 2021
Accepted: August 6, 2021
Article in press: August 6, 2021
Published online: October 18, 2021
Processing time: 230 Days and 11.7 Hours
Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widespread procedure to address end stage osteoarthritis with good results, clinical outcomes, and long-term survivorship. Although it is frequently performed in elderly, an increased demand in young and active people is expected in the next years. However, a considerable dissatisfaction rate has been reported by highly demanding patients due to the intrinsic limitations provided by the TKA. Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) TKA was developed to mimic knee biomechanics, through anterior cruciate ligament preservation. First-generation BCR TKA has not gained popularity due to its being a challenging technique and having poor survival outcomes. Thanks to implant design improvement and surgeon-friendly instrumentation, second-generation BCR TKA has seen renewed interest. This review will focus on surgical indications, kinematical basis, clinical results and latest developments of second-generation BCR TKA.
Core Tip: Second-generation bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR TKA) is designed to overcome the historical durability issues of this implant. Recent kinematics studies point out the advantage of this design in mimicking normal knee motion. Second-generation BCR TKA is generally associated with a more restrictive indication range in terms of coronal alignment, anterior cruciate ligament integrity, and preoperative range of motion. Available clinical results demonstrate variable outcomes with short-term follow-up.