|
1
|
Marois AJ, Field LD. Elbow Arthroscopy: Pearls to Avoid Nerve Injuries. Arthroscopy 2024; 40:2160-2161. [PMID: 39147441 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
Elbow arthroscopy is a useful tool that can be applied in a variety of surgical indications. However, performing the procedure safely demands a thorough understanding of the proximity of neurovascular structures around the elbow. Although nerve injuries in elbow arthroscopy are rare, complications can further be avoided by adhering to a set of principles designed to protect the surrounding neurovascular structures. Before making portals, the surgeon should palpate and mark the ulnar nerve to confirm its location in the groove. Next, the joint should be insufflated with fluid to distend the joint capsule and increase the distance between instruments and the anterior neurovascular structures. Anterior portals ideally should be made proximal to the medial and lateral epicondyles, thereby increasing distance from the median and radial nerve, respectively. Once in the joint, it is critical to stay oriented by maintaining instruments and the articular surfaces in the same view. Special caution should be exercised when in proximity to the capsule in the posteromedial gutter to protect the ulnar nerve. Similarly, the anterior inferior capsule should be approached with caution, as its violation puts branches of the radial nerve, specifically the posterior interosseous nerve, at risk. Elbow arthroscopy can be safely performed with proper knowledge and application of anatomy around the elbow when making portals and understanding at-risk areas beyond the capsule when working within the joint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Marois
- Mississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Jackson, Mississippi, U.S.A
| | - Larry D Field
- Mississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Jackson, Mississippi, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
de Klerk HH, Verweij LPE, Sierevelt IN, Priester-Vink S, Hilgersom NFJ, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MPJ. Wide Range in Complication Rates Following Elbow Arthroscopy in Adult and Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 2023; 39:2363-2387. [PMID: 37146664 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a systematic review of complications associated with elbow arthroscopy in adults and children. METHODS A literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting complications or reoperations after elbow arthroscopy with at least 5 patients were included. Based on the Nelson classification, the severity of complications was categorized as minor or major. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials, and nonrandomized trials were assessed using the Methodological Items for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULT A total of 114 articles were included with 18,892 arthroscopies (16,815 patients). A low risk of bias was seen for the randomized studies and a fair quality for the nonrandomized studies. Complication rates ranged from 0% to 71% (median 3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8%-3.3%), and reoperation rates from 0% to 59% (median 2%; 95% CI, 1.8%-2.2%). A total of 906 complications were observed, with transient nerve palsies (31%) as the most frequent complication. According to Nelson classification, 735 (81%) complications were minor and 171 (19%) major. Forty-nine studies reported complications in adults and 10 studies in children, showing a complication rate ranging from 0% to 27% (median 0%; 95% CI, 0%-0.4%) and 0% to 57% (median 1%; 95% CI, 0.4%-3.5%), respectively. A total of 125 complications were observed in adults, with transient nerve palsies (23%) as the most frequent complication, and 33 in children, with loose bodies after surgery (45%) as the most frequent complication. CONCLUSIONS Predominantly low-level evidence studies demonstrate varying complication rates (median 3%, range 0%-71%) and reoperation rates (median 2%, range 0%-59%) after elbow arthroscopy. Higher complication rates are observed after more complex surgery. The incidence and type of complications can aid surgeons in patient counseling and refining surgical techniques to further reduce the complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV; systematic review of Level I-IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huub H de Klerk
- Amsterdam Shoulder and Elbow Center of Expertise (ASECE), OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) and Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Lukas P E Verweij
- Amsterdam Shoulder and Elbow Center of Expertise (ASECE), OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Academic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inger N Sierevelt
- Specialized Centre for Orthopedic Research and Education (SCORE), Xpert Clinics, Orthopedic Department, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Orthopaedics, Spaarne Gasthuis Academie, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands
| | - Simone Priester-Vink
- Medical Library, Department of Research and Epidemiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nick F J Hilgersom
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Denise Eygendaal
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel P J van den Bekerom
- Amsterdam Shoulder and Elbow Center of Expertise (ASECE), OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Abstract
Heterotopic ossification (HO) refers to benign ectopic bone formation in soft tissue and is common following trauma surgery. HO bone can restrict movement and progress into ankylosis that may necessitate surgical intervention. This article discusses the current literature on the pathophysiology, prophylaxis, treatment, and epidemiology of postoperative HO following orthopedic trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jad Lawand
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
| | - Zachary Loeffelholz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Bilal Khurshid
- Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Eric Barcak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Ge X, Ge X, Wang C, Liu Q, Wang B, Chen L, Cheng K, Qin M. Application of ultrasound in avoiding radial nerve injury during elbow arthroscopy: a retrospective follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:1126. [PMID: 36566206 PMCID: PMC9789568 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06109-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A safe and effective technique for anterolateral portal placement in elbow arthroscopy is significant. We compared the outcomes of patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy using different ultrasound-assisted techniques. METHODS From May 2016 to June 2021 a retrospective analysis on all patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy in our department was performed. Patients were separated into three groups: non-ultrasound; preoperative ultrasound; and intraoperative ultrasound. The minimum follow-up period was 1 year. Nerve injuries, visual analog scale (VAS), Mayo elbow-performance score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), and range of motion (ROM) of the elbow were evaluated for comparison among the three groups pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS All 55 patients completed a 1-year follow-up: non-ultrasound (n = 20); preoperative ultrasound (n = 17); and intraoperative ultrasound (n = 18). There were 3 cases (15.0%) of transient radial nerve palsy in the non-ultrasound group. No nerve complications occurred in preoperative ultrasound and intraoperative ultrasound groups. The probability of postoperative radial nerve injury in the three groups was statistically different (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS score, MEPS, DASH score, and ROM among the three groups at the follow-up evaluation (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Performing anterolateral portal placement during elbow arthroscopy with ultrasound-assisted techniques successfully avoided radial nerve injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingtao Ge
- grid.452710.5Department of Orthopedics, Rizhao People’s Hospital, 276800 Rizhao, Shandong P.R. China
| | - Xinghua Ge
- grid.452710.5Department of Neurosurgery, Rizhao People’s Hospital, 276800 Rizhao, Shandong P.R. China
| | - Chen Wang
- grid.452710.5Department of Orthopedics, Rizhao People’s Hospital, 276800 Rizhao, Shandong P.R. China
| | - Qinghua Liu
- grid.452710.5Department of Ultrasonography, Rizhao People’s Hospital, 276800 Rizhao, Shandong P.R. China
| | - Bin Wang
- grid.452710.5Department of Orthopedics, Rizhao People’s Hospital, 276800 Rizhao, Shandong P.R. China
| | - Longgang Chen
- grid.452710.5Department of Orthopedics, Rizhao People’s Hospital, 276800 Rizhao, Shandong P.R. China
| | - Kai Cheng
- grid.452710.5Department of Orthopedics, Rizhao People’s Hospital, 276800 Rizhao, Shandong P.R. China
| | - Ming Qin
- grid.452710.5Department of Orthopedics, Rizhao People’s Hospital, 276800 Rizhao, Shandong P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
O'Driscoll SW, Lievano JR, Morrey ME, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Shukla DR, Olson TS, Fitzsimmons JS, Vaichinger AM, Shields MN. Prospective Randomized Trial of Continuous Passive Motion Versus Physical Therapy After Arthroscopic Release of Elbow Contracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:430-440. [PMID: 35234723 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous passive motion (CPM) has been used for decades, but we are not aware of any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which CPM has been compared with physical therapy (PT) for rehabilitation following release of elbow contracture. METHODS In this single-blinded, single-center RCT, we randomly assigned patients undergoing arthroscopic release of elbow contracture to a rehabilitation protocol involving either CPM or PT. The primary outcomes were the rate of recovery and the arc of elbow motion (range of motion) at 1 year. The rate of recovery was evaluated by measuring range of motion at 6 weeks and 3 months. The secondary outcomes included other range-of-motion-related outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), flexion strength and endurance, grip strength, and forearm circumference at multiple time points. RESULTS A total of 24 patients were assigned to receive CPM, and 27 were assigned to receive PT. At 1 year, CPM was superior to PT with regard to the range of motion, with an estimated treatment difference of 9° (95% confidence interval [CI], 3° to 16°; p = 0.007). Similarly, the use of CPM led to a greater range of motion at 6 weeks and 3 months than PT. The percentage of lost motion recovered at 1 year was higher in the CPM group (51%) than in the PT group (36%) (p = 0.01). The probability of restoring a functional range of motion at 1 year was 62% higher in the CPM group than in the PT group (risk ratio for functional range of motion, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.61; p = 0.04). PROM scores were similar in the 2 groups at all time points, except for a difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) elbow function subscale, in favor of CPM, at 6 weeks. The use of CPM decreased swelling and reduced the loss of flexion strength, flexion endurance, and grip strength on day 3, with no between-group differences thereafter. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing arthroscopic release of elbow contracture, those who received CPM obtained a faster recovery and a greater range of motion at 1 year, with a higher chance of restoration of functional elbow motion than those who underwent routine PT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Abstract
With advances in the understanding of elbow anatomy, pathologies of the elbow, arthroscopic instrumentation, and surgical techniques over recent decades, elbow arthroscopy has become a valuable treatment modality for a variety of conditions. Elbow arthroscopy has gained utility for treating problems such as septic arthritis, osteoarthritis, synovitis, osteophyte and loose body excision, contracture release, osteochondral defects, select fractures, instability, and lateral epicondylitis. Accordingly, precise knowledge of the neurovascular anatomy, safe arthroscopic portal placement, indications, and potential complications are required to maximize patient outcomes and assist in educating patients. This comprehensive review provides the reader an understanding of the potential complications associated with arthroscopic procedures of the elbow and to describe strategies for prevention and management.
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Rojas Lievano J, Rotman D, Shields MN, Morrey ME, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Shukla DR, Olson TS, Vaichinger AM, Fitzsimmons JS, O’Driscoll SW. Patients Use Fewer Opioids Than Prescribed After Arthroscopic Release of Elbow Contracture: An Evidence-Based Opioid Prescribing Guideline to Reduce Excess. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e1873-e1882. [PMID: 34977643 PMCID: PMC8689263 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
|
8
|
Sanchez-Sotelo J. Arthroscopic management of elbow stiffness. J Exp Orthop 2021; 8:97. [PMID: 34709477 PMCID: PMC8552204 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-021-00420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The elbow is particularly prone to stiffness. Loss of elbow motion is very limiting, and can be the result of trauma, primary osteoarthritis, heterotopic ossification and other conditions. Several exposures have been described for open elbow contracture release. Although a few decades ago elbow arthroscopy was considered only for diagnosis and removal of loose bodies, contemporary arthroscopic techniques allow successful management of the majority of conditions leading to elbow stiffness. Careful patient evaluation, use of advanced imaging studies, and acquisition of appropriate surgical skills are essential for the successful arthroscopic management of the stiff elbow. This expert opinion reviews some fundamentals of elbow stiffness as well as principles for the evaluation and arthroscopic management of the stiff elbow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
- Chair of the Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Gonda 14, 200 First Street SW, MN, 55905, Rochester, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Yang CQ, Hu JS, Xu JG, Lu JZ. Heterotopic Ossification after Arthroscopic Elbow Release. Orthop Surg 2020; 12:1471-1477. [PMID: 33200575 PMCID: PMC7670160 DOI: 10.1111/os.12801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of heterotopic ossification (HO) after arthroscopic elbow release. Methods The present study included 101 elbows, with arthroscopic release performed on 98 patients over the 5‐year period from November 2011 to December 2015. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1, with elbow arthritis, including 46 elbows in 43 patients; group 2, with posttraumatic extrinsic elbow stiffness (without intraarticular adhesion), including 23 elbows in 23 patients; and group 3, with intrinsic contractures (with intraarticular adhesion), including 32 elbows in 32 patients. Arthroscopic elbow release was performed under general anesthesia. For intrinsic stiffness, a radiofrequency device was applied to release intraarticular scar tissue and create work space, which was rarely necessary in groups 1 and 2. In the postoperative period, X‐rays and CT scans were assessed at follow up to determine if there was HO formation, which was diagnosed when new calcifications were identified. The functional recovery was evaluated by comparing the range of motion (ROM) and pain relief preoperativley and postoperatively in each group. Other complications were also assessed postoperatively. Results The patients’ mean age was 38.6 years (range, 12–66), with 57 males and 41 females. Mean follow‐up was 21 months (range, 4–56). The active ROM and Mayo elbow performance index (MEPS) were improved from 93° ± 8.3° to 126° ± 12.4° (P < 0.05) and 71.4 ± 7.6 to 91.3 ± 8.7 (P < 0.001) in group 1, 66° ± 10.3° to 121° ± 10.7° (P < 0.005) and 65.6 ± 9.2 to 93.5 ± 11.2 (P < 0.05) in group 2, and 46° ± 6.7° to 91° ± 11.1° (P < 0.001) and 52.3 ± 6.4 to 80.6 ± 9.4 (P < 0.005) in group 3. HO developed in 25/101 cases (25%) and 4 patients with severe cases underwent repeat surgery. Those in group 1 were primarily arthritis patients; there were 3 out 46 cases with minor HO evident on X‐ray. In group 2, 1/23 had minor HO. In group 3, 21/32 patients had HO; 4 cases were considered severe, 4 were considered moderate, and 13 were considered minor. The average flexion–extension arc was improved by 47° at the last follow up. Other postoperative complications included 8 cases of prolonged drainage from portal sites, 17 transient nerve palsies, 1 permanent radial nerve injury, and 1 patient who developed delayed‐onset ulnar neuritis. This patient was fully recovered 5 months after surgery. Conclusions The high incidence of HO formation after arthroscopic elbow release may relate to improper application of a radiofrequency device. Minimizing thermal injury from these radiofrequency devices could reduce HO formation and improve postoperative functional recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Qun Yang
- Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Hand Reconstruction, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun-Sheng Hu
- Department of Hand Surgery, Xuzhou Renci Hospital, Xuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Guang Xu
- Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Hand Reconstruction, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery, Shanghai, China.,School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiu-Zhou Lu
- Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Hand Reconstruction, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Dai J, Zhang G, Li S, Xu J, Lu J. Arthroscopic Treatment of Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness Due to Soft Tissue Problems. Orthop Surg 2020; 12:1464-1470. [PMID: 33015918 PMCID: PMC7670133 DOI: 10.1111/os.12787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic management of posttraumatic elbow stiffness due to soft tissue problems. METHODS A retrospective review of 30 consecutive arthroscopic elbow releases for posttraumatic stiff elbow from November 2011 to December 2019 was conducted. Stiff elbows with bony problems, such as heterotopic ossification, intraarticular nonunion or malunion, and cartilage lesions were excluded from this study. Contracture and adhesion of soft tissue around the elbow were identified. Surgical treatments included arthroscopic capsulectomy, ligaments and muscle release, and ulnar nerve release. The results were evaluated using the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and range of motion of the elbow. Surgery-related complications were assessed. RESULTS Patients who underwent arthroscopic release were followed up for between 6 and 35 months, with a mean follow-up time of 10.1 months. The postoperative elbow ROM was 123.2° ± 19°, which was significantly different compared to the preoperative value of 68° ± 32°. In addition, the MEPS score improved from 71.2 ± 10.3 preoperatively to 93.7 ± 6.6 at the final follow-up, a mean improvement of 22.5 (range, 0-55; P < 0.05). Postoperative complications included five cases of prolonged drainage from the portal site, three transient nerve palsies, and one hematoma in the medial elbow. CONCLUSION With full recognition by the surgeon of the pathologic changes of the soft tissue around the elbow, arthroscopic release is usually safe and effective for posttraumatic elbow stiffness without symptomatic bony problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junxi Dai
- Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Hand Reconstruction, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery, Shanghai, China
| | - Guofeng Zhang
- Department of Hand Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Shulin Li
- Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Hand Reconstruction, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianguang Xu
- Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Hand Reconstruction, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery, Shanghai, China.,School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiuzhou Lu
- Department of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Key Laboratory of Hand Reconstruction, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Peripheral Nerve and Microsurgery, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Roulet S, Charruau B, Mazaleyrat M, Ferembach B, Marteau E, Laulan J, Bacle G. Modified Lateral Approach of the Elbow for Surgical Release and Synovectomy. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2020; 25:84-88. [PMID: 32868694 DOI: 10.1097/bth.0000000000000312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Elbow stiffness is a common reason for consultation. In recent years, arthroscopic techniques in elbow surgery have progressed, but there are still some contraindications to performance of arthroscopic synovectomy and release in this joint (elbows with anatomic deformity after multiple procedures, malunion, presence of osteosynthesis material, severe stiffness of >80 degrees, instability, or previous transposition of the ulnar nerve). Therefore, knowledge of a safe and reliable open approach to achieve elbow release and/or synovectomy is essential. We report the technical details of the modified lateral approach between extensor carpi radialis brevis and longus muscles, as well as the clinical results of 43 elbow release and/or synovectomy procedures, illustrating its feasibility. The modified lateral approach, providing visual control of the radial nerve and good anterior exposure of the elbow joint, is detailed. From 1994 to 2016, this approach was used in 43 release and/or synovectomy procedures of the elbow in 41 patients, 30 men and 11 women, with a mean age of 40.56 years (range, 17 to 84 y). Using this procedure, 38 elbows (93%) recovered full extension and 5 subtotal extension with an average deficit of 11 degrees (range, 5 to 20 degrees). All elbows were stable. No neurological complications were reported. The modified lateral approach preserves the insertion of the lateral epicondyle muscles that are major dynamic stabilizers and reduces the risk of instability. Initially described for the treatment of radial tunnel syndrome, it should also be recommended for elbow release and synovectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Roulet
- Hand Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Trousseau University Hospital, Medical University François Rabelais of Tours, Tours
| | - Bertille Charruau
- Department of Upper Limb and Hand Surgery, Clinique de l'Essonne, Cedex, France
| | - Matthieu Mazaleyrat
- Hand Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Trousseau University Hospital, Medical University François Rabelais of Tours, Tours
| | - Benjamin Ferembach
- Hand Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Trousseau University Hospital, Medical University François Rabelais of Tours, Tours
| | - Emilie Marteau
- Hand Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Trousseau University Hospital, Medical University François Rabelais of Tours, Tours
| | - Jacky Laulan
- Hand Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Trousseau University Hospital, Medical University François Rabelais of Tours, Tours
| | - Guillaume Bacle
- Hand Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Trousseau University Hospital, Medical University François Rabelais of Tours, Tours
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Schreiner AJ, Schweikardt N, Gühring D, Ahrend MD, Döbele S, Ahmad SS, Baumann M, Hirschmann MT, Bozzi F, Ateschrang A. Arthroscopic arthrolysis leads to improved range of motion and health-related quality of life in post-traumatic elbow stiffness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:1538-1547. [PMID: 32381474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a frequent and disabling complication after elbow trauma. Surgical release is needed if conservative treatment fails. In contrast to open surgical release, arthroscopic arthrolysis is a good and least invasive option to restore joint mobility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and function of post-traumatic elbow contracture after arthroscopic arthrolysis and to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL). METHODS Between 2007 and 2013, 44 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness were treated by arthroscopic arthrolysis and followed up in a consecutive series. Clinical (ROM) and functional analyses (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire [DASH], Mayo Elbow Performance Index [MEPI]) were performed at final follow-up 3 (1-7) years postoperatively. Furthermore, HRQL was evaluated (EQ-5D, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]). DISCUSSION The average arc of elbow motion increased from 84° ± 28° preoperatively to 120° ± 18° postoperatively. All applied scores significantly improved pre- to postoperatively: the MEPI (59.8 ± 17.3 / 84.3 ± 14.0), DASH (43.5 ± 23.1 / 16.8 ± 15.6), EQ-5D (72.8 ± 16.6 / 84.0 ± 13.6), and SF-36 showed improved results in all categories. Univariate logistic regression revealed that preoperative pain level predicts a poorer postoperative outcome measured with the MEPI score. Revision arthroscopy was needed in 1 case because of persistent pain. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic arthrolysis leads to good clinical and functional results in post-traumatic elbow stiffness regarding ROM, pain relief, functionality, and quality of life. The complication rate as well as the revision rate is very low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna J Schreiner
- BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicola Schweikardt
- BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Dorothee Gühring
- BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marc-Daniel Ahrend
- BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
| | - Stefan Döbele
- BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sufian S Ahmad
- BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Baumann
- BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael T Hirschmann
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland (Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen), Bruderholz, Switzerland
| | - Federico Bozzi
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Atesch Ateschrang
- BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Carbonell-Escobar R, Vaquero-Picado A, Barco R, Antuña S. Neurologic complications after surgical management of complex elbow trauma requiring radial head replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:1282-1288. [PMID: 32284308 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) has become a successful procedure for addressing acute unreconstructible radial head fractures that compromise elbow stability in complex elbow trauma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for the development of neurologic complications after surgical treatment of complex elbow fractures that require an RHA. METHODS Sixty-two patients with an unreconstructible radial head fracture and complex elbow instability treated with RHA were included. There were 33 men and 29 women, with a mean age of 54 years (range, 22-87 years). The average follow-up period was 5.2 years (range, 3-16 years). All patients were neurologically intact before surgery. The arthroplasty was implanted through a Kocher approach in 55 cases, whereas a Kaplan approach was used in 7. An uncemented smooth stem arthroplasty (Evolve) was used in 27 patients, and an anatomic ingrowth system (Anatomic Radial Head), in 35. At the time of surgery, 23 patients underwent fixation of a coronoid fracture and 15 underwent plating of the proximal ulna. All patients were clinically examined immediately after surgery and during follow-up to detect any degree of neurologic deficit. Radial and ulnar nerve injuries were classified according to the Hirachi and McGowan classifications, respectively. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. RESULTS A complete posterior interosseous nerve palsy occurred postoperatively in 2 patients. Hand function had completely recovered in both at 2 months after surgery without sequelae. Nine patients complained of ulnar nerve symptoms (immediately after surgery in 6 and as delayed ulnar neuropathy in 3). Most patients with ulnar nerve deficits had undergone additional surgical procedures to address ulnar fractures. Among patients with ulnar neuropathies, only 3 complained of mild sensory symptoms at the latest follow-up. No significant differences in range of motion and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were found between patients with and without neurologic complications. Associated olecranon or coronoid fixation and a prolonged tourniquet time were identified as risk factors for neurologic complications. CONCLUSION This study shows that the incidence of neurologic complications associated with the surgical treatment of complex elbow fractures requiring implantation of a radial head prosthesis may be underestimated in the literature. Inappropriate retraction in the anterior aspect of the radial neck, a prolonged ischemia time, and concomitant coronoid or olecranon fracture fixation represent the main risk factors for the development of this complication. Although the great majority of patients have full recovery of their nerve function, they should be advised on the risk of this stressful complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Raúl Barco
- Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IDIPAZ), Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Samuel Antuña
- Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IDIPAZ), Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Kwak JM, Kim H, Sun Y, Kholinne E, Koh KH, Jeon IH. Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for advanced-stage primary osteoarthritis of the elbow using a computed tomography-based classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:989-995. [PMID: 31831280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for stage III osteoarthritis (advanced stage) shows worse clinical and radiologic outcomes compared with stage I or II according to computed tomography (CT)-based classification. METHODS Clinical and radiologic outcomes in 65 patients treated with arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed for range of motion (ROM) arc, functional score (Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS]), and pain score (visual analog scale [VAS]). Patients were classified into stage I or II (n = 44) and stage III (n = 21) groups according to CT-based classification, and postoperative clinical outcomes and complications were analyzed. RESULTS Mean follow-up duration was 32.9 ± 13.7 months (range, 24-69). The average patient age was 52 ± 10 years (range, 40-63). Improvements from preoperative to final follow-up were seen in the overall ROM-flexion from 94° ± 19° to 129° ± 14° (P < .01), ROM-extension from 25° ± 12° to 14° ± 7° (P < .01), MEPS from 45 ± 13 to 78 ± 14 (P < .01), and VAS score from 6.3 ± 1.6 to 3.1 ± 1.4 (P < .01). Subgroup analysis using the CT-based classification revealed that stage III led to worsened VAS score and MEPS than stage I or II. CONCLUSIONS Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty can be recommended for its favorable overall treatment outcomes for elbow osteoarthritis. However, stage III shows worse clinical and radiologic outcomes compared with stage I or II according to CT-based classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Man Kwak
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyojune Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yucheng Sun
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Hand Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Erica Kholinne
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Carolus Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Kyoung Hwan Koh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In-Ho Jeon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Bachman DR, Fitzsimmons JS, O'Driscoll SW. Safety of Arthroscopic Versus Open or Combined Heterotopic Ossification Removal Around the Elbow. Arthroscopy 2020; 36:422-430. [PMID: 31870750 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the complications of arthroscopic heterotopic ossification (HO) excision and compare them with those of open removal of HO or a combined open-arthroscopic approach. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of elbow HO removal cases performed by a single surgeon from 1997 to 2014. In all cases studied, the intention was to restore range of motion owing to the presence of HO causing functional impairment. The arthroscopic, open, and combined treatment groups were compared. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 223 surgical procedures performed on 213 elbows in 211 patients. Fifty major complications occurred in 46 cases (21%): 17 hematomas (8%) treated by irrigation and debridement, 8 cases of HO requiring reoperation (4%), 7 deep infections (3%), 4 contractures (2%), 3 cases of delayed-onset ulnar neuritis (1%), 2 cases of distal humeral avascular necrosis (1%), 2 tendon ruptures (1%), 2 cases of instability requiring reconstruction (1%), 2 postoperative fractures (1%), 1 intraoperative fracture (<0.5%), 1 case of worsening of pre-existing neuropathic pain (<0.5%), and 1 permanent partial posterior interosseous nerve injury (<0.5%). Of these 46 cases, the major complications occurred in 6 of the 41 (15%) performed arthroscopically, in 36 of the 158 (23%) performed open and in 4 of the 21 (17%) with combined (i.e. open + arthroscopic) HO removal. Preventive strategies, introduced to prevent hematomas and delayed-onset ulnar neuritis, reduced the rate of major complications from 35% during the period from 1997 to 2005 to 10% during the period from 2006 to 2014 (P < .0001). Moreover, the rate of reoperations was reduced from 34% to 10% in the same periods (P < .0001). Minor complications occurred in 36 cases (16%), including 17 cases of transient nerve palsy, 9 cases of superficial infection or delayed wound healing, 6 cases of mild instability, and 4 cases of hematoma resolved by aspiration. CONCLUSIONS The use of arthroscopy-or a combination of arthroscopic and open techniques-to remove HO around the elbow by a surgeon skilled in both arthroscopic and open elbow surgery does not increase the risk of major complications or need for reoperation compared with traditional open surgery. Preventive strategies, such as avoiding raising skin flaps by using multiple separate incisions for open and prophylactic ulnar nerve decompression in arthroscopic cases, were developed during the study period. These strategies were monitored prospectively and found to be effective in preventing two-thirds of the major complications needing reoperation with both open and arthroscopic HO removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Bachman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | | | - Shawn W O'Driscoll
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
What Range of Motion and Functional Results Can Be Expected After Open Arthrolysis with Hinged External Fixation For Severe Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:2319-2328. [PMID: 31107330 PMCID: PMC6999955 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The elbow is more susceptible to loss of motion after trauma than any other joint. Open arthrolysis often is performed for posttraumatic elbow stiffness if the stiffness does not improve with nonsurgical treatment, but the midterm results of this procedure and factors that may limit recovery have not been widely studied. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We reviewed patients who had undergone open arthrolysis with hinged external fixator for severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness (ROM ≤ 60°) with a minimum of 5 years followup to (1) analyze ROM gains; (2) assess functional improvement with the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and DASH, quality of life with the SF-36, pain with VAS, and ulnar nerve function with the Amadio rating scale and Dellon classification; and (3) identify complications and risk factors that might hinder mid-term elbow motion recovery after this procedure. METHODS Between March 2011 and December 2012, we generally offered patients with elbow stiffness an open arthrolysis procedure when function did not improve with 6 months of nonoperative therapy, and no contraindications such as immature heterotopic ossification or complete destruction of articular cartilage were present. During that time, 161 patients underwent open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness at our institution; 49 of them satisfied the study inclusion criteria (adults with elbow ROM ≤ 60° as a result of trauma) and exclusion criteria (stiffness caused by burns or central nervous system injuries, causative trauma associated with nonunion or malunion of the elbow, severe articular damage that would have necessitated joint arthroplasty, or prior elbow release). In general, a combined medial-lateral approach to the elbow was performed to address the soft tissue tethers and any blocks to elbow motion, and a hinged external fixator was applied for 6 weeks to maintain elbow stability and improve the efficacy of postoperative rehabilitation. These patients were evaluated retrospectively at a mean followup period of 69 months (range, 62-83 months), and demographics, disease characteristics, arthrolysis details, pre- and postoutcome measures as noted, and complications were recorded via an electronic database. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with ROM recovery. RESULTS At final followup, total ROM increased from a preoperative mean of 27 ± 20° to a postoperative mean of 131 ± 11° (mean difference, 104°; 95% CI, 98°-111°; p < 0.001), and 98% (48 of 49) of patients achieved a functional ROM of 30° to 130°. Improvements were also found in functional scores (MEPI: 54 ± 12 to 95 ± 7, mean difference, 41 points; DASH: 48 ± 17 to 8 ± 8, mean difference, 40 points; both p < 0.001), life quality (physical SF-36: 46 ± 11 to 81 ± 12, mean difference, 35 points; mental SF-36: 43 ± 14 to 80 ± 9, mean difference, 37 points; both p < .001), pain (VAS: 2.5 ± 2.4 to 0.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 2.0 points; p < 0.001), and ulnar nerve function (Amadio score: 7.8 ± 1.9 to 8.4 ± 0.8; mean difference, 0.6 points; p = 0.004). A total of 18% (nine of 49 patients) developed complications, including new-onset or exacerbated nerve symptoms (four patients), recurrent heterotopic ossification (two patients), and pin-related infections (three patients). No patients underwent subsequent surgery for any of the above complications. Lastly, the medium-term ROM was divided into ROM ≤ 120° (n = 9) and ROM > 120° (n = 40). After controlling for potential confounding variables such as duration of stiffness and tobacco use, we found that tobacco use was the only independent risk factor examined (odds ratio, 9; 95% CI, 2-47; p = 0.009) associated with recovery of ROM. CONCLUSIONS Satisfactory medium-term results were found for open arthrolysis with hinged external fixation with our protocol in patients who had severe posttraumatic elbow stiffness. Appropriate and sufficient releases of tethered soft tissues and correction of any blocks that affect elbow motion intraoperatively, a dedicated team approach, and an aggressive and systematic postoperative rehabilitation program are the core steps for this procedure. Additionally, the importance of preoperative discontinuation of tobacco use should be emphasized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Sun Z, Wang W, Fan C. Tobacco use predicts poorer clinical outcomes and higher post-operative complication rates after open elbow arthrolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139:883-891. [PMID: 30610418 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-03109-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tobacco use is a worldwide public health problem, and has been found to be a predisposing factor for adverse functional outcomes and increased postoperative complication rates after various orthopedic operations. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential impact of tobacco use on open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. MATERIALS AND METHODS A database search identified 145 patients with open arthrolysis performed for post-traumatic elbow stiffness; these were divided into three groups: current tobacco users (37), former users (28), and nonusers (80). All surgeries were performed using the same technique by the same doctor. General patient data, functional performance, and complications were documented and analyzed. RESULTS Demographic data and disease characteristics were comparable at baseline. Postoperatively, significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of range of motion (P < 0.001), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (P = 0.006), visual analog scale score for pain (P = 0.015), Dellon classification for ulnar nerve symptoms (P = 0.013), and total complication rates (P < 0.001). The current tobacco users group had the poorest clinical outcomes and highest complication rates, while no significant differences were found between former users and nonusers. CONCLUSIONS Current tobacco users reported increased risk of poorer clinical outcomes and higher postoperative complication rates after open arthrolysis. Former users were found to have outcomes similar to those of nonusers. This study underlines the importance of discontinuing tobacco use for patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who are considering open arthrolysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III; Retrospective Cohort Design; Therapeutic Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyang Sun
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200233, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200233, People's Republic of China.,Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, 222 Third Huanhu Road West, Pudong, Shanghai, 201306, People's Republic of China
| | - Cunyi Fan
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui, Shanghai, 200233, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital East Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, 222 Third Huanhu Road West, Pudong, Shanghai, 201306, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Arrigoni P, Cucchi D, Menon A, Guerra E, Nicoletti S, Colozza A, Luceri F, Pederzini LA, Randelli PS. The posterior interosseous nerve crosses the radial head midline and increases its distance from bony structures with supination of the forearm. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28:365-370. [PMID: 30392934 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated whether forearm movements change the relative position of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) with respect to the midline of the radial head (Rh) under direct arthroscopic observation. METHODS The PIN was identified in 10 fresh frozen cadaveric specimens dissected under arthroscopy. The forearm was moved first in full pronation and then in full supination, and the displacement of the PIN from medial to lateral with respect to the midline of the Rh was recorded. The shortest linear distance between the nerve and the most anterior part of the Rh was measured with a graduated calliper inserted via the midlateral portal with the forearm in neutral position, full pronation, and full supination. RESULTS The PIN was identifiable in all specimens. In all cases the PIN crossed the Rh midline with forearm movements, moving from medial in full pronation to lateral in full supination. The distance between the PIN and Rh is significantly greater in supination than in the neutral position and pronation (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that the PIN movement described in open surgery (medialization with pronation) also occurs during arthroscopy. The role of pronation in protecting the PIN in extra-articularprocedures is therefore confirmed. Supination, however, increases the linear distance between the PIN and Rh and should therefore be considered to increase the safe working volume whenever intra-articular procedures are performed on the anterolateral aspect of the elbow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Arrigoni
- U.O. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica Universitaria CTO, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy; Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Cucchi
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Alessandra Menon
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; I Clinica Ortopedica, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Guerra
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Nicoletti
- S.O.C. Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Ospedale San Jacopo, Pistoia, Italy
| | - Alessandra Colozza
- Unità Operativa Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Ospedale Civile di Faenza, Faenza, Italy
| | - Francesco Luceri
- U.O. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica Universitaria CTO, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Simone Randelli
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; I Clinica Ortopedica, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Thaveepunsan S, Shields MN, O'Driscoll SW. The Needle-and-Knife Technique: A Safe Technique for Anterolateral Portal Placement in Elbow Arthroscopy. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7:2325967118817232. [PMID: 30729140 PMCID: PMC6350134 DOI: 10.1177/2325967118817232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Safe and effective portal placement is crucial for successful elbow
arthroscopy. Various techniques for anterolateral portal placement in elbow
arthroscopy have been described, yet radial nerve injuries are commonly
reported. Purpose: To report on the technique and safety of anterolateral portal placement by
the needle-and-knife method and its clinical applications. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was completed of patients who underwent an
arthroscopic procedure in the anterior compartment of the elbow and
anterolateral portal placement. Patients were evaluated immediately
postoperatively and at subsequent visits and were monitored for signs of
radial nerve injury. Results: A total of 460 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 309 (67%)
underwent the needle-and-knife technique. There was 1 case (0.3%) of
temporary radial nerve palsy. For the remaining 151 patients who underwent
anterolateral portal placement by other techniques, there were 2 cases of
temporary radial nerve palsy (1.3%). There were no cases of the
needle-and-knife technique being unsuccessful or abandoned in lieu of a
different technique. Use of the needle-and-knife technique increased over
time with experience and practice. Initially, contraindications to this
technique included impaired view of the lateral side of the anterior
compartment of the elbow caused by severe intra-articular scar (65%),
extensive synovitis (10%), or large osteophytes or loose bodies (10%). For
the remaining patients (15%) who did not have portals placed via the
needle-and-knife technique, alternate techniques were used for teaching
purposes. Conclusion: The needle-and-knife technique is reproducible and easy to perform by a
clinician instructed in its use and trained in elbow arthroscopy. Its main
advantage is that it permits the surgeon to safely slide the knife along the
lateral supracondylar ridge, releasing the scarred capsule and thereby
increasing the available space in which to work. Enlarging the working space
inside scarred and contracted elbows cannot be accomplished by distending
the capsule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sutee Thaveepunsan
- Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Maegan N Shields
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shawn W O'Driscoll
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Nietschke R, Schneider MM, Hollinger B, Buder T, Zimmerer A, Zimmermann F, Burkhart KJ. [Performance control after arthroscopic arthrolysis with capsulectomy in fresh-frozen elbow joints]. Unfallchirurg 2018; 122:791-798. [PMID: 30478780 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-018-0584-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Posttraumatic or postoperative movement restrictions in elbow joints can often occur (including capsular contracture) and can generate everyday limitations. In persistent elbow stiffness, arthroscopic arthrolysis with removal of the dorsal and ventral capsule portions can be carried out. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of arthroscopic capsulectomy by means of an in vitro anatomical study. METHODS A standardized elbow arthroscopy with ventral and dorsal capsulectomy was performed and image-documented in five fresh-frozen elbow specimens. Subsequently, open dissection of the elbow joint was performed to analyze the amount of residual capsule by means of photodocumentation of the specimens. RESULTS Regardless of the surgeon and surgical experience, anterior and posterior remnants of the capsule remained in all specimens. Dorsal capsule strands around the standard arthroscopy portals were noticed particularly more often in the area of the high dorsolateral camera portal. An incomplete capsulectomy was seen on the ulnar side at the level of the posterior medial ligament (PML) in the immediate vicinity of the ulnar nerve. Ventrally, a capsulectomy was performed from the radial side and also the ulnar side until the brachialis muscle and additionally a complete capsulectomy as far as the anterior medial ligament (AML) and radial collateral ligament (RCL) was achieved. The capsule was completely resected in a proximal direction. Distally, irrelevant capsular remnants were found in the region of the annular ligament and distal of the tip of the coronoid process. CONCLUSION Arthroscopic arthrolysis can be performed with a high degree of radicality. The radicality must be self-critically taken into account in one's own action. The radicality of the portal change may even be higher ventrally than with an isolated column procedure. On the other hand, it must be critically considered that posteriorly, the PML cannot be adequately addressed by means of arthroscopy due to the risk of ulnar nerve injury. Portal changes might help to enable a more complete visualization of the joint capsule and may avoid leaving possibly relevant remnants of the capsule. If a release of the PML is required, this may have to be carried out in combination with an ulnar nerve release in a mini-open technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Nietschke
- Arcus Sportklinik, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland.
| | - M M Schneider
- Arcus Sportklinik, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland.,Universität Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrhausen-Strasse 50, 58455, Witten, Deutschland
| | - B Hollinger
- Arcus Sportklinik, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland
| | - T Buder
- Institut für Anatomie, Lehrstuhl I, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schlossplatz 4, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - A Zimmerer
- Arcus Sportklinik, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland
| | - F Zimmermann
- Arcus Sportklinik, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland
| | - K J Burkhart
- Arcus Sportklinik, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland.,Universität zu Köln, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Sun Z, Xiong H, Fan C. Impact of different glucose metabolism status on clinical outcomes of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27:1072-1077. [PMID: 29555120 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Revised: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes and prediabetes are worldwide public health problems and are considered predisposing factors for adverse functional outcomes after various orthopedic operations. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the impact of glucose metabolism status on functional outcomes and complications after open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. METHODS The study included 152 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness undergoing arthrolysis, including 120 in the normoglycemic group, 21 in the impaired glucose regulation group, and 11 in the diabetes mellitus group. General patient data, functional performance, and complications were documented and analyzed. RESULTS Demographic data and disease characteristics were comparable at baseline. Postoperatively, significant differences were found in range of motion and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score: the diabetes mellitus group had the poorest clinical outcomes. However, there were no significant differences in forearm rotation, visual analog scale pain scores, and complication rates. CONCLUSION Patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness and abnormal glucose metabolism were at increased risk of poorer outcomes after open arthrolysis, and patients with diabetes mellitus had the poorest performance. This study underlines the importance of glycemic control in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism before open arthrolysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyang Sun
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Xiong
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Cunyi Fan
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Hilgersom NFJ, Molenaars RJ, van den Bekerom MPJ, Eygendaal D, Doornberg JN. Review of Poehling et al (1989) on elbow arthroscopy: a new technique. J ISAKOS 2018. [DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2017-000133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
|
23
|
Burkhart KJ, Gohlke F, Nietschke R, Schneider MM, Hollinger B. [Destruction of the radial head : Endoprosthesis, autologous reconstruction or anconeus arthroplasty?]. DER ORTHOPADE 2017; 46:981-989. [PMID: 29071514 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3492-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiocapitellar arthritis or defects most often result from trauma. Most of the patients are young and have high functional demands with high load capacities. Therefore, endoprosthetic options should be postponed for as long as possible. If conservative treatment cannot relieve symptoms sufficiently, radial head preservation, resection or replacement options are at the surgeon's disposal. In early stages of radiocapitellar arthritis, radial head preservation options can be taken into account. The chances ofgood results decrease with increasing cartilage damage. TREATMENT OPTIONS In addition to radial head preservation options this article discusses radial head resection with and without anconeus interposition and radial head as well as radiocapitellar replacement. Clinical data are rare. The advantages and disadvantages of each option must be discussed with the patient and the decision should be made individually on the basis of patient specific factors. The aim must be to postpone endoprosthetic options - especially total elbow arthroplasty - for as long as possible, while assuring a functional range of motion with an acceptable pain level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Burkhart
- Ellenbogen- und Schulterchirurgie, Arcus Sportklinik, ARCUS Kliniken, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland.
| | - F Gohlke
- Klinik für Schulterchirurgie, Rhön-Klinikum, Bad Neustadt/Saale, Deutschland
| | - R Nietschke
- Ellenbogen- und Schulterchirurgie, Arcus Sportklinik, ARCUS Kliniken, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland
| | - M M Schneider
- Ellenbogen- und Schulterchirurgie, Arcus Sportklinik, ARCUS Kliniken, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland
| | - B Hollinger
- Ellenbogen- und Schulterchirurgie, Arcus Sportklinik, ARCUS Kliniken, Rastatter Str. 17-19, 75179, Pforzheim, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Arrigoni P, Cucchi D, Guerra E, Marinelli A, Menon A, Randelli PS, Pederzini LA. Distance of the Posterior Interosseous Nerve from the Radial Head during Elbow Arthroscopy: An Anatomical Study. JOINTS 2017; 5:147-151. [PMID: 29270544 PMCID: PMC5738474 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1605388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The aims of this study were to measure the distance of the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) from the radial head (RH) and its variations with forearm movements.
Methods
Five fresh frozen cadaver specimens were dissected under arthroscopy. An anterior capsulectomy extended to the entire lateral compartment was performed. The need of soft tissue dissection to isolate the nerve in the extracapsular space was recorded. The distance between the nerve and the anterior part of the RH was then measured with a graduated caliper inserted via the midlateral portal with the forearm in neutral position, full pronation, and full supination.
Results
The PIN was identifiable in all the specimens. In four cases, it was surrounded by a thick layer of adipose tissue, and further dissection was necessary to isolate it. Damage of the PIN during dissection occurred in one case, in which the proximal part of the nerve was accidentally cut. In three of the remaining cases, an increased distance was measured with the forearm in supination, as compared with neutral and full pronation position.
Conclusion
This anatomical study suggests that in most of the cases, the PIN does not lay just extracapular at the level of the radiocapitellar joint, but is surrounded by a thick layer of adipose tissue. Furthermore, its distance from the RH appears to increase with forearm supination. This position could increase the safe working space between RH and PIN.
Clinical Relevance
Knowledge of PIN position in relation to the anterior elbow capsule and its changes with forearm movements can help reduce the iatrogenic injuries during elbow arthroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Arrigoni
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.,U.O.C. 1 a Divisione, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Cucchi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Enrico Guerra
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Menon
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.,U.O.C. 1 a Divisione, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Simone Randelli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.,U.O.C. 1 a Divisione, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Hilgersom NFJ, Oh LS, Flipsen M, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MPJ. Tips to avoid nerve injury in elbow arthroscopy. World J Orthop 2017; 8:99-106. [PMID: 28251060 PMCID: PMC5314153 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Revised: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Elbow arthroscopy is a technical challenging surgical procedure because of close proximity of neurovascular structures and the limited articular working space. With the rising number of elbow arthroscopies being performed nowadays due to an increasing number of surgeons performing this procedure and a broader range of indications, a rise in complications is foreseen. With this editorial we hope to create awareness of possible complications of elbow arthroscopy, particularly nerve injuries, and provide a guideline to avoid complications during elbow arthroscopy.
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Abstract
Posttraumatic elbow stiffness is a disabling condition that remains challenging to treat despite improvement of our understanding of the pathogenesis of posttraumatic contractures and new treatment regimens. This review provides an update and overview of the etiology of posttraumatic elbow stiffness, its classification, evaluation, nonoperative and operative treatment, and postoperative management.
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Park SE, Bachman DR, O'Driscoll SW. The Safety of Using Proximal Anteromedial Portals in Elbow Arthroscopy With Prior Ulnar Nerve Transposition. Arthroscopy 2016; 32:1003-9. [PMID: 26970834 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2014] [Revised: 10/06/2015] [Accepted: 12/04/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the safety of using the proximal anteromedial portal, using a simplified ulnar nerve management strategy derived from an earlier study, in a series of patients with previously transposed ulnar nerves. METHODS A retrospective review of all elbow arthroscopies performed by a single surgeon from 2009 to 2014 was performed. The following techniques were used if, by palpation, localization of the ulnar nerve was considered to be certain (group 1) or uncertain (group 2): In group 1 (certain) the proximal anteromedial portal was established in the normal antegrade fashion. In group 2 (uncertain) a 1- to 3-cm incision was made at the planned proximal anteromedial portal site, and blunt dissection down to the capsule was performed without identification of the nerve. The nerve was not visualized but sometimes was palpated through the wound to confirm its location anteriorly or posteriorly. If there was a disparity between the prior operative records and the physical examination findings, the nerve was explored through a 3- to 4-cm incision. RESULTS We reviewed 394 elbow arthroscopy cases, 22 of which had a prior transposed ulnar nerve (21 subcutaneous and 1 submuscular) that required anterior-compartment arthroscopic surgery. Group 1 (certain location) consisted of 9 elbows (41%), whereas group 2 (uncertain location) consisted of 13 (59%). In 2 cases in group 2, the ulnar nerve was explored because of the disparity between the previous medical records and the physical examination findings. There were no operative ulnar nerve injuries related to the use of the proximal anteromedial portal. CONCLUSIONS The proximal anteromedial portal was able to be used safely in patients with prior transposition of the ulnar nerve. This was achieved by using an algorithm based on the degree of certainty with which the nerve can be localized in the region of the planned portal by clinical palpation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Eun Park
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Daniel R Bachman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Shawn W O'Driscoll
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Chaware PN, Santoshi JA, Pakhare AP, Rathinam BAD. Risk of nerve injury during arthroscopy portal placement in the elbow joint: A cadaveric study. Indian J Orthop 2016; 50:74-9. [PMID: 26952128 PMCID: PMC4759879 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.173510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elbow arthroscopy has become a routine procedure now. However, placing portals is fraught with dangers of injuring the neurovascular structures around elbow. There are not enough data documenting the same amongst the Indians. We aimed to determine the relative distances of nerves around the elbow to the arthroscopy portals and risk of injury in different positions of the elbow. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six standard elbow arthroscopy portals were established in 12 cadaveric upper limbs after joint distension. Then using standard dissection techniques all the nerves around the elbow were exposed, and their distances from relevant portals were measured using digital vernier caliper in 90° elbow flexion and 0° extension. Descriptive statistical analysis was used for describing distance of the nerves from relevant portal. Wilcoxon-signed rank test and Friedman's test were used for comparison. RESULTS There was no major nerve injury at all the portals studied in both positions of the elbow. The total incidence of cutaneous nerve injury was 8.3% (12/144); medial cutaneous nerve of forearm 10/48 and posterior cutaneous nerve of forearm 2/24. No significant changes were observed in the distance of a nerve to an individual portal at 90° flexion or 0° extension position of the elbow. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the risk of injury to different nerves at the standard portals of elbow arthroscopy. In practice, the actual incidence of nerve injury may still be lower. We conclude that elbow arthroscopy is a safe procedure when all precautions as described are duly followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John A Santoshi
- Department of Orthopaedics, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Abhijit P Pakhare
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Bertha A D Rathinam
- Department of Anatomy, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India,Address for correspondence: Dr. Bertha AD Rathinam, Department of Anatomy, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
An Expedited Care Pathway with Ambulatory Brachial Plexus Analgesia Is a Cost-effective Alternative to Standard Inpatient Care after Complex Arthroscopic Elbow Surgery. Anesthesiology 2015; 123:1256-66. [DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000000852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Common standard practice after complex arthroscopic elbow surgery includes hospital admission for 72 h. The authors hypothesized that an expedited care pathway, with 24 h of hospital admission and ambulatory brachial plexus analgesia and continuous passive motion at home, results in equivalent elbow range of motion (ROM) 2 weeks after surgery compared with standard 72-h hospital admission.
Methods
A randomized, single-blinded study was conducted after obtaining approval from the research ethics board. Forty patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated list of random numbers into an expedited care pathway group (24-h admission) and a control group (72-h admission). They were treated equally aside from the predetermined hospital length of stay.
Results
Patients in the control (n = 19) and expedited care pathway (n = 19) groups achieved similar elbow ROM 2 weeks (119 ± 18 degrees and 121 ± 15 degrees, P = 0.627) and 3 months (130 ± 18 vs. 130 ± 11 degrees, P = 0.897) postoperatively. The mean difference in elbow ROM at 2 weeks was 2.6 degrees (95% CI, −8.3 to 13.5). There were no differences in analgesic outcomes, physical function scores, and patient satisfaction up to 3 months postoperatively. Total hospital cost of care was 15% lower in the expedited care pathway group.
Conclusion
The results suggest that an expedited care pathway with early hospital discharge followed by ambulatory brachial plexus analgesia and continuous passive motion at home is a cost-effective alternative to 72 h of hospital admission after complex arthroscopic elbow surgery.
Collapse
|
|
30
|
van Rheenen TA, van den Bekerom MPJ, Eygendaal D. The incidence of neurologic complications and associated risk factors in elbow surgery: an analysis of 2759 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24:1991-7. [PMID: 26456432 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Revised: 07/29/2015] [Accepted: 07/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of neurologic complications after elbow surgery and to provide perioperative tips and potential pitfalls for neurologic complications and how to cope with them. METHODS A single orthopedic surgeon performed 2759 elbow-related surgical procedures between January 2006 and October 2014. The surgical records and the postoperative follow-up of all 2759 patients were retrospectively reviewed to determine the preoperative diagnosis, the type of procedure, and postoperative neurologic complications. RESULTS Neurologic complications were very uncommon. Neurologic deficit occurred in 10 of 2759 elbow operations. A neurologic complication occurred 4 distal biceps tendon surgeries (5.3%), 4 elbow arthroscopies (0.4%), 2 ligament reconstructions (0.7%), and 2 total elbow prosthesis (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS A thorough understanding of the 3-dimensional anatomy of the elbow and surrounding nerves is needed to avoid neurologic complications. The neurologic complications we encountered in our series are well within the limits of earlier reports and show that elbow surgery is a relatively safe procedure to perform for a wide variety of indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs A van Rheenen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
| | - Michel P J van den Bekerom
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Eygendaal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Bachman DR, Kamaci S, Thaveepunsan S, Park SE, Vasileiadis GI, O'Driscoll SW. Preoperative nerve imaging using computed tomography in patients with heterotopic ossification of the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24:1149-55. [PMID: 25771035 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2014] [Revised: 12/05/2014] [Accepted: 12/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS This study evaluated the usefulness of computed tomography (CT) imaging for preoperative planning of heterotopic ossification (HO) excision, specifically the spatial relationship between HO and radial and median nerves. Our hypotheses were that CT imaging of the elbow can be used (1) to trace the paths of the radial and median nerves, (2) to distinguish the nerves from the heterotopic bone, and (3) to precisely measure distances from the respective nerve to the most clinically relevant HO. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who had HO removed from the elbow were reviewed retrospectively. On the basis of preoperative CT scans, 22 were identified as likely having HO along the pathway of the radial or median nerve. These cases were independently evaluated by 4 observers, who answered these questions: (1) Can the location of the nerve be adequately seen on sequential images to permit tracing of its path for surgical planning? (2) Can the nerve be distinguished from the HO accurately enough to permit measurement of its distance from the bone? Each observer also measured the shortest distance between nerves and the HO. RESULTS Overall utility of the CT images for visualizing the nerves was high. The radial nerve was more readily distinguished from the HO (21 of 22 cases) than the median nerve (17 of 22 cases). The distance measured from HO was less for the radial nerve (3 mm) than for the median nerve (9 mm). CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the usefulness of CT imaging to determine the paths of the radial and median nerves and their spatial relationship to HO at the elbow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Bachman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Saygin Kamaci
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Sang Eun Park
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, South Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Finkbone PR, O'Driscoll SW. Box-loop ligament reconstruction of the elbow for medial and lateral instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24:647-54. [PMID: 25659866 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2014] [Revised: 11/26/2014] [Accepted: 12/06/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elbow instability remains a challenging surgical problem. Most commonly, isolated reconstructions of the medial collateral ligament or lateral collateral ligament are performed; however, on occasion, there can be deficiency that requires reconstruction of both ligaments. The senior author has developed a method to reconstruct both the medial and lateral collateral ligaments using 1 graft. This technique uses a "box-loop" design, whereby the donor tendon is passed through the humerus and ulna and tied back to itself, creating a loop. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fourteen cases with mean follow-up of 64 months were reviewed. Nine patients returned to the clinic and were evaluated both clinically and radiographically. An additional 5 patients participated by phone questionnaire. RESULTS Average follow-up time was 64 months (range, 19-109 months). According to the Summary Outcome Determination given by the patients, 7 elbows were normal or nearly normal, 4 were greatly improved, 2 were improved, and 1 was worse compared with before surgery. The Summary Outcome Determination score average was 7 (range, -2 to 10). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (including both clinic patients and phone questionnaire patients) ranged from 36 to 100, with an average of 81; of 14 patients, 8 had an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons self-satisfaction score of 10. The average Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 13 (range, 0-64). The average Mayo Elbow Performance Index score was 88 (range, 60-100), with 4 excellent (90-100), 3 good (75-89), and 3 fair (60-74) results and no poor results. DISCUSSION This technique was found to have excellent midterm results. Compared with separate medial- and lateral-sided reconstruction, there is simplification of bone tunnel formation as well as graft fixation.
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Blonna D, Huffmann GR, O'Driscoll SW. Delayed-onset ulnar neuritis after release of elbow contractures: clinical presentation, pathological findings, and treatment. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42:2113-21. [PMID: 25016013 DOI: 10.1177/0363546514540448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little information exists regarding delayed-onset ulnar neuritis (DOUN) after arthroscopic release of elbow contractures. PURPOSE To describe, in a large cohort of patients, the clinical presentation of and risk factors for developing DOUN after arthroscopic release of elbow contractures. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS A retrospective study of 565 consecutive arthroscopic releases of elbow contractures was conducted. Essentially, DOUN was defined as ulnar neuritis or neuropathy, or worsening of pre-existing ulnar nerve symptoms, that developed postoperatively in patients with normal neurological examination findings immediately after surgery. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were met, 235 contracture releases in patients who had not undergone any ulnar nerve surgery remained and were used for the analysis of risk factors with a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (11%) developed DOUN. The patients fell into 1 of 3 distinct groups. Fifteen (58%) presented with rapidly progressive DOUN, characterized by rapidly progressive sensorimotor ulnar neuropathy, increasing pain at the cubital tunnel during end-range flexion and/or extension, and rapidly deteriorating range of motion within the first week after surgery. Urgent ulnar subcutaneous nerve transposition was performed within 1 or 2 days of diagnosis. Eight (31%) presented with nonprogressive DOUN, characterized by mild sensory ulnar neuropathy, neither motor weakness nor substantial pain at the cubital tunnel, or loss of motion. Three (12%) presented with slowly progressive DOUN, characterized by the insidious onset of mild ulnar neuropathy. Significant risk factors for DOUN included a diagnosis of heterotopic ossification (odds ratio, 31; 95% CI, 5-191; P < .001), preoperative neurological symptoms (odds ratio, 6; 95% CI, 2-19; P = .001), and preoperative arc of motion (odds ratio, 0.97 per degree of motion; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99; P = .02). CONCLUSION Delayed-onset ulnar neuritis is an important complication of arthroscopic release of elbow contractures. We recommend a high index of suspicion and monitoring patients with progressive loss of elbow motion and end-range pain for evidence of subclinical ulnar neuritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Blonna
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy
| | - G Russell Huffmann
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn Sports Medicine Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shawn W O'Driscoll
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Blonna D, O'Driscoll SW. Delayed-onset ulnar neuritis after release of elbow contracture: preventive strategies derived from a study of 563 cases. Arthroscopy 2014; 30:947-56. [PMID: 24974167 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2013] [Revised: 03/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/21/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to determine whether delayed-onset ulnar neuritis (DOUN) after elbow contracture release can be prevented and to compare the efficacy of ulnar nerve decompression versus subcutaneous transposition. METHODS A retrospective study of 563 consecutive arthroscopic elbow contracture releases was conducted. The prophylactic efficacy of (1) subcutaneous transposition, (2) ulnar nerve decompression, (3) limited ulnar nerve decompression (7 to 8 cm), and (4) mini-decompression (4 to 6 cm) was assessed prospectively. The efficacy of prophylactic strategies (transposition, decompression, limited decompression, or mini-decompression) in preventing DOUN was compared by univariate survival analysis. Patients who underwent a subcutaneous transposition were matched with patients who underwent a standard open decompression or a limited decompression, according to gender, age (±10 years), diagnosis, and preoperative motion. This analysis was repeated after we excluded the patients who underwent associated open procedures (e.g., hardware removal). RESULTS DOUN occurred in 26 of 235 patients (11%) who did not undergo any prophylactic procedure versus 8 of 295 patients (3%) who underwent a prophylactic ulnar nerve decompression or transposition at the time of contracture release (P < .001). The neurologic impairment was significantly less severe after prophylactic decompression compared with patients without any prophylactic intervention (grade on Neuropathy Grading Scale, 2 vs. 4; P = .03). Ulnar nerve transposition and decompression were equally protective. The decompression length was the only factor significantly related to the failure of the prophylactic intervention (odds ratio, 0.19; P = .02). A mini-decompression was not as effective as a prophylactic procedure, whereas a limited decompression was equal to a standard decompression. The case-control analysis showed that the decompression and transposition had equal preventive effects but the transposition was associated with a higher rate of wound complications (19% vs. 4%, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS DOUN is a complication of arthroscopic elbow contracture release. Its incidence and severity can be reduced by limited open ulnar nerve decompression or transposition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prospective comparative study with retrospective analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Blonna
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turin Medical School, Torino, Italy
| | - Shawn W O'Driscoll
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Starman JS, Griffin JW, Kandil A, Ma R, Hogan MV, Miller MD. What's new in sports medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96:695-702. [PMID: 24740667 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.m.01569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- James S Starman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Box B00159 HSC, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Justin W Griffin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Box B00159 HSC, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Abdurrahman Kandil
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Box B00159 HSC, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Richard Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Box B00159 HSC, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Macalus V Hogan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Box B00159 HSC, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Mark D Miller
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Box B00159 HSC, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| |
Collapse
|
|
36
|
O'Driscoll SW, Blonna D. Osteocapsular Arthroplasty of the Elbow: Surgical Technique. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2013; 3:e15. [PMID: 30881746 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.st.m.00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty of the elbow is a procedure involving three-dimensional reshaping of the bones, removal of any loose bodies, and capsulectomy to restore motion and function as well as to reduce or eliminate pain. Step 1 Get in and Establish a View Visualize identifiable articular structures and confirm their anatomic orientation. Step 2 Create a Space in Which to Work Remove debris and loose bodies, as well as excise the fat pad and perform a synovectomy as necessary, so that you can see clearly. Step 3 Bone Removal Remove osteophytes and restore the olecranon to its normal shape. Step 4 Capsulectomy Release the capsule according to the severity of the flexion loss. Step 1 Anterior Compartment Get in and Establish a View As with the posterior compartment, the first step in the anterior compartment is to visualize the joint structures and to be sure of their anatomic orientation. Step 2 Anterior Compartment Create a Space in Which to Work The stripping of the capsule is usually extremely effective for improving or creating the space in which to work in the anterior joint compartment. Step 3 Anterior Compartment Bone Removal Remove osteophytes and reshape the coronoid and coronoid fossa to their normal shape. Step 4 Anterior Compartment Capsulectomy Meticulously excise the anterior aspect of the capsule following four consistent steps. Closure Close the wounds after drains have been placed anteriorly (through the arthroscope sheath into the proximal anterolateral portal) and posteriorly (through the posterolateral portal into the olecranon fossa, exiting proximally through a separate skin puncture). Postoperative Regimen Postoperatively, check the nerve function before performing a regional block and commencing continuous passive motion. Results A retrospective review of a consecutive series of 502 arthroscopic elbow contracture releases (including 388 osteocapsular arthroplasties) in 464 patients revealed twenty-four cases (4.8%) of transient nerve injury7. What to Watch For IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn W O'Driscoll
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail address:
| | - Davide Blonna
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, University of Turin Medical School, Largo Turati 62, Turin 10128, Italy
| |
Collapse
|