Antiresorptive drugs have been widely used for osteoporosis. Intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH), an anabolic agent, increases osteoblast production rate and inhibits apoptosis of osteoblasts, thus increasing skeletal mass besides improving bone microarchitecture and strength. Combination therapy for osteoporosis produced great interests and controversies. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature search from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINDHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using the search terms PTH or teriparatide combined with bisphosphonate, alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, raloxifene, denosumab, and zoledronic acid with the limit osteoporosis. At last, 36 related articles were included for further analysis. Findings from previous studies revealed that combination therapy in different conditions of naive or previous bisphosphonate treatment might have different outcomes. The use of combination therapy, however, may be an alternative option among osteoporotic patients with a history of bisphosphonate use. Combined teriparatide with denosumab appear to show the most substantial and clinically relevant skeletal benefits to osteoporotic patients. Additional research is necessary to define optimal methods of developing sequential and/or cyclical combinations of PTH and antiresorptive agents.

The objective is to formulate clinical practice guidelines for the pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Evidence from clinical trials and insights from clinical experience with pharmacologic therapies for osteoporosis were critically evaluated in formulating this guideline for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Patient preferences, data on adherence and persistence, and risks and benefits from the patient and provider perspectives were also considered in writing committee deliberations. A consensus by the Writing Committee members was achieved for four management principles: (i) The risk of future fractures in postmenopausal women should be determined using country-specific assessment tools to guide decision-making. (ii) Patient preferences should be incorporated into treatment planning. (iii) Nutritional and lifestyle interventions and fall prevention should accompany all pharmacologic regimens to reduce fracture risk. (iv) Multiple pharmacologic therapies are capable of reducing fracture rates in postmenopausal women at risk with acceptable risk-benefit and safety profiles.

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are both characterized as ossification in paravertebral ligaments and sometimes present simultaneously, however, the bone metabolism in patients with cervical OPLL accompanying/not accompanying DISH has not well been studied. Thus, a retrospective analysis was performed to understand any differences in bone metabolism in these patients.

Male patients who underwent surgery for OPLL were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of DISH (OD and O group, respectively). Patients with cervical spondylosis comprised the control group (CS group). Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism factors were compared among the groups.

The OD and O groups had significantly higher body mass indexes (BMIs) than did the CS group. Morphologically, the number of continuous type of OPLL was high in the OD group whereas that of segmental type was higher in the O group. The OD and O group had greater BMD than the CS group. Both TRACP-5b and P1NP were tended to be lower in the OD group whereas Ca and P concentrations were similar level among the groups. Intact parathyroid hormone in OD group was significantly higher than CS group.

Patients with OPLL accompanying DISH had significantly higher BMD whereas they tend to be lower in bone turnover. Significantly higher i-PTH levels was found in the OD group and would be the characteristic blood marker, but further research on the relationship between DISH and PTH was necessary.

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is often treated with bisphosphonates (eg, alendronate, [ALN]), but oversuppression of bone turnover by long-term bisphosphonate treatment may decrease bone tissue heterogeneity. Thus, alternate treatment strategies after long-term bisphosphonates are of great clinical interest. The objective of the current study was to determine the effect of intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) following 12 weeks of ALN (a bisphosphonate) treatment in 6-month-old, ovariectomized (OVX) rats on bone microarchitecture, bone remodeling dynamics, and bone mechanical properties at multiple length scales. By using in vivo μCT and 3D in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry techniques, we demonstrated the efficacy of PTH following ALN therapy for stimulating new bone formation, and increasing trabecular thickness and bone volume fraction. In healthy bone, resorption and formation are coupled and balanced to sustain bone mass. OVX results in resorption outpacing formation, and subsequent bone loss and reduction in bone tissue modulus and tissue heterogeneity. We showed that ALN treatment effectively reduced bone resorption activity and regained the balance with bone formation, preventing additional bone loss. However, ALN treatment also resulted in significant reductions in the heterogeneity of bone tissue mineral density and tissue modulus. On the other hand, PTH treatment was able to shift the bone remodeling balance in favor of formation, with or without a prior treatment with ALN. Moreover, by altering the tissue mineralization, PTH alleviated the reduction in heterogeneity of tissue material properties induced by prolonged ALN treatment. Furthermore, switching to PTH treatment from ALN improved bone's postyield mechanical properties at both the whole bone and apparent level compared to ALN alone. The current findings suggest that intermittent PTH treatment should be considered as a viable treatment option for patients with prior treatment with bisphosphonates. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Teriparatide (TPTD), a recombinant human parathyroid hormone N-terminal fragment (1-34), is a widely used bone anabolic drug for osteoporosis. Sequential treatment with antiresorptives such as bisphosphonates after TPTD discontinuation is generally recommended. However, relative effects of bisphosphonates have not been determined. In the present study, we directly compared effects of risedronate (RIS) and alendronate (ALN) on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, structural property and strength in ovariectomized (OVX) rats, when administered after TPTD. Female Sprague Dawley rats were divided into one sham-operated and eight ovariectomized groups. TPTD, RIS, and ALN were given subcutaneously twice per week for 4 or 8 weeks after 4 week treatment with TPTD. TPTD significantly increased BMD (+9.6%) in OVX rats after 4 weeks of treatment. 8 weeks after TPTD withdrawal, vehicle-treated group showed a blunted BMD increase of +8.4% from the baseline. In contrast, 8 weeks of treatment with RIS and ALN significantly increased BMD to 17.4 and 21.8%, respectively. While ALN caused a consistently larger increase in BMD, sequential treatment with RIS resulted in lower Tb.Sp compared to ALN in the fourth lumbar vertebra as well as in greater stiffness in compression test. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that sequential therapy with ALN and RIS after TPTD both improved bone mass and structure. Our results further suggest that RIS may have a greater effect on improving bone quality and stiffness than ALN despite less prominent effect on BMD. Further studies are necessary to determine clinical relevance of these findings to fracture rate.

The existing medications approved for treatment of primary osteoporosis can be divided into antiresorptive drugs and anabolic drugs. According to the mechanisms of action, the combined therapy may produce a synergistic effect on bone mineral density (BMD) compared with monotherapy, and thus improves the efficacy of fracture resistance. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacies of different combined methods for the treatment of primary osteoporosis.

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases will be searched to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that evaluate the effectiveness of combined therapy versus monotherapy for primary osteoporosis. The primary outcome will be the BMD changes at the lumbar spine and total hip, and the secondary outcome will be the risks of vertebral fracture and non-vertebral fracture. The efficacies of different combined methods will be compared via traditional pairwise meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane tool and the quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation for network meta-analysis.

Ethical approval is not required because this is a protocol for a systematic review without including confidential personal data or data on interventions on patients. Our results will be published in a peer-review journal.

PROSPERO CRD42016038569.

Co-administration of antiresorptive and anabolic therapies has appeal because these treatments target the two main abnormalities in bone remodeling responsible for bone loss and microstructural deterioration. Antiresorptives reduce the number of basic multicellular units (BMUs) remodeling bone and reduce the volume of bone each BMU resorbs. Intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) increases the volume of bone formed by existing BMUs and those generated by PTH administration. PTH also increases bone formation by stimulating the differentiation, maturation, and longevity of osteoblast lineage cells residing upon quiescent bone surfaces. Despite these rationally targeted actions, enthusiasm for this approach waned when combined therapy blunted the increase in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) relative to that produced by PTH. Although many studies have since reported additive effects of combined therapy, whatever the aBMD result (blunting, additive, or null), these outcomes give little, if any, insight into changes in bone's material composition or microstructure and give misleading information concerning the net effects on bone strength. Combined therapy remains a potentially valuable approach to therapy. Because studies of antifracture efficacy comparing combined with single therapy are unlikely to be performed in humans, efforts should be directed toward improving methods of quantifying the net effects of combined therapy on bone's material composition, microarchitecture, and strength.

To evaluate the effects of alendronate, vitamin D, and calcium supplementation on bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD) in both HIV-infected men and women treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

We performed a 52-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. Eligible participants were on stable HAART and had BMD values at the femoral neck or lumbar spine that corresponded to a t score less than -1. Patients were randomized to receive alendronate 70 mg weekly or no alendronate; calcium 1000 mg daily and vitamin D 500 IU daily were provided to all study recipients. Primary endpoint of the study was the change in bone metabolism evaluated by N-telopeptide of type 1 collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase; the secondary endpoint was BMD variation.

18 patients were randomized to the alendronate and 23 to the no-alendronate group (controls). The alendronate-treatment group compared to controls had a significant decrease in serum N-telopeptides, 1914 +/- 1433.4 vs. 3967 +/- 1650.5 pM/L (p = .005) after 1 year. Lumbar spine BMD increased by 4% in the alendronate group (p = .004) vs. 3.7% (p = .062) in controls, compared to baseline values. Femoral neck BMD decreased by 0.5% in the alendronate group (p = .05) and by 3.5% in the control group (p = .04). No between-groups differences for BMD were found (Delta lumbar-BMD 0.0351 +/- 0.0406 in cases and 0.0356 +/- 0.073 in controls [p = .977], Delta femoral-BMD -0.085 +/- 0.160 in cases and -0.100 +/- 0.165 in controls [p = .795]).

Alendronate plus vitamin D and calcium was effective in reducing bone resorption. Alendronate improved lumbar BMD and minimized femoral BMD decrease after 52 weeks compared to treatment with vitamin D and calcium alone in patients on HAART with osteopenia/osteoporosis.

The purpose of this study was to determine the individual and combined effects on periprosthetic cancellous bone of intermittent parathyroid hormone administration (iPTH) and mechanical loading at the cellular, molecular, and tissue levels. Porous titanium implants were inserted bilaterally on the cancellous bone of adult rabbits beneath a loading device attached to the distal lateral femur. The left femur received a sham loading device. The right femur was loaded daily, and half of the rabbits received daily PTH. Periprosthetic bone was evaluated up to 28 days for gene expression, histology, and µCT analysis. Loading and iPTH increased bone mass by a combination of two mechanisms: (1) Altering cell populations in a pro-osteoblastic/anti-adipocytic direction, and (2) controlling bone turnover by modulating the RANKL-OPG ratio. At the tissue level, BV/TV increased with both loading (+53%, p < 0.05) and iPTH (+54%, p < 0.05). Combined treatment showed only small additional effects at the cellular and molecular levels that corresponded to a small additive effect on bone volume (+13% compared to iPTH alone, p > 0.05). This study suggests that iPTH and loading are potential therapies for enhancing periprosthetic bone formation. The elucidation of the cellular and molecular response may help further enhance the combined therapy and related targeted treatment strategies.

Bone remodelling maintains skeletal integrity by osteoclasts removing foci of damaged bone and osteoblasts replacing them with new bone. Diseases associated with increased bone resorption have increased remodelling often with inadequate bone formation and increased risk of fracture. New therapies are needed for these diseases to reduce resorption and increase formation.

The molecular mechanisms regulating osteoclast and osteoblast functions have become better understood in the past 20 years and have led to questioning of the long-held notion that osteoblastic cells have the dominant regulatory role over osteoclastic cells in bone remodelling. Here, we review current knowledge of how osteoclast formation and functions are regulated and describe how enhanced understanding of these has led to development of new drugs for the management of common bone diseases characterized by increased bone resorption.

Osteoclast formation and functions are regulated by cytokines, especially receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF). The differentiation, activity and lifecycle of osteoclasts are regulated in part by other cells that reside within the bone. These include osteoblasts, osteocytes and immune cells, which express these cytokines in response to most factors that promote bone resorption. RANKL and M-CSF activate numerous signalling pathways, which are potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Importantly, osteoclastic cells also function as positive and negative regulators of osteoblastic bone formation.

There are multiple targets within osteoclasts for pharmacologic intervention to prevent bone loss in osteoporosis and other resorptive bone diseases. However, novel therapies could also affect osteoblastic cell functions.

Hachimi-jio-gan is one of the most common recipes in traditional Chinese, Japanese and Korean medicines and has been used for preventing and treating various diseases associated with aging, including osteoporosis.

The present study was performed to examine the combined effects of a traditional Chinese medicine, Hachimi-jio-gan (HJG) and antiresorptive agent, alendronate (ALN) on ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats.

Six-month-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were underwent ovariectomy (OVX) or sham operation. Eight weeks later, the OVX rats were treated either with HJG or ALN alone or in combination of both. The skeletal response was evaluated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), image analysis software, and biochemical markers.

This study demonstrated that treatment with HJG or ALN alone increased trabecular bone volume and bone mineral density (BMD), and partially improved bone microstructure of the proximal tibia and vertebra in OVX rats. Treatment with ALN to OVX rats resulted in significant reduction in both bone resorption and bone formation. Treatment with HJG to OVX rats inhibited bone resorption, with no marked effects on bone formation. Combined treatment of HJG and ALN significantly improved trabecular bone mass and bone microstructure, compared with either agent alone.

We conclude that the combined treatment with HJG and ALN has beneficial effects on trabecular bone mass, improving the structural properties of both tibia and vertebra in OVX rats.

In recent years, there has been growing interest in the potential use of combination therapy in the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Possible regimens include sequential or combined use of anti-resorptive drugs or combinations of anabolic and anti-resorptive agents, given concurrently or in sequence. Combined therapy with anti-resorptive drugs usually produces greater increases in bone mineral density (BMD) than monotherapy but there is no evidence that this results in greater anti-fracture efficacy. The use of bisphosphonates before strontium ranelate or PTH peptides blunts the BMD response. Combined PTH and anti-resorptive therapy results in more rapid gains in spine BMD and a greater increase in hip BMD than PTH monotherapy in the first year of treatment but greater gains in both spine and hip BMD are seen with PTH monotherapy than combined therapy after 2 years of treatment. Anti-resorptive therapy after PTH therapy maintains or increases the gains in BMD. Further research is required to establish the cost-effectiveness and safety of combined and sequential regimens.

Osteoporosis and age-related bone loss is associated with changes in bone remodeling characterized by decreased bone formation relative to bone resorption, resulting in bone fragility and increased risk of fractures. Stimulating the function of bone-forming osteoblasts, is the preferred pharmacological intervention for osteoporosis. Recombinant parathyroid hormone (PTH), PTH(1-34), is an anabolic agent with proven benefits to bone strength and has been characterized as a potential therapy for skeletal repair. In spite of PTH's clinical use, safety is a major consideration for long-term treatment. Studies have demonstrated that intermittent PTH treatment enhances and accelerates the skeletal repair process via a number of mechanisms. Recent research into the molecular mechanism of PTH action on bone tissue has led to the development of PTH analogs to control osteoporotic fractures. This review summarizes a number of advances made in the field of PTH and bone fracture to combat these injuries in humans and in animal models. The ultimate goal of providing an alternative to PTH, currently the sole anabolic therapy in clinical use, to promote bone formation and improve bone strength in the aging population is yet to be achieved.

Osteoporosis remains a challenging problem. Understanding the regulation on osteoclast and osteoblast by drugs has been of great interest. Both anabolic and anti-resorptive drugs yield positive results in the treatment of osteoporosis. However, whether the concurrent administration of parathyroid hormone (1-34) and ibandronate may offer an advantage over monotherapy is still unknown. This study, therefore, attempts to compare the efficacy of two therapeutical approaches and to investigate the beneficial effects in concurrent therapy in a rat model using three-point bending, pQCT and μCT analysis. A total of 60 female Sprague-Dawley rats of age 10 to 12 weeks were divided into 5 groups (SHAM, OVX+VEH, OVX+PTH, OVX+IBAN, OVX+PTH+IBAN) and subjected to ovariectomy or sham surgery accordingly. Low-dose parathyroid hormone (PTH) and/or ibandronate or its vehicle were administered subcutaneously to the respective groups starting from 4th week post-surgery at weekly intervals. Three rats from each group were euthanized every 2 weeks and their tibiae were harvested. The tibiae were subjected to metaphyseal three-point bending, pQCT and μCT analysis. Serum biomarkers for both bone formation (P1NP) and resorption (CTX) were studied. A total of 11 indices showed a significant difference between SHAM and OVX+VEH groups, suggesting the successful establishment of osteoporosis in the rat model. Compared to the previous studies which showed impedance from bisphosphonates in combination therapy with PTH, our study revealed that ibandronate does not block the anabolic effects of PTH in ovariectomized rat tibiae. Maximum load, strength-strain indices and serum bone formation markers of OVX+PTH+IBAN group are significantly higher than both monotherapy groups. With the proper ratio of anabolic and anti-resorptive drugs, the effect could be more pronounced.

Teriparatide increases both bone formation and bone resorption.

We sought to determine whether combining teriparatide with an antiresorptive agent would alter its anabolic action.

This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in a single university hospital.

We randomized 93 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density (BMD) to alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 40 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months. Teriparatide was begun at month 6.

BMD of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, proximal radius, and total body was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) every 6 months. Lumbar spine trabecular BMD was measured at baseline and month 30 by quantitative computed tomography. Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and N-telopeptide levels were assessed frequently. Women who had at least one repeat DXA scan on therapy were included in the analyses (n = 69).

DXA spine BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (18 +/- 11 vs. 7 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (18+/-11 vs. 12 +/- 9%; P = 0.045). Similarly, femoral neck BMD increased more in women treated with teriparatide alone than with alendronate alone (11 +/- 5 vs. 4 +/- 4%; P < 0.001) or both (11 +/- 5 vs. 3 +/- 5%; P < 0.001). Quantitative computed tomography spine BMD increased 1 +/- 7, 61 +/- 31, and 24 +/- 24% in groups 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen, and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen increased more with teriparatide alone than with both (P < 0.001 for each marker).

Alendronate reduces the ability of teriparatide to increase BMD and bone turnover in women.

In the past decade, we have witnessed a revolution in osteoporosis diagnosis and therapeutics. This includes enhanced understanding of basic bone biology, recognizing the severe consequences of fractures in terms of morbidity and short-term re-fracture and mortality risk and case finding based on clinical risks, bone mineral density, new imaging approaches, and contributors to secondary osteoporosis. Medical interventions that reduce fracture risk include sufficient calcium and vitamin D together with a wide spectrum of drug therapies (with antiresorptive, anabolic, or mixed effects). Emerging therapeutic options that target molecules of bone metabolism indicate that the next decade should offer even greater promise for further improving our diagnostic and treatment approaches.

The striking clinical benefit of PTH in osteoporosis began a new era of skeletal anabolic agents. Several studies have been performed, new studies are emerging out and yet controversies remain on PTH anabolic action in bone. This review focuses on the molecular aspects of PTH and PTHrP signaling in light of old players and recent advances in understanding the control of osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and function.

Osteoporosis is a growing health concern as the number of senior adults continues to increase worldwide. Falls and fractures are very common among frail older adults requiring home health and long-term care. Preventative strategies for reducing falls have been identified and many therapies (both prescription and nonprescription) with proven efficacy for reducing fracture risk are available. However, many practitioners overlook the fact that a fragility fracture is diagnostic for osteoporosis even without knowledge of bone mineral density testing. As a result, osteoporosis is infrequently diagnosed and treated in the elderly after a fracture. Based on existing literature, we have developed an algorithm for the assessment and treatment of osteoporosis among persons with known prior fracture(s) living in long-term care facilities or receiving home health care based on the data available in the literature.

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of the antiresorptive treatments of alendronate (ALN), risedronate (RIS) and raloxifene (RLX) on the response of bone to endogenous parathyroid hormone (PTH) induced by acute hypocalcemia. Forty women (age, 55-80 years) with postmenopausal osteoporosis (treated with ALN, RIS and RLX or untreated-control group) were given infusions of sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; 10 mg/kg of body weight). Serum ionized calcium (iCa), plasma intact PTH and marker of bone resorption, serum beta C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (beta-CTX; beta CrossLaps) were followed for 180 min. In all women, decrease in serum iCa following the EDTA load resulted in an acute increase in serum PTH. Between 60 and 180 min, plasma PTH in the ALN and RIS treated women remained significantly higher than in the control group. The integrated beta-CTX responses (area under curves, AUCs) to peaks of PTH were significantly lower in the ALN treated women than in those treated with RIS, RLX or control group. There was no significant difference in beta-CTX AUC response to PTH between RIS, RLX and control women. Taken together, these findings suggest that in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with ALN, a substantial reduction of bone turnover blunts the acute bone resorbing effect of endogenous PTH.

There has recently been a dramatic expansion of clinical investigation of parathyroid hormone (PTH). There are no other anabolic agents on the horizon at the current time but clearly there are a large number of questions that remain about this powerful agent for osteoporosis.

The present study reviews clinical trials using PTH alone and in combination and sequence with antiresorptive agents in postmenopausal women and briefly overviews trials in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men. PTH will be referred to as teriparatide when it is the recombinant human PTH(1-34) fragment produced by Lilly (Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) or the human PTH(1-34) produced by biochemical synthetic methods (Bachem, California, USA); and PTH(1-84) as the intact human recombinant molecule developed by NPS Pharmaceuticals (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA). PTH without other designation denotes either of the compounds.

Because PTH improves microarchitecture, macroarchitecture and mass of bone, it might produce better long-term protection against fracture, when given first and followed by antiresorptive therapy, compared with antiresorptive agents alone. Results of studies on combination therapy must distinguish previously untreated vs. previously treated individuals. PTH should be considered in women with persistent osteoporosis on established bisphosphonates or raloxifene, in which adding PTH might produce better results than switching to PTH. There are still many unanswered questions concerning PTH therapy, one of the most important being the optimal regimen.

PTH (1-34) is the only FDA-approved anabolic agent for osteoporosis treatment in the U.S., but its mechanisms are not completely understood. This study investigated PTH effects on osteogenic cells at various stages of differentiation and proliferation using an engineered bone growth model in vivo. Ossicles were generated from bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) implanted in immunocompromised mice. Three weeks of PTH (40 microg/kg/day) or vehicle treatment initiated 1 day, 1, 2, or 3 weeks after BMSC implantation resulted in an anabolic response in PTH-treated implants (via histomorphometry and muCT) in all treatment groups. A novel in vivo tracking strategy with luciferase tagged BMSCs and weekly bioluminescent imaging of ossicles revealed increased donor cell proliferation in PTH-treated ossicles. The greatest increase occurred during the first week, and the activity remained elevated in PTH-treated implants over time. Zoledronic acid (ZA) was combined with PTH to delineate interactive mechanisms of these bone active agents. Combining ZA with PTH treatment reduced the PTH-mediated increase in luciferase BMSC activity, serum osteocalcin, and serum tartrate resistant acid phosphotase-5b (TRAP-5b) but ZA did not reduce the PTH-induced increase in total bone. Since zoledronic acid reduced PTH-induced proliferation without reducing bone volume, these data suggest that combining PTH and bisphosphonate therapy warrants further investigation in the treatment of bone disorders.

In recent years, intermittent PTH treatment has been investigated extensively for its efficacy in preventing osteoporotic fractures and to improve fracture healing and implant fixation. Although these tasks concern patients of all ages, very little is known about whether aging impacts the bone anabolic response to PTH. Female Sprague-Dawley rats of 1, 3, and 13 months of age were either treated by hPTH-(1-34) or by vehicle solution (CTR) for 1 week. As main outcome measures, we determined the effects on static and dynamic histomorphometry of cancellous bone. In addition, we measured gene expression in femur and serum parameters reflecting bone turnover and mineral metabolism. There was a profound decrease in bone formation rate (BFR) with aging in CTR rats, whereas PTH treatment resulted in a significant relative 1.5-, 3-, and 4.7-fold increase in BFR, without altering indices of bone resorption. Aging decreased and PTH increased mRNA levels for bone matrix proteins and growth factors in a gene-specific manner. In younger animals, PTH-induced a marked stimulation in the mineral apposition rate with no effect on osteoblast number, whereas the latter was increased in older animals (1.0-, 1.7-, and 3.1-fold). Treatment with PTH in young rats led to a significant increase in trabecular number (1.6-2.6/mm, p < 0.05), whereas older rats demonstrated increases in trabecular thickness only (52.8-77.8 microm, p < 0.001). Although PTH increased bone formation at all ages, we found significant age-related differences in the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the bone anabolic response to the hormone.

The study was designed to investigate if pre-treating rats with a therapeutic equivalent dose of risedronate blunted the anabolic effects of PTH, and whether a withdrawal period prior to PTH treatment would alter any effect of risedronate on PTH treatment. Skeletally mature rats were treated for 18 weeks with vehicle, risedronate, or risedronate for 8 weeks followed by vehicle for 10 weeks (withdrawal period). At the end of this period, animals were treated for a further 12 weeks with PTH or PTH vehicle. Trabecular and cortical bone mass were monitored by serial pQCT, or by DXA and microCT. Bone histomorphometry was performed on the proximal tibiae and tibial shafts for bone turnover parameters at week 40. Risedronate alone moderately increased while PTH alone markedly increased trabecular bone mass at the proximal tibial (35% and 200%, respectively) and lumbar vertebral body (14% and 36%, respectively). The maximum bone gains were similar with and without pretreatment with risedronate as compared to the PTH alone. Continuous administration of risedronate for 18 weeks prior to PTH treatment had lower percentage increases in proximal tibial BMD during the first 8 weeks of PTH treatments, and had lower active bone forming surface and bone formation rates after being treated with PTH 12 weeks as compared to the PTH alone group. However, with the 10-week withdrawal period, risedronate did not blunt the stimulatory effect of PTH on osteoblast activity as shown by similar bone formation rates as with PTH alone. Our findings suggest that while risedronate pretreatment may slow the bone anabolic response to PTH, a withdrawal period prior to PTH treatment allows osteoblastic activity to respond normally to PTH stimulation.

Osteoclast resorptive activity, which is known to demonstrate circadian rhythmicity, is regulated by various endocrine hormones and cytokines. PTH suppresses osteoprotegerin (OPG), a regulator of osteoclast activity that has recently been shown to have a circadian rhythm in healthy controls. We studied the differences in the relationship between PTH, OPG, and type I collagen C-telopeptide (betaCTX) over a 24-h period in premenopausal women, elderly postmenopausal women, and elderly men.

Hourly peripheral venous blood samples were obtained from 18 healthy non-osteoporotic volunteers: premenopausal women (n = 6; mean age, 30.2 +/- 2.2 yr), postmenopausal women (n = 6; mean age, 68.2 +/- 2.6 yr), and elderly men (n = 6; mean age, 68.2 +/- 2.3 yr). Plasma PTH (1-84), OPG, betaCTX, and calcium were measured on all samples. Cosinor analysis was performed to analyze the circadian rhythm parameters. Cross-correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the time series of the variables.

The 24-h mean PTH, OPG, and betaCTX concentrations were significantly higher in postmenopausal women as compared with premenopausal women and elderly men (P < 0.001). Significant circadian rhythms were observed for PTH (P < 0.05), OPG (P < 0.05), and betaCTX (P < 0.001) in all subjects. PTH secretion was characterized by two peaks in premenopausal women and elderly men and by a sustained increase in PTH concentration in postmenopausal women. OPG secretion was circadian with a daytime increase and nocturnal decrease, and a greater percent decrease in OPG secretion was observed in the postmenopausal women between 1600 and 2400 h. OPG secretion was inversely related to PTH (r = -0.4) and betaCTX (r = -0.6) secretion over a 24-h period.

This report confirms a circadian rhythm for circulating OPG. The nocturnal decline in circulating OPG is greater in postmenopausal women as compared with premenopausal women and elderly men. Altered PTH secretion may contribute to the OPG secretory pattern in postmenopausal women resulting in increased nocturnal bone resorption.

Previous studies have indicated that bisphosphonate pretreatment can inhibit the anabolic actions of PTH. We examined the capacity of two anticatabolic agents with different mechanisms of action, alendronate and osteoprotegerin (OPG), to influence the anabolic activity of PTH. Oophorectomized mice were pretreated for 30 d with alendronate or OPG and then treated for 30 d with the respective anticatabolic alone or the respective anticatabolic plus PTH(1-34). Bones were analyzed by bone mineral density (BMD), microcomputed tomography, histology and histomorphometry, and biochemical bone markers. OPG pretreatment produced a greater inhibition of bone turnover and a greater increase in bone than alendronate. Increases in bone were sustained during subsequent treatment with vehicle or continued administration of the anticatabolic. Pretreatment with each anticatabolic blunted the capacity of PTH to increase BMD and bone volume and continued treatment with each anticatabolic agent also reduced the effectiveness of PTH. Although both anticatabolics decreased the maximal PTH effect, BMD and bone volume increased more when PTH was added than when only anticatabolics were used. These results demonstrate that mechanistically distinct anticatabolics may reduce PTH efficacy, that the characteristics of this inhibition may reflect the different modes of action of the anticatabolics, but that the addition of PTH still provides a skeletal benefit even if the anabolic effect is submaximal.

Intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone (PTH) stimulates bone formation by increasing osteoblast number, but the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying this effect are not completely understood. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that PTH directly activates survival signaling in osteoblasts; and that delay of osteoblast apoptosis is a major contributor to the increased osteoblast number, at least in mice. This effect requires Runx2-dependent expression of anti-apoptotic genes like Bcl-2. PTH also causes exit of replicating progenitors from the cell cycle by decreasing expression of cyclin D and increasing expression of several cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Exit from the cell cycle may set the stage for pro-differentiating and pro-survival effects of locally produced growth factors and cytokines, the level and/or activity of which are known to be influenced by PTH. Observations from genetically modified mice suggest that the anabolic effect of intermittent PTH requires insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), and perhaps Wnts. Attenuation of the negative effects of PPAR gamma may also lead to increased osteoblast number. Daily injections of PTH may add to the pro-differentiating and pro-survival effects of locally produced PTH related protein (PTHrP). As a result, osteoblast number increases beyond that needed to replace the bone removed by osteoclasts during bone remodeling. The pleiotropic effects of intermittent PTH, each of which alone may increase osteoblast number, may explain why this therapy reverses bone loss in most osteoporotic individuals regardless of the underlying pathophysiology.

We examined the effects of 60 days of co-treatment of PTH with either OPG or alendronate in oophorectomized mice. Compared with PTH alone, co-treatment of PTH with either of these two mechanistically distinct anti-catabolics improved bone volume, mechanical strength, and appendicular and axial mineralization and prolonged the beneficial effect of PTH on BMD.

Conflicting evidence exists as to whether the anabolic effect of PTH is inhibited by the action of anti-catabolics. To examine this issue, we assessed the effects of alendronate and osteoprotegerin (OPG), two anti-catabolics with different modes of action, on the anabolic activity of PTH(1-34) in the skeleton of 4-month-old oophorectomized mice.

Mice treated with vehicle alone (PBS), alendronate alone (100 microg/kg/week), OPG alone (10 mg/kg twice a week), or PTH alone (80 microg/kg/day) were compared with each other and with animals administered PTH plus alendronate or PTH plus OPG. We assessed lumbar spine and femoral BMD at 0, 30, and 60 days. Contact radiography, histology, and histomorphometry, three-point bending assay of the femur, and serum osteocalcin and TRACP5b assays were performed at 2 months.

Although alendronate and OPG each suppressed bone turnover, at the doses used, this was more profound with OPG. Increases in lumbar spine and femoral BMD and in trabecular bone volume were at least as great with OPG as with alendronate, and mechanical indices of femoral bone strength improved only with OPG. Both produced a plateau in spine and femoral BMD increases by 30 days. Co-treatment of PTH with each anti-catabolic produced additive increases in BMD in the femur and supra-additive increases in the lumbar spine with no plateau effects. Neither anti-catabolic impeded the PTH-induced increase in bone volume or the increase in mechanical strength of the femur.

These studies show that the highly potent anti-catabolic OPG can produce dramatic increases in BMD and bone strength; that the temporal pattern of activity of bone formation and resorption modulators may have major influence on net skeletal accrual; and that, depending on timing, inhibition of osteoclastic activity may markedly augment the anabolic action of PTH.

It is desirable for clinicians to know what bone mineral density (BMD) response they can expect in women treated with osteoporosis therapies. The focus of this analysis was to determine what percentage of women attained a lumbar spine BMD response to teriparatide that equaled or exceeded the least significant change (LSC) value of 3%.

Data from three clinical trials involving postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were examined. The Fracture Prevention Trial was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial examining the safety and efficacy of teriparatide 20 and 40 microg/day. The other two trials were double-blinded, head-to-head comparisons of alendronate 10 mg/day and teriparatide 20 or 40 microg/day, respectively. Only treatment-compliant women who had lumbar spine BMD measurements at all specified time points in these trials were included. For reference, we also examined the percentage of women with lumbar spine BMD responses to alendronate. Hip BMD responses that equaled or exceeded 3% were also examined.

According to the LSC criteria, 91% of the teriparatide 20 microg/day group and 94% of the teriparatide 40 microg/day group were lumbar spine BMD responders at 18 months in the Fracture Prevention Trial. In the teriparatide 20 microg/alendronate head-to-head trial, 94% of women receiving teriparatide had a lumbar spine BMD response that equaled or exceeded the 3% criterion at 18 months compared to 75% of those receiving alendronate 10 mg/day (p < 0.01). In the teriparatide 40 microg/day group of the other head-to-head trial, 92% of women achieved the 3% criterion for the lumbar spine at 12 months compared to 69% of those receiving alendronate 10 mg/day (p < 0.01). The median 3-month change in amino-terminal extension peptide of procollagen type 1 [PINP] in women who had a lumbar spine BMD response to teriparatide at 18 months was larger than in women who did not have a lumbar spine BMD response. However, the median 3-month PINP change in lumbar spine BMD nonresponders still exceeded the LSC value of 10 microg/L. Although the percentage of teriparatide-treated women with a hip BMD response that met the 3% criterion was significantly greater than for placebo, there was no significant difference between the percentage of teriparatide 20 microg/day and alendronate 10 mg/day responders in the comparison trial. The baseline characteristics of teriparatide lumbar spine responders and nonresponders were similar.

This analysis demonstrates that the vast majority of treatment-compliant postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and minimal prior bisphosphonate exposure have a lumbar spine BMD response to teriparatide that meets or exceeds the LSC. The characteristics of teriparatide responders and nonresponders were not significantly different; thus, we were unable to discern any characteristics that could be used to identify potential nonresponders.

We have previously demonstrated that alendronate reduces the ability of teriparatide to increase bone mineral density (BMD) in osteoporotic men. The underlying basis for this observation is poorly understood.

The primary aim of this study was to determine whether teriparatide increases osteoblast activity when the ability of teriparatide to increase osteoclast activity is suppressed by alendronate.

This was a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial.

The study was conducted at the General Clinical Research Center of a teaching hospital.

We studied 63 men, age 46-85, with low spine and/or hip BMD.

Subjects received alendronate 10 mg daily (group 1), teriparatide 37 microg sc daily (group 2), or both (group 3) for 30 months. Teriparatide was begun at month 6.

The primary endpoint was the change in serum N-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen.

In men receiving teriparatide monotherapy (group 2), levels of all bone turnover markers increased markedly during the first 6 months of teriparatide administration and then declined toward baseline during the next 18 months. In men who received combination therapy (group 3), bone turnover marker levels declined in the first 6 months (while receiving alendronate alone) and then returned to baseline levels (N-telopeptide) or above (osteocalcin and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen) after teriparatide was added. Changes in each marker were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (all P values < 0.001), groups 1 and 3 (all P values < 0.001), and groups 2 and 3 (all P values < 0.03).

As with BMD, alendronate impairs the action of teriparatide to increase bone turnover in men.

Anabolic skeletal agents have recently broadened our therapeutic options for osteoporosis. By directly stimulating bone formation, they reduce fracture incidence by improving bone qualities in addition to increasing bone mass. Teriparatide [recombinant human parathyroid hormone(1-34)], the only anabolic agent currently approved in the United States for osteoporosis, has emerged as a major therapeutic approach to selected patients with osteoporosis. Teriparatide is approved for both postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis who are at high risk for fracture. With the use of this anabolic agent, bone density and bone turnover increase, microarchitecture improves, and bone size is beneficially altered. The incidence of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures is reduced with teriparatide use. Combination therapy with parathyroid hormone and an antiresorptive does not appear to offer definitive advantages over the use of PTH or an antiresorptive alone, although recent ideas about combining these agents may offer new insights. In order to maintain increases in bone density acquired during PTH therapy, it is important to follow its use with an antiresorptive agent.

Combination therapy strategies for osteoporosis are reviewed in this article. Regimens including two antiresorptives agents increase BMD more than single therapy alone, but they have not proved to reduce fracture risk. The alternative of combining antiresorptives together with anabolics has gained more interest. There are, however, many questions still pending, as which antiresorptive should be used, and the appropriate sequence of the treatments. It seems that bisphosphonates can blunt the anabolic effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH) when given simultaneously. Instead, when PTH follows the antiresorptive treatment the anabolic effect seems not to be blunted. Finally, other possible approach would be to initiate therapy with an anabolic agent and maintain the effect with any antiresorptive if necessary.

Continuous parathyroid hormone secretion caused by primary hyperparathyroidism contributes to osteoporosis. Laboratory tests, in particular the intact PTH assay, make the diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism certain. In hyperparathyroidism, the bone damage primarily affects the cortical bone, especially the proximal one-third of the radius and to a lesser degree the upper femur; the lumbar spine is affected more rarely. Intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone stimulates bone formation and is useful in treating osteoporosis. Subcutaneous injections once daily administration of PTH stimulates bone formation on the surface of trabecular and cortical bone, by preferential stimulation of osteoblastic more than osteoclastic activity.

The quest for effective treatment for osteoporosis merits great attention because of the widespread prevalence of this disease, which is not only associated with fragility fractures, but also with significant morbidity and mortality. The efficacy of the antiresorptive drugs in this disease is achieved by reducing bone turnover, increasing bone density and improving other aspects of bone quality. This article concentrates on another approach to the treatment of osteoporosis, namely the use of anabolic therapy, which has even greater prospects for improving bone quality. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is currently available only as the recombinant amino-terminal fragment, PTH(1-34), known as teriparatide. The full-length molecule, human PTH(1-84), is currently being investigated, as are other PTH molecules. Teriparatide improves bone quality through actions on bone turnover, bone density, bone size and bone microarchitecture. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, teriparatide reduces the incidence of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. In individuals who have previously been treated with an antiresorptive agent, the subsequent actions of teriparatide on bone density are transiently delayed if bone turnover has been markedly suppressed. Combination therapy with teriparatide or PTH(1-84) and an antiresorptive agent does not appear, at this time, to offer advantages over the use of PTH or an antiresorptive agent alone. However, in order to maintain the densitometric gains in bone density obtained with PTH, it is important to follow its use with that of an antiresorptive agent.

Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34) is the only anabolic agent currently approved for the treatment of osteoporosis. The term anabolic is based on mechanism of action. PTH stimulates bone formation, in contrast to antiresorptive agents, which reduce bone resorption and formation. Recent investigations involving the PTH(1-34) and PTH(1-84) peptides, alone and in combination or sequential regimens with antiresorptive agents, have provided a greater understanding of the place of PTH in the armamentarium against osteoporosis. These studies indicate that adding a bisphosphonate to PTH in previously untreated individuals does not produce additional bone benefit; however, sequential use of PTH followed-up by an antiresorptive agent is highly effective at increasing bone mineral density. Adding PTH after an antiresorptive agent also produces substantial bone density increments, though the magnitude of bone density increase may differ for different antiresorptive agents. PTH can repair underlying micro-architectural defects in bone, improve bone mass substantially, and perhaps change macro-architecture and geometry of bone. There are still many unanswered questions regarding PTH treatment of osteoporosis, including the optimal duration of treatment, optimal dosing regimen, mechanism of resistance to its effect after 18-24 months, and the effect of subsequent rechallenge.

Antiresorptive agents for osteoporosis are a cornerstone of therapy, but anabolic drugs have recently widened our therapeutic options. By directly stimulating bone formation, anabolic agents reduce fracture incidence by improving other bone qualities in addition to increasing bone mass. Teriparatide (human parathyroid hormone[1-34]) has clearly emerged as a major approach for selected patients with osteoporosis. Teriparatide increases bone mineral density and bone turnover, improves bone microarchitecture, and changes bone size. The incidence of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures is reduced. Teriparatide is approved in many countries throughout the world for the treatment of both postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis who are at high risk for fracture. Another anabolic agent, strontium ranelate, may both promote bone formation and inhibit bone resorption. Clinical trials support the use of strontium ranelate as a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis and have shown that strontium ranelate reduces the frequency of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Other potential anabolic therapies for osteoporosis, including other forms of parathyroid hormone, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor-I, have been examined, although less data are currently available on these approaches.

Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34) is the only anabolic agent currently approved for the treatment of osteoporosis. The term anabolic is based on mechanism of action. PTH stimulates bone formation, in contrast to antiresorptive agents, which reduce bone resorption and formation. Recent investigations involving the PTH(1-34) and PTH(1-84) peptides, alone and in combination or sequential regimens with antiresorptive agents, have provided a greater understanding of the place of PTH in the armamentarium against osteoporosis. These studies indicate that adding a bisphosphonate to PTH in previously untreated individuals does not produce additional bone benefit; however, sequential use of PTH followed-up by an antiresorptive agent is highly effective at increasing BMD. Adding PTH after an antiresorptive agent also produces substantial bone density increments, though the magnitude of bone density increase may differ for different antiresorptive agents. PTH can repair underlying micro-architectural defects in bone, improve bone mass substantially, and perhaps change macro-architecture and geometry of bone. There are still many unanswered questions regarding PTH treatment of osteoporosis, including the optimal duration of treatment, optimal dosing regimen, mechanism of resistance to its effect after 18-24 months, and the effect of subsequent rechallenge.

Major advancements in the treatment of osteoporosis have occurred over the last decade. Therapies including the anti-resorptive drugs such as alendronate and risedronate have been shown in randomized placebo-controlled trials to increase bone mineral density and reduce fracture risk. Anabolic therapy in the form of parathyroid hormone has been introduced as the first treatment to build bone mass. However, gaps in our knowledge about specific management issues that arise frequently among primary care providers persist. In this paper, three common clinical scenarios are discussed: a postmenopausal woman with only slightly reduced bone mineral density; an osteoporotic woman on anti-resorptive therapy for more than 5 years; and a woman who continues to fracture despite treatment. Evidence gaps in each treatment scenario are presented, and rational approaches to management are suggested.

We evaluated whether patients with osteoporosis treated with long-term alendronate have a response to parathyroid hormone treatment and whether short, three-month cycles of parathyroid hormone therapy could be as effective as daily administration.

We randomly assigned 126 women with osteoporosis who had been taking alendronate for at least 1 year to continued alendronate plus parathyroid hormone (1-34) subcutaneously daily, continued alendronate plus parathyroid hormone (1-34) subcutaneously daily for three 3-month cycles alternating with 3-month periods without parathyroid hormone, or alendronate alone for 15 months.

In both parathyroid hormone groups, bone formation indexes rose swiftly. Among the women who were receiving cyclic parathyroid hormone, bone formation declined during cycles without parathyroid hormone and increased again during cycles with parathyroid hormone. Bone resorption increased in both parathyroid hormone groups but increased progressively more in the daily-treatment group than in the cyclic-therapy group. Spinal bone mineral density rose 6.1 percent in the daily-treatment group and 5.4 percent in the cyclic-therapy group (P<0.001 for each parathyroid hormone group as compared with the alendronate group and no significant difference between parathyroid hormone groups). One woman in the daily-treatment group, two in the cyclic-therapy group, and four in the alendronate group had new or worsening vertebral deformities.

This study suggests that a regimen of three-month cycles of parathyroid hormone alternating with three-month cycles without parathyroid hormone causes the early phase of action of parathyroid hormone (characterized by pure stimulation of bone formation) to be dissociated from the later phase (activation of bone remodeling). The early phase may be more important to the increase in spinal bone mineral density. In patients with persistent osteoporosis after prior alendronate treatment, both daily treatment and cyclic treatment with parathyroid hormone increase spinal bone mineral density.

All therapies currently recommended for the management of osteoporosis act mainly to inhibit bone resorption and reduce bone remodeling. PTH and its analog, teriparatide [recombinant human PTH(1-34)], represent a new class of anabolic therapies for the treatment of severe osteoporosis, having the potential to improve skeletal microarchitecture. Significant reductions in both vertebral and appendicular fracture rates have been demonstrated in the phase III trial of teriparatide, involving elderly women with at least one prevalent vertebral fracture before the onset of therapy. However, there is as yet no evidence that the antifracture efficacy of PTH will be superior to the bisphosphonates, whereas cost-utility estimates suggest that teriparatide is significantly more expensive. Teriparatide should be considered as treatment for postmenopausal women and men with severe osteoporosis, as well as for patients with established glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis who require long-term steroid treatment. Teriparatide should also be considered for the management of individuals at particularly high risk for fractures, including subjects who are younger than age 65 and who have particularly low bone mineral density measurements (T scores < or = 3.5). Teriparatide therapy is not recommended for more than 2 yr, based, in part, on the induction of osteosarcoma in a rat model of carcinogenicity. Total daily calcium intake from both supplements and dietary sources should be limited to 1500 mg together with adequate vitamin D intake (< or =1000 U/d). Monitoring of serum calcium may be safely limited to measurement after 1 month of treatment; mild hypercalcemia may be treated by withdrawing dietary calcium supplements, reducing the dosing frequency of PTH, or both. At present, concurrent therapy with antiresorptive therapy, particularly bisphosphonates, should be avoided, although sequential therapy with such agents may consolidate the beneficial effects upon the skeleton after PTH is discontinued.

Combination therapy includes the concomitant or sequential use of compounds sharing the same mode of action (eg, two or more inhibitors of bone resorption) or with distinct pathways of activity (eg, an inhibitor of resorption plus an anabolic agent). Combination use of antiresorptive agents may generate concerns, because of the risk of inducing oversuppression of bone turnover. However, if low doses of estrogen, used for the management of climacteric symptoms, are insufficient to normalize bone turnover, the addition of a bisphosphonate to hormone therapy may prove to be useful to achieve this objective. Patients pretreated with inhibitors of resorption, who have not achieved a full therapeutic response, are good candidates for treatment with anabolic agents. The increase in bone turnover that comes after the introduction of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in patients treated with an antiresorptive agent is similar to that observed in treatment-naïve patients and the pattern of bone mineral density (BMD) increase is also identical, with the exception of a 6 month delay in the spine and hip BMD changes observed in prior alendronate-treated subjects. Current data discourage the concomitant use of alendronate and PTH since the bisphosphonate appears to blunt (in men and women) the anabolic action of PTH. Whether this applies to other bisphosphonates or inhibitors of resorption, remains unknown. The use of an inhibitor of bone resorption after completion of PTH treatment seems an appropriate way to maintain the skeletal benefits gained during therapy. Long-term clinical studies, using fractures as an endpoint should be initiated to better understand the clinical and pharmaco-economic interest of combination therapies in the management of osteoporosis.

beta2-Adrenergic receptors have been identified on human osteoblastic and osteoclastic cells, raising the question of a sympathetic regulation of bone metabolism. We investigated effects of treatment with beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (beta-blockers) on bone turnover, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk. Within the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study (DOPS) a population based, comprehensive cohort study of 2016 perimenopausal women, associations between treatment with beta-blockers and bone turnover and BMD were assessed in a cross-sectional design at the start of study. Moreover, in a nested case-control design, fracture risk during the subsequent 5 years was assessed in relation to treatment with beta-blockers at baseline. Multiple regression- and logistic regression-analyses were performed. Treatment with beta-blockers was associated with a threefold increased fracture risk (OR(adj) 3.3; 95% CI: 1.1-9.4). Analyses on duration of treatment showed that women who had been treated for more than 8 years had a higher fracture risk (OR(adj) 5.3; 95% CI: 1.1-26.3) than those treated for less than 8 years (OR(adj) 2.4; 95% CI: 0.6-9.5). In addition, cross-sectional data showed 20% lower serum osteocalcin levels (an osteoblastic marker of bone formation) in women treated with beta-blockers compared to untreated women (P < 0.001), whereas BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck did not differ between groups. beta-Blockers may decrease the activity of bone-forming cells and thereby increase fracture risk. However, confirmative studies and studies exploring mechanisms of action are needed.

The ideal treatment of osteoporosis should preferably prevent fractures through normalization of bone mass and bone micro-architecture. Biosynthetic human parathyroid hormone 1-34 (teriparatide) was recently approved in the EU and the USA as the first anabolic treatment of osteoporosis. The effects of teriparatide are mediated by the G-protein-dependent, parathyroid hormone receptor-1 in the cell membrane. The binding of the ligand to the receptor activates adenylate cyclase and a number of phospholipases (A, C, and D) and increases intracellular levels of cAMP and calcium. Intermittent teriparatide increases the number of osteoblasts and bone formation by activation of pre-existing osteoblasts, increased differentiation of lining cells, and reduced osteoblast apoptosis. Anabolic effects of teriparatide on bone have been demonstrated in several species. It increases bone mass, structural integrity, bone diameter, and bone strength. Clinical efficacy was demonstrated in a randomized study comprising 1637 post-menopausal women with osteoporosis showing a 65% and 35% reduction of the relative risk of vertebral and appendicular fractures, respectively, during 18 months of treatment. Moreover, bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and hip increased by 9.7% and 2.6%, respectively. Similar effects on bone mineral density have been reported in men with osteoporosis and in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, however, fracture data are limited in these groups. Direct comparison with alendronate revealed that teriparatide has a more pronounced effect on bone mineral density. Teriparatide should be used in combination with calcium plus vitamin D, and may be combined with hormonal replacement therapy. In contrast, alendronate attenuates the effect of teriparatide. The efficacy of other combinations remains uncertain. After termination of teriparatide, bone mineral density of the lumbar spine is reduced by approximately 2-3% after 2 1/2 years. This decrease is prevented by treatment with bisphosphonates. The most frequent adverse effects with teriparatide are nausea, headache, dizziness, and leg cramps, however, only the latter two differed significantly between the groups receiving teriparatide 20 microg/day and placebo. In the pivotal clinical study, reduced dosage or termination of therapy due to hypercalcaemia was necessary in 3% and 0.2%, respectively. In a rat toxicology study, in which teriparatide was administered in high dosages for an extended period of time, osteosarcoma was seen in a significant number of animals. However, none of the approximately 2800 patients in clinical trials has developed osteosarcoma. Teriparatide constitutes a break-through in the treatment of severe osteoporosis, although a number of issues about the optimal use of teriparatide remains unsettled. The published data provide proof of concept on anabolic therapy which changes several paradigms of bone physiology. Other parathyroid hormone analogues are being investigated in clinical trials and the development of non-peptide, small molecules targeted at the parathyroid hormone receptor may be envisaged.

Traditionally, the management of osteoporosis in men and women has included the use of antiresorptive agents in combination with calcium and vitamin D supplementation. The mechanism of action of teriparatide is unique in that it possesses anabolic properties and therefore builds bone. Since the approval of teriparatide in the United States in 2002, a great deal of interest regarding its use in osteoporosis has developed.

This article reviews the information available on the new recombinant human parathyroid hormone teriparatide (hPTH [1-34]), including its clinical pharmacology, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, safety profile, potential drug interactions, contraindications and warnings, dosage and administration, and pharmacoeconomics.

The articles included in this review were identified through searches of PubMed and MEDLINE (1966-December 2003) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-December 2003). Search terms included teriparatide, Forteo, recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34), and osteoporosis. The references of the identified articles were reviewed for additional publications. Specific product information was also obtained from the manufacturer of teriparatide.

Teriparatide has been studied in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, drug-induced osteoporosis (specifically, corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis), and men with osteoporosis. The data available from various clinical trials have shown an increase in both bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) with the use of teriparatide compared with placebo. One study found that women treated with the 20-microg dose and the 40-microg dose were 35% and 40%, respectively, less likely to have one or more new nonvertebral fractures compared with placebo (P = 0.02). Another study compared the use of daily teriparatide 40-microg injections versus oral daily alendronate. Results showed that the incidence of nonvertebral fractures was significantly lower in the teriparatide group than the alendronate group (P < 0.05). A study using 20- and 40-microg daily injections of teriparatide was performed in men with osteoporosis. There was a statistically significant increase in lumbar spine BMD of 5.9% in the 20-microg group and 9.0% in the 40-microg group (both, P < 0.001). In the femoral neck, a 1.5% increase in BMD occurred in the 20-microg group (P = 0.021) and a 0.9% increase in the 40-microg group (P < 0.001). A limited number of studies are available assessing the combination of antiresorptive medications and teriparatide; however, the available data suggest that the effects of teriperatide do not require prior stimulation of bone resorption.

Teriparatide has been shown clinically to improve BMD and BMC in postmenopausal women and in men. Because of its anabolic capabilities, teriparatide can be used as an alternative to the traditional therapies that are currently available for the treatment of osteoporosis, with scheduled monitoring for adverse effects such as hypercalcemia and urinary calcium excretion. In 1 study, mild hypercalcemia was seen most often 4 to 6 hours after SC injection of teriparatide before returning to normal. Urinary calcium was observed to increase by 30 mg/d (0.75 mmol/d) with teriparatide.

Until recently, the only therapeutic agents available for postmenopausal osteoporosis acted by inhibiting bone resorption and decreased the fracture risk by no more than 50%. Teriparatide, the recombinant 1-34 fragment of human parathyroid hormone, is a bone formation enhancer that has recently been licensed for use in established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Intermittent parathyroid hormone administration preferentially stimulates bone formation. The resultant increase in bone mass and improvement in bone architecture translate into a large decrease in the fracture risk that constitutes a major advance in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Further work is needed to define the role for teriparatide in the therapeutic strategy for postmenopausal osteoporosis and to determine whether this agent is best used alone or in synchronous or sequential combination with bone resorption inhibitors.

We investigated the effects of 18 months of treatment with teriparatide in patients previously treated with long-term antiresorptive therapy using bone turnover markers and bone densitometry. Previous raloxifene treatment allowed for teriparatide-induced early bone marker and BMD increases comparable with previously published results for treatment-näive patients. Conversely, previous alendronate treatment reduced the bone marker and BMD response.

Teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] has been shown to increase BMD and reduce the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Our objective was to investigate the skeletal effects of 18 months of treatment with teriparatide in women whose osteoporosis was previously treated with either alendronate or raloxifene.

Daily subcutaneous injections of 20 microg teriparatide were administered for 18 months to 59 postmenopausal women, 60-87 years of age, with BMD T-scores </= -2.0 who had previously received either alendronate (ALN) or raloxifene (RLX) therapy for 18-36 months. All patients received daily calcium (1000 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) supplementation. The primary study outcome was change in lumbar spine BMD measured by DXA. Secondary outcomes included changes in bone turnover markers, total hip BMD, and safety.

Median baseline bone turnover marker levels in prior ALN patients were about one-half those of prior RLX patients. During teriparatide treatment, bone markers in prior ALN patients increased later and peaked at about one-third lower levels compared with prior RLX patients. During the first 6 months, there were statistically significant (p < 0.05) group differences in BMD change at the hip (prior ALN -1.8% versus prior RLX +0.5%) and at the spine (prior ALN +0.5% versus prior RLX +5.2%). The positive slopes in hip and lumbar spine BMD were similar in both groups between 6 and 18 months. After 18 months, mean lumbar spine BMD increased 10.2% in prior RLX compared with 4.1% in prior ALN (p < 0.05) patients. Furthermore, at 18 months, mean total hip BMD had significantly increased (1.8%, p < 0.05) in prior RLX patients but was not different from baseline in prior ALN patients.

Teriparatide treatment stimulates bone turnover in patients pretreated with both RLX and ALN. Prior treatment with RLX allows for the expected teriparatide-induced BMD increases comparable with those previously reported for treatment-näive patients. In contrast, prior treatment with ALN prevents increases in BMD, particularly in the first 6 months.

Teriparatide, recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) (rhPTH [1-34]), is approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in men and postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture. The best candidates are those who have already had vertebral compression fractures (symptomatic or asymptomatic) or other osteoporosis-related fractures, or those who have very low bone mineral density, in the T score range of -3.5 or below. Teriparatide is the first anabolic drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for osteoporosis. It not only dramatically improves bone mass, but also restores bone microarchitecture and increases bone diameter. All of these mechanisms contribute to increasing bone strength and reducing the risk for osteoporosis-related fractures. Although PTH has been used in combination with other agents such as estrogens, calcitonin, and bisphosphonates, the relative benefit of the combined approach versus teriparatide alone for fracture risk reduction has not been shown. In fact, some data suggest that initiating PTH and alendronate together in previously untreated patients or pretreating patients for a short time with alendronate before initiating PTH may somewhat reduce the anabolic response to PTH. There are many unanswered questions regarding PTH, such as the optimal duration of treatment, the optimal sequence of medications for severe osteoporosis, the mechanism of resistance to effect after 18 to 24 months, the effect of subsequent rechallenge with PTH and, most importantly, surrogates to measure PTH effect.