1
|
Tang JX, Wang L, Bu S, Roberts W, Ungureanu N, Mahmood A, Gao F, Lakshmanan RV, Veenith T, Sachdeva R. Comparison of traditional systemic analgesic, single shot or continuous fascia iliaca compartment block for pain management in patients with hip or proximal femoral fractures: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One 2025; 20:e0319988. [PMID: 40138268 PMCID: PMC11940658 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pain management for hip and proximal femoral fractures includes oral and parenteral opioids and various regional anesthesia techniques. Fascia iliaca compartment blocks (FICB) are commonly used for these patients. At present, a unified view of the analgesic effect of FICB has not been reached. In addition, the comparison between single shot FICB and continuous FICB has not elicited clear evidence-based results. We will compare the efficacy and safety of systemic analgesics, single shot or continuous FICB in the pain management, complication prevention and satisfaction, in our systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literatures database, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, EMBASE, and Web of Science will be searched until June 2023. Two authors will independently screen the studies for eligibility and perform data extraction. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) will be used to assess the quality of evidence. We will use the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence across studies included in this review. All the statistical analyses will be conducted using Rev Man 5.3, WinBUGS 1.4.3, and Stata 13. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Our review involves a secondary analysis of existing published studies, therefore there is no need for formal research ethics approval. We will disseminate our findings through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42023425282.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Xi Tang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized Treatment, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Phase I Clinical Trial Ward, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Shaojin Bu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fengdu People’s Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Wallisa Roberts
- Department of Emergency medicine, University Hospital of Coventry & Warwickshire, United Kingdom
| | - Narcis Ungureanu
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ansar Mahmood
- Trauma and Orthopaedics Division, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Fang Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Raja V Lakshmanan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tonny Veenith
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rajneesh Sachdeva
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hayashi M, Yamamoto N, Kuroda N, Kano K, Miura T, Kamimura Y, Shiroshita A. Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Preoperative Management of Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2024; 83:522-538. [PMID: 38385910 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip fractures. METHODS We searched Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials. We included participants aged more than 16 years with hip fractures who received peripheral nerve blocks or analgesics for preoperative pain management. The primary outcomes were defined as absolute pain score 2 hours after block placement, preoperative consumption of morphine equivalents, and length of hospital stay. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis conceptualized in the Bayesian framework. Confidence of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). RESULTS We included 63 randomized controlled studies (4,778 participants), of which only a few had a low risk of bias. The femoral nerve block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group block yielded significantly lowered pain scores at 2 hours after block placement compared with those with no block (standardized mean differences [SMD]: -1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI]: -1.7 to -0.48, [confidence of evidence: low]; SMD: -1.8; 95% CrI: -3.0 to -0.55, [low]; SMD: -1.4; 95% CrI: -2.0 to -0.72, [low]; SMD: -2.3; 95% CrI: -3.2 to -1.4, [moderate], respectively). The pericapsular nerve group block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and femoral nerve block resulted in lower pain scores than the no-block group. Additionally, the pericapsular nerve group block yielded a lower pain score than femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block (SMD: -1.21; 95% CrI: -2.18 to -0.23, [very low]: SMD: -0.92; 95% CrI: -1.70 to -0.16, [low]). However, both the fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block did not show a reduction in morphine consumption compared with no block. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the pericapsular nerve group block with other methods regarding morphine consumption. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between peripheral nerve blocks and no block in terms of the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS Compared with no block, preoperative peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures appear to reduce pain 2 hours after block placement. Comparing different blocks, pericapsular nerve group block might be superior to fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain relief, though the confidence evidence was low in most comparisons because of the moderate to high risk of bias in many of the included studies and the high heterogeneity of treatment strategies across studies. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minoru Hayashi
- Department of Emergency Medicine Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Yotsui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Norio Yamamoto
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan; Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.
| | - Naoto Kuroda
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; Department of Epileptology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kenichi Kano
- Department of Emergency Medicine Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Yotsui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Takanori Miura
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita Rosai Hospital, Odate, Japan
| | - Yuji Kamimura
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicin, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Akihiro Shiroshita
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rukerd MRZ, Erfaniparsa L, Movahedi M, Mirkamali H, Alizadeh SD, Ilaghi M, Sadeghifar A, Barazandehpoor S, Hashemian M, Pourzand P, Mirafzal A. Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block versus fascia iliaca compartment block for femoral fractures in emergency department: A randomized controlled trial. Acute Med Surg 2024; 11:e936. [PMID: 38450032 PMCID: PMC10916633 DOI: 10.1002/ams2.936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim Femoral fractures are one of the most debilitating injuries presenting to the emergency departments (EDs). The pain caused by these fractures is typically managed with opioids and adjunctive regional analgesia. These approaches are often associated with adverse side effects. Thus, appropriate alternative methods should be thoroughly investigated. To evaluate ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB) with ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in femoral fractures, to determine which provides better analgesia and less opioid requirement. Methods This study was a randomized clinical trial performed on adult patients presenting to the ED within 3 h of isolated femoral fracture with initial numerical pain rating scale (NRS-0) score of more than 5. The patients were randomized to receive FNB or FICB. The outcomes were block success rates, pain at 20 (NRS-20) and 60 (NRS-60) min after the end of the procedures, as well as the number and total dose of fentanyl administration during ED stay. Results Eighty-seven patients were recruited (40 FNB and 47 FICB). Success rates were 82.5% in FNB and 83.0% in FICB group, with no significant difference between the groups. NRS-20, NRS-60, the number of patients who received supplemental fentanyl, and the total dose of administered fentanyl were significantly lower following FNB. However, the length of the procedure was significantly lower in the FICB group. Conclusion Both FNB and FICB are effective in pain reduction for fractures of femur, but FNB provides more pain relief and less need for supplemental fentanyl.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Rezaei Zadeh Rukerd
- HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV SurveillanceInstitute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| | - Lida Erfaniparsa
- Department of Emergency MedicineKerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| | - Mitra Movahedi
- Department of Emergency MedicineKerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| | - Hanieh Mirkamali
- HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV SurveillanceInstitute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| | | | - Mehran Ilaghi
- Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman Neuroscience Research Center, Kerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| | - Amirreza Sadeghifar
- Department of Orthopedic surgeryKerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| | | | - Morteza Hashemian
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineKerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| | - Pouria Pourzand
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of MedicineUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Müller M, Passegger O, Zehnder P, Hanschen M, Muggleton E, Biberthaler P, Wegmann H, Greve F. [Use of regional anesthesia for preoperative analgesia for proximal femoral fractures in the emergency department : A survey on current practice in German-speaking countries and the United Kingdom]. UNFALLCHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 126:456-462. [PMID: 37084002 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-023-01315-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional anesthesia (RA) techniques such as femoral nerve block (FNB) or fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) are effective analgesia techniques in the treatment of pain from proximal femoral fractures (PFF). While in Great Britain (GB) these are already frequently used in the emergency department for preoperative analgesia, in the German-speaking D‑A-CH area (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) this seems to occur much less frequently. Therefore, the aim of this study was to survey the type and frequency of RA procedures used and to compare international practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the D‑A-CH area as well as in GB, registered emergency departments were contacted and invited to participate in an online survey. The survey included questions on the frequency and type of RA procedures, reasons for non-use, equipment used, person performing the procedure and medications used. RESULTS The participation rate was 17.4% (142/818 emergency departments). RA procedures for preoperative analgesia in PFF were used in 18.3% (21/115) of hospitals in the D‑A-CH region and in 96.3% (26/27) in GB. The most commonly used block was the FICB in GB at 96.2% (25/26) and the FNB in Germany at 66.7% (14/21). In the D‑A-CH area, RA procedures are primarily performed by anesthesiology specialists 71.4% (15/21), and in GB by emergency department residents 65.4% (17/26). DISCUSSION RA procedures are still performed too rarely following PFF in emergency departments in the D‑A-CH area. In international comparison with GB there is potential for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Müller
- Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
| | - O Passegger
- Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland
| | - P Zehnder
- Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland
| | - M Hanschen
- Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland
| | - E Muggleton
- Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland
- Anästhesie am Josephinum, Klinik Josephinum, München, Deutschland
| | - P Biberthaler
- Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland
| | - H Wegmann
- Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland
| | - F Greve
- Fakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fahey A, Cripps E, Ng A, Sweeny A, Snelling PJ. Pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture is feasible, safe and effective in the emergency department: A prospective observational comparative cohort study. Emerg Med Australas 2022; 34:884-891. [PMID: 35701386 PMCID: PMC9796647 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block was first described for analgesia of hip fracture in 2018. We hypothesised that the PENG block is safe and effective for patients with hip fracture when provided by emergency physicians and trainees in the ED. METHODS This was an observational study of routine care. Consecutive patients receiving regional anaesthesia for hip fracture at a single ED were prospectively enrolled. Pain scores were assessed prior to regional anaesthesia then at 15, 30 and 60 min after administration. Maximal reduction in pain scores within 60 min were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (at rest and on movement) or the Pain Assessment IN Advanced Dementia tool (at rest). Patients were followed for opioid use for 12 h after regional anaesthesia and adverse events over the duration of admission. RESULTS There were 67 eligible patients during the enrolment period, with 52 (78%) prospectively enrolled. Thirty-three received femoral blocks (19 fascia iliaca compartment blocks, 14 femoral nerve blocks) and 19 received a PENG block. Inexperienced providers were able to successfully perform the PENG block. There was no difference in maximum pain score reduction between the groups. There was no difference in adverse effects between groups. Opioid use was similar between the groups. More patients were opioid-free after a PENG block. CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrated that the PENG block can be provided safely and effectively to patients with hip fracture in the ED. On the basis of this pilot study, a larger randomised controlled study should now be designed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Fahey
- Department of Emergency MedicineGold Coast University HospitalGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
| | - Elinor Cripps
- Department of AnaesthesiaLismore Base HospitalLismoreNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Aloysius Ng
- Department of Acute Care MedicineFiona Stanley HospitalPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Amy Sweeny
- Department of Emergency MedicineGold Coast University HospitalGold CoastQueenslandAustralia,School of Medicine and DentistryGriffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia,Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
| | - Peter J Snelling
- Department of Emergency MedicineGold Coast University HospitalGold CoastQueenslandAustralia,School of Medicine and DentistryGriffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia,Sonography Innovation and Research GroupGold CoastQueenslandAustralia,Child Health Research CentreThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tsai TY, Yeh HT, Liu YC, Lee CH, Chen KF, Chou E, Sun JT, Chen KC, Lee YK, Chau SW. Trends of Regional Anesthesia Studies in Emergency Medicine: An Observational Study of Published Articles. West J Emerg Med 2022; 23:878-885. [DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2022.8.57552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Regional anesthesia (RA) has become a prominent component of multimodal pain management in emergency medicine (EM), and its use has increased rapidly in recent decades. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of data on how RA practice has evolved in the specialty. In this study we sought to investigate how RA has been implemented in EM by analyzing trends of published articles and to describe the characteristics of the published research.
Methods: We retrieved RA-related publications from the SciVerse Scopus database from inception to January 13, 2022, focusing on studies associated with the use of RA in EM. The primary outcome was an analysis of trend based on the number of annual publications. Other outcomes included reports of technique diversity by year, trends in the use of individual techniques, and characteristics of published articles. We used linear regression analysis to analyze trends.
Results: In total, 133 eligible publications were included. We found that overall 23 techniques have been described and results published in the EM literature. Articles related to RA increased from one article in 1982 to 18 in 2021, and the rate of publication has increased more rapidly since 2016. Reports of lower extremity blocks (60.90%) were published most frequently in ranked-first aggregated citations. The use of thoracic nerve blocks, such as the erector spinae plane block, has increased exponentially in the past three years. The United States (41.35%) has published the most RA-related articles. Regional anesthesia administered by emergency physicians (52.63%) comprised the leading field in published articles related to RA. Most publications discussed single-shot (88.72%) and ultrasound-guided methods (55.64%).
Conclusion: This study highlights that the number of published articles related to regional anesthesia in EM has increased. Although RA research has primarily focused on lower extremity blocks, clinical researchers continue to broaden the field of study to encompass a wide spectrum of techniques and indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tou-Yuan Tsai
- Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chiayi, Taiwan; Tzu Chi University, School of Medicine, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Tzu Yeh
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chang Liu
- Chi Mei Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Hsing Lee
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Kuan-Fu Chen
- Chang Gung University, Clinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Community Medicine Research Center, Keelung, Taiwan; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Eric Chou
- Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas; Baylor University Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jen-Tang Sun
- Tzu Chi University, School of Medicine, Hualien, Taiwan; Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Chih Chen
- Taipei Medical University, Shuang Ho Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Kung Lee
- Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chiayi, Taiwan; Tzu Chi University, School of Medicine, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Su Weng Chau
- Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chiayi, Taiwan; Tzu Chi University, School of Medicine, Hualien, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The difficulty of choosing the method of analgesia after total replacement of the lower limb large joints (case report, literature review). ACTA BIOMEDICA SCIENTIFICA 2022. [DOI: 10.29413/abs.2022-7.4.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
A case of successful treatment of a patient with a periprosthetic fracture of the femur is described. The fracture occurred one day after total hip replacement as a result of a fall, possibly associated with postoperative conduction analgesia. Lower limb large joints total replacement may become the most frequently performed type of elective surgery already in the current decade. The increasing prevalence of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatic diseases and hip fractures is an objective prerequisite for it. Despite of all efforts, the problem of postoperative pain control during these surgical interventions currently remains unresolved. There is currently no “gold standard” for pain relief after total hip and knee replacement surgeries. An excellent ratio of effectiveness and safety is demonstrated by multimodal pain relief programs based on peripheral nerve blocks. However, while having undeniable advantages, conduction anesthesia/analgesia has a critically important drawback. The cornerstone of postoperative rehabilitation for patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement is their early activation. All methods of conduction anesthesia are associated with motor blockade. In particular, femoral nerve block causes weakness of quadriceps muscle of thigh, inducing patients’ inadvertent falling when attempting to stand or walk. The situation with the choice of the method of anesthesia after total replacement of the lower limb large joints can be described as “a long way to go”.
Collapse
|
8
|
Li XD, Han C, Yu WL. Comparison of Femoral Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Block for Proximal Femoral Fracture in the Elderly Patient: A Meta-analysis. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2022; 13:21514593221111647. [PMID: 35782718 PMCID: PMC9243384 DOI: 10.1177/21514593221111647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pain management modalities after proximal femoral fracture are variable and have been studied extensively. Regional anesthesia, specifically femoral nerve (FNB) and fascia iliaca compartment blocks (FICB), can be used to provide analgesia preoperatively. Methods Systematic searches of all related literature were conducted in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of proximal femoral fractures were included. The pain scores at different time points, opioid requirement in 24 h, mean arterial pressure, time for spinal anesthesia, patient satisfaction, and incidence of side effects between the 2 groups were extracted throughout the study. Results Fifteen RCTs including 1240 patients met the inclusion criteria. The present meta-analysis indicated that compared with FNB, FICB could decrease the visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 4 h after surgery (P < .05). The incidence of side effects (nausea, vomiting, and sedation) was lower in the FNB group (P < .05). Compared to the FICB, no significant difference was found at any other observed time point. Additionally, no difference was found in opioid requirement at 24 h, mean arterial pressure, time for spinal anesthesia, or patient satisfaction (P > .05). Conclusions FICB demonstrates a reduction in VAS score at 4 while FNB decreases the risk of several adverse events. More high-quality RCTs are necessary for proper comparison of the efficacy and safety of FNB and FICB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-dan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai District, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Chao Han
- Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital Tianjin University, Hexi District, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Wen-li Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai District, Tianjin, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Is Femoral Nerve Block Superior to Fascia Iliac Block in Hip Surgery? Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:4840501. [PMID: 35647188 PMCID: PMC9135520 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4840501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background. Femoral nerve block (FNB) and fascia iliac compartment block (FICB) are alternative methods of pain relief during hip surgery. Nevertheless, the effectiveness and safety of FNB compared with FICB are yet to be fully determined. Methods. Electronic databases were systematically searched. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on hip surgery were included. Postoperatively, the pain scores at different time points, narcotic requirements in 24 h, mean arterial pressure, spinal anesthesia (SA) time, patient satisfaction, and adverse effect rates between the two groups were extracted throughout the study. Results. Fourteen RCTs including 1179 patients were included. Compared to the FICB, FNB decreased the VAS scores postoperatively at 24 h at rest (
) and the incidence rate of some side effects (nausea, vomiting, and sedation) (
). However, compared to the FICB, no significant difference was found in the FNB regarding the VAS scores postoperatively at any of the other time points (2 min, 20 min, 2 h, 24 h at movement, 48 h at rest, and 48 h at movement). Patients in both groups had similar narcotic needs after 24 h, mean arterial pressure, SA time, and patient satisfaction (
). Conclusions. FNB has more advantages in reducing VAS scores postoperatively at 24 h at rest and the odds of some adverse effects. A better quality RCT is needed to properly compare FNB with FICB.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kamel I, Ahmed MF, Sethi A. Regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures: What orthopedic surgeons need to know. World J Orthop 2022; 13:11-35. [PMID: 35096534 PMCID: PMC8771411 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery. Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia. Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and hematological assessments. Neuraxial blocks include spinal, epidural, and combined spinal epidural. Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary. Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block, saphenous nerve block, sciatic nerve block, iPACK block, ankle block and lumbar plexus block. The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment. The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation, patient positing, operative structures, operative manipulation, tourniquet use and the impact of post-operative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy. Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), nerve injury, falls, hematoma, infection and allergic reactions. Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications. LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications (intralipid) should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ihab Kamel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Muhammad F Ahmed
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Anish Sethi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goel CP, Desai S. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in femoral nerve block for post-op pain relief in hip surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2021; 37:383-388. [PMID: 34759548 PMCID: PMC8562428 DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_182_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: To determine whether the addition of dexmedetomidine either in peripheral block or via systemic route leads to prolongation of the duration of analgesia is inconclusive. The present study aimed to assess the duration of postoperative analgesia with dexmedetomidine used as an additive with bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB) and to compare it with intramuscular dexmedetomidine along with FNB. Material and Methods: A prospective, double-blind randomized clinical trial involving adult patients undergoing elective hip surgery, performed under subarachnoid block. When sensory block receded to T12 after the surgery, FNB was given for postoperative analgesia. Patients were randomized into three groups; Group A received FNB with 40 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.5 mL saline as IM injection, Group B received FNB with 39.5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + 0.5 mL (50 mcg) of dexmedetomidine in the affected limb and 0.5 mL saline IM injection, and Group C received FNB with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.5 mL (50 mcg) of dexmedetomidine as IM injection. Postoperative pain was assessed and for pain with VAS score >3, intravenous tramadol was given as rescue analgesia. Chi-square test for categorical variables and one-way ANOVA for continuous variables. Results: The mean duration of analgesia in groups A, B, and C was 671, 676, and 490 min, respectively which was not significant. A 24 h analgesic requirement was also not different between the groups. Conclusion: The use of dexmedetomidine perineurally or systemically did not prolong the duration of analgesia as compared to bupivacaine alone for femoral nerve block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna P Goel
- Department of Anesthesia, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
| | - Sameer Desai
- Department of Anesthesia, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Allard C, Pardo E, de la Jonquière C, Wyniecki A, Soulier A, Faddoul A, Tsai ES, Bonnet F, Verdonk F. Comparison between femoral block and PENG block in femoral neck fractures: A cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252716. [PMID: 34086782 PMCID: PMC8177466 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional analgesia is worth performing in the multimodal postoperative management of hip fracture (HF) because it reduces hospital morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and side effects of the recently described "Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block" with those of the femoral block, which is considered the standard of care for postoperative pain control after femoral neck fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a comparative observational study at a university hospital (Saint Antoine Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France), where the PENG block was introduced in August 2019. We include all patients from June to October 2019, who were coming for femoral neck fractures and who had an analgesic femoral block or PENG block before their surgery. The primary outcome was the comparison of cumulative postoperative morphine consumption 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS Demographics, medical charts, and perioperative data of 42 patients were reviewed: 21 patients before (Femoral group) and 21 patients after the introduction of PENG block (PENG group) in clinical practice. Thirteen total hip arthroplasties (THA) and eight hemi arthroplasties (HA) were included in each group. Demographics were also comparable. The median, postoperative, morphine equivalent consumption at 48 hours was 10 [0-20] mg and 20 [0-50] mg in Femoral and PENG groups respectively (p = 0.458). No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative pain intensity, time to ambulation, incidence of morphine-related side effects, or length of hospital stay. The postoperative muscle strength of the quadriceps was greater in the PENG group than in the Femoral group (5/5 vs. 2/5, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION In the management of hip fractures, PENG block is not associated in our study with a significant change in postoperative morphine consumption, compared to femoral block. However, it does significantly improve the immediate mobility of the operated limb, making it appropriate for inclusion in enhanced recovery programs after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Allard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Pardo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Christophe de la Jonquière
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Anne Wyniecki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Anne Soulier
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Annibal Faddoul
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eileen S. Tsai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Francis Bonnet
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Franck Verdonk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Perioperative Pain Management of Geriatric Patients with Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Res Manag 2020; 2020:8503963. [PMID: 33294087 PMCID: PMC7714603 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8503963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background With continuous increase of the aging population, the number of geriatric patients with fragility hip fractures is rising sharply, and timely surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. However, adequate and effective pain control is the precondition of satisfactory efficacy. This systematic review aimed to summarize the use of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) as an analgesic strategy for perioperative pain management in geriatric patients with hip fractures. Methods PubMed and Embase databases were searched for English published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting application of FICB for pain control of the older adults with hip fractures between January 1st, 2000, and May 31st, 2020. The modified Jadad scale was used to evaluate quality of the RCTs included. Primary outcomes of the eligible RCTs were presented and discussed. Results A total of 27 RCTs with 2478 cases were included finally. The present outcomes suggested, after admission or in the emergency department (ED), FICB can provide patients with equal or even better pain relief compared with the conventional analgesia methods, which can also reduce additional analgesic consumptions. While, before positioning for spinal anesthesia (SA), FICB is able to offer superior pain control, facilitating SA performance, after surgery FICB can effectively alleviate pain with decreased use of additional analgesics, promoting earlier mobilization and preventing complications. Conclusions FICB is a safe, reliable, and easy-to-conduct technique, which is able to provide adequate pain relief during perioperative management of geriatric patients with hip fractures.
Collapse
|
14
|
Koning MV, van der Sijp M, Stolker RJ, Niggebrugge A. Intrathecal Morphine Is Associated with Less Delirium Following Hip Fracture Surgery: A Register Study. Anesth Pain Med 2020; 10:e106076. [PMID: 33134152 PMCID: PMC7539054 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.106076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Delirium is a common complication after proximal femoral fracture surgery, with pain and opioid consumption as the contributing factors. The administration of intrathecal morphine may decrease these factors postoperatively and potentially reduce delirium. Objectives This research aimed to study the association between the use of intrathecal morphine and the occurrence of delirium. Methods A retrospective analysis of a prospective register kept in a non-academic hospital in the Netherlands was performed. The register contained data of all patients with proximal femur fractures that were surgically treated with osteosynthesis or prosthesis. Patients receiving spinal anesthesia (SA group) were compared with patients receiving spinal anesthesia with the addition of intrathecal morphine (SIM group). The administration of either SA or SIM was based on the preference of the anesthesiologist. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium, as defined by the DSM-V classification. The follow-up lasted until hospital discharge. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results The SA group consisted of 451 patients, and the SIM group included 34 patients. Delirium occurred in 19.7% in the SA group versus 5.9% in the SIM group (P = 0.046). This association remained significant after correction in multivariate analysis (OR of delirium in the SA group, 95% CI: 1.062 - 21.006, P = 0.041). Additionally, multivariate analysis revealed that age, gender, preoperative cognitive impairment, and fracture treatment (osteosynthesis or prosthesis) were independently associated with delirium. Conclusions This retrospective study found an independent association between the use of intrathecal morphine and a lower incidence of delirium. This clinically relevant decrease in delirium should be studied in a prospective randomized study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Vincent Koning
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Univerity Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Univerity Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max van der Sijp
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, LUMC-Campus the Hague, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Stolker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Univerity Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur Niggebrugge
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Liang Y, Lv L, He L, Deng W, Chen C, Li J. A Randomized Controlled Trial of FNB versus FICB for Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures Before Spinal Anesthesia. Clin Interv Aging 2020; 15:1113-1119. [PMID: 32764898 PMCID: PMC7360407 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s251025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Patients with femoral neck fractures often suffer severe pain. This randomized controlled clinical study compared the effect of femoral nerve block (FNB) and fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in this population. Patients and Methods Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: FNB group (femoral nerve block, n=23) or FICB group (fascia iliaca compartment block, n=23). Before positioning for spinal anesthesia, patients received FNB with 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine or FICB with 40 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and during hip flexion after admission to the operation room; at 3, 5, 8, and 10 min after analgesia intervention; and during positioning for spinal anesthesia. Positioning was attempted after 10 min of analgesia intervention in each group. Time required to perform spinal anesthesia, quality of positioning, and patient satisfaction were documented. Results The VAS scores in the FNB group were significantly lower than those in FICB group at 3 and 5 min after analgesia intervention (P=0.000). However, there were no significant differences in VAS between groups at 8 or 10 min or during positioning. Conclusion FNB and FICB produce similar analgesic effects in patients with femoral neck fractures, but FNB has a more rapid onset of pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Liang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Lv Lv
- Emergency Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Liang He
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University), Jiaxing, People's Republic of China
| | - Cai Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingjuan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gupta M, Kamath SS. Comparison of preoperative ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block versus femoral nerve block for proximal femur fractures before positioning for spinal anesthesia: an observational study. Korean J Pain 2020; 33:138-143. [PMID: 32235014 PMCID: PMC7136299 DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe pain associated with proximal femur fractures makes the positioning for regional anesthesia a challenge. Systemic administration of analgesics can have adverse effects. Individually, both the fascia iliaca block (FIB) and femoral nerve blocks (FNB) have been studied. However, there is little evidence comparing the two. The aim of this study was to compare the overall efficacy of the two blocks in patients with proximal femur fracture before positioning for spinal anesthesia. Methods ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I, II, and III patients scheduled for elective and emergency surgery with the diagnosis of proximal femur fracture between October 2018 and June 2019 were included in the study. The patients were assigned to two groups by convenience nonprobability sampling of 35 each. Results Our study showed a reduction in visual analogue scale scores at 3, 4, and 5 minutes after administration of the FIB being 5.1 ± 1.1, 4.1 ± 1.3, and 2.8 ± 0.8, and those after the FNB as 4.4 ± 1.1, 3.3 ± 1.1, and 2.1 ± 1.4 with P < 0.05, which was statistically significant. The mean first rescue analgesia time for the FIB was 7.1 ± 2.1 hours, while for the FNB it was 5.2 ± 0.7 hours. The P value was less than 0.001, which was significant. Conclusions Both ultrasound guided FNB and FIB techniques provide sufficient analgesia for patient's positioning before spinal anesthesia. However, the duration of postoperative analgesia provided by FIB was greater than that of the FNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meeta Gupta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College of Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Shaila Surendra Kamath
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College of Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu X, Hu X, Li R, Zhang Y. Combination of post-fascia iliaca compartment block and dexmedetomidine in pain and inflammation control after total hip arthroplasty for elder patients: a randomized control study. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15:42. [PMID: 32041613 PMCID: PMC7011216 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-1562-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to investigate the efficiency of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) combined with dexmedetomidine (DEX) in postoperative and inflammation management for elder patients after total hip arthroplasty. Methods The present randomized controlled study included a total of 119 elder patients who received total hip arthroplasty in our hospital from March 2016 to December 2018. These patients were divided into three groups: control group, patients received routine general anesthesia; FICB group, patients received additional FICB after surgery; and combined group, patients received both pre-treatment of DEX and post-treatment of fascia iliaca compartment block. The serum levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured by ELISA. The visual analog scale (VAS) score was measured at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery, and the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pressing time within 48 h after surgery was also recorded. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) was used to measure the sleep quality before and at 1 month after surgery. Results The VAS scores were significantly lower in patients in the combined group, when compared with the other two groups, at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. In addition, the VAS scores at all time points were significantly lower in the FICB group than the control group. The PCIA pressing times were also remarkably lower in the combined group. At 4, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery, the serum levels of these inflammatory factors were the lowest in the combined group, and the PSQI scores were significantly lower in the combined group, when compared with the other two groups, while the control group had the highest PSQI scores among the three groups. There was no severe side effects and significant difference observed. Conclusion FICB combined with DEX reduced the postoperative pain, improved the sleep condition, and decreased the serum levels of inflammatory factors after total hip arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofen Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678, Furong Road, Hefei, 230000, China
| | - Xianwen Hu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678, Furong Road, Hefei, 230000, China
| | - Rui Li
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678, Furong Road, Hefei, 230000, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678, Furong Road, Hefei, 230000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abu Elyazed MM, Mostafa SF. A randomized trial of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus fascia iliaca compartment block for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.egja.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shaimaa F. Mostafa
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical ICU, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fadhlillah F, Chan D, Pelosi P, Rubulotta F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single injection fascia iliaca blocks in the peri-operative management of patients with hip fractures. Minerva Anestesiol 2019; 85:1211-1218. [PMID: 31274264 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.19.13535-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety profile of single injection fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) performed peri-operatively for isolated hip fractures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and CINAHL were searched from inception to February 2018. Inclusion criteria were: English language, adult patients (>18 years old), isolated traumatic hip fracture treated with single injection FICB peri-operatively. Data were extracted into a pre-piloted form that utilized the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist. Two investigators conducted reviews independently; any ambiguity was resolved by discussion. The quality of studies was assessed using the GRADE checklist and Cochrane risk of bias tool. A random-effects model was applied. Outcomes reviewed were pain level at rest and movement, breakthrough analgesia and complications. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Out of 3757 citations, eight RCTs were included involving 645 participants. Pain was significantly reduced during movements (SMD=-1.82, 95% CI -2.26 to -1.38, P<0.00001) but not at rest (SMD=-0.68, 95% CI -1.70 to 0.35, P=0.20). FICB allowed less (breakthrough) supplemental analgesic (N.=57 vs. N.=73), however this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS FICB is effective in controlling acute peri-operative pain in adult patients with traumatic hip fractures. The benefit is more evident during mobilization of the limb when compared to patients at rest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiqry Fadhlillah
- Department of Anesthesia, Imperial College London Institute of Clinical Sciences, London, UK
| | - David Chan
- Department of Anesthesia, Imperial College London Institute of Clinical Sciences, London, UK
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, San Martino Policlinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Rubulotta
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Imperial College London Institute of Clinical Sciences, London, UK -
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the effect of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) on pain control and morphine consumption in patients with hip fracture. METHODS We searched databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to September 12, 2018. We only included hip fracture patients who received FICB versus placebo for pain control. Risk ratios (RRs), standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS Eleven trials involving 937 patients underwent hip fracture were retrieved. FICB significantly decreased the pain intensity at 1-8 h (SMD = -1.03, 95% CI [-1.48, -0.58], P = .000), 12 h (SMD = -1.06, 95% CI [-1.36, -0.75], P = .000), 24 h (SMD = -1.14, 95% CI [-1.66, -0.62], P = .000) and 48 h (SMD = -0.96, 95% CI [-1.33, -0.60], P = .000). Moreover, FICB could reduced the total morphine consumption and the occurrence of nausea (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the pain intensity at 72 h (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI [-0.12, 0.34], P = .355). CONCLUSIONS FICB has a beneficial role in reducing pain intensity and morphine consumption after hip fracture. Moreover, FICB has morphine-sparing effects when compared with a control group. More high-quality RCTs are needed to identify the optimal technique and volume of injectate for FICB.
Collapse
|
22
|
Soffin EM, Gibbons MM, Wick EC, Kates SL, Cannesson M, Scott MJ, Grant MC, Ko SS, Wu CL. Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: Focus on Anesthesiology for Hip Fracture Surgery. Anesth Analg 2019; 128:1107-1117. [PMID: 31094775 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols represent patient-centered, evidence-based, multidisciplinary care of the surgical patient. Although these patterns have been validated in numerous surgical specialities, ERAS has not been widely described for patients undergoing hip fracture (HFx) repair. As part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery, we have conducted a full evidence review of interventions that form the basis of the anesthesia components of the ERAS HFx pathway. A literature search was performed for each protocol component, and the highest levels of evidence available were selected for review. Anesthesiology components of care were identified and evaluated across the perioperative continuum. For the preoperative phase, the use of regional analgesia and nonopioid multimodal analgesic agents is suggested. For the intraoperative phase, a standardized anesthetic with postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis is suggested. For the postoperative phase, a multimodal (primarily nonopioid) analgesic regimen is suggested. A summary of the best available evidence and recommendations for inclusion in ERAS protocols for HFx repair are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M Soffin
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Melinda M Gibbons
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Elizabeth C Wick
- Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen L Kates
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Maxime Cannesson
- Department of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael J Scott
- Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael C Grant
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Samantha S Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher L Wu
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Odor PM, Cavalier AG, Reynolds ND, Ang KS, Parrington SJ, Xu H, Johnston A, Sage FJ. Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine Following Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Elderly Patients. Drugs Aging 2019; 36:541-548. [DOI: 10.1007/s40266-019-00652-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
24
|
Han C, Ma T, Lei D, Xie S, Ge Z. Effect of ultrasound-guided proximal and distal approach for obturator nerve block in transurethral resection of bladder cancer under spinal anesthesia. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:2499-2505. [PMID: 31114320 PMCID: PMC6497820 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s191540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound-guided proximal or distal approach for obturator nerve block is preformed to prevent adductor muscle spasm during transurethral resection of bladder tumors. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of two different techniques in blocking the obturator nerve during transurethral resection of a bladder tumor. Methods: Fifty obturator nerve blocks were performed for transurethral bladder tumor resection and divided into two groups. One group received ultrasound-guided proximal obturator nerve block approach (proximal group), and the other group received ultrasound-guided distal obturator nerve block approach (distal group). Grade of adductor muscle spasm, the rate of clinical effectiveness, duration of block procedure, and complications were recorded. Patients with grade two adductor spasms were transferred to general anesthesia. Results: Two patients in the distal group and one in the proximal group were transferred to general anesthesia for severe adductor muscle spasms. No difference was found in clinical effectiveness rate of obturator nerve block between the two groups. differed insignificantly. The number of patients who had no adductor muscle spasms in the proximal group was significantly higher than that of the distal group. Vascular puncture was detected in two patients in the proximal group and one patient in the distil group. No other complications were observed. Conclusion: No difference was found for clinical effectiveness between the two groups. However, vascular puncture should receive more attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Han
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Yixing Clinical College, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yixing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tieliang Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Yixing Clinical College, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yixing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Daoyun Lei
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Songhui Xie
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhijun Ge
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
- Yixing Clinical College, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yixing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fascia iliaca compartment blocks: Different techniques and review of the literature. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2019; 33:57-66. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
26
|
Tran DQ, Salinas FV, Benzon HT, Neal JM. Lower extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019; 44:rapm-2018-000019. [PMID: 30635506 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Revised: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The advent of ultrasound guidance has led to a renewed interest in regional anesthesia of the lower limb. In keeping with the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine's ongoing commitment to provide intensive evidence-based education, this article presents a complete update of the 2005 comprehensive review on lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks. The current review article strives to (1) summarize the pertinent anatomy of the lumbar and sacral plexuses, (2) discuss the optimal approaches and techniques for lower limb regional anesthesia, (3) present evidence to guide the selection of pharmacological agents and adjuvants, (4) describe potential complications associated with lower extremity nerve blocks, and (5) identify informational gaps pertaining to outcomes, which warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- De Q Tran
- Department of Anesthesiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Francis V Salinas
- Department of Anesthesiology, US Anesthesia Partners-Washington, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Honorio T Benzon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joseph M Neal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cooper AL, Nagree Y, Goudie A, Watson PR, Arendts G. Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks are not superior to ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca blocks for fractured neck of femur. Emerg Med Australas 2018; 31:393-398. [PMID: 30198199 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Revised: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB) is superior to an ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in providing pain relief to patients with a neck of femur or proximal femoral fracture. METHODS A double-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted. All participants received two blocks, one active and one placebo. An active FICB was administered to 52 participants and 48 participants received an active FNB. RESULTS Analysis was completed on data collected from 100 participants. Most patients were elderly and the majority were female. Both FICB and FNB achieved clinically significant mean reductions in pain scores (2.62 for FICB and 2.3 for FNB). There was no significant difference in reduction in pain scores between the two cohorts, P = 0.408. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound-guided FNB is not superior to ultrasound-guided FICB, with both facilitating an equivalent analgesia effect in patients with a neck of femur or proximal femur fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alannah L Cooper
- Emergency Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Nursing and Midwifery Research, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Yusuf Nagree
- Emergency Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Adrian Goudie
- Emergency Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peter R Watson
- Emergency Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Glenn Arendts
- Emergency Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ma Y, Wu J, Xue J, Lan F, Wang T. Ultrasound-guided continuous fascia iliaca compartment block for pre-operative pain control in very elderly patients with hip fracture: A randomized controlled trial. Exp Ther Med 2018; 16:1944-1952. [PMID: 30186422 PMCID: PMC6122427 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study presented the results of a prospective, randomized controlled trial. The present study enrolled 98 very elderly patients with hip fractures, complicated with at least one cardiovascular, neurological or pulmonary disease, of whom 10 patients were excluded. A total of 88 patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: i) The control group, receiving traditional analgesia including 50 mg Tramadol and 500 mg paracetamol orally three times a day from admission to surgery; and ii) the study group, receiving ultrasound-guided continuous fascia iliaca compartment block (CFICB), a single 50 ml 0.4% ropivacaine injection with continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at a dose of 5 ml/h from admission to surgery. The primary outcome measure of pain relief or pain intensity was assessed preoperatively and up to 48 h postoperatively using a visual analog scale (VAS). The results of the present study indicated that in the preoperative period, in the morning of the day of surgery, the VAS pain at rest scores were lower in the study group compared with the control group (P=0.023). The VAS passive movement scores of the study group were also significantly lower compared with the control group 1 h following analgesia at the time of admission (P<0.05) and in the morning of the day of surgery (P<0.05). Scores for patients' satisfaction with the analgesic regimen in the preoperative period were greater in the study group compared with the control group (P<0.001). There was no difference in analgesia-associated side effects between groups. Duration of hospital stay of patients in the control group was significantly longer compared with the study group (P=0.001). Patients in the study group were less likely to have increased complications compared with patients in the control group over the N2-N4 period (from preoperative period to after surgery; P=0.016). The present study concluded that ultrasound guided CFICB was an effective method of providing analgesia for very elderly (≥80 years old) with hip fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhui Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| | - Jie Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| | - Jixiu Xue
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| | - Fei Lan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| | - Tianlong Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Steenberg J, Møller A. Systematic review of the effects of fascia iliaca compartment block on hip fracture patients before operation. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120:1368-1380. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2016] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
30
|
Scurrah A, Shiner CT, Stevens JA, Faux SG. Regional nerve blockade for early analgesic management of elderly patients with hip fracture - a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2017; 73:769-783. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.14178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Scurrah
- Department of Anaesthetics; St Vincent's Hospital Sydney; NSW Australia
| | - C. T. Shiner
- Department of Rehabilitation and Pain Medicine; St Vincent's Hospital Sydney; NSW Australia
| | - J. A. Stevens
- Department of Anaesthetics; St Vincent's Hospital Sydney; NSW Australia
| | - S. G. Faux
- Department of Rehabilitation and Pain Medicine; St Vincent's Hospital Sydney; NSW Australia
- University of New South Wales; Sydney NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wennberg P, Andersson H, Wireklint Sundström B. Patients with suspected hip fracture in the chain of emergency care: An integrative review of the literature. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 2017; 29:16-31. [PMID: 29631852 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2017] [Revised: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pär Wennberg
- Research and Development Centre, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden; Centre for Health Care Sciences, Örebro County Council, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden.
| | - Henrik Andersson
- University of Borås, PreHospen - Centre for Prehospital Research, Sweden; University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Wireklint Sundström
- University of Borås, PreHospen - Centre for Prehospital Research, Sweden; University of Borås, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dawe H. Modernising Hip Fracture Anaesthesia. Open Orthop J 2017; 11:1190-1199. [PMID: 29290856 PMCID: PMC5721325 DOI: 10.2174/1874325001711011190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Hip fracture carries a 30-day mortality of around 8% in the United Kingdom. This figure has remained relatively unchanged despite modern developments in anaesthetic technique. These range from improvements in perioperative analgesia and mortality scoring systems, changes to intra-operative anaesthetic technique and strategies to reduce the requirement for blood transfusion. In this article, we review the current literature on the perioperative management of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery including some of the current controversies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Dawe
- St. Georges Hospital, Tooting, SW170QT, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Amin NH, West JA, Farmer T, Basmajian HG. Nerve Blocks in the Geriatric Patient With Hip Fracture: A Review of the Current Literature and Relevant Neuroanatomy. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2017; 8:268-275. [PMID: 29318091 PMCID: PMC5755841 DOI: 10.1177/2151458517734046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2017] [Revised: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hip fracture is a common occurrence in the elderly population with high morbidity and mortality due to postoperative pain and opioid use. The goal of this article is to review the current literature on the neuroanatomy of the hip and the use of localized nerve block in controlling hip fracture pain. Methods A thorough search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted using the search terms "hip fracture" and "fascia iliaca block (FICB)." An additional search was conducted utilizing multiple search terms including "hip fracture," "greater trochanter," "femur," "hip," "anatomy," "neuroanatomical," and "anatomic." Each search result was investigated for cadaveric studies on the innervation of the trochanteric region. Results Twenty-five clinical studies examining the use of FICBs in hip fracture patients were identified. These studies show that FICB is safe and effective in controlling perioperative pain. Additionally, FICB has been shown to decrease opioid requirement and opioid-related side effects. Neuroanatomical studies show that the hip capsule is innervated by contributions from the femoral, obturator, sciatic, and superior gluteal nerves. Imaging studies suggest that FICB anesthetizes these branches through localized spread along the fascia iliaca plane. Cadaveric evidence suggests that the greater trochanter region is directly innervated by a single branch from the femoral nerve. Discussion The proven efficacy of nerve blocks and their anatomic basis is encouraging to both the anesthesiologist and orthopedic surgeon. Their routine use in the hip fracture setting may improve patient outcomes, given the unacceptably high morbidity and mortality associated with opioid use. Conclusions Localized nerve blocks, specifically FICB, have been shown to be safe and effective in managing acute hip fracture pain in geriatric patients, leading to decreased opioid use. Knowledge of the hip neuroanatomy may help guide future development of hip fracture pain blockade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirav H Amin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | | | - Travis Farmer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Hrayr G Basmajian
- Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pomona, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wang X, Sun Y, Wang L, Hao X. Femoral nerve block versus fascia iliaca block for pain control in total knee and hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e7382. [PMID: 28682889 PMCID: PMC5502162 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000007382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare the efficiency and safety between femoral nerve block (FNB) and fascia iliaca block (FIB) for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasties. METHODS A systematic search was performed in Medline (1966-2017.05), PubMed (1966-2017.05), Embase (1980-2017.05), ScienceDirect (1985-2017.05) and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria (1) Participants: Only published articles enrolling adult participants that with a diagnosis of end-stage of osteoarthritis and prepared for unilateral TKA or THA; (2) Interventions: The intervention group received FIB for postoperative pain management; (3) Comparisons: The control group was received FNB for postoperative pain control; (4) Outcomes: Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in different periods, opioids consumption, length of stay and postoperative complications; (5) Study design: clinical randomized control trials (RCTs) were regarded as eligible in our study. Cochrane Hand book for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used for assessment of the included studies and risk of bias was shown. Fixed/random effect model was used according to the heterogeneity tested by I2 statistic. Sensitivity analysis was conducted and publication bias was assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 11.0 software. RESULTS Five RCTs including 308 patients met the inclusion criteria. The present meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between groups in terms of visual analog scale (VAS) score at 12 hours (SMD = -0.080, 95% CI: -0.306 to 0.145, P = .485), 24 hours (SMD = 0.098, 95% CI: -0.127 to 0.323, P = .393), and 48 hours (SMD = -0.001, 95% CI: -0.227 to 0.225, P = .993). No significant differences were found regarding opioid consumption at 12 hours (SMD = 0.026, 95% CI: -0.224 to 0.275, P = .840), 24 hours (SMD = 0.037, 95% CI: -0.212 to 0.286, P = .771), and 48 hours (SMD = -0.016, 95% CI: -0.265 to 0.233, P = .900). In addition, no significant increase of complications was identified between groups. CONCLUSION There is no significant differences of VAS scores at 12-48 hour and opioids consumption at 12-48 hour between two groups following total joint arthroplasty. No increased risk of nausea, vomiting and pruritus was observed in both groups. More high-quality large RCTs with long follow-up period are necessary for proper comparisons of the efficacy and safety of FNB with FIB. The present meta-analysis exists some limitations that should be noted: (1) Only five articles were included in present meta-analysis, although all of them are recently published RCTs, the sample size are relatively small; (2) Functional outcome is an important parameter, due to the insufficiency of relevant data, we cannot perform a meta-analysis. (3) Dose and types of local anesthetics are varied, which may influence the results; (4) The duration of follow up is relatively short which leads to underestimating complications. (5) Publication bias in present meta-analysis may influence the results.
Collapse
|
35
|
Cowan R, Lim JH, Ong T, Kumar A, Sahota O. The Challenges of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief in Hip Fracture Care. Drugs Aging 2017; 34:1-11. [PMID: 27913981 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-016-0427-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The care of the older person with hip fracture is complicated by their comorbid condition, limited physiological reserve, cognitive impairment and frailty. Two aspects of hip fracture management that have received considerable attention are how best to manage the pain associated with it and the ideal mode of anaesthesia. Existing literature has reported on the suboptimal treatment of pain in this orthogeriatric cohort. With recent advancements in medical care, a number of options have emerged as alternatives to conservative systemic analgesia. Systemic analgesia, such as opioids, can lead to untoward side effects, especially in this particular group of patients. Hence, peripheral nerve blocks, epidural analgesia and regional anaesthesia have emerged as options in the delivery of adequate pain relief in hip fractures. Besides that, there is ongoing debate regarding the appropriate anaesthesia technique for surgical repair of the fractured hip. The benefits and risks related to either spinal anaesthesia or general anaesthesia have been subject to studies determining which method is associated with better short- and long-term outcomes. In this review, we aim to examine the evidence behind the different analgesia options available, compare spinal and general anaesthesia, and discuss the importance of the multidisciplinary orthogeriatric model of care in hip fracture and its potential role in other fragility fractures.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Analgesia, Epidural/methods
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use
- Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects
- Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
- Anesthesia, Conduction/methods
- Anesthesia, General/methods
- Anesthesia, Spinal/methods
- Female
- Hip Fractures/drug therapy
- Hip Fractures/surgery
- Humans
- Male
- Nerve Block/methods
- Pain/prevention & control
- Pain Management/methods
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Cowan
- Department for Healthcare of Older People, Queens Medical Centre, HCOP Research Office, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, F Floor, West Block, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Jun Hao Lim
- Department for Healthcare of Older People, Queens Medical Centre, HCOP Research Office, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, F Floor, West Block, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Terence Ong
- Department for Healthcare of Older People, Queens Medical Centre, HCOP Research Office, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, F Floor, West Block, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Ashok Kumar
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Nottingham, UK
| | - Opinder Sahota
- Department for Healthcare of Older People, Queens Medical Centre, HCOP Research Office, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, F Floor, West Block, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Thelaus Å, Pettersson T, Gordon M, Krupic F, Sköldenberg O. A Prospective Observational Cohort Study on Orthopaedic and Anaesthetic Registrars Performing Femoral Nerve Block on Patients with an Acute Hip Fracture. Surg Res Pract 2016; 2016:7512360. [PMID: 27704039 PMCID: PMC5040792 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7512360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Revised: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated if a femoral nerve block (FNB) for patients with a proximal femoral fracture (PFF) and administered by an orthopaedic registrar (OR) instead of an anaesthesiology registrar (AR) lowers the lead time to block and reduces the total amount of rescue analgesics during the preoperative phase. 205 patients were included in a prospective observational cohort study. The main outcome variable was rescue analgesics as total intravenous morphine prior to surgery. All results were adjusted for confounding using age, sex, cognitive dysfunction, and ASA classification. The OR group (n = 135) was over 2 hours faster in performing the block compared to the AR group (n = 70) but was nonetheless correlated with an increased amount of rescue analgesics during the study, 2.4 mg morphine (95% CI 0.0-4.9) more compared to the AR group. We found no difference between the groups in the risk of adverse events. We conclude that, for patients with an acute PFF and with morphine consumption as end point, how soon from arrival to hospital the patients receive a FNB is of lesser importance than who is administering it. Based on our results we recommend that emergency hospitals should have routines for anaesthesiologists performing FNB on this frail patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åsa Thelaus
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Pettersson
- Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Max Gordon
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ferid Krupic
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Olof Sköldenberg
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
The treatment of hip fractures in the elderly represents a major public health priority and a source of ongoing debate among orthopaedic surgeons and anesthesiologists. Most of these injuries are treated with surgery in an expedient fashion. From the surgical perspective, there are certain special considerations in this population including osteoporosis, pre-existing arthritis, age, activity level, and overall health that contribute to the type of surgical fixation performed. Open reduction and internal fixation versus arthroplasty remain the two major categories of treatment. While the indications and treatment algorithms still remain controversial, the overall goal for these patients is early mobilization and prevention of morbidity and mortality. The use of preoperative, regional anesthesia has aided in this effort. The purpose of this review article is to examine the various treatment modalities for hip fractures in the elderly and discuss the most recent evidence in the face of a rapidly aging population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua C Rozell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark Hasenauer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Derek J Donegan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark Neuman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Parras T, Blanco R. Randomised trial comparing the transversus abdominis plane block posterior approach or quadratus lumborum block type I with femoral block for postoperative analgesia in femoral neck fracture, both ultrasound-guided. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2016; 63:141-148. [PMID: 26302669 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2015.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2014] [Revised: 06/14/2015] [Accepted: 06/16/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A double-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted to compare the analgesic effect of the transversus abdominis plane block posterior approach or the quadratus lumborum block I versus femoral block, both ultrasound-guided. MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospective study with parallel groups with 104 patients with neck of femur fracture undergoing hemiarthroplasty (although 7 participants did not finish the study). The inclusion criteria were patients older than 65 years old, ASA I-III status, who required and gave their consent for hemiarthroplasty. The exclusion criteria were patients with known allergy to local anaesthetics, mental disability, peripheral neuropathy, a coagulopathy disorder, and those patients who received morphine, or a block was performed previous to the surgery. Each patient received one block followed by a spinal anaesthetic technique, performed by the anaesthetist. Pain was measured using a visual analogue score, sensory blockade using cold spray, and motor blockade, evaluating the leg movement. These were compared on arrival in recovery and at 6, 12, 18, and 24h later. Total opioid amount administered in 24 hours, duration of stay in post-anaesthesia care unit, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects were also recorded. RESULTS A lower visual analogue score was observed in the quadratus lumborum block group at 6, 12, 18 and 24h (3.7, 1.4, 0.8, 0.7 versus 5.2, 4.6, 3.4, 2.6 in the femoral group, P<.01). Opioid use in 24h was lower in this group (9.7 versus 16.9mg in the femoral group, P<.01). The sensory and motor blockade, satisfaction, and adverse effects, were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Quadratus lumborum block is an effective analgesic option to be used in patients with neck of femur fracture. More clinical trials are required to validate this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Parras
- St George's Hospital, NHS Trust Foundation, Londres, Reino Unido.
| | - R Blanco
- Corniche Hospital, Abu Dabi, Emiratos Árabes
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
This paper is the thirty-seventh consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2014 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (endogenous opioids and receptors), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (pain and analgesia); stress and social status (human studies); tolerance and dependence (opioid mediation of other analgesic responses); learning and memory (stress and social status); eating and drinking (stress-induced analgesia); alcohol and drugs of abuse (emotional responses in opioid-mediated behaviors); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (opioid involvement in stress response regulation); mental illness and mood (tolerance and dependence); seizures and neurologic disorders (learning and memory); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (opiates and conditioned place preferences (CPP)); general activity and locomotion (eating and drinking); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (alcohol and drugs of abuse); cardiovascular responses (opiates and ethanol); respiration and thermoregulation (opiates and THC); and immunological responses (opiates and stimulants). This paper is the thirty-seventh consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2014 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (endogenous opioids and receptors), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (pain and analgesia); stress and social status (human studies); tolerance and dependence (opioid mediation of other analgesic responses); learning and memory (stress and social status); eating and drinking (stress-induced analgesia); alcohol and drugs of abuse (emotional responses in opioid-mediated behaviors); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (opioid involvement in stress response regulation); mental illness and mood (tolerance and dependence); seizures and neurologic disorders (learning and memory); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (opiates and conditioned place preferences (CPP)); general activity and locomotion (eating and drinking); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (alcohol and drugs of abuse); cardiovascular responses (opiates and ethanol); respiration and thermoregulation (opiates and THC); and immunological responses (opiates and stimulants).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bodnar
- Department of Psychology and Neuropsychology Doctoral Sub-Program, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Impact of preoperative continuous femoral blockades on morphine consumption and morphine side effects in hip-fracture patients: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2015; 35:37-43. [PMID: 26563608 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2014] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upon arrival at the emergency department, hip-fracture pain relief is usually carried out via systemic opioids. Continuous nerve blocks are efficient in the postoperative period, but have not been evaluated preoperatively. This study compared the reduction in morphine consumption and related side effects of a continuous femoral block with a single shot block in hip-fracture patients. METHODS Hip-fracture patients admitted to the emergency department received a femoral nerve catheter, with a single lidocaine injection. They were then randomized to ropivacaine (group R) or saline continuous infusion (placebo, group P) in a double-blind manner. Morphine consumption and side effects were prospectively collected until the 24th postoperative hour. RESULTS Sixty patients were included and 55 analyzed. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding fracture types, delay before surgery (median [Q1-Q3]: 21.3 [14.5-29.4] versus 20.8 [15.7-36.2] hours for groups R and P, respectively; P=0.87) and catheter duration (47.5 [39.8-52.4] versus 42.5 [32.1-50.5] hours, P=0.29). Total morphine consumption was not significantly decreased in group R (5 [0-14] versus 8 [4.5-11] mg, P=0.3) and pain scores were similar (mean±SD; VAS 29±15/100 versus 33±13, P=0.3). We observed a significant reduction in morphine adverse effects (31% versus 69% for groups R and P, respectively; P<0.01), mainly nausea (31% versus 59%, P=0.03). One morphine side effect could be avoided for every 5 patients treated. CONCLUSION Preoperative continuous femoral blockades using ropivacaine reduce morphine side effects (mainly nausea) in hip-fracture patients without reducing morphine consumption.
Collapse
|
42
|
Tosounidis TH, Sheikh H, Stone MH, Giannoudis PV. Pain relief management following proximal femoral fractures: Options, issues and controversies. Injury 2015; 46 Suppl 5:S52-8. [PMID: 26323378 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The majority of proximal femoral fractures occur in the elderly population. Safe and adequate pain relief is an integral part of the overall management of hip fractures. Inherent difficulties in the assessment of pain in elderly need to be taken into account and unique considerations should be made regarding the effective analgesia due to different elderly physiology, and their response to trauma and subsequent surgery. The pain management should start as soon as possible and special emphasis should be paid to contemporary methods of regional anaesthesia whilst a multimodal approach should be adopted in the perioperative period. The present review summarises the contemporary treatment options and controversies pertaining to the management of pain in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros H Tosounidis
- Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Leeds, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Floor A, Great George Street, LS1 3EX Leeds, UK; NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, LS7 4SA Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
| | - Hassaan Sheikh
- Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Leeds, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Floor A, Great George Street, LS1 3EX Leeds, UK
| | - Martin H Stone
- Hip Reconstruction Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS7 4SA, UK; NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, LS7 4SA Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Peter V Giannoudis
- Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Leeds, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Floor A, Great George Street, LS1 3EX Leeds, UK; NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, LS7 4SA Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gadsden J, Warlick A. Regional anesthesia for the trauma patient: improving patient outcomes. Local Reg Anesth 2015; 8:45-55. [PMID: 26316813 PMCID: PMC4540140 DOI: 10.2147/lra.s55322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Trauma is a significant health problem and a leading cause of death in all age groups. Pain related to trauma is frequently severe, but is often undertreated in the trauma population. Opioids are widely used to treat pain in injured patients but have a broad range of undesirable effects in a multitrauma patient such as neurologic and respiratory impairment and delirium. In contrast, regional analgesia confers excellent site-specific pain relief that is free from major side effects, reduces opioid requirement in trauma patients, and is safe and easy to perform. Specific populations that have shown benefits (including morbidity and mortality advantages) with regional analgesic techniques include those with fractured ribs, femur and hip fractures, and patients undergoing digital replantation. Acute compartment syndrome is a potentially devastating sequela of soft-tissue injury that complicates high-energy injuries such as proximal tibia fractures. The use of regional anesthesia in patients at risk for compartment syndrome is controversial; although the data is sparse, there is no evidence that peripheral nerve blocks delay the diagnosis, and these techniques may in fact facilitate the recognition of pathologic breakthrough pain. The benefits of regional analgesia are likely most influential when it is initiated as early as possible, and the performance of nerve blocks both in the emergency room and in the field has been shown to provide quality pain relief with an excellent safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff Gadsden
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alicia Warlick
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mears SC, Kates SL. A Guide to Improving the Care of Patients with Fragility Fractures, Edition 2. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2015; 6:58-120. [PMID: 26246957 DOI: 10.1177/2151458515572697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past 4 decades, much has been learned about the pathophysiology and treatment of osteoporosis, the prevention of fragility fractures, and the perioperative management of patients who have these debilitating injuries. However, the volume of published literature on this topic is staggering and far too voluminous for any clinician to review and synthesize by him or herself. This manuscript thoroughly summarizes the latest research on fragility fractures and provides the reader with valuable strategies to optimize the prevention and management of these devastating injuries. The information contained in this article will prove invaluable to any health care provider or health system administrator who is involved in the prevention and management of fragility hip fractures. As providers begin to gain a better understanding of the principles espoused in this article, it is our hope that they will be able to use this information to optimize the care they provide for elderly patients who are at risk of or who have osteoporotic fractures.
Collapse
|
45
|
Kumie FT, Gebremedhn EG, Tawuye HY. Efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment nerve block as part of multimodal analgesia after surgery for femoral bone fracture. World J Emerg Med 2015; 6:142-6. [PMID: 26056546 DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2014] [Accepted: 01/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fascia iliaca compartment nerve block (FICNB) has been an established technique for postoperative analgesia after surgery for femoral bone fracture. FICNB is technically easy, effective for postoperative pain control after operation for femoral bone fracture and decreases the complications induced by systemic analgesic drugs. The severity of postoperative pain is affected by genetics, cultural and social factors across the world. In this study we assessed the efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment nerve block when it is used as part of multimodal analgesia after surgery for femoral bone fracture. METHODS An institution-based case control study was conducted from September, 2013 to May, 2014. All patients who had been operated on under spinal anesthesia for femoral bone fracture were included. The patients divided into a FICNB group (n=20) and a control group (n=20). The FICNB group was given 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of the operation. Postoperative pain was assessed within the first 24 hours, i.e. at 15 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours using 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), total analgesic consumption, and the time for the first analgesic request. RESULTS VAS pain scores were reduced within the first 24 hours after operation in the FICNB group compared wtih the control group. VAS scores at 2 hours were taken as median values (IQR) 0.00 (0.00) vs.18.00 (30.00), P=0.001; at 6 hours 0.00 (0.00) vs. 34.00 (20.75), P=0.000; at 24 hours 12.50 (10.00) vs. 31.50 (20.75), P=0.004; and at 12 hours (17.80±12.45) vs. (29.95±12.40), P=0.004, respectively. The total analgesic consumption of diclofenac at 12 and 24 hours was reduced in the FICNB group, and the time for the first analgesic request was significantly prolonged (417.50 vs. 139.25 minutes, P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS A single injection for FICNB could lead to postoperative pain relief, reduction of total analgesic consumption and prolonged time for the first analgesic request in the FICNB group after surgery for femoral bone fracture. We recommend FICNB for analgesia after surgery for femoral bone fracture and for patients with femoral bone fracture at the emergency department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fentahun Tarekegn Kumie
- Department of Anaesthesia, School of Medicine, Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Endale Gebreegziabher Gebremedhn
- Department of Anaesthesia, School of Medicine, Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Hailu Yimer Tawuye
- Department of Anaesthesia, School of Medicine, Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block for positioning patients with hip fractures for central nervous blockade: a randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2015; 39:394-8. [PMID: 25068412 DOI: 10.1097/aap.0000000000000133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Appropriate pain management may positively affect outcome following hip fractures. Positioning patients for spinal anesthesia (SA) can be extremely painful. Peripheral nerve blockades are gaining popularity in this setting. This prospective, randomized study compares the efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) to intravenous (IV) fentanyl for positioning hip fracture patients for SA. METHODS Forty-one patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery were randomized to receive a bolus dose of IV fentanyl (IVFE) 1.5 μg/kg (IVFE group) or an FICB using 40 mL ropivacaine 0.5% (FICB group) 5 or 20 minutes before positioning for SA, respectively. Numeric rating pain scale scores before and following the analgesic intervention, time needed and quality of patient position for SA performance, postoperative analgesia in terms of time to first IV morphine dose demand and morphine consumption during the first 24 hours, and patient satisfaction were documented. RESULTS Compared with the IVFE group, the FICB group showed significantly lower numeric rating pain scale scores in all instances following the analgesic intervention (P < 0.001), shorter spinal performance time (P = 0.001), and better quality of position (P = 0.001). Postoperative morphine consumption was lower (P = 0.026), the time to first dose demand was longer (P = 0.001), and patient satisfaction rates were higher (P < 0.001) in the FICB group. CONCLUSIONS Performing an FICB before positioning for SA provides superior pain management compared with IVFE administration, facilitates spinal performance, and yields satisfactory postoperative analgesia and wide patient acceptance, hence improving overall quality and efficiency of care.
Collapse
|
47
|
Virtual Cadaver Laboratory—Anatomy Pearls in Regional Anesthesia to Improve Clinical Success. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1097/asa.0000000000000026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
48
|
Abstract
Regional anesthesia plays a key role in the treatment of patients with orthopedic trauma. Trauma-induced pain can be in multiple locations, severe, and can predispose the patient to other morbidities. Additional complications as a result of the overdependence on opioids as a primary pain therapy that can be minimized or avoided with the use of regional anesthesia. Both neuraxial and peripheral regional techniques in patients with orthopedic trauma should be incorporated into the patient care plan and recognized as an essential therapeutic intervention in the overall treatment of this unique patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Clark
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 530 S Jackson Street, C2A01, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
| | - Marjorie Robinson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 530 S Jackson Street, C2A01, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Marina Varbanova
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, 530 S Jackson Street, C2A01, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Reavley P, Montgomery AA, Smith JE, Binks S, Edwards J, Elder G, Benger J. Randomised trial of the fascia iliaca block versus the ‘3-in-1’ block for femoral neck fractures in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2014; 32:685-9. [DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2013] [Accepted: 11/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
50
|
Newman B. Pre-operative femoral nerve block vs fascia iliaca block for femoral neck fracture - a reply. Anaesthesia 2013; 69:86-7. [PMID: 24320865 DOI: 10.1111/anae.12551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B Newman
- Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Poole, UK.
| |
Collapse
|