Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a viable option for localized osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular osteonecrosis with several advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). UKA implants may feature a tibial component either all-polyethylene (AP) or metal-backed (MB). This study aims to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes and survivorship of 74 UKAs over 16 years, focusing on comparing the results and survivorship of MB versus AP tibial tray.

This retrospective study assesses 74 patients who underwent medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using ACCURIS Uni Knee System (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) implants between January 2003 and December 2008. Patients were divided in two groups: all-polyethylene (AP) tibial implants and metal-backed (MB) tibial components. The two groups were compared at final follow-up regarding survivorship, revision rates and clinical outcomes using the WOMAC score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12).

Between January 2003 and December 2008, 74 medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were implanted in 74 patients. Clinical outcomes were assessed with a mean follow-up of 214.4 months. The implant survivorship was 97.3% for the MB-UKAs and 94.6% for the AP-UKAs (p = 0.55). The average OKS in the MB-UKAs was 42, while in the AP-UKAs 41.6 (p = 0.53), with a total of 64.9% of patients exhibiting excellent outcomes (OKS > 41) and 35.1% showing good outcomes (OKS: 34-41). The average FJS-12 at final follow-up was 81.5 for the MB-UKAs and 82.3 for the AP-UKAs (p = 0.34). The average WOMAC score was 20. 9 for the MB-UKAs and 22.4 for the AP-UKAs (p = 0.55). No statistically significant differences were found between AP-UKAs and MB-UKAs in terms of patient demographics, surgical indications, or clinical outcomes.

This research demonstrated outstanding implant durability and favorable outcomes during extended follow-up periods for both cohorts undergoing medial UKA utilizing the original fixed bearing Cartier design. The results regarding both survivorship and PROMs were equivalent the AP group and the MB group.

Background and Objectives: The ten-year survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is up to 96%, varying from implants and hospitals; however, most of registry studies do not distinguish between metal-back (MB) tibial implants and all-polyethylene (AP) tibial implants. The aim of the present retrospective clinical study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and survivorship of medial and lateral UKA with a newly designed all-polyethylene tibial plateau at short-term follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected consecutive patients who underwent medial or lateral UKA with AP tibial plateau was conducted, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Primary outcomes were clinical score (VAS, OKS, and KOOS) variations from baseline up to the latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes were Likert scale variations from baseline to the follow-up, evaluation of the influence of demographic factors (age and BMI) at the time of surgery on the clinical outcomes, and evaluation of revision rate up to the last follow-up. Results: The final study population included 99 knees. The mean VAS score for the medial group significantly decreased from 7.61 ± 1.65 (pre-intervention) to 2.74 ± 2.26 (post-intervention). Similar improvements were registered for the OKS as well, for both the medial group (from 22.5 ± 12.6 to 36.6 ± 10.6, with a delta of 14.11 (10.05 to 18.17)) and the lateral group (from 22.6 ± 12.6 to 36.9 ± 11.8, with a delta of 14.24 (8.65 to 19.83)). Moreover, all the KOOS subscales reported an amelioration, both in medial UKA and lateral UKA. Furthermore, a logistic regression of delta VAS was performed in relation to the other clinical questionnaires and the demographic factors. For both medial and lateral UKAs, no statistically significant correlation was found between the VAS scale regression and the demographic factors. The survival rate free from any revision of the cohort at the latest follow-up was 96.32%. Conclusions: All-polyethylene tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty demonstrates significant improvements in clinical scores and a low failure rate at short-term follow-up.

This retrospective medium-term follow-up study compares the outcomes of medial fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) using a cemented metal-backed (MB) or an all-polyethylene (AP) tibial component.

The database of our institution was mined for primary mUKA patients implanted with an MB or an AP tibial component (the MB-UKA and AP-UKA groups, respectively) from 2015 to 2018. We compared patient demographics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and motion analysis data obtained with the Riablo™ system (CoRehab, Trento, Italy). We conducted propensity-score-matching (PSM) analysis (1:1) using multiple variables.

PSM analysis yielded 77 pairs of MB-UKA and AP-UKA patients. At 5 years, the physical component summary (PCS) score was 52.4 ± 8.3 in MB-UKA and 48.2 ± 8.3 in AP-UKA patients (p < 0.001). The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) was 82.9 ± 18.8 in MB-UKAs and 73.4 ± 22.5 in AP-UKAs (p = 0.015). Tibial pain was reported by 7.8% of the MB-UKA and 35.1% of the AP-UKA patients (p < 0.001). Static postural sway was, respectively, 3.9 ± 2.1 cm and 5.4 ± 2.3 (p = 0.0002), and gait symmetry was, respectively, 92.7% ± 3.7 cm and 90.4% ± 5.4 cm (p = 0.006). Patient satisfaction was 9.2 ± 0.8 in the MB-UKA and 8.3 ± 2.0 in the AP-UKA group (p < 0.003).

MB-UKA patients experienced significantly better 5-year static sway and gait symmetry outcomes than AP-UKA patients. Although the PROMs of the two groups overlapped, MB-UKA patients had a lower incidence of tibial pain, better FJS-12 and PCS scores, and were more satisfied.

Although metal-backed tibial component (MB) is biomechanically superior to all-polyethylene (AP) implants in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), recent studies have shown comparable functional outcomes between the two. However, no study has examined this comparison in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²). We investigated whether functional outcomes between the two implants differ among obese patients, and whether the extent of obesity influences these outcomes.

Four hundred twenty-two UKA implants from 347 obese patients were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were assessed using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Function Score (KSFS), the original Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) attainment was recorded. Patients' fulfillment of expectations and satisfaction with the surgery outcome was also graded. Patients were further divided into lower obesity (BMI 30-34.9 kg/m²) and higher obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²) to examine effect modification.

There were no differences in functional outcomes and quality-of-life scores, MCID attainment of functional scores, as well as satisfaction and expectation fulfillment between AP and MB. Among higher obesity patients, AP was associated with a poorer KSKS (p = 0.031) and lower proportion of satisfaction fulfillment (p = 0.041) 2 years postoperatively compared to MB.

We found no differences in functional and quality-of-life outcomes between fixed-bearing AP and MB tibial components among obese patients who underwent UKA. However, among higher obesity patients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²), patients with AP tibial component were associated with lower KSKS score and a lower proportion of attaining satisfaction fulfillment 2 years postoperatively.

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a viable solution for isolated lateral compartment arthritis. Several prosthetic designs are available such as fixed-bearing metal-backed (FB M-B), fixed-bearing all-polyethylene (FB A-P), and mobile-bearing metal-backed (MB M-B) implants. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare failure rates of different prosthetic designs.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review was conducted using 4 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed) to identify all studies that investigate outcomes of lateral UKA. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, and failure rates were compared by implant type and follow-up time separately in order to assess potential confounding factors. Two separate analyses have been performed among different implant designs (FB M-B vs FB A-P vs MB M-B) and different follow-ups (<5 years, between 5 and 10 years, >10 years).

The failure rate of FB M-B lateral UKA was significantly lower compared to other lateral UKA designs present in the market (0.8% vs 8.6% and 7.1% for FB M-B, FB A-P, and MB M-B, respectively). No significative difference among groups has been detected when comparing all implants with regard to follow-up time.

Considering actual evidence, for a surgeon approaching lateral UKA, the FB M-B design is preferable, given the lower failure rates and subsequently a longer implant survivorship.

(I) To determine the incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and (II) to summarize the existing evidence on characteristics and risk factors of periprosthetic fractures in UKA.

Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase databases were comprehensively searched. Any clinical, laboratory or case report study describing information on proportion, characteristics or risk factors of periprosthetic tibial fractures in UKA was included. Proportion meta-analysis was performed to estimate the incidence of fractures only using data from clinical studies. Information on characteristics and risk factors was evaluated and summarized.

A total of 81 studies were considered to be eligible for inclusion. Based on 41 clinical studies, incidences of fractures were 1.24% (95%CI 0.64-2.41) for cementless and 1.58% (95%CI 1.06-2.36) for cemented UKAs (9451 UKAs). The majority of fractures in the current literature occurred during surgery or presented within 3 months postoperatively (91 of 127; 72%) and were non-traumatic (95 of 113; 84%). Six different fracture types were observed in 21 available radiographs. Laboratory studies revealed that an excessive interference fit (press fit), excessive tibial bone resection, a sagittal cut too deep posteriorly and low bone mineral density (BMD) reduce the force required for a periprosthetic tibial fracture to occur. Clinical studies showed that periprosthetic tibial fractures were associated with increased body mass index and postoperative alignment angles, advanced age, decreased BMD, female gender, and a very overhanging medial tibial condyle.

Comparable low incidences of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented UKA can be achieved. However, surgeons should be aware that an excessive interference fit in cementless UKAs in combination with an impaction technique may introduce an additional risk, and could therefore be less forgiving to surgical errors and patients who are at higher risk of periprosthetic tibial fractures.

V.

The present study's primary aim was to determine the survivorship of a large cohort of patients implanted with a single design all-polyethylene tibial component medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Its secondary purpose was to investigate the reasons underlying implant failure, with specific attention to component positioning and limb alignment. Between 2007 and 2013, 166 patients underwent medial UKA with a single design all-polyethylene tibial component at two centers. Preoperatively and postoperatively, patients were administered clinical outcome scores and radiographic information were collected. Postoperative complications and causes of revision were recorded. A total of 140 patients (80 in Center A and 60 in Center B) who underwent all-polyethylene tibial component medial UKA (82 cases in Center A and 60 in Center B) were taken into account. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship of implants was 96.5% (confidence interval [CI]: 91.7-98.6%) at an average follow-up of 61.1 months. Tibial aseptic loosening was accounted for failure in one case, while no correlation was found between implant positioning and failure. Two revisions were performed in Center A and three in Center B. Slight correction of the preoperative varus deformity was performed at both centers. All-polyethylene tibial component UKA provided satisfactory clinical and functional outcome, with excellent survival rate in the early and mid-term follow-up. Continued patient follow-up is needed to determine long-term survivorship of the examined UKA model.

The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes, quality of life and survivorship at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively, between MB and AP tibial components in fixed-bearing UKAs.

A retrospective cohort study of 146 Query ID="Q3" Text="Author names: Please confirm if the author names are presented accurately and in the correct sequence (Lo Ngai Nung, Yeo Seng Jin). Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct." UKAs performed between 2004 and 2007 by a single fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon was carried out. 27 UKAs received MB tibial components and 119 UKAs received AP tibial components. The cohort was followed up prospectively for 10 years. Functional outcomes were compared using the Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS), Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Quality of life measures were obtained from the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), derived from the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:3 ratio of MB versus AP tibial components to account for possible confounding variables. Thereafter, outcomes between the two groups were compared. The proportion of patients who had attained the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the abovementioned scores was recorded as well.

After propensity score matching, there were 28 UKAs with MB tibial components and 76 UKAs with AP tibial components. There was no significant difference between the two groups in functional outcomes (KSFS, KSKS and OKS), quality of life (PCS and MCS) and survivorship (92.3% vs 91.1%, respectively) at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively. However, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the group with AP tibial components attained the MCID for PCS at 10 years postoperatively, compared to those with MB tibial components (p = 0.031).

In conclusion, there were no significant differences in functional outcomes measures, quality of life and survivorship between MP and AP tibial components at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively.

III.

During the last 5 years, there has been an increase in the use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to treat knee osteoarthritis in Australia, and these account for almost 6% of annual knee replacement procedures. However, there is debate as to whether a fixed bearing or a mobile bearing design is best for decreasing revision for loosening and disease progression as well as improving survivorship. Small sample sizes and possible confounding in the studies on the topic may have masked differences between fixed and mobile bearing designs.

Using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), we selected the four contemporary designs of medial compartment UKA: mobile bearing, fixed modular, all-polyethylene, and fixed molded metal-backed used for the treatment of osteoarthritis to ask: (1) How do the different designs of unicompartmental knees compare with survivorship as measured by cumulative percentage revision (CPR)? (2) Is there a difference in the revision rate between designs as a function of patient sex or age? (3) Do the reasons for revision differ, and what types of revision procedures are performed when these UKA are revised?

The AOANJRR longitudinally maintains data on all primary and revision joint arthroplasties, with nearly 100% capture. The study population included all UKA procedures undertaken for osteoarthritis between September 1999 and December 2018. Of 56,628 unicompartmental knees recorded during the study period, 50,380 medial UKA procedures undertaken for osteoarthritis were included in the analysis after exclusion of procedures with unknown bearing types (31 of 56,628), lateral or patellofemoral compartment UKA procedures (5657 of 56,628), and those performed for a primary diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (560 of 56,628). There were 50,380 UKA procedures available for analysis. The study group consisted of 40% (20,208 of 50,380) mobile bearing UKA, 35% (17,822 of 50,380) fixed modular UKA, 23% (11,461 of 50,380) all-polyethylene UKA, and 2% (889 of 50,380) fixed molded metal-backed UKA. There were similar sex proportions and age distributions for each bearing group. The overall mean age of patients was 65 ± 9.4 years, and 55% (27,496 of 50,380) of patients were males. The outcome measure was the CPR, which was defined using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship to describe the time to the first revision. Hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for sex and age, were performed to compare the revision rates among groups. The cohort was stratified into age groups of younger than 65 years and 65 years and older to compare revision rates as a function of age. Differences among bearing groups for the major causes and modes of revision were assessed using hazard ratios.

At 15 years, fixed modular UKA had a CPR of 16% (95% CI 15% to 17%). In comparison, the CPR was 23% (95% CI 22% to 24%) for mobile bearing UKA, 26% (95% CI 24% to 27%) for all-polyethylene UKA, and 20% (95% CI 16% to 24%) for fixed molded metal-backed UKA. The lower revision rate for fixed modular UKA was seen through the entire period compared with mobile bearing UKA (hazard ratio 1.5 [95% CI 1.4 to 1.6]; p < 0.001) and fixed molded metal-backed UKA (HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1 to 1.6]; p = 0.003), but it varied with time compared with all-polyethylene UKA. The findings were consistent when stratified by sex or age. Although all-polyethylene UKA had the highest revision rate overall and for patients younger than 65 years, for patients aged 65 years and older, there was no difference between all-polyethylene and mobile bearing UKA. When compared with fixed modular UKA, a higher revision risk for loosening was shown in both mobile bearing UKA (HR 1.7 [95% CI 1.5 to 1.9]; p < 0.001) and all-polyethylene UKA (HR 2.4 [95% CI 2.1 to 2.7]; p < 0.001). The revision risk for disease progression was higher for all-polyethylene UKA at all time points (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.3 to 1.6]; p < 0.001) and for mobile bearing UKA after 8 years when each were compared with fixed modular UKA (8 to 12 years: HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2 to 1.7]; p < 0.001; 12 or more years: HR 1.9 [95% CI 1.5 to 2.3]; p < 0.001). The risk of revision to TKA was higher for mobile bearing UKA compared with fixed modular UKA (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.3 to 1.5]; p < 0.001).

If UKA is to be considered for the treatment of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis, the fixed modular UKA bearing has the best survivorship of the current UKA designs.

Level III, therapeutic study.

While considered a satisfactory solution, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) still raises concerns in regard to its durability. These concerns particularly focus on the tibial component. This study aims to compare two different cemented tibial components belonging to the same UKA design: all polyethylene (AP) versus metal backed (MB), at a long-term follow-up.

We retrospectively reviewed 143 successive patients, 83 of which underwent surgery with AP tibial component UKA (37 males, 46 females), and 67 with MB ones (17 males, 50 females). All implants had the same prosthetic design (Accuris UKA, Smith e Nephew) with identical femoral oxinium component but different tibial component, AP or MB. The KSS and KOOS were assessed at a mean of 11.5-year follow-up and compared to pre-operative, post-operative, and one year evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Mac (version 17.0). To assess potential statistically significant differences, t test was used and significance was set at P < 0.05.

Final KSS at a mean of 11.5-year follow-up was 94.27 for the AP group and 96.12 for the MB ones. The final KOOS was 87 for AP components and 89.67 for the MB group. These results demonstrated, in all cases, statistically significant better results for MB tibial components compared to AP regarding KSS (P = 0.048), KOOS (P = 0.000), and pain (P = 0.014) at the 11.5-year follow-up. Survivorship for AP tibial component implants was 97.6%, while it was 89.5% for MB ones.

While the survivorship rate has been found to be greater for AP implants compared to MB tibial components, this study reveals statistically better functional results according to KSS and KOOS, and pain, at a long-term follow-up for MB implants.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) accounts for 8.9% of knee arthroplasty procedures in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Fixed bearing UKA designs have shown favourable survivorship in registries when compared with mobile bearings but some studies suggest poor survival of all-polyethylene fixed tibial bearings. This study analyses long-term follow-up of patients with a medial fixed all-polyethylene tibial bearing UKA and reports survivorship and 10-year clinical outcomes.

Data was collected prospectively for 214 medial unicompartmental all-polyethylene tibial bearing UKAs implanted in 184 patients at our tertiary referral centre between November 2002 and December 2007. The indication was osteoarthritis in all but one patient. Patient reported outcome scores were documented pre-operatively and at five, eight, 10 and 12 years of follow-up. The mean patient age was 70 years (range 41-87).

Outcome and survivorship data were collected for 214 medial all-polyethylene tibial bearing UKAs. There were outcomes recorded for 83 UKAs with at least 10-year follow-up. Twenty-four patients underwent revision of their UKA at an average of 5.84 years after the primary procedure. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated survivorship of 89.1% at 10 years and the OKS, AKSS and WOMAC patient reported outcomes remained significantly improved in comparison to preoperatively. For those 70 years or older, 10-year survivorship was 92.4%, compared to 85.0% for those under 70 years old.

Medial fixed all-polyethylene tibial bearing UKA demonstrates acceptable long-term survivorship and patient outcomes. It appears to be a suitable option for the treatment of medial compartment OA, particularly in older patients.

An age younger than 60 years, a body weight of 180 lb (82 kg) or more, performing heavy work, having chondrocalcinosis and having exposed bone in the patellofemoral (PF) joint are not contraindications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).Severe wear of the lateral facet of the PF joint with bone loss and grooving is a contraindication for UKA.Medial UKA should only be performed in cases of severe osteoarthritis (OA) as shown in pre-operative X-rays, with medial bone-on-bone contact and a medial/lateral ratio of < 20%.The post-operative results of UKA are generally good. Medium-term and long-term studies have reported acceptable results at 10 years, with implant survival greater than 95% for UKAs performed for medial OA or osteonecrosis and for lateral UKA, especially when fixed-bearing implants are used.When all implant-related re-operations are considered, the 10-year survival rate is 94%, and the 15-year survival rate is 91%.Aseptic loosening is the principal failure mechanism in the first few years in mobile-bearing implants, whereas OA progression causes most failures in later years in fixed-bearing implants.The overall complication rate and the comprehensive re-operation rate are comparable in both mobile bearings and fixed bearings.The survival likelihood of the all-polyethylene UKA implant is similar to that of metal-backed modular designs for UKA.Notable cost savings of approximately 50% can be achieved with an outpatient UKA surgery protocol. Outpatient surgery for UKA is efficacious and safe, with satisfactory clinical results thus far. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:363-373. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170048.

Biomechanical studies have suggested that proximal tibial strain is elevated in UKAs incorporating all-polyethylene tibial components with concern that this leads to premature failure. This study reports minimum 10-year outcomes for a UKA incorporating an all-polyethylene tibial component to determine whether these concerns were realised.

109 fixed bearing UKAs (97 patients, mean age 68 (range 48-87), 54/97 (56%) female) with all-polyethylene tibial components were followed up for ≥ 10 years with Oxford Knee Scores, Forgotten Joint Scores and Kaplan-Meier analysis. 106/109 implants were 7 mm, 3 were 9.5 mm.

Ten-year survival was 85.5% (78.6-92.4 95% CI) with the end-point failure for any reason. Unexplained pain was the commonest mode of failure (6/17) followed by lateral compartment osteoarthritis (5/17) and tibial subsidence/loosening (4/17). Revision rate was highest at 2-5 years due to revisions for unexplained pain. Ten-year survival was worse in patients < 65 years old (p = 0.035), in those with BMI > 30 (p = 0.017) and in those with postoperative increases in medial tibial sclerosis (p < 0.001 log-rank). Implant malalignment was not significantly associated with failure. Radioisotope bone scans in 16 patients all remained "hot" at mean 6.1 years (range 2.1-11.5). Relative risk of failure in patients < 65 years was 2.9 (1.2-7.0 95% CI) and when BMI > 30 was 2.9 (1.2-6.9 95% CI). In those with intact UKAs at 10 years, mean Oxford Knee Score was 34.8 ± 10.7, Forgotten Joint Score was 37.9 ± 26.7 and 96% were satisfied with their knee.

The high rate of early failure between 2 and 5 years in this all-polyethylene tibial component UKA did not persist in the long term. Though medial proximal tibial metabolic changes appear to persist they are not necessarily symptomatic. BMI > 30 and age < 65 years were significant risk factors for revision.