1
|
Steiner Q, Zacharias A, Chumanov E, Baer GS, Walczak BE. Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic With Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Comparative Study Examining Changes in Health Care Access, Delivery, and Functional Outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med 2024; 12:23259671241280982. [PMID: 39450197 PMCID: PMC11500221 DOI: 10.1177/23259671241280982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Structured rehabilitation optimizes outcomes and reduces reinjury risk after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic interrupted standard rehabilitation, possibly affecting ACLR outcomes. Purpose To characterize changes to ACLR functional outcomes related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Patients who underwent ACLR between June 11, 2019, and March 11, 2020, (postpandemic group) were compared retrospectively with those who underwent ACLR the year before (June 11, 2018, to March 11, 2019). A mixed-effects linear regression model was used to estimate group differences in isokinetic quadriceps testing. A Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed the probability of achieving >90% limb symmetry index (LSI) for isokinetic quadriceps strength at 60 deg/s and passing all return-to-sport functional outcomes at 1 year postoperatively. Results A total of 176 patients (80 in the control group and 96 in the postpandemic group) were included. The rate of achieving >90% LSI in isokinetic strength at 60 deg/s at 1 year postoperatively was 39% (95% CI, 27%-49%) for the control group versus 22% (95% CI, 13%-30%) for the postpandemic group (P = .01). Similarly, the rate of achieving >90% LSI in all functional tests at 1 year postoperatively was 15% (95% CI, 7%-22%) for the control group versus 7% (95% CI, 2%-12%) for the postpandemic group (P = .04). The number of in-person physical therapy visits per patient was 25.8 ± 6.8 in the control group versus 24.4 ± 7.5 in the postpandemic group (P = .23). Only the postpandemic group accessed physical therapy using remote telemedicine. Each additional telehealth rehabilitation visit was associated with a 1-week delay in achieving >90% LSI in isokinetic quadriceps strength for the postpandemic group. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a decrease in lower extremity strength and a lower probability of achieving limb symmetry and passing the criteria for return to sport at 1 year postoperatively. These results were not due to lack of access to physical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quinn Steiner
- Departments of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Chumanov
- University of Wisconsin Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Geoffrey S. Baer
- Departments of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Brian E. Walczak
- Castle Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rush Copley Medical Center, Rush University, Aurora, Illinois, USA
- Advancing Translational Orthopedics and Medical Sciences (ATOMS) Laboratory, Department of Orthopedics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Foissey C, Pineda T, Servien E, Fontalis A, Batailler C, Lustig S. Adapting hip arthroplasty practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing the impact of outpatient care sudden increase on early complications and clinical outcomes. SICOT J 2024; 10:1. [PMID: 38193980 PMCID: PMC10775906 DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2023037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected access to timely care for patients with hip osteoarthritis requiring total hip replacement (THR). This study aimed to assess the changes in surgical activity, outpatient treatment, length of stay (LOS), discharge destinations, readmission rates, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction before and after the pandemic at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study encompassed patients undergoing primary THR through the direct anterior approach at a single university hospital. Data on demographic characteristics, surgical technique, perioperative management, LOS, discharge destinations, complications, and clinical outcomes were collected. Furthermore, a comparative analysis between the pre-pandemic (2019) and post-pandemic (2022) periods was conducted. RESULTS There was a 14% increase in surgical activity post-pandemic, with 214 patients undergoing surgery in 2019 versus 284 in 2022. The percentage of patients managed as outpatients significantly increased from 0.5% in 2019 to 29.6% in 2022 (p < 0.001). LOS decreased from 2.7 ± 1 [0-8] days to 1.4 ± 1.1 [0-12] days (p < 0.001), and the rate of discharge to rehabilitation centres declined from 21.5% to 8.8% (p < 0.001). No significant increase in the readmission rates was observed (1.4% in both periods). At two months postoperatively, the mean HHS and satisfaction rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 1 and p = 0.73, respectively). DISCUSSION Despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical activity at our institution demonstrated an increase compared to the pre-pandemic levels by expanding outpatient care, reducing LOS, and increasing rates of home discharges. Importantly, these changes did not adversely affect rehospitalization rates or early clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constant Foissey
- Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital Lyon France
| | - Tomas Pineda
- Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital Lyon France
| | - Elvire Servien
- Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital Lyon France
- LIBM – EA 7424, Interuniversity Laboratory of Biology of Mobility Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University Lyon France
| | - Andreas Fontalis
- Univ Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406 69622 Lyon France
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 235 Euston Rd. London NW1 2BU UK
| | - Cécile Batailler
- Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital Lyon France
| | - Sébastien Lustig
- Orthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital Lyon France
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sajjadi NB, Anderson JM, Hughes GK, Abraham CE, Malik J, Hartwell M, Vassar M. Delayed discovery: the COVID-19 pandemic's influence on osteoarthritis clinical trials. J Osteopath Med 2024; 124:5-11. [PMID: 37580988 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted clinical research in many medical and surgical fields, resulting in research waste and loss of treatment for patients. Although other areas have been explored, the extent of the pandemic's influence on osteoarthritis (OA) trials is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES This study aims to explore the reasons for termination of clinical trials investigating OA during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for OA trials and characterized their reason for discontinuation, noting where trialists directly cited the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for trial discontinuation. We also coded other common reasons for trial discontinuation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to determine the difference in enrollment, funding source, trial phase, allocation, and intervention type between the trials terminated early due to pandemic and nonpandemic reasons. RESULTS Out of 135 clinical trials, 119 were included and 27 (22.7 %) of them reported the COVID-19 pandemic as a primary reason for discontinuation, which was the overall most common reason for OA trial discontinuation during the study period. We found statistically significant differences for trials discontinued due to pandemic vs. non-pandemic-related reasons, with trials having sites outside the United States, randomized allocation, and drug or device intervention type being most affected. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding trial phase, funding source, or enrollment. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical trials related to OA. We found that many trials reported discontinuation directly due to the pandemic, which may lead to the loss or delay of novel treatments for OA. To avoid such discontinuation in the future, alternative methods for conducting OA-related clinical trials should be explored and implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas B Sajjadi
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Jon Michael Anderson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University Medical Center, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Griffin K Hughes
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Christena E Abraham
- Division of Research, Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Joplin, MO, USA
| | - Jamal Malik
- Division of Research, Liberty University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Lynchburg, VA, USA
| | - Micah Hartwell
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University College of Osteopathic Medicine at Cherokee Nation, Tahlequah, OK, USA
| | - Matt Vassar
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glinkowski WM. Telemedicine Orthopedic Consultations Duration and Timing in Outpatient Clinical Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2022; 29:778-787. [PMID: 36251954 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Orthopedic associations advocated telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic to prevent disease transmission without hindering providing services to orthopedic patients. The study aimed to evaluate outpatient orthopedic teleconsultations' timing, length, and organizational issues in the circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic based on consecutive orthopedic teleconsultations during the period of the first lockdown. Methods: Orthopedic telemedical consultations (OTCs) were provided from March 23, 2020, to June 1, 2020, and analyzed retrospectively based on mobile smartphone billing and electronic health record. Teleconsultations were based on the legal regulations of telemedicine services in Poland. Results: One thousand seventy-one patients (514 women and 557 men) with a mean age of 41.7 were teleconsulted. The length of the OTC averagely lasted 13.36 min (standard deviation 8.63). Consulted patients suffered from orthopedic disorders 65.3%, musculoskeletal injuries 26.3%, and other diseases 8.4%. Most OTCs were delayed (74.22%) concerning the planned schedule, with a median delay time of 12 min. Only 7.3% of teleconsultations were held precisely on time. Conclusions: Televisit length may not be dependent on gender, older age, or more diagnoses. The services like e-prescriptions, e-Referrals, e-Orders for orthotics, and e-Sick-leaves influence OTC length. Any extension of the patient's OTC may create a "snowball effect" of further delay for each subsequent OTC. Orthopedic teleconsultation requires new understanding and skills by both the patient and specialist physicians. Future research directions should concern the practical aspects of orthopedic teleconsultations, like legal, organizational, and technological issues and their implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech, M. Glinkowski
- Center of Excellence “TeleOrto” for Telediagnostics and Treatment of Disorders and Injuries of the Locomotor System, Department of Medical Informatics and Telemedicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Polish Telemedicine and eHealth Society, Warsaw, Poland
- Gabinet Lekarski, Warsaw, Poland
- Centrum Medyczne PZU Zdrowie, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vatsya P, Garika SS, Mittal S, Trikha V, Sharma V, Malhotra R. Lockdown imposition due to COVID-19 and its effect on orthopedic emergency department in level 1 trauma center in South Asia. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2022; 28:101826. [PMID: 35345869 PMCID: PMC8942879 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus pandemic brought the entire world to a standstill. One of the most stringent lockdowns in the world was implemented in India. With the entire healthcare system being stretched, emergency orthopaedic services also take a hit. We studied the trends in patient presentation, testing, management, and restructuring of doctors at a tertiary care orthopaedic centre and compared them with the data from the same time period the previous year (2019). METHOD Data was collected separately for all the 5 different phases of lockdown and unlock, as well as for the same duration of months in 2019, and was analysed for epidemiological trends. RESULTS A rapid fall in the total number of cases was seen during the lockdown, followed by a skewed rise during the unlock. Forearm, wrist, and hip fractures were the most common fractures. Once nucleic acid testing of all patients intended to be admitted was started, a steep rise in coronavirus positivity was seen. There was a reduction in the total number of cases compared to 2019, but it was not as significant as would have been expected due to the complete standstill of activity during the lockdown. CONCLUSION During a pandemic, with the healthcare system under a crisis of workforce and infrastructure, there needs to be a separate task force for catering to orthopaedic emergencies since all fractures cannot be managed conservatively and the numbers of trauma-related patients did not show a stark fall as compared to normal months of last year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3 Retrospective Case Series.
Collapse
|
6
|
Thevendran G, Glazebrook M, Eastwood D, Weber K, Kit DCS, Johari A, Rajasekaran S, Khanduja V. Rising within the leadership of an orthopaedic society: learning from the presidents. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2022; 46:443-447. [PMID: 34982195 PMCID: PMC8724003 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05295-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Orthopaedic societies, with their diverse membership from across the world, serve a mission to endorse the progress and innovation in the field of orthopaedics and traumatology with a focus on improving patient care, as well as to encourage and develop education, teaching and research. Such organizations, whether small or large, have been successful in meeting the professional, educational and training needs of its members. The past and future presidents of these societies share insights addressing their professional experiences, lessons learnt and their vision for future leaders of the field. The objective of this article is to summarize the thoughts of presidents of orthopaedic societies from around the globe and to inspire younger and aspiring members of the global orthopaedic fraternity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark Glazebrook
- Reconstructive Foot & Ankle Surgery and Orthopedic Sports Medicine Queen, Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, Halifax Infirmary (Room 4867), 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7 Canada
| | - Deborah Eastwood
- Great Ormond St Hospital for Children and the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kristy Weber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | - Ashok Johari
- Paediatric Orthopaedics, B.Nanavati Super Specialty Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma & Spine Surgery, Ganga Medical Centre & Hospitals (P) Limited, 313 Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India
| | - Vikas Khanduja
- Adenbrooke’s - Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rising to the challenge: Value based research for Orthopaedic ailments. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2022; 25:101769. [PMID: 35155123 PMCID: PMC8802836 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
|
8
|
Özşahin MK, Değer GU, Aydın N. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the first 100 days on orthopedic trauma surgery practice, the experience of a university hospital in Istanbul. ULUS TRAVMA ACIL CER 2022; 28:27-32. [PMID: 34967425 PMCID: PMC10443172 DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.23796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the rapid and effective change created by the COVID-19 pandemic in all medical practice, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the first 100 days of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operations performed in a reference university hospital in the field of orthopedics and traumatology. Compare the results with the same period of the previous year and aim to evaluate importance of restrictions. METHODS The operations performed in orthopedics and traumatology clinic between March 18, 2020 (the day we stopped the elective surgeries), and July 1, 2020 (when the normalization process began), were collected from the electronic archive to compare with the same period of 2019. RESULTS Comparing the same periods of the year, it was seen that 102 surgeries were performed in the 2020 COVID-19 period compared to 380 operations performed in 2019. Although most of the operations performed during the COVID-19 period were traumas, the comparison revealed that trauma cases decreased by 25% from 73 to 58 (p<0.001). Among trauma patients operated in the restraint period, decrease in the pediatric group and the increase in patients over 65 years of age had seen statistically significant. Compared to the same period of the previous year, 50% increase seen in amputation cases related to diabetic foot (p<0.001). CONCLUSION The postponement of elective cases due to the COVID-19 pandemic enabled us to manage trauma cases despite decreasing capacity utilization. In addition, it was observed that the transition of schools to online education and the implementation of curfews significantly reduced the number of trauma in the pediatric group. Separation of operating rooms and wards had a huge effect on protection of non-COVID patients. We hope that, in light of this study, we can guide health policies and help other colleagues to manage the possible new waves of the pandemic process or similar processes that may occur in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmut Kürşat Özşahin
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Turkey
| | - Göker Utku Değer
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Turkey
| | - Nuri Aydın
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vatsya P, Mittal S, Trikha V, Sharma V, Malhotra R. Has the time to reinstate elective orthopedic procedures come? J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 22:101571. [PMID: 34429572 PMCID: PMC8378042 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus pandemic changed how we manage and operate patients in orthopaedic practice. Although elective orthopaedic procedures were halted to prevent spread of the disease as well as sustain supplies of essential protective equipment and healthcare workers, trauma services were continued. We studied the orthopaedic trauma cases operated over 6 months of the pandemic, and discuss the protocols used to minimize disease spread. METHODS Data was collected for all orthopaedic emergency cases operated at our centre from 1 st March - 10 th August 2020. During this time specific protocols were used for first aid, pre-operative care, inside the operation theatre, post-operative stay as well as for follow ups. RESULTS A total of 851 patients were operated. A sharp decline in surgeries was seen during the lockdown. Average stay in the hospital was 4 days. Only 44% of the patients came for follow-up visits. None of the contacted patients or their relatives developed symptoms or tested positive for COVID after discharge. CONCLUSION Multiple waves and various mutant strains of COVID-19 have made this pandemic longer than expected. Elective orthopaedic cases cannot be ignored for forever, as it leads to poor quality of life and an increasing burden of such patients. We suggest, that using the protocols used at our centre, we have successfully operated on cases without risking spread of the virus. Thus, we believe it's time to reinstate elective orthopaedic procedures, in a phased manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Rajesh Malhotra
- Corresponding author. JPN Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS, Raj Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patralekh MK, Jain VK, Iyengar KP, Upadhyaya GK, Vaishya R. Mortality escalates in patients of proximal femoral fractures with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 studies on 4255 patients. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 18:80-93. [PMID: 33897205 PMCID: PMC8056882 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns have been raised about the escalated mortality in patients of proximal femoral fractures (PPFs) with COVID-19. A meta-analysis to evaluate the mortality in patients with PPFs managed during the current COVID-19 pandemic was conducted. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies were conducted with a search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases using appropriate keywords from January 01, 2020 to January 29, 2021. RESULTS 35 relevant studies reporting 4255 patients with hip fracture in the current ongoing pandemic, out of which 692 patients were COVID-19 positive. Twenty studies reported mortality and other relevant statistics on hip fracture patients with and without COVID-19 (4123 hip fracture patients in the year 2020-21, out of which 560 had or were suspected of having COVID -19). A meta-analysis of mortality statistics in patients with and without COVID revealed increased odds of mortality among COVID patients [odds ratio (OR) 6.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) [5.09, 7.83] and meta-analysis on the subgroup of surgically treated patients also showed markedly increased mortality risk among those with COVID-19 (OR) 5.99, 95% CI [3.88,9.24]. CONCLUSION The mortality risk is markedly increased in hip fracture with concomitant COVID-19 as compared to those without it. This increased risk persisted in those managed surgically. It could be due to the inflammation induced by the fracture or surgery for fracture fixation, further exacerbating inflammation, leading to cytokine storm. It is imperative that such patients are informed regarding increased mortality risk during the consent and shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Kumar Patralekh
- Department of Orthopaedics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, 110 029, India
| | - Vijay Kumar Jain
- Department of Orthopaedics, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, 110001, India
| | - Karthikeyan P. Iyengar
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon, Southport and Ormskirk NHS Trust, Southport, PR8 6PN, UK
| | - Gaurav Kumar Upadhyaya
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rae Bareli, UP, India
| | - Raju Vaishya
- Department of Orthopaedics, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Sarita Vihar, Mathura Road, 110076, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
A tale of three pandemics: Shining a light on a hidden problem. Surgeon 2021; 20:231-236. [PMID: 34167911 PMCID: PMC9300845 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
An “epidemic” is an event in which a disease, infectious or non-infectious, is actively spreading within a population and designated area. The term “pandemic” is defined as “an epidemic occurring worldwide, or over a very wide area, crossing international boundaries and usually affecting a large number of people”. The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic has not been seen since the outbreak of Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the early eighties. But there is another unseen pandemic running alongside the current COVID-19 pandemic, which affects a vast number of people, crossing international boundaries and occurring in every single country worldwide. The pandemic of traumatic injuries. Traumatic injuries account for 11% of the current Global Burden of Disease, resulting in nearly 5 million deaths annually and is the third-leading cause of death worldwide. For every trauma-related death, it is estimated that up to 50 people sustain permanent or temporary disabilities. Furthermore, traumatic injuries occur at disproportionately higher rates in low- and middle-income countries, with approximately 90% of injuries and more than 90% of global deaths from injury occurring these countries. Injuries are increasing worldwide, crossing international boundaries and affecting a large number of people, in the same manner Human Immunodeficiency Virus did in the 1980's and COVID-19 is today. The tremendous global effort to tackle the COVID-19 and Human Immunodeficiency Virus pandemics has occurred whilst ignoring the comparable pandemic of injury. Without change and future engagement with policy makers and international donors this disparity is likely to continue.
Collapse
|
12
|
Pietrzak JRT, Maharaj Z, Erasmus M, Sikhauli N, Cakic JN, Mokete L. Pain and function deteriorate in patients awaiting total joint arthroplasty that has been postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. World J Orthop 2021; 12:152-168. [PMID: 33816142 PMCID: PMC7995341 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i3.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures have been postponed as part of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response to avert healthcare system collapse. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures comprise the highest volume of elective procedures performed at health care facilities worldwide.
AIM To determine the demand for TJA despite the pandemic and the impact of surgery postponement on physical and mental health.
METHODS We conducted a prospective cross-sectional telephonic interview-based study on patients awaiting THA and TKA at an academic institution in South Africa. The questionnaire consisted of four sections. The first section recorded baseline demographic data and medical co-morbidities, the length of time spent awaiting TJA, and the patients’ desire to undergo elective surgery despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Section 2 and Section 3 assessed the patients’ current physical and mental health, respectively, as a consequence of deferred surgical intervention. The last section established the patients’ perception of the healthcare system’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic and necessity to postpone elective surgery. Patients received counseling and education on the current state of surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated risks. Thereafter, patients were once again asked about their desire to undergo TJA during the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESULTS We included 185 patients (65.95% female; mean age: 50.28 years) awaiting TJA for a mean of 26.42 ± 30.1 mo. Overall, 88.65% of patients wanted TJA despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients awaiting TJA for 1-3 years were 3.3-fold more likely to want surgery than those waiting < 1 year (P < 0.000). Patients with comorbidities were 8.4-fold less likely to want TJA than those with no comorbidities (P = 0.013). After receiving education, the patients wanting TJA decreased to 54.05%. Patients who changed their opinion after education had less insight on the increased morbidity (P = 0.046) and mortality (P = 0.001) associated with COVID-19. Despite awaiting TJA for shorter period (24.7 ± 20.38 mo), patients who continued to demand TJA had greater pain (P < 0.000) and decreased function (P = 0.043) since TJA postponement.
CONCLUSION There is deterioration in health for patients, who have had elective procedures postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Waiting lists should be prioritized for urgency with the re-initiation of elective surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zia Maharaj
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg 2193, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Magdalena Erasmus
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg 2193, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Nkhodiseni Sikhauli
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg 2193, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Josip Nenad Cakic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Life Fourways, Johannesburg 2193, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Lipalo Mokete
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg 2193, Gauteng, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miclau T. Orthopaedic trauma care: initial global approaches to management during a pandemic. OTA Int 2021; 4:e120. [PMID: 38630065 PMCID: PMC7959860 DOI: 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has significantly affected the treatment of patients with surgical conditions, including those with acute and chronic musculoskeletal issues. While different global regions experienced different levels of COVID-19 activity and had different resources with which to deal with the pandemic, there were many consistent approaches to injury care and musculoskeletal trauma management. Understanding these approaches is necessary to improve current and future strategies to taking care of orthopaedic trauma patients in an infectious disease outbreak. This supplement focuses on approaches to musculoskeletal trauma care during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 19 countries from 6 continents. This work represents a collaborative work of member societies of the International Orthopaedic Trauma Association (IOTA), an international association of orthopaedic societies dedicated to the promotion of musculoskeletal trauma care through advancements in patient care, research, and education. The information in these reports will aid efforts to understand and ultimately better address musculoskeletal trauma care worldwide during the first waves of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore Miclau
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Institute, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Richards AE, Curley K, Christel L, Zhang N, Kouloumberis P, Kalani MA, Lyons MK, Neal MT. Patient satisfaction with telehealth in neurosurgery outpatient clinic during COVID-19 pandemic. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2020.101017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
|
15
|
Tarun V, Anurag T, Yugal K, Raj K, Lalit M. Orthopaedic operating room considerations in covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 8:91-95. [PMID: 34307063 PMCID: PMC7900750 DOI: 10.1016/j.jajs.2021.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Worldwide COVID 19 has affected the medical practices and Orthopaedics is not any different. Despite risk, the surgeons cannot deny the surgical procedure on patients with suspected or confirmed COVID 19 infection. The purpose of this manuscript is to review various operating room measures which are recommended and being followed to carry out orthopaedic surgeries in the current scenario of COVID 19 pandemic. The information would be useful for orthopaedic surgeons to carry out safe surgical practice for reducing the transmission of COVID 19 infection. Method ology: A systematic literature search was performed using search engines- PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus from January to August 2020 for relevant research articles. The keywords utilized for systematic literature search were "COVID 19", "Corona virus" and "Operating room", "Orthopaedic procedure" in 4 combinations. Duplicates were excluded. Further sorting was done according to the pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Original articles pertaining to orthopaedic surgery and operating room in COVID 19 and available in English language were included. Editorials, case reports, other speciality articles were excluded. Results 16 articles were finally included in review after screening for titles, abstracts and full texts. The information obtained is presented as a narrative review. Conclusion Various important recommendations include use of negative pressure OR, HEPA filters, dedicated separate OR for COVID positive and suspected patients with well defined separate corridors for transport, avoid AGP wherever possible, minimize the number of assistants and staff and follow strict sanitation protocols after each surgery. A well planned systematic approach is warranted to mitigate the risk of transmission of COVID 19 while carrying out orthopaedic surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verma Tarun
- Department of Orthopaedics, Medical College Baroda and SSG Hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - Tiwari Anurag
- Department of Orthopaedics, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India
| | - Karkhur Yugal
- Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement, Managing Head- Orthopaedic Services, Orthocure Clinics Pvt Ltd, Gurugram, India
| | - Kumar Raj
- Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Maini Lalit
- Department of Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Spine surgeon perceptions of the challenges and benefits of telemedicine: an international study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:2124-2132. [PMID: 33452924 PMCID: PMC7811153 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06707-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Introduction While telemedicine usage has increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there remains little consensus about how spine surgeons perceive virtual care. The purpose of this study was to explore international perspectives of spine providers on the challenges and benefits of telemedicine. Methods Responses from 485 members of AO Spine were analyzed, covering provider perceptions of the challenges and benefits of telemedicine. All questions were optional, and blank responses were excluded from analysis. Results The leading challenges reported by surgeons were decreased ability to perform physical examinations (38.6%), possible increased medicolegal exposure (19.3%), and lack of reimbursement parity compared to traditional visits (15.5%). Fewer than 9.0% of respondents experienced technological issues. On average, respondents agreed that telemedicine increases access to care for rural/long-distance patients, provides societal cost savings, and increases patient convenience. Responses were mixed about whether telemedicine leads to greater patient satisfaction. North Americans experienced the most challenges, but also thought telemedicine carried the most benefits, whereas Africans reported the fewest challenges and benefits. Age did not affect responses. Conclusion Spine surgeons are supportive of the benefits of telemedicine, and only a small minority experienced technical issues. The decreased ability to perform the physical examination was the top challenge and remains a major obstacle to virtual care for spine surgeons around the world, although interestingly, 61.4% of providers did not acknowledge this to be a major challenge. Significant groundwork in optimizing remote physical examination maneuvers and achieving legal and reimbursement clarity is necessary for widespread implementation.
Collapse
|
17
|
Khalifa AA, Ahmed AM. How fast is the peer-review process for orthopaedic publications related to the Covid-19 pandemic? J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 12:9-15. [PMID: 32952334 PMCID: PMC7486289 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study's primary objective is to evaluate the time spent in the peer-review process for orthopaedic publications related to the Covid-19 pandemic. The secondary objective is to evaluate the countries' and journals' contributions in these publications. MATERIALS AND METHODS We carried a search on August 1st, 2020, in one database (PubMed) using limited search terms to identify the orthopaedic publications related to the Covid-19 pandemic. After a filtration process, we evaluated the eligible article to identify the prevalence of different articles types, different countries, and journal contributions in these publications. The evaluation of the time spent in the peer-review process was done by obtaining the submission and acceptance dates. RESULTS Of the 231 articles eligible for initial assessment, review articles were the most common article type published (51%), 48 countries published articles in a unique 78 journals. Evaluation of the peer-review process in 147 articles revealed that the mean time from submission to acceptance was 14.3 ± 15.8 days (range from 0 to 74), the peer-review process took less than 30 days in 127 (86.4%) articles, 15 (10.2%) articles were accepted within the first day of submission. CONCLUSION Orthopaedic community contributed significantly to the publications related to the Covid-19 pandemic, with a contribution from many countries and journals. The peer-review process was notably shortened for some articles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed A. Khalifa
- Orthopaedic and Traumatolgy Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt
| | - Ahmed M. Ahmed
- Orthopaedic and Traumatolgy Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kamal AF, Widodo W, Kuncoro MW, Karda IWAM, Prabowo Y, Habib H, Liastuti LD, Trimartani, Hutagalung EU, Saleh I, Tobing SDAL, Gunawan B, Dilogo IH, Lubis AM, Kurniawan A, Rahyussalim AJ, Oesman I, Ifran NN, Latief W, Wijaya MT, Ivansyah MD, Primaputra MRA, Reksoprodjo AY, Hendriarto A, Novriandi KMA, Alaztha Z, Canintika AF, Sitanggang AHR. Emergency orthopaedic surgery in the pandemic era: A case series at Cipto Mangunkusumo national tertiary hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia. Int J Surg Case Rep 2020; 77:870-874. [PMID: 33288992 PMCID: PMC7709787 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Every emergency surgery performed is aimed at saving lives; however, during COVID-19 pandemic, surgeries are often postponed. Many existing recommendations take into account postponing surgery during a pandemic. How these surgeries can lead to increasing infection rates has not been widely published. This study aims to investigate the relationship of emergency orthopaedic surgery and the incidence rate of COVID-19. PRESENTATION OF CASE This was a case series of 14 patients. The study was performed at the emergency department unit at a national tertiary hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia. A total of 14 patients underwent orthopaedic surgery in the emergency room of our institution. The mean age of the subjects was 40.07 ± 20.5 years. Twelve (85.7%) were male patients and 2 (14.3%) were female patients. The average duration of surgery was 125 minutes. The most used type of anaesthesia was general anaesthesia for 6 operations (50%). Patients were hospitalized for an average length of 4 days. Three patients had infiltrates found on plain x-ray examination, which required further examination to determine whether the cause was COVID-19 infection or not. There was no ground glass appearance (GGO) in the three patients in further follow-up examination. CONCLUSIONS We found that emergency orthopaedic surgery was not associated with increasing number of COVID-19 cases. Factors including duration of surgery, length of stay, types of anaesthesia and comorbidities were also not associated with COVID-19 cases in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achmad Fauzi Kamal
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Wahyu Widodo
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Mohamad Walid Kuncoro
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - I Wayan Arya Mahendra Karda
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
| | - Yogi Prabowo
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Hadiki Habib
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | | | - Trimartani
- Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Errol Untung Hutagalung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ifran Saleh
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Singkat Dohar A L Tobing
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Bambang Gunawan
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ismail Hadisoebroto Dilogo
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Andri Mt Lubis
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Aryadi Kurniawan
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ihsan Oesman
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Nadia Npps Ifran
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Wildan Latief
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Mohammad Triadi Wijaya
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Muhammad Deryl Ivansyah
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Muhammad Rizqi Adhi Primaputra
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Adisa Yusuf Reksoprodjo
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Andra Hendriarto
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - K M Azka Novriandi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ziad Alaztha
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Anissa Feby Canintika
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Anita Happy Rahayu Sitanggang
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Verma V, Nagar M, Jain V, Santoshi JA, Dwivedi M, Behera P, Selvanayagam R, Pal D, Singh K. Adapting Policy Guidelines for Spine Surgeries During COVID-19 Pandemic in View of Evolving Evidences: An Early Experience From a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Cureus 2020; 12:e9147. [PMID: 32789084 PMCID: PMC7417187 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The recent novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought the world to a standstill. This outbreak not only affected healthcare systems but the resultant economic losses were also enormous. COVID-19 has demanded that the health care systems globally evolve, develop new strategies, identify new models of functioning, and at times, fall back on the old conservative methods of orthopedic care to decrease the risk of disease transmission. Although, the majority of hospitals are refraining from performing elective surgeries, emergent and urgent procedures cannot be delayed. Various strategies have been developed at the institute level to reduce the risk of infection transmission among the theatre team from an unsuspected patient (asymptomatic and presymptomatic) during the perioperative period. Material and methods The present study is a part of an ongoing project which is being conducted in a tertiary level hospital after obtaining research review board approval. All patients admitted either for vertebral fracture or spinal cord compression from February 2020 to May 2020 were included. The present study included 13 patients (nine males and four females) with an average age of 35.4 years The oldest patient was of 63 years which is considered a risk factor for developing severe COVID-19 infection. Results Eight patients (61.5%) presented with spinal cord injury (SCI) due to vertebral fracture with fall from height (87.5%) as the most common etiology. Among the traumatic SCI patients, six (75%) were managed surgically with posterior decompression and instrumented fusion with pedicle screws while two patients (25%) were managed conservatively. There were four patients (30.8%) of tuberculosis of the spine of whom two (50%) were managed with posterior decompression, debridement, and stabilization with pedicle screws, samples for culture, biopsy, and cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test (CBNAAT) were collected during the procedure; for the remaining two patients (50%), a trans-pedicular biopsy was performed to confirm the diagnosis for initiation of anti-tubercular therapy. Prolapsed intervertebral disc causing cauda equina syndrome was the reason for emergency surgery in one patient (7.7%). COVID-19 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was performed in four patients (30.8%), in whom the most common symptom was fever (two patients (50%)). These patients were residents of high prevalence area for COVID-19 infection. Sore throat (25%), fatigue (25%), and low oxygen saturation (25%) were present in one patient which prompted us to get the COVID-19 test. All patients were reported negative for COVID-19. Conclusion The structural organization and the management protocol we describe allowed us to reduce infection risk and ultimately hospital stay, thereby maximizing the already stretched available medical resources. These precautions helped us to reduce transmission and exposure to COVID-19 in health care workers (HCW) and patients in our institute. The aim of this article is that our early experience can be of value to the medical communities that will soon be in a similar situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virendra Verma
- Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND
| | - Manoj Nagar
- Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND
| | - Vaibhav Jain
- Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND
| | - John A Santoshi
- Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND
| | - Manish Dwivedi
- Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND
| | - Prateek Behera
- Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND
| | | | - Dharm Pal
- Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND
| | - Kuldeep Singh
- Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND
| |
Collapse
|