Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 10, 2011; 2(6): 262-271
Published online Jun 10, 2011. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i6.262
Published online Jun 10, 2011. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i6.262
Outcome | Erlotinib[41] (150 mg daily) | Docetaxel[38-40,46](75 mg/m2 , every 3 wk) | Pemetrexed[40] (500 mg/m2 , every 3 wk) |
RR (%) | 8.9 | 6.7-8.8 | 9.1 |
Median duration of response (mo) | 7.9 | 5.3-9.1 | 4.6 |
Median PFS (mo) | 2.2 | 2.7-6 | 2.9 |
Median OS (mo) | 6.7 | 5.7-7.9 | 8.3 |
1-year survival (%) | 31 | 30-37 | 30 |
2-year survival (%) | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Median OS (mo) in PS 0/1 patients with one prior regimen | 9.4 | 9.1 | 9.4 |
Study | Phase | n | Eligibility | Regimen | Line of therapy | Primary endpoint |
PASSPORT (AVF3752g) | II | 110 | Previously treated or untreated non-squamous NSCLC with treated CNS metastases | Chemo or erlotinib followed by bev | First/second | Grade ≥ 2 symptomatic CNS haemorrhage |
BRAIN (AVF21823) | II | 115 | Stage IV non-squamous NSCLC with asymptomatic brain metastases in first and second line | First line: bev + carbo/pac | First/second | PFS |
Second line: bev + erlotinib | ||||||
EAGLES | II | 78 | Patients aged > 70 yr without important comorbidities | Bev + gem or bev + gem/cis | First | PFS at 6 mo |
ML21896 | II | ~250 | Patients aged ≥ 65 yr with advanced metastatic or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC | Bev + pem or bev + pem/carbo | First | Proof of non-inferiority of bev + pem |
BRIDGE (AVF2744g) | I/II | 40 | Previously untreated squamous NSCLC | Bev + carbo/pac | First | Grade ≥ 3 pulmonary haemorrhage |
ABIGAIL (BO21015) | II | ~300 | Locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC | Bev + carbo/gem or carbo/pac | First | Correlation of biomarkers with response |
MIMEB (ML21803) | II | 40 | Histologically confirmed advanced non-squamous NSCLC stage IIIB/IV | Bev + erlotinib | First | Evaluate accuracy of FDG-/FLT-PET and DCE-MRI for early prediction of non-progression |
EURTAC | III | 146 | EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC | Erlotinib | First | PFS in patients with |
SATURN (BO18192) | III | 1949 | Previously untreated advanced NSCLC | Erlotinib | First | PFS in all patients and in patients with EGFR IHC+ tumours |
RADIANT | 945 | Advanced NSCLC | Erlotinib vs placebo | Adjuvant | DFS | |
FASTACT-2 | III | 450 | Asian patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC | Erlotinib + chemo vs placebo + chemo | First line | PFS |
ATLAS (AVF3671f) | III | 1150 | Previously untreated advanced NSCLC | Bev + carbo/pac, gem/cis or carbo/doc) | First line maintenance | PFS |
Non-progressing patients randomized (1:1) to bev + erlotinib or bev + placebo | ||||||
TARGET | II | 428 | EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC | Erlotinib | First | PFS |
TORCH | III | 900 | Previously untreated advanced NSCLC | First-line erlotinib second-line gem/cis vs first-line gem/cis second-line erlotinib | First/second | OS |
- Citation: Hirsh V. Review of the treatment of metastatic non small cell lung carcinoma: A practical approach. World J Clin Oncol 2011; 2(6): 262-271
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v2/i6/262.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v2.i6.262