Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2025; 16(4): 102565
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.102565
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.102565
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of 336 patients, n (%)
Clinicopathological characteristics | n (%) |
Age (year), mean ± SD | 62.7 ± 9.35 |
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 4.7 ± 2.40 |
Gender | |
Male | 277 (82.4) |
Female | 59 (17.6) |
Smoking history | |
Yes | 143 (42.6) |
No | 193 (57.4) |
Drinking history | |
Yes | 142 (42.3) |
No | 194 (57.7) |
Pathological grade | |
NEC | 227 (67.6) |
MANEC | 109 (32.4) |
CgA | |
Positive | 230 (68.5) |
Negative | 106 (31.5) |
Syn | |
Positive | 324 (96.4) |
Negative | 12 (3.6) |
CD56 | |
Positive | 271 (80.7) |
Negative | 65 (19.3) |
Vascular cancer | |
Yes | 117 (34.8) |
No | 219 (65.2) |
Perineural invasion | |
Yes | 64 (19.0) |
No | 272 (81.0) |
Ki-67 index (%) | |
< 70 | 104 (31.0) |
≥ 70 | 232 (69.0) |
Tumor diameter (cm) | |
< 3 | 45 (13.4) |
≥ 3 | 291 (86.6) |
Tumor morphology | |
Uplift | 52 (15.5) |
Ulcer | 272 (81.0) |
Others | 12 (3.5) |
Tumor location | |
Upper third | 199 (59.2) |
Middle third | 53 (15.8) |
Lower third | 78 (23.2) |
Others | 6 (1.8) |
Invasion depth | |
T1 | 27 (8.0) |
T2 | 41 (12.3) |
T3 | 111 (33.0) |
T4 | 157 (46.7) |
Lymph node metastasis | |
N0 | 77 (22.9) |
N1 | 77 (22.9) |
N2 | 86 (25.6) |
N3 | 96 (28.6) |
Distant metastasis | |
M0 | 275 (81.8) |
M1 | 61 (18.2) |
TNM stage | |
I stage | 48 (14.3) |
II stage | 83 (24.7) |
III stage | 144 (42.9) |
IV stage | 61 (18.1) |
PLR | |
Low-PLR | 193 (57.4) |
High-group | 143 (42.6) |
FBG | |
Low-FBG | 218 (64.9) |
High-FBG | 118 (35.1) |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of survival time of gastric cancer patients
Clinicopathological characteristics | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | |
Age (year) | 1.030 | 1.012-1.048 | 0.001 | 1.040 | 1.019-1.061 | < 0.001 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.959 | 0.916-1.004 | 0.071 | - | - | - |
Gender | ||||||
Female vs male | 0.938 | 0.612-1.437 | 0.767 | - | - | - |
Smoking history | ||||||
Yes vs no | 1.120 | 0.821-1.528 | 0.474 | - | - | - |
Drinking history | ||||||
Yes vs no | 1.006 | 0.738-1.373 | 0.968 | - | - | - |
Pathological grade | ||||||
MANEC vs NEC | 0.770 | 0.546-1.087 | 0.137 | - | - | - |
CgA | ||||||
Positive vs negative | 0.768 | 0.556-1.061 | 0.109 | - | - | - |
Syn | ||||||
Positive vs negative | 1.745 | 0.646-4.710 | 0.272 | - | - | - |
CD56 | ||||||
Positive vs negative | 1.073 | 0.734-1.568 | 0.717 | - | - | - |
Vascular cancer | ||||||
Yes vs no | 1.461 | 1.062-2.010 | 0.020 | 0.897 | 0.634-1.268 | 0.538 |
perineural invasion | ||||||
Yes vs no | 1.398 | 0.964-2.029 | 0.078 | - | - | - |
Ki-67 index (%) | ||||||
≥ 70 vs < 70 | 1.786 | 1.240-2.571 | 0.002 | 1.504 | 1.022-2.214 | 0.038 |
Tumor diameter (cm) | ||||||
≥ 3 vs < 3 | 2.713 | 1.470-5.006 | 0.001 | 0.775 | 0.369-1.628 | 0.502 |
Tumor morphology | - | - | 0.107 | - | - | - |
Ulcer vs uplift | 1.466 | 0.933-2.303 | 0.097 | - | - | - |
Others vs uplift | 0.645 | 0.193-2.157 | 0.477 | - | - | - |
Tumor location | - | - | 0.042 | - | - | 0.082 |
Middle third vs upper third | 1.097 | 0.715-1.684 | 0.671 | 1.388 | 0.880-2.189 | 0.159 |
Lower third vs upper third | 0.769 | 0.519-1.139 | 0.190 | 0.756 | 0.501-1.142 | 0.184 |
Others vs upper third | 2.655 | 1.157-6.093 | 0.021 | 1.784 | 0.761-4.183 | 0.183 |
Invasion depth | - | - | < 0.001 | - | - | 0.040 |
T2 vs T1 | 3.003 | 0.846-10.874 | 0.089 | 2.224 | 0.582-8.490 | 0.242 |
T3 vs T1 | 4.824 | 1.493-15.590 | 0.009 | 2.288 | 0.594-8.819 | 0.229 |
T4 vs T1 | 11.766 | 3.728-37.133 | < 0.001 | 3.764 | 0.972-14.575 | 0.055 |
Lymph node metastasis | - | - | < 0.001 | - | - | < 0.001 |
N1 vs N0 | 1.534 | 0.853-2.759 | 0.153 | 1.229 | 0.654-2.308 | 0.522 |
N2 vs N0 | 3.335 | 1.966-6.658 | < 0.001 | 2.746 | 1.518-4.968 | 0.001 |
N3 vs N0 | 8.491 | 5.117 | < 0.001 | 4.534 | 2.416-8.355 | < 0.001 |
Distant metastasis | ||||||
M1 vs M0 | 4.808 | 3.396-6.808 | < 0.001 | 2.513 | 1.666-3.792 | < 0.001 |
TNM stage | - | - | < 0.001 | - | - | - |
II stage vs I stage | 2.012 | 0.899-4.500 | 0.089 | - | - | |
III stage vs I stage | 5.502 | 2.649-11.428 | < 0.001 | - | - | - |
IV stage vs I stage | 16.746 | 7.837-35.784 | < 0.001 | - | - | - |
PLR | ||||||
High-group vs low-PLR | 1.840 | 1.350-2.509 | < 0.001 | 1.424 | 1.020-1.988 | 0.038 |
FBG | ||||||
High-FBG vs low-FBG | 2.386 | 1.746-3.260 | < 0.001 | 1.153 | 0.821-1.620 | 0.410 |
- Citation: Zhang BL, Peng F, Li L, Gao YH, Wang ZJ, Lu YX, Chen L, Zhang KC. Construction and validation of a novel prognostic nomogram for patients with poorly differentiated gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(4): 102565
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i4/102565.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.102565