Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2025; 16(4): 102565
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.102565
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of 336 patients, n (%)
Clinicopathological characteristics
n (%)
Age (year), mean ± SD62.7 ± 9.35
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD4.7 ± 2.40
Gender
Male277 (82.4)
Female59 (17.6)
Smoking history
Yes143 (42.6)
No193 (57.4)
Drinking history
Yes142 (42.3)
No194 (57.7)
Pathological grade
NEC227 (67.6)
MANEC109 (32.4)
CgA
Positive230 (68.5)
Negative106 (31.5)
Syn
Positive324 (96.4)
Negative12 (3.6)
CD56
Positive271 (80.7)
Negative65 (19.3)
Vascular cancer
Yes117 (34.8)
No219 (65.2)
Perineural invasion
Yes64 (19.0)
No272 (81.0)
Ki-67 index (%)
< 70104 (31.0)
≥ 70232 (69.0)
Tumor diameter (cm)
< 345 (13.4)
≥ 3291 (86.6)
Tumor morphology
Uplift52 (15.5)
Ulcer272 (81.0)
Others12 (3.5)
Tumor location
Upper third199 (59.2)
Middle third53 (15.8)
Lower third78 (23.2)
Others6 (1.8)
Invasion depth
T127 (8.0)
T241 (12.3)
T3111 (33.0)
T4157 (46.7)
Lymph node metastasis
N077 (22.9)
N177 (22.9)
N286 (25.6)
N396 (28.6)
Distant metastasis
M0275 (81.8)
M161 (18.2)
TNM stage
I stage48 (14.3)
II stage83 (24.7)
III stage144 (42.9)
IV stage61 (18.1)
PLR
Low-PLR193 (57.4)
High-group143 (42.6)
FBG
Low-FBG218 (64.9)
High-FBG118 (35.1)
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of survival time of gastric cancer patients
Clinicopathological characteristicsUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Age (year)1.0301.012-1.0480.0011.0401.019-1.061< 0.001
BMI (kg/m2)0.9590.916-1.0040.071---
Gender
Female vs male0.9380.612-1.4370.767---
Smoking history
Yes vs no1.1200.821-1.5280.474---
Drinking history
Yes vs no1.0060.738-1.3730.968---
Pathological grade
MANEC vs NEC0.7700.546-1.0870.137---
CgA
Positive vs negative0.7680.556-1.0610.109---
Syn
Positive vs negative1.7450.646-4.7100.272---
CD56
Positive vs negative1.0730.734-1.5680.717---
Vascular cancer
Yes vs no 1.4611.062-2.0100.0200.8970.634-1.2680.538
perineural invasion
Yes vs no1.3980.964-2.0290.078---
Ki-67 index (%)
≥ 70 vs < 701.7861.240-2.5710.0021.5041.022-2.2140.038
Tumor diameter (cm)
≥ 3 vs < 32.7131.470-5.0060.0010.7750.369-1.6280.502
Tumor morphology--0.107---
Ulcer vs uplift1.4660.933-2.3030.097---
Others vs uplift0.6450.193-2.1570.477---
Tumor location--0.042--0.082
Middle third vs upper third1.0970.715-1.6840.6711.3880.880-2.1890.159
Lower third vs upper third0.7690.519-1.1390.1900.7560.501-1.1420.184
Others vs upper third2.6551.157-6.0930.0211.7840.761-4.1830.183
Invasion depth--< 0.001--0.040
T2 vs T13.0030.846-10.8740.0892.2240.582-8.4900.242
T3 vs T14.8241.493-15.5900.0092.2880.594-8.8190.229
T4 vs T111.7663.728-37.133< 0.0013.7640.972-14.5750.055
Lymph node metastasis--< 0.001--< 0.001
N1 vs N01.5340.853-2.7590.1531.2290.654-2.3080.522
N2 vs N03.3351.966-6.658< 0.0012.7461.518-4.9680.001
N3 vs N08.4915.117< 0.0014.5342.416-8.355< 0.001
Distant metastasis
M1 vs M04.8083.396-6.808< 0.0012.5131.666-3.792< 0.001
TNM stage--< 0.001---
II stage vs I stage2.0120.899-4.5000.089--
III stage vs I stage5.5022.649-11.428< 0.001---
IV stage vs I stage16.7467.837-35.784< 0.001---
PLR
High-group vs low-PLR1.8401.350-2.509< 0.0011.4241.020-1.9880.038
FBG
High-FBG vs low-FBG2.3861.746-3.260< 0.0011.1530.821-1.6200.410