Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2025; 16(4): 102397
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.102397
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies, n (%)
Ref.
Design
Country
Diagnosis
Sample size
Mean age (years)
Men (%)
Stage
HP evaluation
HP positive
PD-L1 evaluation and cutoffs
PD-L1 expression
Koizumi et al[27], 2022CSJapanPatients with GC after resection who underwent R0 gastrectomy4916967.0I-IIIImmunohistochemistry175 (35.6)IHC (≥ 10%)152 (30.9)
Shen et al[28], 2019CSChinaPatients with early GC546546.3IPathological evaluation or histological immunostaining19 (35.2)IHC (≥ 1%)24 (44.4)
Yoshida et al[29], 2022CSJapanPatients with GC or GEJC for total or partial1066867I-IVBiopsy, serum test, or breath antibody test53 (50.0)CPS (≥ 1)73 (68.9)
Böger et al[30], 2016CSGermanyPatients with GC or GEJC for total or partial gastrectomy3926862.4I-IVHistological PCR61 (15.9)IHC (≥ 5%)93 (23.7)
Che et al[18], 2022CSChinaPatients with GC or GEJC25NA70.1III-IVHistopathology, HpSA, or breath antibody test14 (56.0)NA8 (32.0)
Magahis et al[31], 2023CSUnited StatesPatients with stage IV GC1215965.1IVHistopathology, serum test, or breath antibody test25 (20.7)CPS (≥ 1%)76 (62.8)
Wu et al[32], 2017CSChinaPatients with GC for total or partial gastrectomy102NA74.7I-IVSerum test62 (60.8)IHC (≥ 5%)62 (60.8)
Jia et al[17], 2024CSChinaPatients with GC562NA48.9I-IVBreath antibody test290 (51.6)CPS (≥ 1%)331 (58.9)
Liu et al[33], 2020CSKoreaPatients with GC for gastrectomy1276466.0I-IVPathological evaluation or histological55 (43.3)CPS (≥ 1%)74 (58.3)
Di Bartolomeo et al[34], 2015CSItalyPatients with GC after resection556264II-IIIPathological evaluation or histological immunostaining23 (41.8)IHC (≥ 5%)37 (67.3)
Kuo et al[35], 2017CSKoreaPatients with GC after radical resection112NANAI-IVHistological PCR43 (38.4)IHC (≥ 5%)35 (31.3)
Sughayer et al[36], 2020CSJordanPatients with GC for total or partial gastrectomy926361I-IVPathological evaluation or histological immunostaining10 (10.9)CPS (≥ 1%)63 (68.5)
Tseng et al[37], 2020CSChinaPatients with GC after radical resection370NA81I-IIIHistological PCR97 (26.2)CPS (≥ 1%)78 (21.4)
Fang et al[38], 2020CSChinaPatients with GC after radical resection460NA71I-IIIHistological PCR157 (34)CPS (≥ 1%)140 (30.0)
Table 2 The Newcastle-Ottawa scores of the included studies
Ref.
Adequate definition of cases
Representativeness of cases
Selection of controls
Definition of controls
Control for age and sex
Control for other confounders
Exposure ascertainment
Same methods for events ascertainment
Non-response rates
Total
Koizumi et al[27], 20221111001117
Shen et al[28], 20191111001117
Yoshida et al[29], 20221111001106
Böger et al[30], 20161111001117
Che et al[18], 20221111001106
Magahis et al[31], 20231111001106
Wu et al[32], 20171111001106
Jia et al[17], 20241111001117
Liu et al[33], 20201111001106
Di Bartolomeo et al[34], 20151111001117
Kuo et al[35], 20171111001117
Sughayer et al[36], 20201111001117
Tseng et al[37], 20201111001117
Fang et al[38], 20201111001117