Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2022; 13(10): 789-801
Published online Oct 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i10.789
Table 1 Patient and surgical characteristics for patients who underwent 3-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction
Patient
Age
ASA
Sex
BMI (kg/m2)
Surgery
Indication
1803F29.1Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSESigmoid cancer pT3N1M0
2591F20.0Left hemicolectomy, transvaginal NOSESplenic flexure cancer pT3N1M0
3823F22.4Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSESigmoid cancer pT3N0M0
4432F31.7Anterior resection, transanal NOSESigmoid cancer pT1N0M0
5783F21.6Right hemicolectomy (D3), transvaginal NOSETransverse colon cancer pT3N1M0
6632F28.0Right hemicolectomy (D3), transvaginal NOSEHepatic flexure cancer pT1N0M0
7772M20.3Anterior resection with DI, transanal NOSEMid rectal cancer pT3N1M0
8502F28.0Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSESigmoid cancer pT3N0M0
9772M24.3Anterior resection with DI, transanal NOSEMid rectal cancer pT3N1M0
10793M24.3Anterior resection, transanal NOSEUpper rectal cancer pT3N1M0
11733M22.4Anterior resection, transanal NOSESigmoid cancer pT4N2M1
12582F23.5Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSESigmoid cancer pT2N0M0
13672M27.6Anterior resection, transanal NOSESigmoid cancer pT2N1M0
14582F23.8Left hemicolectomy, transvaginal NOSESplenic flexure cancer pT1N0M0
Table 2 Intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes for patients who underwent 3-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction
Patient
Operative time (min)
Blood loss (mL)
Time to first flatus/ BO (da)
Postoperative LOS (da)
Postoperative complications
1235301/14Nil
2170201/23Nil
3210302/23Nil
4200201/13Nil
52601002/13Nil
6255502/25 Chylous ascites
7265801/13 Nil
8175101/13Nil
93001501/16 High stoma output
103651001/13 Nil
11205201/23Nil
12155301/22Nil
13205102/23Nil
14180501/23Nil
Table 3 Comparison of characteristics between laparoscopic 3-port colorectal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery with a propensity score-matched cohort of conventional surgery
Characteristic
NOSE, n = 14 Frequency (%)
Non-NOSE, n = 56 Frequency (%)
P value
Age, mean ± SD (yr)67.4 ± 12.473.1 ± 10.20.182
Gender
Male5 (35.7)21 (37.5)0.765
Female9 (64.3)35 (62.5)
BMI, mean ± SD (kg/m2)24.8 ± 3.524.0 ± 4.10.526
ASA score
1 1 (7.1)1 (1.8)0.265
28 (57.1)43 (76.8)
35 (35.7)12 (21.4)
Tumor location
Caecum to transverse colon2 (14.3)18 (32.1)0.219
Splenic flexure to sigmoid 9 (64.3)22 (39.3)
Rectum3 (21.4)16 (28.6)
Surgery
Anterior resection7 (50.0)23 (41.1)0.576
Low anterior resection3 (21.4)13 (23.2)
Left hemicolectomy2 (14.3)3 (5.4)
Right hemicolectomy2 (14.3)17 (30.4)
Defunctioning stoma creation
Yes3 (21.4)9 (16.1)0.634
No11 (78.6)47 (83.9)
AJCC pT stage
T14 (28.6)7 (12.5)0.527
T22 (14.3)10 (17.9)
T37 (50)33 (58.9)
T41 (7.1)6 (10.7)
AJCC pN stage
N06 (42.9)33 (58.9)0.236
N17 (50.0)15 (26.8)
N21 (7.1)8 (14.3)
M stage
M013 (92.9)55 (98.2)0.282
M11 (7.1)1 (1.8)
Stage
I4 (28.6)13 (23.2)0.162
II1 (7.1)20 (35.7)
III8 (57.1)22 (39.3)
IV1 (7.1)1 (1.8)
Table 4 Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic 3-port colorectal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery with a propensity score-matched cohort of conventional surgery
Outcome
NOSE n = 14 Frequency (%)
Non-NOSE n = 56 Frequency (%)
P value
Duration of surgery, mean ± SD (min) 227 ± 55261 ± 960.463
Intraoperative complications
Yes0 (0)2 (3.6)0.473
No14 (100)54 (96.4)
30-day postoperative complications
Yes2 (14.3)13 (23.2)0.466
No12 (85.7)43 (76.8)
Clavien-Dindo classification0.202
11 (7.1)5 (8.9)
21 (7.1)7 (12.5)
300
401 (1.8)
500
Time to first bowel movement, mean ± SD (d)1.2 ± 0.42.6 ± 2.0<0.001
Length of hospitalization stay, mean ± SD (d)3.4 ± 1.06.4 ± 5.3<0.001
POD 1 highest pain scorea, mean ± SD1.5 ± 1.93.0 ± 2.00.012
POD 2 highest pain scorea, mean ± SD0.7 ± 1.51.8 ± 2.20.066
POD 1 PCA total morphine use, mean ± SD (mg)1.4 ± 3.36.7 ± 8.10.002
POD 2 PCA total morphine use, mean ± SD (mg)0 2.5 ± 5.10.005