Seow-En I, Chen LR, Li YX, Zhao Y, Chen JH, Abdullah HR, Tan EKW. Outcomes after natural orifice extraction vs conventional specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13(10): 789-801 [PMID: 36337314 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i10.789]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Isaac Seow-En, FRCS (Ed), MBBS, MMed, Assistant Professor, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore. isaac.seow.en@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2022; 13(10): 789-801 Published online Oct 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i10.789
Table 1 Patient and surgical characteristics for patients who underwent 3-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction
Patient
Age
ASA
Sex
BMI (kg/m2)
Surgery
Indication
1
80
3
F
29.1
Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSE
Sigmoid cancer pT3N1M0
2
59
1
F
20.0
Left hemicolectomy, transvaginal NOSE
Splenic flexure cancer pT3N1M0
3
82
3
F
22.4
Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSE
Sigmoid cancer pT3N0M0
4
43
2
F
31.7
Anterior resection, transanal NOSE
Sigmoid cancer pT1N0M0
5
78
3
F
21.6
Right hemicolectomy (D3), transvaginal NOSE
Transverse colon cancer pT3N1M0
6
63
2
F
28.0
Right hemicolectomy (D3), transvaginal NOSE
Hepatic flexure cancer pT1N0M0
7
77
2
M
20.3
Anterior resection with DI, transanal NOSE
Mid rectal cancer pT3N1M0
8
50
2
F
28.0
Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSE
Sigmoid cancer pT3N0M0
9
77
2
M
24.3
Anterior resection with DI, transanal NOSE
Mid rectal cancer pT3N1M0
10
79
3
M
24.3
Anterior resection, transanal NOSE
Upper rectal cancer pT3N1M0
11
73
3
M
22.4
Anterior resection, transanal NOSE
Sigmoid cancer pT4N2M1
12
58
2
F
23.5
Anterior resection, transvaginal NOSE
Sigmoid cancer pT2N0M0
13
67
2
M
27.6
Anterior resection, transanal NOSE
Sigmoid cancer pT2N1M0
14
58
2
F
23.8
Left hemicolectomy, transvaginal NOSE
Splenic flexure cancer pT1N0M0
Table 2 Intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes for patients who underwent 3-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery with natural orifice specimen extraction
Table 3 Comparison of characteristics between laparoscopic 3-port colorectal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery with a propensity score-matched cohort of conventional surgery
Characteristic
NOSE, n = 14 Frequency (%)
Non-NOSE, n = 56 Frequency (%)
P value
Age, mean ± SD (yr)
67.4 ± 12.4
73.1 ± 10.2
0.182
Gender
Male
5 (35.7)
21 (37.5)
0.765
Female
9 (64.3)
35 (62.5)
BMI, mean ± SD (kg/m2)
24.8 ± 3.5
24.0 ± 4.1
0.526
ASA score
1
1 (7.1)
1 (1.8)
0.265
2
8 (57.1)
43 (76.8)
3
5 (35.7)
12 (21.4)
Tumor location
Caecum to transverse colon
2 (14.3)
18 (32.1)
0.219
Splenic flexure to sigmoid
9 (64.3)
22 (39.3)
Rectum
3 (21.4)
16 (28.6)
Surgery
Anterior resection
7 (50.0)
23 (41.1)
0.576
Low anterior resection
3 (21.4)
13 (23.2)
Left hemicolectomy
2 (14.3)
3 (5.4)
Right hemicolectomy
2 (14.3)
17 (30.4)
Defunctioning stoma creation
Yes
3 (21.4)
9 (16.1)
0.634
No
11 (78.6)
47 (83.9)
AJCC pT stage
T1
4 (28.6)
7 (12.5)
0.527
T2
2 (14.3)
10 (17.9)
T3
7 (50)
33 (58.9)
T4
1 (7.1)
6 (10.7)
AJCC pN stage
N0
6 (42.9)
33 (58.9)
0.236
N1
7 (50.0)
15 (26.8)
N2
1 (7.1)
8 (14.3)
M stage
M0
13 (92.9)
55 (98.2)
0.282
M1
1 (7.1)
1 (1.8)
Stage
I
4 (28.6)
13 (23.2)
0.162
II
1 (7.1)
20 (35.7)
III
8 (57.1)
22 (39.3)
IV
1 (7.1)
1 (1.8)
Table 4 Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic 3-port colorectal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery with a propensity score-matched cohort of conventional surgery
Citation: Seow-En I, Chen LR, Li YX, Zhao Y, Chen JH, Abdullah HR, Tan EKW. Outcomes after natural orifice extraction vs conventional specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13(10): 789-801