Published online Dec 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i12.957
Peer-review started: September 17, 2022
First decision: October 21, 2022
Revised: October 31, 2022
Accepted: December 6, 2022
Article in press: December 6, 2022
Published online: December 24, 2022
Processing time: 92 Days and 17.8 Hours
It has been found that 8%-29% of colorectal cancers are obstructive. The use of “stent as bridge to surgery” is one of the most debated topics in obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer management. The endoscopic placement of a self-expanding metallic stent as bridge to surgery (BTS) could turn an emergency surgery to an elective one, increasing the number of primary anastomoses instead of stoma and facilitating the laparoscopic approach instead of an open one. However, in recent years the possible risk of perforations and microperforations facilitating cancer spread related to the use of self-expanding metallic stent for BTS has been highlighted. Therefore, despite the useful short-term outcomes related to BTS, the recent literature has focused on long-term outcomes investigating the disease-free survival, the recurrence rate and the overall survival. Due to discordant data, international guidelines are still conflicting, and the debate is still open. There is not agreement about using self-expanding metallic stent for BTS as the gold standard.
Core Tip: The most recent articles (published after 2020) about self-expanding metallic stent as bridge to surgery in left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction were collected. Both the short-term and long-term outcomes were analyzed, focusing on the role of stent-related microperforations in worsening disease-free and overall survival rates. Despite the growing number of studies published in recent years, the use of self-expanding metallic stent as bridge to surgery is not considered the gold standard due to conflicting reports. Updating meta-analyses, randomized studies and reviews will help determine new international guidelines and a shared treatment flow-chart.