Published online Aug 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i8.614
Peer-review started: January 20, 2020
First decision: April 21, 2020
Revised: May 21, 2020
Accepted: July 1, 2020
Article in press: July 1, 2020
Published online: August 24, 2020
Processing time: 213 Days and 12.9 Hours
Mutational activation of Ras genes is established as a prognostic factor for the genesis of a constitutively active RAS-mitogen activated protein kinase pathway that leads to cancer. Heterogeneity among the distribution of the most frequent mutations in Ras isoforms is reported in different patient populations with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB).
To determine the presence/absence of mutations in Ras isoforms in patients with UCB in order to predict disease outcome.
This study was performed to determine the mutational spectrum at the hotspot regions of H-Ras, K-Ras and N-Ras genes by polymerase chain reaction - restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and DNA sequencing followed by their clinical impact (if any) by examining the relationship of mutational spectrum with clinical histopathological variables in 87 UCB patients.
None of the 87 UCB patients showed point mutations in codon 12 of H-Ras gene; codon 61 of N-Ras gene and codons 12, 13 of K-Ras gene by PCR-RFLP. Direct DNA sequencing of tumor and normal control bladder mucosal specimens followed by Blastn alignment with the reference wild-type sequences failed to identify even one nucleotide difference in the coding exons 1 and 2 of H-Ras, N-Ras and K-Ras genes in the tumor and control bladder mucosal specimens.
Our findings on the lack of mutations in H-Ras, K-Ras and N-Ras genes could be explained on the basis of different etiological mechanisms involved in tumor development/progression, inherent genetic susceptibility, tissue specificity or alternative Ras dysfunction such as gene amplification and/or overexpression in a given cohort of patients.
Core tip: Mutant Ras has been shown to be associated with drug resistance, enhanced metastasis and shorter survival of patients. Due to reported heterogeneity among the distribution of the most frequent mutations in Ras isoforms in different patient populations with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, it is necessary to examine these patients for Ras mutations in order to predict disease outcome. Our findings on the lack of Ras mutations could be explained on the basis of different etiological mechanisms involved in tumor development, inherent genetic susceptibility, tissue specificity or alternative Ras dysfunction including gene amplification or overexpression in a given cohort of patients.