The number of transmasculine and gender diverse (TMGD) individuals who retain their uterus or postpone surgery while using testosterone is increasing. However, the influence of exogenous testosterone on the risk of cervical cancer remains unclear. This study aims to assess the risk of cervical cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia in TMGD individuals undergoing testosterone treatment.

This retrospective, cohort study was conducted at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre in the Netherlands, included transmasculine and gender diverse (TMGD) individuals receiving testosterone at our clinic between February 17, 1972 and December 3, 2018. Data from medical records were linked to the national pathology database to acquire diagnoses related to cervical cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Individuals assigned female at birth who received testosterone were included, excluding those last seen before 1991. Lesions ≥ CIN2 were classified as "high grade", considering their increased cancer progression risk. Based on observed and expected cases, age-adjusted standardised incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated to assess relative risk compared to cisgender women.

The cohort comprised 2095 TMGD individuals; 1200 participants underwent hysterectomy, and cervical biopsies obtained from seven patients. Median testosterone exposure time was 1.7 years (IQR 1.3-2.5). No cervical cancer cases were observed (0.30 (95% CI 0-1.4) expected). Five cases of ≥CIN2 (0.002%) were observed, versus 9.5 expected (SIR 0.53 (95% CI 0.19-1.17).

In this large cohort with several years of testosterone exposure we did not observe any cervical cancer, nor did we observe an increased risk of ≥CIN2. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as the relatively short median time of follow-up and lack of data on HPV infection prevalence and cervical screening may introduce bias. Longer follow-up studies incorporating this information are needed.

None.

Cervical cytology remains a critical screening tool for cervical cancer. While various factors can influence cytology quality, the effect of lubricant type used during specimen collection has been previously studied with inconclusive results. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of surgical lubricant on cervical cytology results and elucidate risk factors associated with unsatisfactory results. We hypothesized that switching from a carbomer-containing lubricant to a noncarbomer, water-soluble lubricant would improve specimen adequacy in cervical cytology.

A retrospective chart review was performed examining patient cytologic results from January to December 2017 at a single academic institution. After historical rates of unsatisfactory cytology were higher than acceptable standards, the practice changed lubricant formulation from a carbomer containing lubricant to a noncarbomer, water soluble lubricant. Demographic data and treatment characteristics were collected for eligible patients. Matched analysis was performed to examine factors associated with an unsatisfactory cytology result.

After the change in lubricant, there was a significant decline in the rates of unsatisfactory cytology from 9.6% to 5.7%, P = 0.01. This decline was also observed when patients were matched based on menopausal status, personal history of gynecologic malignancy, pregnancy status, and cytology specimen type (10.0% to 4.8%, P = 0.001).

Change in lubricant from a carbomer containing to noncarbomer, water soluble product was associated with a statistically significant decline in the rates of unsatisfactory cytology. Although prior data have had mixed results as to the etiology of unsatisfactory cytology, we feel that this directly contributed to the high rates observed at our institution.

To compare rates of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) in transgender patients with cisgender patients after minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH).

We performed a single-surgeon, retrospective cohort analysis comparing the rates of VCD in patients undergoing MIH for gender affirmation with other indications (benign, malignant, prophylactic) with our study surgeon between January, 2015, and December, 2021.

Major, urban, academic tertiary care hospital in the United States.

166 patients met inclusion criteria with 49 of those patients undergoing MIH (29.5%) for gender affirmation. Of the remaining 117 patients, 92 (78.6%) underwent MIH for cancer, 15 (12.8%) for prophylaxis, and 10 (8.5%) for benign indications.

Not applicable.

We assessed included patients for baseline demographics, presence of risk factors for VCD, details of index hysterectomy, and details of cuff dehiscence events.

Transgender patients tended to be younger at the time of surgery, but demographics were otherwise similar between both groups. Most transgender patients (n = 36, 73.5%) had both ovaries removed at the time of hysterectomy, 100% were on testosterone therapy pre- and postoperatively, and none used supplementary estrogen. Three of the 49 transgender patients (6.1%) experienced postoperative dehiscence of the vaginal cuff compared with 2 of the 117 cisgender patients (1.7%). This failed to reach statistical significance; however, our descriptive analysis showed that all cases of dehiscence in the cisgender group had identifiable precipitating factors (i.e., trauma). By comparison, all cases of dehiscence in the transgender group were spontaneous with few identifiable risk factors.

Transgender patients undergoing MIH may be at increased risk of VCD, although the rarity of this surgical complication precluded determination of statistical significance in our data set. We propose testosterone exposure as a possible risk factor for VCD, although we cannot exclude other factors, such as young age, as drivers of VCD in this population. Future studies of biospecimens are needed to evaluate for cellular differences in these patients.

The transgender population faces unique psychosocial and physical obstacles to cervical cancer screening. Additionally, most individuals undergo masculinizing testosterone hormone therapy, and the physiologic changes can cause cytomorphologic alterations that may mimic lesions. Although the literature on cervicovaginal cytology is growing in this patient population, it is still limited.

The pathology information system was queried for all Papanicolaou (Pap) tests from transgender men from January 2013 to February 2023. The original diagnostic categories were catalogued. Cases were reviewed to evaluate the cytomorphologic alterations. Clinical data were also sought, including whether the sample was self-collected. Two comparison groups were established: one was a postpartum atrophic group and the other was an all-comer group.

A total of 51 cases from 43 individuals were identified, with a mean age of 31 years. Approximately a third of cases (18 of 51; 35%) were self-collected. The abnormal rate was low, with 5.9% of cases rendered atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on original review and no lesions identified. The Pap unsatisfactory rate according to original reports was 3.9%. This increased to 13.7% when the cases were rereviewed, which was significantly higher than the all-comer comparison group. The unsatisfactory rate did not correlate with self-collection. Atrophy was a prevalent cytomorphologic alteration, with the vast majority of cases (92%) showing at least mild atrophy. Small blue cells and transitional cell metaplasia were seen in many cases (53% and 43%, respectively).

There are clinical and morphologic considerations that are distinct to the transgender patient population. Laboratory personnel and diagnosticians need to be aware of these in order to optimize patient care.

Literature focused on cancer screening and management is lacking in the transgender population.

To action to increase contributions to the scientific literature that drives the creation of cancer screening and management protocols for transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) patients.

We performed a systematic search of PubMed on January 5th, 2022, with the following terms: "TGNC", OR "transgender", OR "gender non-conforming", OR "gender nonbinary" AND "cancer screening", AND "breast cancer", AND "cervical cancer", AND "uterine cancer", AND "ovarian cancer", AND "prostate cancer", AND "testicular cancer", AND "surveillance", AND "follow-up", AND "management". 70 unique publications were used. The findings are discussed under "Screening" and "Management" categories.

Screening: Current cancer screening recommendations default to cis-gender protocols. However, long-term gender-affirming hormone therapy and loss to follow-up from the gender-specific specialties contribute to a higher risk for cancer development and possible delayed detection. The only known screening guidelines made specifically for this population are from the American College of Radiology for breast cancer. Management: Prior to undergoing Gender Affirmation Surgery (GAS), discussion should address cancer screening and management in the organs remaining in situ. Cancer treatment in this population requires consideration for chemotherapy, radiation, surgery and/or reconstruction. Modification of hormone therapy is decided on a case-by-case basis. The use of prophylactic vs aesthetic techniques in surgery is still debated.

When assessing transgender individuals for GAS, a discussion on the future oncologic risk of the sex-specific organs remaining in situ is essential. Cancer management in this population requires a multidisciplinary approach while the care should be highly individualized with considerations to social, medical, surgical and gender affirming surgery related specifications. Special considerations have to be made during planning for GAS as surgery will alter the anatomy and may render the organ difficult to sample for screening purposes. A discussion with the patient regarding the oncologic risk of remaining organs is imperative prior to GAS. Other special considerations to screening such as the conscious or unconscious will to unassociated with their remaining organs is also a key point to address. We currently lack high quality studies pertinent to the cancer topic in the gender affirmation literature. Further research is required to ensure more comprehensive and individualized care for this population.

The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence-based guidance on the management of a positive human papilloma virus (HPV) test and to provide guidance around screening and HPV testing for specific patient populations. The guideline was developed by a working group in collaboration with the Gynecologic Oncology Society of Canada (GOC), Society of Colposcopists of Canada (SCC), and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The literature informing these guidelines was obtained through a systematic review of relevant literature by a multi-step search process led by an information specialist. The literature was reviewed up to July 2021 with manual searches of relevant national guidelines and more recent publications. The quality of the evidence and strength of recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The intended users of this guideline include primary care providers, gynecologists, colposcopists, screening programs, and healthcare facilities. The implementation of the recommendations will ensure an optimum implementation of HPV testing with a focus on the management of positive results. Recommendations for appropriate care for underserved and marginalized groups are made.

Cervical cancer screening is as important in female-to-male transgender (FTMT) patients as it is in cisgender female patients. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of clinical information regarding gender identity and testosterone therapy on the cytological interpretations.

A list of FTMT patients and cisgender female patients who had received a cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) test for cancer screening was obtained. The cytological diagnoses, rendered at the time of collection, were recorded. A retrospective slide review with knowledge of the pertinent clinical information, including testosterone therapy status, was performed. The data sets were statistically compared.

Of 122 cervical Pap tests in 111 FTMT individuals, 23 (19%) had surgical follow-ups; 73 (60%) had HPV testing, of which 12 (16%) were positive for high-risk strains; and 79 (65%) were known to be receiving testosterone. On the "original" review, 12 (9.8%) tests were diagnosed as unsatisfactory. Seventy-one (58%) Pap tests were initially diagnosed as negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) without atrophy and 32 (26%) with atrophy. Seven (5.7%) of the tests were initially diagnosed as abnormal. On the "retrospective" review, the rate of unsatisfactory tests remained the same, and atrophy was observed in 76 (62%) tests. The number of abnormal tests was reduced to 4 (3.3%) after the retrospective review. Almost all comparative studies returned a P-value of ≤0.05.

Our findings indicate that clinical information regarding whether a subject is transgender and/or is receiving testosterone therapy is crucial to avoiding Pap test overcalls.

Testosterone is one of the strategies that transmasculine persons can elect in order to align physical traits to their gender identity. Previous studies have shown morphologic changes in the genital tract associated with testosterone. Here, we aim to evaluate cervicovaginal cytology specimens (Pap tests) and high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) testing from transmasculine individuals receiving testosterone.

This is a retrospective cohort of 61 transmasculine individuals receiving testosterone from 2013 to 2021. Cytologic diagnoses from 65 Pap tests were correlated with HPV status and histologic follow-up and compared with the institutional data and a cohort of cisgender women with atrophic changes.

The median age was 28 years and median time of testosterone use was 3 years. Transmasculine persons showed significantly higher rates of HSIL (2%) and unsatisfactory (16%) when compared with the institutional data and atrophic cohort of cisgender women. After reviewing slides of 46 cases, additional findings were noted: atrophy was present in 87%, glycogenated cells were seen in 30%, and Lactobacilli were substantially decreased in 89%. Among 32 available HPV tests, 19% were positive for HR-HPV and 81% were negative. On histologic follow-up, all HR-HPV-positive cases with abnormal cytology showed HSIL, while none of the HPV-negative cases revealed HSIL.

Our study cohort demonstrated a high percentage of abnormal Pap tests in transmasculine persons receiving testosterone. Testosterone seems to induce changes in squamous cells and shifts in vaginal flora. HR-HPV testing can be a useful adjunct in the workup of abnormal Pap tests from transmasculine individuals.

There are substantial disparities in cancer screening for sexual minorities and gender non-conforming patients. In additional to patients having trauma due to negative experiences with the healthcare system, disparities may be heightened due to heteronormative and cisnormative design of screening programs and electronic medical record systems. Furthermore, there are morphologic challenges specific to certain specimen types from the LGBT + population, such as anal cytology samples, cervical cytology from transgender men taking testosterone, and neovaginal cytology samples. Men who have sex with men are at increased risk for anal cancer compared with the general population. While early detection of anal dysplasia decreases the risk of invasive carcinoma, screening programs are not widespread. Cervical cancer screening may be psychologically and physically challenging for transgender men and non-binary patients. The use of exogenous testosterone therapy causes atrophic changes in cervical cytology samples which mimic high-grade dysplasia. The rate of unsatisfactory samples are also increased in this population. Although HPV driven cancers have been reported in patients with neovaginas, there are currently no guidelines about appropriate screening for transgender women and intersex patients who have neovaginas. Cytopathologists can optimize the health of LGBT + patients in many ways including advocating for inclusive screening guidelines, validating self-collection for HPV and cytology samples, updating requisition forms to better capture the spectrum of gender expression, and recognizing the morphologic changes in cytology samples due to exogenous hormone use.

As gender-affirming surgeries become more routine, it is increasingly important for pathologists to recognize the expected histologic changes seen in various tissues secondary to gender-affirming hormone therapy. For example, exogenous testosterone-related squamous atrophy or transitional cell metaplasia of the cervix may be confused for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. In addition to distinguishing between benign and dysplastic/malignant features, pathologists should be mindful of the phrasing of their reports and aim to use objective, nongendered language.

Transgender men and transmasculine persons experience a discordance between the female sex they were assigned at birth and their gender. They may choose to take hormone therapy and/or undergo surgery to masculinize the body. Understanding the common (and less common) histologic changes present in patients taking masculinizing hormones will empower pathologists to better serve this unique patient population.

To summarize histologic findings in surgical pathology specimens from persons taking masculinizing hormones as a part of gender transition.

A systematic review of the OVID Medline and PubMed databases was performed to identify all studies describing histologic findings in surgical pathology specimens from transgender men from January 1946 to January 2021.

Publication in this area has markedly increased in the last 2 decades. However, most of the studies identified were descriptive and case reports describing changes seen in specimens removed as a part of masculinizing surgical procedures. Benign histologic findings include stromal hyalinization and epithelial atrophy in the breast, polycystic ovarian syndrome-like changes in the ovary, and transitional cell metaplasia in the cervix. The most commonly reported neoplastic finding was adenocarcinoma of the breast, with rare cases of ovarian, endometrial, cervical, vaginal, pituitary, pancreatic, and cardiovascular neoplasia also reported. Ongoing research in this area is needed to better characterize the histologic findings in persons taking masculinizing hormones to provide a deeper understanding of the effect of these treatments on different tissues and facilitate better patient management.

As gender-affirming surgeries become more common, it is important for pathologists to recognize potential benign findings to avoid misinterpretation. Cervical transitional cell metaplasia and superficial clusters of small basophilic cells have been described in the context of gender-affirming testosterone therapy; these findings may be misdiagnosed as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or endometrial cells on Pap. Prostatic metaplasia has been reported in the surface squamous epithelium of the vagina and uterine cervix in individuals undergoing gender-affirming androgen therapy; this finding is often associated with NKX3.1-positive basal keratinocytes.

Here, we assess morphologic and immunohistochemical features of the uterine cervix in 49 gender-affirming hysterectomies compared to 57 hysterectomies from cisgender patients to establish the relative prevalence of surface prostatic metaplasia, NKX3.1-positive basal keratinocytes, transitional cell metaplasia, and small basophilic cells in cervical squamous epithelium.

The cervical tissue from the gender-affirming therapy cohort demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of NKX3.1 positive basal keratinocytes (86% versus 1.8%), transitional cell metaplasia (80% versus 3.5%), superficial clusters of small basophilic cells (67% versus 7%), and surface prostatic metaplasia (43% versus 3.5%).

NKX3.1 positive basal keratinocytes, transitional cell metaplasia, small basophilic cells, and surface prostatic metaplasia are all more prevalent in the cervices of individuals on gender-affirming testosterone therapy; awareness of this fact allows pathologists to avoid the overdiagnosis of dysplasia or recommendation of unnecessary follow-up procedures.

Gender-affirming surgery is part of a multidisciplinary approach in gender transitioning. Deeper histologic examination may strengthen care for transmasculine individuals and increase the understanding of the influence of hormonal therapy in specific organs.

To evaluate and catalogue histologic findings of tissue obtained from gender-affirming gynecologic surgery and cervical cytology specimens.

This is an institutional review board-approved retrospective study that included transmasculine individuals who underwent gender-affirming gynecologic surgery from January 2015 to June 2020. All surgical gynecologic pathology and cervical cytology slides were reviewed by 2 pathologists.

Fifty-five patients were included, which represented 40 uteri, 35 bilateral ovaries, 15 vaginectomy specimens, and 24 cervical cytology results. The median age was 27 years (range, 18-56) and 94% (50 of 53) of patients were receiving testosterone for at least 1 year. Seventy-five percent (30 of 40) of endometria were inactive, while 25% (10 of 40) showed evidence of cycling. Transitional cell metaplasia was the most common finding in the cervix (17 of 40) and vagina (15 of 15), reflecting a high percentage (4 of 24) of unsatisfactory or ASC-US (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) cervical cytologies. Prostatic-type glands were identified in 20% (8 of 40) of cervices and 67% (10 of 15) of vaginectomy specimens. Multiple bilateral cystic follicles and evidence of follicular maturation were present in 57% (20 of 35) of cases. Four cases showed paratubal epididymis-like mesonephric remnant hypertrophy.

A comprehensive evaluation of tissue from gender-affirming surgery increases knowledge of the changes following androgen therapy in transmasculine individuals and may contribute to optimal patient care by raising awareness of normal histologic variations in this population.

Despite the growing number of adult transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients seeking health services, there are many unknowns regarding how routine screening recommendations should be applied to TGD persons receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). Patients taking GAHT may have disease risks that differ from what is expected based on their sex assigned at birth or affirmed gender identity. We discuss two patient cases, one transgender man and one transgender woman who present for routine medical care, to review several conditions that may be impacted by the hormones utilized in masculinizing and feminizing GAHT and for which screening recommendations are available for TGD adults: cardiovascular risk factors, osteoporosis, breast cancer, cervical cancer, and prostate cancer. We reviewed the TGD-specific screening recommendations from several major medical organizations and programs and found them to be largely based upon expert opinion due to a lack of evidence. The goal of this narrative review is to assist healthcare professionals in counseling and screening their TGD patients when and where appropriate. Not all TGD adults have the ability or need to receive routine medical care from a specialized TGD health clinic; therefore, it is essential for all healthcare professionals involved in routine and gender-affirming care to have knowledge about these conditions and screenings.

It is recommended that female-to-male (FTM) transgender patients with a cervix follow the same cervical cancer screening guidelines as cisgender women. This study analyzes Papanicolaou tests, HPV results, and follow-up histology in FTM patients, and compares those results to other atrophic populations at our institution.

A cohort of FTM patients receiving androgen therapy was identified through our institution's translational research database. We collected data on Papanicolaou tests, human papillomavirus (HPV) results, follow-up surgical procedures, and duration of androgen therapy. ThinPrep slides were reviewed for cellularity and cytomorphology. The results of these tests were compared with those of an atrophic control group consisting of postpartum and postmenopausal cisgender women.

We identified 71 FTM patients with 77 Papanicolaou tests collected over 6 years. Papanicolaou interpretations included: negative for intraepithelial lesion (69%), atypical cells of undermined significance (5%), low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (1%), atypical glandular cells (1%), and unsatisfactory due to inadequate cellularity (23%). Five of 27 (18.5%) HPV tests were positive. Follow-up surgical specimens did not identify high-grade lesions. Unsatisfactory rates among FTM patients differed significantly from the atrophic group (P < 0.05), while epithelial abnormality rates and HPV positivity did not (P > 0.05). Most FTM Papanicolaou tests reviewed showed features of atrophy.

FTM patients receiving androgen have high Papanicolaou test unsatisfactory rates secondary to atrophy. Epithelial abnormality and HPV rates do not differ significantly from atrophic cisgender patients. Lowering the cellularity threshold for this population to 2000 like that of other atrophic groups should be considered.

There is increased awareness of transgender physical and mental health widely and in academic research. A significant proportion of transgender men will retain their cervix with an increased risk of cervical cancer. In this review of cervical cancer screening among transgender men, we try to estimate how many transgender men still have a cervix, understand to identify challenges and barriers to cervical screening and propose possible solutions. Organised cervical screening programmes need to consider the needs of this population, in particular the provision of HPV self-sampling. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Transgender men need access to cervical screening.

Trans and gender-diverse people with a cervix experience difficulties accessing cervical cancer screening because of structural, interpersonal, and individual barriers.

The aim of this study was to explore issues with cervical cancer screening participation, awareness, and healthcare provider recommendation for trans and gender-diverse people.

A national Australian survey was conducted in 2018 to 2019. Participants included 196 trans and gender-diverse people with a cervix. Data were analyzed using descriptive and multiple regression analyses. Two awareness items related to cervical cancer screening, healthcare provider recommendation, and cervical cancer screening participation were assessed. Four variables associated with cervical cancer screening were included in the regression: age, healthcare provider recommendation, like for body, and gender.

The sample was young; half (52.6%) were aged 20 to 24 years. Almost half (44.6%) had never had a healthcare provider recommend cervical cancer screening to them. Around half (48.0%) had never participated, with 21.9% reporting that they are regular screeners. More than a quarter (27.5%) of people who had screening had an abnormal result. The most common reasons for not participating in screening were that it is emotionally traumatic for them (55.3%) and inability to find a healthcare provider with whom they are comfortable (38.3%).

Trans and gender-diverse Australians with a cervix are unlikely to be regular participants in cervical cancer screening. To continue reducing cervical cancer rates, healthcare providers must address underscreening in this community.

Gender diversity training needs to be provided to healthcare providers. In addition, healthcare providers need to promote participation in cervical screening in this trans and gender-diverse community.

Cervical cancer mortality in the United Kingdom (UK) has decreased over the last decade, largely due to uptake of cervical cancer screening. However, only those with a female gender marker on their health records are invited, creating a significant barrier to gender minorities accessing screening. We undertook a systematic review to synthesise published literature on cervical cancer screening among eligible gender minorities, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators that might inform changes in UK policy and clinical practice. We conducted a broad search across Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Global Health databases to 3rd January 2020 and included any original, peer-reviewed research, published in the English language that reported on cervical cancer screening among gender minorities assigned female at birth (AFAB). Twenty-seven studies were critically appraised and included in the final synthesis, which identified significant disparities in cervical cancer screening uptake between gender minorities AFAB and cis women. It revealed a lack of knowledge surrounding the relationship between gender minority status and cervical cancer risk among both service users and providers and highlighted significant barriers to access for gender minorities AFAB. Cervical cancer screening was not universally associated with dysphoria among gender minorities AFAB and we recommend that providers explore patients' preferences around screening, while avoiding assumptions. Providers should be proficient in examination techniques that maximise patient autonomy and minimise gender dysphoria or pain. Self-swabs for high-risk HPV may provide a more acceptable, evidence-based, alternative to Pap smears but there remains a need for further UK-specific research, to inform changes in policy.

Estimates of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and susceptibility to HPV-related cancer in transgender men (TM) are comparable to prevalence rates found in cisgender women. Regular and thorough screening for cervical cancer is equally as crucial for TM as for cisgender women; however, despite continued risk for cervical cancer in TM and associated recommendations for screening, studies indicate disparities in rates of cervical cancer screening (CCS) in TM compared to cisgender women. The current scoping review explores TM's knowledge and experiences of CCS and barriers to screening uptake in this population. A range of barriers were identified including the need for health-care services to provide care for TM within the context of a nonbinary approach to gender identity and health. Findings synthesized from relevant research studies (n = 15; published 2008-2019) are presented, and recommendations are drawn from these findings to inform primary health-care providers' clinical practice and care of TM.

The cervical cancer screening recommendation for transgender female-to-male (FTM) patients is the same as that for cisgender females. A lack of literature on testosterone-induced changes in cervical cytology in these patients may result in interpretation errors, especially without a proper clinical history. The aim of this study was to delineate the Papanicolaou (Pap) test findings in this patient population.

A pathology laboratory information system was used to obtain a cohort of FTM transgender patients on testosterone therapy (2009-2019). A cohort of age-matched, atrophic, control cisgender female patients (postpartum or menopausal) was selected. A retrospective review of the cytomorphologic findings on cervical Pap smears, pertinent follow-up, and human papillomavirus (HPV) test results was performed.

Fourteen transgender patients (age range, 21-64 years; mean age, 42.5 years) receiving testosterone therapy with 17 Pap smears were identified. One of the 5 available HPV tests was positive for HPV, and 4 were negative. A Pap smear review revealed the following: negative for intraepithelial lesion (NILM; 82.4%), unsatisfactory (5.9%), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS; 5.9%), and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (5.9%). The Pap smears of the atrophic cisgender cohort (102 patients) revealed the following: NILM (92.5%), unsatisfactory (0.9%), ASCUS (5.6%), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (0.9%). The difference between the rates of epithelial cell abnormality in the 2 cohorts was not statistically significant. Although atrophy was noted in both groups, cytomorphologic findings of transitional cell metaplasia (TCM; 88.2%) and "small cells" (82.4%) were characteristic of the testosterone-treated transgender cohort. Histologic correlates of TCM and small cells were noted in hysterectomy specimens from 6 patients.

Small cells and TCM are common cytomorphologic findings in Pap smears of testosterone-treated transgender (FTM) patients. On the basis of histologic follow-up, small cells most likely represent atrophic parabasal cells of cervical-vaginal epithelium.