Future liver remnant hypertrophy is the primary endpoint of portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy. However, even when adequate future liver remnant is achieved, postoperative hepatic insufficiency is not universally averted. We aimed to identify preoperative risk factors of postoperative hepatic insufficiency despite the use of portal vein embolization.

Patients who underwent portal vein embolization followed by major hepatectomy at 6 academic medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency was defined as postoperative peak bilirubin >7 mg/dL. Preoperative variables associated with postoperative hepatic insufficiency were analyzed.

From 2008 to 2019, 164 patients underwent portal vein embolization followed by major hepatectomy. Twenty (12%) patients developed postoperative hepatic insufficiency. On univariate analysis, postoperative hepatic insufficiency was associated with older age, performance status, preoperative biliary drainage, smaller pre- and post-portal vein embolization future liver remnant volumes, diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer, and preoperative cholangitis. There was significant future liver remnant hypertrophy noted even in the setting of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (from 27% to 39%); however, degree of hypertrophy >5% (100% vs 93%, P = .6) and kinetic growth rate >2%/week (95% vs 82%, P = .3) did not differ between the postoperative hepatic insufficiency and non-postoperative hepatic insufficiency groups. On multivariate analysis, the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer and preoperative cholangitis (postoperative hepatic insufficiency incidence 34% and 62%, respectively), but not future liver remnant volumetrics, were independently associated with postoperative hepatic insufficiency. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency raised post-hepatectomy 90-day mortality from 3.5% to 45% and hospitalization from 7 days to 16 days (both P < .001).

Postoperative hepatic insufficiency still occurs in 12% of patients after major hepatectomy despite preoperative portal vein embolization. In addition to traditional volumetric information, surgeons should be aware of preoperative cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer as powerful predictors of this fatal complication.

Future liver remnant volume (FLRV) is a critical determinant of safety for hepatectomy. This study assesses concordance between imaging-based measured FLRV (mFLRV), and body surface area (BSA)-based standardized FLRV (sFLRV), and their association with post-hepatectomy complications.

All major hepatectomy between 1999 and 2021 were assessed for agreement between mFLRV and sFLRV using concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Association between each method and major postoperative complications, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), or grade 4/5 morbidity was compared using logistic regression model and area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUC) curve to evaluate the discriminatory power of each volumetry method separately.

A total of 1749 patients were included, 49% were female, median age was 60 years, 70.2% had metastatic disease, and 49.7% received preoperative chemotherapy. Median sFLRV (41.3%) was higher than mFLRV (39.4%). Major complications were observed in 5.1% (n = 90). Concordance between mFLRV and sFLRV was moderate, CCC = 0.78 (95% CI 0.75-0.79) but was poor (CCC = 0.39; 95% CI 0.32-0.43) among patients with mFLRV ≤ 35% (n = 528). In this subset, sFLRV overestimated remnant volume in 63% (n = 333) with ≥ 5% overprediction in 145 patients (27.5%). Factors associated with ≥ 5% variation were lower weight (p = 0.003), lower BMI (p = 0.003), and lower BSA (p = 0.004). Both methods performed similarly in predicting major complications with AUC of 0.64 and 0.63 for sFLRV and mFLRV, respectively.

Imaging- and BSA-based volumetry are moderately correlated, with poor concordance among patients with smaller FLRV where sFLRV overestimated remnant volume. Both techniques can be safely used for volumetric assessment before major hepatectomy.

An international registry on liver venous deprivation (LVD, simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization) was created in 2020. This study assessed the outcomes after LVD in patients included in the registry.

Eight international centers participated. Future liver remnant (FLR) and standardized FLR ratios were defined as FLR/total functional liver volume and FLR/total estimated liver volume.

216 patients were included (80 women, median age 63). Main surgical indication was colorectal metastases (n=124). Median and standardized FLR ratios before LVD were 33% (IQR27-47) and 32% (IQR24-39). In one patient, right hepatic vein embolization failed. Complications after LVD occurred in 14 patients (6.5%). After LVD, median and standardized FLR ratios significantly increased to 46% (IQR38-60, p<0.001) and 44% (IQR35-51, p<0.001), corresponding to a median kinetic growth rate of 3.4%/week (IQR1.5-6.0). Hepatectomy was performed in 160 patients (72 extended hepatectomies), while 56 dropped out (4% insufficient hypertrophy, 13% tumor progression). Seventy-seven patients had postoperative complications (48%; 5 postoperative liver failures, 3%). Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 20.9 (IQR0-30.8).

Preliminary data of this international registry showed that LVD had a high technical success rate with few post-procedural complications and significant kinetic growth. Major hepatectomy after LVD appeared to be safe.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between voxel-based dosimetric variables derived from Y-90 PET/MRI and hypertrophy observed in the left lobe after radioembolization and to investigate if there is any difference in hypertrophy induced by glass versus resin microspheres.

Voxel-based dosimetry-derived variables and their relationship with the change of the standardized future liver remnant (ΔFLR) was investigated with linear regression models. To compare and evaluate the discriminatory power of the dosimetric variables, ROC analyses were utilized. ΔFLR and kinetic growth rate (KGR) induced with glass and resin microspheres were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

In this retrospective study, data of the 40 patients treated with Y-90 microspheres were evaluated. Among the several dosimetric variables, the mean perfused volume normal tissue dose (pDnorm), perfused normal tissue V90 (pV90), and pV100 values for glass microspheres; and the mean whole liver normal tissue dose (Dnorm), pDnorm, whole liver normal tissue V30 (nV30), nV40, and pV40 for resin microspheres had the highest relationship with ΔFLR. In the ROC analysis for glass microspheres, the optimal cut-offs to predict ΔFLR > 5% were 60.55 Gy for Dnorm, 94.21 Gy for pDnorm, 28.07% for pV90, and 24.98% for pV100. For resin microspheres, corresponding values were 23.20 Gy for Dnorm, 37.40 Gy for pDnorm, 31.50% for nV30, 24.50% for nV40, and 43.60% for pV40. No significant difference was observed between glass and resin microsphere-induced median ΔFLR, KGR values and atrophy of the right lobe.

Following Y-90 radioembolization therapy with glass and resin microspheres applied to the right lobe of the liver, ΔFLR is correlated with pDnorm and Dnorm, but is also significantly related to various nV and pV values. In addition, the hypertrophy and kinetic growth rates observed with glass and resin microspheres were largely similar.

Modern liver surgery has improved the percentage of potentially resectable malignant tumors. However, if the future liver remnant is small, patients remain at risk of developing postoperative liver failure. Thus, the future liver remnant must be increased, while at the same time, the primary tumor may have to be controlled by chemotherapy. To address this conflict, we retrospectively analyzed the changes in hypertrophy before and after Associating Liver Partition with Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) or Portal Vein Embolization (PVE), with or without parallel systemic chemotherapy.

We retrospectively analysed 172 patients (54 female and 118 male), treated with ALPPS in 90 patients (median age 61 years [Q1, Q3: 52,71]) and with PVE in 82 patients (median age 66 years [Q1, Q3: 56,73]). The median control interval was 4.9 [Q1, Q3: 4.0, 6.0] weeks after the PVE, and 2.6 [Q1, Q3: 1.6, 5.8] weeks after ALPPS step 1.

The overall kinetic growth rate (median) for the entire group was 0.02 (2%) per week. When systemic chemotherapy was administered prior to intervention, the kinetic growth rate of these treated patients (vs. untreated) exhibited a median of 0.020 [Q1, Q3: 0.011, 0.067] compared to 0.024 [Q1, Q3: 0.013, 0.041] (p = 0.949). When chemotherapy was administered after the PVE/ ALPPS treatment, the kinetic growth rate declined from a median of 0.025 [Q1, Q3: 0.013, 0.053] to 0.011 [Q1, Q3: 0.007, 0.021] (p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant effects only in the PVE group (median ALPPS -45% (p = 0.157), PVE -47% (p = 0.005)).

This retrospective analysis indicated that systemic chemotherapy given after PVE/ the first step of the ALPPS procedure, i.e., the growth phase, has a negative effect on the kinetic growth rate.

Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is known to induce better future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy than portal vein embolization (PVE). The role of LVD, compared with PVE, in inducing FLR hypertrophy and allowing safe hepatectomy for patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and high-risk factors for inadequate hypertrophy remains unclear.

Patients undergoing LVD (n = 22) were matched to patients undergoing PVE (n = 279) in a 1:3 ratio based on propensity scores, prior to planned hepatectomy for CLM at a single center (1998-2023). The propensity scores accounted for high-risk factors for inadequate hypertrophy, namely pre-procedure standardized FLR (sFLR), body mass index, number of systemic therapy cycles, an extension of PVE to segment IV portal vein branches, prior resection, and chemotherapy-associated liver injury.

The matched cohort included 78 patients (LVD, n = 22; PVE, n = 56). Baseline characteristics were comparable. The number of tumors in the whole liver was similar but more LVD patients had five or more tumors in the left liver (32% vs. 11%; p = 0.024). Post-procedure sFLR was similar but LVD patients had a significantly higher degree of hypertrophy (16% vs. 11%; p = 0.017) and kinetic growth rate (3.9 vs. 2.4% per week; p = 0.006). More LVD patients underwent extended right hepatectomy (93% vs. 55%; p = 0.008). Only one patient had postoperative hepatic insufficiency after PVE, and no patients died within 90 days of hepatectomy.

In patients with extensive CLM and high-risk factors, LVD is associated with better FLR hypertrophy compared with PVE and allows for safely performing curative-intent extended major hepatectomy.

Approximately 50% of colorectal cancer patients develop liver metastases. Hepatic metastases represent the most common cause of colorectal cancer-related mortality. Metastasectomy, if possible, represents the most effective treatment strategy; 20% of patients will be cured and more than 50% survive at least 5 years. Nuances to treatment planning hinge on whether patients present with resectable disease upfront, whether the future liver remnant is adequate, and whether the primary tumor, if present, is colon versus rectal in origin. This article discusses considerations impacting our approach to patients with colorectal liver metastases and the role for various multimodal treatment options.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant global health burden. Surgery remains a cornerstone in the curative treatment of HCC, and recent years have witnessed notable advancements aimed at refining surgical techniques and improving patient outcomes. This review presents a detailed examination of the recent innovations in HCC surgery, highlighting key developments in both surgical approaches and adjunctive therapies. Advanced imaging technologies have revolutionized preoperative assessment, enabling precise tumour localization and delineation of vascular anatomy. The use of three-dimensional rendering has significantly augmented surgical planning, facilitating more accurate and margin-free resections. The advent of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgical techniques has ushered in an era of minimal access surgery, offering patients the benefits of shorter hospital stays and faster recovery times, while enabling equivalent oncological outcomes. Intraoperative innovations such as intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) and fluorescence-guided surgery have emerged as valuable adjuncts, allowing real-time assessment of tumour extent and aiding in parenchyma preservation. The integration of multimodal therapies, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies, has allowed for 'bio-selection' and shown the potential to optimize patient outcomes. With the advent of augmented reality and artificial intelligence (AI), the future holds immense potential and may represent significant strides towards optimizing patient outcomes and refining the standard of care.

To compare the safety and effectiveness of liver vein deprivation (LVD) and portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients scheduled to undergo liver resection.

This retrospective cohort study included 59 patients who underwent either PVE (n = 28) or LVD (n = 31) in preparation for liver resection. The primary outcome was percent change in future liver remnant volume (FLRV). The secondary endpoints were degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR).

Low baseline FLRV and time interval in days between the procedure and follow-up imaging (Ti) positively impacted the primary and secondary endpoints in both groups. Percent change in FLRV was higher in the LVD group (52.8% ± 5.3) than in the PVE group (22.3% ± 3.0, P < .001). DH was also higher in the LVD group (15.4% ± 1.7) than in the PVE group (6.4% ± 0.9, P < .001). KGR did not differ significantly between groups (LVD, 0.54%/d ± 0.06; PVE, 0.35%/d ± 0.1; P = .239). When patients with a baseline standardized FLRV of >35% were excluded from the analysis, the LVD group demonstrated higher values than the PVE group in KGR (0.57%/d ± 0.06 vs 0.29%/d ± 0.05, P < .001), percent change in FLRV (64.2% ± 6.0 vs 25.9% ± 4.3, P < .001), and DH (15.4% ± 1.4 vs 6.6% ± 1.0, P < .001). No adverse events were noted in either group.

LVD appears to be safe and may be superior to PVE in inducing hypertrophy of future liver remnant in patients scheduled to undergo surgical resection.

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 (Y-90) has been historically reserved for unresectable liver malignancy. Evidence is emerging for the use of SIRT to increase future liver remnant (FLR), allowing for the resection of previously inoperable disease.

This was a 5-year retrospective review of all patients undergoing SIRT with Y-90 at a tertiary institute. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic data, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. The primary outcome, safety of liver resection after SIRT, was evaluated with 90-day morbidity and mortality.

A total of 134 SIRT procedures were performed on 113 patients. Post-SIRT complications occurred in 18 patients (15.9%), with a single 30-day mortality. In addition, 17 patients underwent SIRT with the intent to augment FLR for liver resection. After SIRT, mean hepatic mebrofenin extraction and FLR increased from 2.5%/min/m2 and 30.5% to 4.2%/min/m2 and 52.5% (P = .01 and P < .0001, respectively). Ten patients underwent resection, and there were 2 intraoperative complications. The median time from SIRT to resection was 5.2 months. The 90-day postoperative morbidity was 20% (n = 2), and complications were analyzed according to the Clavien-Dindo II classification scale. There was no 30-day or 90-day postoperative mortality.

Post-SIRT liver resection is a challenging procedure with low postoperative mortality and morbidity.

To assess the performance of FLIS in predicting adverse outcomes, namely post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and death, in patients who underwent liver surgery for malignancies.

All consecutive patients who underwent liver resection and 1.5 T gadoxetic acid MR were enrolled. PHLF and overall survival (OS) were collected. Two radiologists with 18 and 8 years of experience in abdominal imaging, blinded to clinical data, evaluated all images. Radiologists evaluated liver parenchymal enhancement (EnQS), biliary contrast excretion (ExQS), and signal intensity of the portal vein relative to the liver parenchyma (PVsQs). Reliability analysis was computed with Cohen's Kappa. Cox regression analysis was calculated to determine which factors are associated with PHLF and OS. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) was computed.

150 patients were enrolled, 58 (38.7 %) in the HCC group and 92 (61.3 %) in the non-HCC group. The reliability analysis between the two readers was almost perfect (κ = 0.998). The multivariate Cox analysis showed that only post-surgical blood transfusions and major resection were associated with adverse events [HR=8.96 (7.98-9.88), p = 0.034, and HR=0.99 (0.781-1.121), p = 0.032, respectively] in the whole population. In the HCC group, the multivariable Cox analysis showed that blood transfusions, major resection and FLIS were associated with adverse outcomes [HR=13.133 (2.988-55.142), p = 0.009, HR=0.987 (0.244-1.987), p = 0.021, and HR=1.891 (1.772-3.471), p = 0.039]. The FLIS AUROC to predict adverse outcomes was 0.660 (95 %CIs = 0.484-0.836), with 87 % sensitivity and 33.3 % specificity (81.1-94.4 and 22.1-42.1).

FLIS can be considered a promising tool to preoperative depict patients at risk of PHLF and death.

One of the major reasons for unresectability of the liver is that the remnant liver volume is insufficient to support postoperative liver function. Post-hepatectomy liver insufficiency is one of the most serious complications in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Preoperative portal vein embolization is performed with the aim of inducing hypertrophy of the future liver remnant and is thought to reduce the risk of liver insufficiency after hepatectomy. We, interventional radiologists, are required to safely complete the procedure to promote future liver remnant hypertrophy as possible and understand portal vein anatomy variations and hemodynamics, embolization techniques, and how to deal with possible complications. The basic information interventional radiologists need to know about preoperative portal vein embolization is discussed in this review.

For primary and secondary liver tumors oncological resection remains a chance of cure. Augmentation of functional liver tissue may be necessary to preserve sufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Clinical decision-making on liver augmentation techniques and indications may differ internationally. Thus, this study aims to identify standards of liver augmentation in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.

Using a web-based survey, 48 hospitals in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria were invited to report their surgical indication, standard procedures, and results of liver augmentation.

Forty (83.3%) of the hospitals invited participated. Most of the hospitals were certified liver centers (55%), performing complex surgeries such as liver transplantation (57.5%) and ALPPS (80%). The standard liver augmentation technique in all countries was portal vein embolization (PVE; 56%), followed by ALPPS (32.1%) in Germany or PVE with hepatic vein embolization (33.3%) in Switzerland and Austria. Standard procedure for liver augmentation did not correlate with certification as liver center, performance of liver transplantation or ALPPS. Surgical indication for PVE varied depending on tumor entity. Most hospitals rated the importance of PVE before resection of cholangiocarcinoma or colorectal metastases as high, while PVE for hepatocellular carcinoma was rated as low.

The survey gives an overview of the clinical routine in HPB centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. PVE seems to dominate as standard technique to increase the FLR. However, there is a variety in the main indication for liver augmentation. Further studies are necessary evaluating the differing PVE techniques for liver augmentation.

Background and Objectives: Preoperative right portal vein embolization (RPVE) is often attempted before right hepatectomy for liver tumors to increase the future remnant liver volume (FRLV). Although many factors affecting FRLV have been discussed, few studies have focused on the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the right portal vein to that of the left portal vein (RPVA/LPVA). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of RPVA/LPVA on predicting FRLV increase after RPVE. Materials and Methods: The data of 65 patients who had undergone RPVE to increase FRLV between 2004 and 2021 were investigated retrospectively. Using computed tomography scans, we measured the total liver volume (TLV), FRLV, the proportion of FRLV relative to TLV (FRLV%), the increase in FRLV% (ΔFRLV%), and RPVA/LPVA twice, immediately before and 2-3 weeks after RPVE; we analyzed the correlations among those variables, and determined prognostic factors for sufficient ΔFRLV%. Results: Fifty-four patients underwent hepatectomy. Based on the cut-off value of RPVA/LPVA, the patients were divided into low (RPVA/LPVA ≤ 1.20, N = 30) and high groups (RPVA/LPVA > 1.20, N = 35). The ΔFRLV% was significantly greater in the high group than in the low group (9.52% and 15.34%, respectively, p < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, RPVA/LPVA (HR = 20.368, p < 0.001) was the most significant prognostic factor for sufficient ΔFRLV%. Conclusions: RPVE was more effective in patients with higher RPVA/LPVA, which is an easily accessible predictive factor for sufficient ΔFRLV%.

Despite considerable advances in surgical technique, many patients with hepatic malignancies are not operative candidates due to projected inadequate hepatic function following resection. Consequently, the size of the future liver remnant (FLR) is an essential consideration when predicting a patient's likelihood of liver insufficiency following hepatectomy. Since its initial description 30 years ago, portal vein embolization has become the standard of care for augmenting the size and function of the FLR preoperatively. However, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed to improve surgical candidacy, chief among them liver venous deprivation and radiation lobectomy. The purpose of this review is to discuss the status of preoperative liver augmentation prior to resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with a focus on these three techniques, highlighting the distinctions between them and suggesting directions for future investigation.

Postoperative hepatic insufficiency (PHI) is the most feared complication after hepatectomy. Volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) is one objectively measurable indicator to identify patients at risk of PHI. In this review, we summarized the development and rationale for the use of liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions and highlighted emerging tools that could yield new advancements in liver volumetry.

A review of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify literature related to liver volumetry. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional publications.

Liver volumetry based on radiologic imaging was developed in the 1980s to identify patients at risk of PHI and later used in the 1990s to evaluate grafts for living donor living transplantation. The field evolved in the 2000s by the introduction of standardized FLR based on the hepatic metabolic demands and in the 2010s by the introduction of the degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate as measures of the FLR regenerative and functional capacity. Several liver-regenerative interventions, most notably portal vein embolization, are used to increase resectability and reduce the risk of PHI. In parallel with the increase in automation and machine assistance to physicians, many semi- and fully automated tools are being developed to facilitate liver volumetry.

Liver volumetry is the most reliable tool to detect patients at risk of PHI. Advances in imaging analysis technologies, newly developed functional measures, and liver-regenerative interventions have been improving our ability to perform safe hepatectomy.

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a life-threatening complication after hepatectomy. To reduce PHLF, a preoperative assessment of liver function is indispensable. For this purpose, 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy with SPECT (MSPECT) can be used. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the predictive value of MSPECT for PHLF in patients with non-colorectal liver tumors (NCRLT) compared to patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) undergoing extended liver resection.

We included all patients undergoing extended liver resections via two-stage procedures between January 2019 and December 2021 at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. All patients received a preoperative MSPECT.

Twenty patients were included. In every fourth patient, PHLF was observed. Four patients had PHLF grade C. There were no differences between patients with CRLM and NCRLT regarding PHLF rate and future liver remnant (FLR) volume. Patients with CRLM had higher mebrofenin uptake in the FLR compared to those with NCRLT (2.49%/min/m2 vs. 1.51%/min/m2; p = 0.004).

Mebrofenin uptake in patients with NCRLT was lower compared to those patients with CRLM. However, there was no difference in the PHLF rate and FLR volume. Cut-off values for the mebrofenin uptake might need adjustments for different surgical indications, surgical procedures, and underlying diseases.

Two-staged hepatectomy (TSH) including portal vein embolization (PVE) may offer surgical treatment for extensive bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and outcomes of extended right hepatectomy (ERH) within TSH including PVE for patients with extended CRLM.

We retrospectively collected data of patients who underwent TSH for extended CRLM between 2015 and 2021 at our institution. Clearance of the left liver lobe (clear-up, CU) associated with PVE was followed by ERH.

Minimally invasive (n = 12, 46%, MIH) or open hepatectomy (n = 14, 54%, OH) was performed. Postoperative major morbidity and 90-day mortality were 54% and 0%. Three-year overall survival was 95%. Baseline characteristics, postoperative and long-term outcomes were comparable between MIH and OH. However, hospital stay was significantly shorter after MIH (8 vs. 15 days, p = 0.008). Additionally, the need for intraoperative transfusions tended to be lower in the MIH group (17% vs. 50%, p = 0.110).

ERH following CU and PVE for extended CRLM is feasible and safe in laparoscopic and open approaches. MIH for ERH may result in shorter postoperative hospital stays. Further high-volume, multicenter studies are required to evaluate the potential superiority of MIH.

The liver is one the largest organs in the abdomen and the most frequent site of metastases for gastrointestinal tumors. Surgery on this complex and highly vascularized organ can be associated with high morbidity even in experienced hands. A thorough understanding of liver anatomy is key to approaching liver surgery with confidence and preventing complications. The aim of this quiz is to provide an active learning tool for a comprehensive understanding of liver anatomy and its integration into clinical practice.

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is used to induce remnant liver hypertrophy prior to major hepatectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of baseline computed tomography (CT) data for future remnant liver (FRL) hypertrophy after PVE.

In this retrospective study, all consecutive patients undergoing right-sided PVE with or without hepatic vein embolization between 2018 and 2021 were included. CT volumetry was performed before and after PVE to assess standardized FRL volume (sFRLV). Radiomic features were extracted from baseline CT after segmenting liver (without tumor), spleen and bone marrow. For selecting features that allow classification of response (hypertrophy ≥ 1.33), a stepwise dimension reduction was performed. Logistic regression models were fitted and selected features were tested for their predictive value. Decision curve analysis was performed on the test dataset.

A total of 53 patients with liver tumor were included in this study. sFRLV increased significantly after PVE, with a mean hypertrophy of FRL of 1.5 ± 0.3-fold. sFRLV hypertrophy ≥ 1.33 was reached in 35 (66%) patients. Three independent radiomic features, i.e. liver-, spleen- and bone marrow-associated, differentiated well between responders and non-responders. A logistic regression model revealed the highest accuracy (area under the curve 0.875) for the prediction of response, with sensitivity of 1.0 and specificity of 0.5. Decision curve analysis revealed a positive net benefit when applying the model.

This proof-of-concept study provides first evidence of a potential predictive value of baseline multi-organ radiomics CT data for FRL hypertrophy after PVE.

Liver resection is the treatment for a variety of benign and malignant conditions. Despite advances in preoperative selection, surgical technique, and perioperative management, post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following liver resection.

A review of the literature was performed utilizing MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases in May of 2023. The MESH terms "liver failure," "liver insufficiency," and "hepatic failure" in combination with "liver surgery," "liver resection," and "hepatectomy" were searched in the title and/or abstract. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional eligible publications.

PHLF can have devastating physiological consequences. In general, risk factors can be categorized as patient-related, primary liver function-related, or perioperative factors. Currently, no effective treatment options are available and the management of PHLF is largely supportive. Therefore, identifying risk factors and preventative strategies for PHLF is paramount. Ensuring an adequate future liver remnant is important to mitigate risk of PHLF. Dynamic liver function tests provide more objective assessment of liver function based on the metabolic capacity of the liver and have the advantage of easy administration, low cost, and easy reproducibility.

Given the absence of randomized data specifically related to the management of PHLF, current strategies are based on the principles of management of acute liver failure from any cause. In addition, goal-directed therapy for organ dysfunction, as well as identification and treatment of reversible factors in the postoperative period are critical.

The liver is a common site of cancer metastases. Systemic therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for liver metastases (LM), although select patients with liver oligometastases may be candidates for potentially curative liver resection. Recent data support the role of nonsurgical local therapies such as ablation, external beam radiotherapy, embolization, and hepatic artery infusion therapy for management of LM. Additionally, for patients with advanced, symptomatic LM, local therapies may provide palliative benefit. The American Radium Society gastrointestinal expert panel, including members representing radiation oncology, interventional radiology, surgical oncology, and medical oncology, performed a systemic review and developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of nonsurgical local therapies for LM. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the use of nonsurgical local therapies for patients with LM.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver tumor after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Management depends on their resectability at the time of diagnosis. Two types can be distinguished by imaging: resectable ICCs amenable to surgery and locally advanced and/or metastatic ICCs, that are treated by chemotherapy, radiotherapy or loco-regional treatment (radioembolization, chemoembolization, intra-arterial chemotherapy and thermoablation). Over the last decade, the management strategy for these tumors has been modified by the appearance of loco-regional treatments as well as the introduction of immunotherapy that have shown their efficacy in the control of ICC. The aim of this review is to describe the current status of treatments for ICCs, as well as the different therapeutic strategies being assessed.

Purpose: Among liver hypertrophy technics, liver venous deprivation (LVD) has been recently introduced as an effective procedure to combine simultaneous portal inflow and hepatic outflow abrogation, raising growing clinical interest. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of LVD for preoperative optimization of future liver remnant (FLR) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), especially when compared with portal vein embolization (PVE). Methods: Between January 2013 and July 2022, all patients diagnosed with PHC and scheduled for preoperative optimization of FTR, through radiological hypertrophy techniques, prior to liver resection, were included. FTR volumetric assessment was evaluated at two distinct timepoints to track the progression of both early (T1, 10 days post-procedural) and late (T2, 21 days post-procedural) efficacy indicators. Post-procedural outcomes, including functional and volumetric analyses, were compared between the LVD and the PVE cohorts. Results: A total of 12 patients underwent LVD while 19 underwent PVE. No significant differences in either post-procedural or post-operative complications were found. Post-procedural FLR function, calculated with (99m) Tc-Mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy, and kinetic growth rate, at both timepoints, were greater in the LVD cohort (3.12 ± 0.55%/min/m2 vs. 2.46 ± 0.64%/min/m2, p = 0.041; 27.32 ± 16.86%/week (T1) vs. 15.71 ± 9.82%/week (T1) p < 0.001; 17.19 ± 9.88%/week (T2) vs. 9.89 ± 14.62%/week (T2) p = 0.034) when compared with the PVE cohort. Post-procedural FTR volumes were similar for both hypertrophy techniques. Conclusions: LVD is an effective procedure to effectively optimize FLR before liver resection for PHC. The faster growth rate combined with the improved FLR function, when compared to PVE alone, could maximize surgical outcomes by lowering post-hepatectomy liver failure rates.

Liver resection is the first curative option for most hepatic primary and secondary malignancies. However, post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) still represents a non-negligible postoperative complication, embodying the most frequent cause of hepatic-related mortality. In the absence of a specific treatment, the most effective way to deal with PHLF is its prevention through a careful preoperative assessment of future liver remnant (FLR) volume and function. Apart from the clinical score and classical criteria to define the safe limit of resectability, new imaging modalities have shown their ability to assist surgeons in planning the best operative strategy with a precise estimation of the FLR amount. New technologies leading to liver and tumor 3D reconstruction may guide the surgeon along the best resection planes combining the least liver parenchymal sacrifice with oncological appropriateness. Integration with imaging modalities, such as hepatobiliary scintigraphy, capable of estimating total and regional liver function, may bring about a decrease in postoperative complications. Magnetic resonance imaging with hepatobiliary contrast seems to be predominant since it simultaneously integrates hepatic function and volume information along with a precise characterization of the target malignancy.

The size and function of the future liver remnant (FLR) is an essential consideration for both eligibility for treatment and postoperative prognosis when planning surgical hepatectomy. Over time, a variety of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques have been investigated, from the earliest portal vein embolization (PVE) to the more recent Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and liver venous deprivation (LVD) procedures. Despite numerous publications on this topic, no bibliometric analysis has yet been conducted.

Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database was searched to identify studies related to preoperative FLR augmentation techniques published from 1997 to 2022. The analysis was performed using the CiteSpace [version 6.1.R6 (64-bit)] and VOSviewer [version 1.6.19].

A total of 973 academic studies were published by 4431 authors from 920 institutions in 51 countries/regions. The University of Zurich was the most published institution while Japan was the most productive country. Eduardo de Santibanes had the most published articles, and Masato Nagino was the most frequently co-cited author. The most frequently published journal was HPB, and the most cited journal was Ann Surg, with 8088 citations. The main aspects of preoperative FLR augmentation technique is to enhance surgical technology, expand clinical indications, prevent and treat postoperative complications, ensure long-term survival, and evaluate the growth rate of FLR. Recently, hot keywords in this field include ALPPS, LVD, and Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy.

This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of preoperative FLR augmentation techniques, offering valuable insights and ideas for scholars in this field.

Colorectal malignancy is the third most common cancer and one of the prevalent causes of death globally. Around 20-25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis, and 50-60% of patients develop metastases in due course of the disease. Liver, followed by lung and lymph nodes, are the most common sites of colorectal cancer metastases. In such patients, the 5-year survival rate is approximately 19.2%. Although surgical resection is the primary mode of managing colorectal cancer metastases, only 10-25% of patients are competent for curative therapy. Hepatic insufficiency may be the aftermath of extensive surgical hepatectomy. Hence formal assessment of future liver remnant volume (FLR) is imperative prior to surgery to prevent hepatic failure. The evolution of minimally invasive interventional radiological techniques has enhanced the treatment algorithm of patients with colorectal cancer metastases. Studies have demonstrated that these techniques may address the limitations of curative resection, such as insufficient FLR, bi-lobar disease, and patients at higher risk for surgery. This review focuses on curative and palliative role through procedures including portal vein embolization, radioembolization, and ablation. Alongside, we deliberate various studies on conventional chemoembolization and chemoembolization with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads. The radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres has evolved as salvage therapy in surgically unresectable and chemo-resistant metastases.

CT body composition analysis has been shown to play an important role in predicting health and has the potential to improve patient outcomes if implemented clinically. Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning have led to high speed and accuracy for extracting body composition metrics from CT scans. These may inform preoperative interventions and guide treatment planning. This review aims to discuss the clinical applications of CT body composition in clinical practice, as it moves towards widespread clinical implementation.

Technetium-99m-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy is preferred for assessing the liver functional reserve in patients undergoing hepatectomy, but its superiority over computed tomography volumetry after portal vein embolization and subsequent hepatectomy remains elusive. We aimed to compare technetium-99m-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy with conventional computed tomography volumetry for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure in patients after portal vein embolization.

This retrospective study analyzed 152 consecutive patients who underwent hepatobiliary cancer resection after portal vein embolization between 2006 and 2021. Posthepatectomy liver failure was graded according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria. The predictive abilities for posthepatectomy liver failure were compared between the future remnant uptake (%) by technetium-99m-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy and the future remnant volume (%) by computed tomography volumetry.

Future remnant uptake (%) was significantly greater than future remnant volume (%) after portal vein embolization (47.9% vs 40.8%; P < .001), while the values were comparable before portal vein embolization (32.7% vs 31.2%; P = .116). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that post-portal vein embolization future remnant volume (%) had a significantly higher area under the curve than post-portal vein embolization future remnant uptake (%) (0.709 vs 0.630; P = .046) for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure. Multivariable analysis revealed that post-portal vein embolization future remnant volume (%) independently predicted posthepatectomy liver failure, but future remnant uptake (%) did not. Although the incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure grade ≥B was 17.8% when indocyanine green-clearance of the future liver remnant based on both future remnant volume (%) and future remnant uptake (%) was ≥0.05, it was higher in other combinations: 55.6% for indocyanine green clearance of the remnant volume ≥0.05/indocyanine green clearance of the remnant uptake ≤0.05; 50.0% for indocyanine green clearance of the remnant volume ≤0.05/indocyanine green clearance of the remnant uptake ≥0.05; and 50% for indocyanine green clearance of the remnant volume ≤0.05/indocyanine green clearance of the remnant uptake ≤0.05.

Technetium-99m-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy is not superior to computed tomography volumetry for assessing the future liver remnant in patients undergoing major hepatectomy after portal vein embolization.

In the pre-clinical setting, hepatocellular bile salt accumulation impairs liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy. Here, we study the impact of cholestasis on portal vein embolization (PVE)-induced hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR).

Patients were enrolled with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) undergoing PVE before a (extended) right hemihepatectomy. Volume of segments II/III was considered FLR and assessed on pre-embolization and post-embolization CT scans. The degree of hypertrophy (DH, percentual increase) and kinetic growth rate (KGR, percentage/week) were used to assess PVE-induced hypertrophy.

A total of 50 patients (31 CRLM, 19 pCCA) were included. After PVE, the DH and KGR were similar in patients with CRLM and pCCA (5.2 [3.3-6.9] versus 5.7 [3.2-7.4] %, respectively, p = 0.960 for DH; 1.4 [0.9-2.5] versus 1.9 [1.0-2.4] %/week, respectively, p = 0.742 for KGR). Moreover, pCCA patients with or without hyperbilirubinemia had comparable DH (5.6 [3.0-7.5] versus 5.7 [2.4-7.0] %, respectively, p = 0.806) and KGR (1.7 [1.0-2.4] versus 1.9 [0.8-2.4] %/week, respectively, p = 1.000). For patients with pCCA, unilateral drainage in FLR induced a higher DH than bilateral drainage (6.7 [4.9-7.9] versus 2.7 [1.5-4.2] %, p = 0.012). C-reactive protein before PVE was negatively correlated with DH (ρ = - 0.539, p = 0.038) and KGR (ρ = - 0.532, p = 0.041) in patients with pCCA.

There was no influence of cholestasis on FLR hypertrophy in patients undergoing PVE. Bilateral drainage and inflammation appeared to be negatively associated with FLR hypertrophy. Further prospective studies with larger and more homogenous patient cohorts are desirable.

Hepatectomy remains the gold standard for curative therapy for patients with limited primary or metastatic hepatic tumors as it offers the best survival rates. In recent years, the indication for partial hepatectomy has evolved away from what will be removed from the patient to the volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR), i.e., what will remain. With this regard, liver regeneration strategies have become paramount in transforming patients who previously had poor prognoses into ones who, after major hepatic resection with negative margins, have had their risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure minimized. Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) via the purposeful occlusion of select portal vein branches to promote contralateral hepatic lobar hypertrophy has become the accepted standard for liver regeneration. Advances in embolic materials, selection of treatment approaches, and PVE with hepatic venous deprivation or concurrent transcatheter arterial embolization/radioembolization are all active areas of research. To date, the optimal combination of embolic material to maximize FLR growth is not yet known. Knowledge of hepatic segmentation and portal venous anatomy is essential before performing PVE. In addition, the indications for PVE, the methods for assessing hepatic lobar hypertrophy, and the possible complications of PVE need to be fully understood before undertaking the procedure. The goal of this article is to discuss the rationale, indications, techniques, and outcomes of PVE before major hepatectomy.

Curative resection is the only potential treatment for cure in patients with perihilar biliary tract cancer (PBTC). However, post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) due to insufficient future liver remnant volume (FRLV) remains a lingering risk even after portal vein embolization (PVE). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of a sequential treatment strategy consisting of PVE followed by preoperative chemotherapy before surgery.

Between April 2019 and December 2021, 15 patients with locally advanced PBTC (LA-PBTC) underwent sequential treatment consisting of PVE followed by preoperative chemotherapy. The feasibility and efficacy, including resection rate, changes of FRLV, and chemotherapeutic effect, were investigated retrospectively.

Thirteen of 15 patients (86.6%) underwent curative resection. The median duration time between PVE and surgery was 144 days. FRLV/TLV ratio was 31.3% at prePVE, 38.4%, at two weeks after PVE, and 45.7% before surgery, respectively. There was significant increase in FRLV/TLV ratio two weeks after PVE. Additional increase in FRLV/TLV ratio was significantly achieved before surgery. PHLF occurred in 5 patients (38.4%). Pathological complete response was found in 2 of 13 patients (15.3%).

Sequential PVE and systemic chemotherapy contribute to the sufficient hypertrophy of FRLV without compromising resectability in patients with LA-PBTC.

Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is associated with high mortality following liver resection. There have been limited studies evaluating predictors of PHLF and clinically significant PHLF in non-cirrhotic patients.

This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (NSQIP) to evaluate 8,093 non-cirrhotic patients undergoing hepatectomy from 2014 to 2018. Primary endpoints were PHLF and clinically significant PHLF (PHLF grade B or C).

Among all patients, 4.74% (n = 383) developed PHLF and 2.5% clinically significant PHLF (n = 203). The overall 30-day mortality was 1.35% (n = 109), 11.5% (n = 44) in patients with PHLF, and 19.2% in those with clinically significant PHLF. Factors associated with PHLF were: metastatic liver disease (OR = 1.84, CI = 1.14-2.98), trisectionectomy (OR = 3.71, CI = 2.59-5.32), right total lobectomy (OR = 4.17, CI = 3.06-5.68), transfusions (OR = 1.99, CI = 1.52-2.62), organ/space SSI (OR = 2.84, CI = 2.02-3.98), post-operative pneumonia (OR = 2.43, CI = 1.57-3.76), sepsis (OR = 2.27, CI = 1.47-3.51), and septic shock (OR = 5.67, CI = 3.43-9.36). Patients who developed PHLF or clinically significant PHLF had 2-threefold increased risk of perioperative mortality. Post-hepatectomy renal failure (OR = 8.47, CI = 3.96-18.1), older age (OR = 1.04, CI = 1.014-1.063), male sex (OR = 1.83, CI = 1.07-3.14), sepsis (OR = 2.96, CI = 1.22-7.2), and septic shock (OR = 3.92, CI = 1.61-9.58) were independently associated with 30-mortality in patients with clinically significant PHLF.

PHLF in non-cirrhotic patients increased the risk of perioperative mortality and is associated with the extent of hepatectomy and infectious complications. Careful evaluation of the liver remnant, antibiotic prophylaxis, nutritional assessment, and timely management of post-operative infections could decrease major morbidity and mortality following hepatectomy.

Portal vein ligation (PVL)-induced liver hypertrophy increases future liver remnant (FLR) volume and improves resectability of large hepatic carcinoma. However, the molecular mechanism by which PVL facilitates liver hypertrophy remains poorly understood.

To gain mechanistic insight, we established a rat PVL model and carried out a comprehensive transcriptome analyses of hepatic lobes preserving portal blood supply at 0, 1, 7, and 14-day after PVL. The differentially expressed (DE) long-non coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and mRNAs were applied to conduct weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). LncRNA-mRNA co-expression network was constructed in the most significant module. The modules and genes associated with PVL-induced liver hypertrophy were assessed through quantitative real-time PCR.

A total of 4213 DElncRNAs and 6809 DEmRNAs probesets, identified by transcriptome analyses, were used to carry out WGCNA, by which 10 modules were generated. The largest and most significant module (marked in black_M6) was selected for further analysis. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the module exhibited several key biological processes associated with liver regeneration such as complement activation, IL-6 production, Wnt signaling pathway, autophagy, etc. Sixteen mRNAs (Notch1, Grb2, IL-4, Cops4, Stxbp1, Khdrbs2, Hdac2, Gnb3, Gng10, Tlr2, Sod1, Gosr2, Rbbp5, Map3k3, Golga2, and Rev3l) and ten lncRNAs (BC092620, AB190508, EF076772, BC088302, BC158675, BC100646, BC089934, L20987, BC091187, and M23890) were identified as hub genes in accordance with gene significance value, module membership value, protein-protein interaction (PPI) and lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network. Furthermore, the overexpression of 3 mRNAs (Notch1, Grb2 and IL-4) and 4 lncRNAs (BC089934, EF076772, BC092620, and BC088302) was validated in hypertrophic liver lobe tissues from PVL rats and patients undergoing hepatectomy after portal vein embolization (PVE).

Microarray and WGCNA analysis revealed that the 3 mRNAs (Notch1, Grb2 and IL-4) and the 4 lncRNAs (BC089934, EF076772, BC092620 and BC088302) may be promising targets for accelerating liver regeneration before extensive hepatectomy.

Liver resection is the best treatment option for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). A 10-year follow-up can reflect the true curative potential of resection. This retrospective study investigated factors for long-term survival of CRLM patients.

Data of patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM without extrahepatic disease from 1990 to 2012 at our hospital were reviewed. Patients who survived for > 10 years were compared with those who survived for < 10 years.

Totally, 315 patients were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups: < 10-year group and > 10-year group. Patients in the < 10-year group had more tumor nodules (P = 0.016), more bilobar involvement (P = 0.004), narrower resection margin (P < 0.001), and worse disease-free and overall survival (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, low preoperative hemoglobin level, large number of tumor nodules, and bilobar involvement were poor prognostic factors for overall survival, while adjuvant chemotherapy was a favorable factor. Further analysis of patients with bilobar disease showed that perioperative blood transfusion was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival while adjuvant chemotherapy was a favorable one. In patients with multiple bilobar tumor nodules, adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive impact on disease-free survival and overall survival.

Patients who survived for > 10 years after liver resection for CRLM tended to have normal preoperative hemoglobin level, unilobar disease, fewer tumor nodules, and have received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy favorably affected long-term survival of CRLM patients.

Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) followed by portal vein embolization (PVE) has increased the chance of resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCC). We aim to identify the optimal timing of PVE after PBD in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hilar CCC.

We retrospectively reviewed 64 patients who underwent hepatectomy after PBD and PVE for hilar CCC. The patients were classified into 3 groups: Group 1 (PBD-PVE interval ≤7 days), Group2 (8-14 days) and Group 3 (>14 days). The primary end points were 90 days mortality and grade B/C posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF).

There was no significant difference in primary end points between three groups. A marginally significant difference was found in the incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications and wound infection (57.1% vs 38.1% vs 72.4%, p = 0.053 and 21.4% vs 38.1% vs 55.2%, p = 0.099). In multivariable analysis, Bismuth type IIIb or IV was independent risk factors for grade B/C PHLF (HR: 4.782, 95% CI 1.365-16.759, p = 0.014).

Considering that the PBD-PVE interval did not affect PHLF, and the surgical complications increased as the interval increases, PVE as early as possible after PBD would be beneficial.

After portal vein embolization (PVE) 30% fail to achieve liver resection. Malnutrition is a modifiable risk factor and can be assessed by radiological indices. This study investigates, if sarcopenia affects resectability and kinetic growth rate (KGR) after PVE.

A retrospective study was performed of the outcome of PVE at 8 centres of the DRAGON collaborative from 2010 to 2019. All malignant tumour types were included. Sarcopenia was defined using gender, body mass and skeletal muscle index. First imaging after PVE was used for liver volumetry. Primary and secondary endpoints were resectability and KGR. Risk factors impacting liver growth were assessed in a multivariable analysis.

Eight centres identified 368 patients undergoing PVE. 62 patients (17%) had to be excluded due to unavailability of data. Among the 306 included patients, 112 (37%) were non-sarcopenic and 194 (63%) were sarcopenic. Sarcopenic patients had a 21% lower resectability rate (87% vs. 66%, p < 0.001) and a 23% reduced KGR (p = 0.02) after PVE. In a multivariable model dichotomized for KGR ≥2.3% standardized FLR (sFLR)/week, only sarcopenia and sFLR before embolization correlated with KGR.

In this largest study of risk factors, sarcopenia was associated with reduced resectability and KGR in patients undergoing PVE.

Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) was first introduced in the 1990s and has now become widely accepted for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is considered a safe and effective approach for liver disease. However, the role of laparoscopic hepatectomy in HCC with cirrhosis remains controversial and needs to be further assessed, and the present literature review aimed to review the surgical and oncological outcomes of Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH). According to Hong and colleagues laparoscopic resection for liver cirrhosis is a very safe and feasible procedure for both ideal cases and select patients with high risk factors [29]. The presence of only 1 of these factors does not represent an absolute contraindication for LH.

We selected 23 studies involving about 1363 HCC patients treated with LH. 364 (27%) patients experienced major resections. The mean operative time was 244.9 minutes, the mean blood loss was 308.1 mL and blood transfusions were required in only 4.9% of patients. There were only 2 (0.21%) postoperative deaths and overall morbidity was 9.9%. Tumor recurrence ranged from 6 to 25 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year disease free Survival (DFS) rates ranged from 71.9% to 99%, 50.3% to 91.2%, and 19% to 82% respectively. Overall survival rates ranged from 88% to 100%, 73.4% to 94.5%, and 52.6% to 94.5% respectively.